LORI HANDRAHAN AND MILA’S CASE IN MAINE


RE-POSTING FROM BLOG BELOW . . .

bECAUSE IT APPEARS THERE HAVE BEEN SOME MINUTE DETAILS THAT CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS DID OR DID NOT MISS ON PURPOSE THAT BEAR A STRIKING RESEMBLANCE TO DETAILS TO/ AT ACTUALLY OCCURRING AND/OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE FALSE ALLEGATIONS AND “COACHING” CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE, ALLEGED BY CHILD WHO IS NOW EIGHT YEARS OLD AND DENIED ALL CONTACT WITH LOVING MOTHER FOR THREE YEARS, THOUGH described as “Joni Saloom” did what all non-offending professionals demanded s/he do and believed he/r only child, private property sometimes described for profit by “state” absent (un)timely, sufficient notice, AS DID ALL OTHER PROFESSIONALS AS CONFESSED AND IN “OUTCOMES” BASE, . . . OF THEN (2012) FIVE YEAR OLD LITTLE BOY (MAY 2012) BY  CHERYL HARVICK, LESLY DAMIAN-MURRAY, KAREN COBLENTZ, OTHERS ON THEIR “TEAM” IN BRAZORIA COUNTY CPS FOR CHILD’S “FATHER,” MATTHEW JAMES WORRELL AND FAMILY IN HARRIS COUNTY, TOMBALL, TEXAS AND “PLAY THERAPIST,” KIMBERLY A. ABERNETHY (LICENSED BY DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR “‘STATE’ OF TEXAS”/”DFPS,” CPS DIVISION), PEARLAND POLICE OFFICER PAUL ELTON, AND HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE/OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT/COUNTY COMMISSIONER’S COURT’S SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS APPOINTMENT AND (FORMER) SGT. WILLIAM LILLY, IN CONTRAVENTION OF US CONSTITUTIONAL, NATURAL LAW, AND INALIENABLE AND UNALIENABLE, GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS, FREEDOMS, AND LIBERTIES OF MOTHER  AND CHILD, described as “Joni Saloom,” WHOSE SON HAS BEEN KIDNAPPED AND TRAFFICKED PURSUANT TO, AMONG OTHER CRIMES PERPETRATED PURSUANT TO “COLOR OF AUTHORITY OF LAW” INDIVIDUAL CO-COMPLICITS FALSELY ALLEGE “‘STATE’ OF TEXAS,”  ” GETTING HIT OVER THE HEAD” (peppered with the same old “domestic violence” at falsely alleged to have allegedly said to “tell ‘Daddy’ . . . “chop off head” “coached,” but actually, by complicits, being individuals, and each of them:  cps, police officer, father, and play therapist individuals, and other suborned, “commissioned” individuals, specialists, “experts,” guardian ad litem, amicus attorneys, a multitude of special interest service providers for the various “states,” BAR members, essentially, against sometimes described as “Julian’s Real Mummy,” and  also  in the case of Lori Handrahan, and also for he/r little daughter, he/r only “child,” Lori’s private property not yet, but to be restoreth.

 May Lori’s, he/r daughter’s, “Julian’s Real Mummy’s,” Julian . . . ” of Genealogy Saloom’s, waking nightmares END.  MAY the nightmares End, for all of s real mommies FORCED TO ENDURE THE ABUSE OF ROGUE TERRORISTS PERMITTED TO OPERATE BY COMPLICIT STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AGENTS, AND NOW, POLICE WILL BE CALLED “VENDORS” WITH CPS.  IN CASE THEY HAVEN’T REALIZED IT YET, THE “MENTAL HEALTH” TRICK IS A TRICK OLDER THAN TIME.  NOT BUYING IT!  IT IS CLEAR WHO THE DANGEROUS PSYCHOTICS REALLY ARE IN THESE RELATIONSHIPS AND AFFAIRS.  BUT THEN, WE ALWAYS KNEW THAT AS A SOCIETY, AND WE STILL DO, DIDN’T WE?

We DO Not, and we shalt not forget  crimes against our children, crimes against real mommies, real beings with real feelings, hearts, memories, and consciousness, natural (wo)man, individual, the vessel on whose waters berthed/birthed little natural man, being living, corporeal body imbued with the live holy Spirit of our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD, the “alpha and the omega” “the first and the last,” the “I AM.”

Yet, we are forced still here to endure it, and also in spite of the usual “suspected classes” and hacks(ers) contracted by . . . the usual “suspected classes” and defendants, and each of them, who, being subjected to Higher law and authority will always, naturally, loathe the undeniable pure and real truth that is the faith and the strength, the humble confidence that WINS the marathon.

Of the thousands of mothers who grieve for our children, “Julian’s Real Mummy,” described sometimes as “Joni Saloom” also prays that private property/”children and full and fair compensation available, but not “subjected” to semantic art) be restored also to:

sometimes described as,  ” Linda Marie Sacks (Ormond Beach, Florida;  Volusia County);  Sandra Grazzini-Rucki(Dakota County, Minnesota), Leah  Dannewitz (Carver County, Minnesota), Kimberly Sperling (Dakota County, Minnesota), Caroline Rice (Minnesota), “Emily Court” (Minnesota), Sharon and Bill Burns, the real parents of little Donnelly Keaton Burns who was wrongfully adopted without any cause, but for nothing more than the retaliation, the burning jealousy and pride of vindictive ex-wife  whose mother was a veteran, though retired social worker for corrupt Riverside County DPS for thirty years (Ontario, California; Riverside County; see active civil class complaint in the case of A.A. v. County of Riverside , 5:14-cv-2556, US Central District of California, Riverside division, filed 12/12/”2014″), Amy Charron (Houston, Texas; Harris County), Jennie Morton (Conroe, Athens, Dallas, Texas; Montgomery, Ellis, Dallas Counties, Texas–moves all forced after, but not before bizarre crimes by law enforcement and other ring members made the moves matter of survival for Jennie), apparently had a book published in 2013, Standing Strong, Trisha Schafer (Houston, Texas ; Harris County), reportedly the target of customary Texas style police and law enforcement judicial and worse interference, but way more than the usual, and interestingly lived right down the street from mine and my son’s former home, and also kidnapper’s current husband of his wife’s former husband, father of he/r three still get to live with their real mommy in the same home  with my real, natural son cps and guardian ad litem/court-appointed child’s attorney sinecure top campaign contributor every year as reported in the Texas Tribune and see Public Integrity Unit records,  Donna Everson conspired “stepparent adoption” so solicitously advertised and trending on all family law attorney sites, but supervised (un)”SAFE VICTIM’S ASSISTANCE CENTRE, INC.”/ (free stalking for fathers) unconstitutional rook jobs are not without guilt, lies, and, generally, criminal enterprise racketeering structure (Houston, Texas; Harris County),  Miriam Blank, earned a medical degree which Texas can never truly, or wrongfully and in customary retaliation so familiar to author of this post, take away from he/r like he/r five daughters, God-given gifts (Houston, Texas; Harris County and also Utah “suspected class” facility, on knowledge and belief), Robin Karr (Rockwall, Texas; Tyler, Texas; Dallas and Smith Counties, and also Kentucky State Police), more than sixteen years of “no contact with no reason), Andrea Lebow. another school teacher lost four year old little girl to registered sex offender father in Texas (Amarillo, Texas; Potter County), Michelle Murphy (Newnan, Georgia; Coweta County); Susan Skipp (a usual ideological “suspected class” “state”), Melissa Harris (a usual ideological “suspected class,” politically obsessed, or, perhaps, to give the benefit of the doubt, misguided (?) and i can’t figure out because so good at rehearsing neutral neutering for homogeneous “ambiguity” play, but Stands in truth and righteously battles (Ephesians 6:11, The Holy Bible, all verziones reales) intolerable acts like the Dickens (New Jersey), Brenda Battle Jordan, who i believe ran or said s/he was running for mayor at the time, and read about he/r help (now deceased) agent Gunderson’s and his partner’s research unveiled “The Damon 10,000 Screw,”The Fix is In” game in family court fraud (Detroit, Michigan), Dr. Cherie Safapou, another doctoral degreed mother to little son who begs to come home to his real mommy who the court, in spite of Dr. Safapou’s degree . . .in psychology, mislabeled it by proxy for wrongful, dishonest services profit, but not he/rs and certainly not little “I AM’s” (Marin County, California), mother, but with media coverage, Dr. Ruby Dillon, a dentist and real, natural mommy (Texas; California), Kathy Lee Scholpp (Massachusetts “State” Police; Rhode Island); Susan Farris, an investigative news writer(California), Connie Bedwell (Auburn, California; Placer County), Karen Anderson (Davis, California; Yolo County), as told directly to me by Deborah Connor (Fort Worth/Dallas, Texas; Tarrant County), another real mommy who, pursuant to the same scheme in the late 1990’s, had he/r three week only baby girl who she was still feeding in the natural way and her other child ripped away, career as flight attendant also sabotaged by children’s father, bankrupted, rendered homeless but climbed he/r way back where a district attorney somewhere eventually helped he/r get her children back, but not the same (Fort Worth/Dallas, Texas, Tarrant County; Salt Lake City, Utah; Billings, Montana, father lived in Honolulu, Hawaii), Rebecca McLaughlin, a Ph.D. earning mother(Rhode Island), Stacy Lynne, energy sector (Fort Collins, Colorado; Jefferson County), young mother who had the misfortune to get locked out of he/r home only to call the police for help who then called cps to kidnap called “remove” infant, Johneisha Kemper who did receive settlement by Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for child “protection” via attorney Shawn McMillan (Los Angeles County, California) who also won jury award of $4.9 million dollars tolled to almost $10 million with lone star lodestar, taxes, and court costs due to stubborn cps refused to settle the case regarding real mommy, Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick (Seal Beach California; County of San Diego), the same story as HERE, recently, the interestingly popular mother, Dr. Ruby Dillon, real mommy, natural mother (Tustin, California, Orange County),   Pamela Gaston (Portland, Oregon; Michigan), Angela/”Mad Angel” (Washington State), Theola Nealy (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), real,  being the natural mommy, who was raped, or, otherwise not “mentally disabled,” and also by he/r social worker, he, the same kidnapping cps father, . . . Nealy’s, mother’s, cps social worker, the judgment free father against whom the actual $1,000,000 judgment  plus rendered lies (Milwaukee, Wisconsin), Tammy Rief (California judge, though Tammy is from Georgia, but in Alabama), and we grieve for the loss of real mommies,’ Sandy Fonzo‘s (deceased) son, “victim” of former Judge Mark Ciavarella’s and Michael Conahan’s, and also others,’ scandalous, landmark case-making “Kids-for-Cash” court (Luzerne, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania), and also Karen Scott,  mother of Nathan Grieco, suicided by  “threat therapy, “jurisprudence,” at age sixteen (North Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh; Westmoreland County; see also federal case decided in favor of parent’s rights against over zealous social services workers, Croft v. Westmoreland County Children and Youth Services, 103 F. 3d 1123 (3rd Cir., 1997), and also for the loss of real mommy, recent, 2015 suicide by social services and social workers stole Lacey Drier, mother of three children and step-child (Parma, Michigan), and i also grieve for real mommy who was forced to “suffer” the loss, the tragic social-worker inspired accidental death of little Logan Marr (Kennebac County, Maine).”

One who takes the time to read and have right to any opinion shall appropriately observe that the majority of all “similarly ‘deprived'” mothers have good educations and many also had good careers until lives destroyed and some even made homeless the direct result of such schemes and juvenile “games.

 Most Important Thank You and Hats Off to any and all Supporters (absent art, extortion, deception)of Real Mommys.  Your work is very important.  Thank you to author of the following article,  keith harmon snow, to Brett Redmayne Titley, who has followed-up on the Ruby Dillon case.  For your invaluable, thorough, and amazingly cogent and well-reasoned, thoughtful research, thank you also to the following individuals who have courageously acted and who Stand committed to doing their jobs the right way, the only way.  to the incredible and thorough research and sometimes costly experiences,  and writings of, among others forced to endure experiences that apparently produce desirable character, strength, and fortitude: Liz Richards of the Liz Library, Robin Sacks guest speaker, a lawyer, on Fox News affiliate in California, Gina Silva, investigative reporter of the same Fox affiliate in California, Kathleen Russell of Center for Judicial Excellence, Garland Waller, documentary filmmaker in Boston, Dr. Joyanna Silberg of the Leadership Council, Barry Goldstein, researcher, author, speaker, expert in family law matters who specializes in this “high conflict” niche, Dr. Judith Reisman, who has passionately shed light where dare not most all others within described sometimes as “Julian’s Real Mommy’s” present knowledge, and thank you also to the lone ranger gentlemen out there in Southern California and their new  colleague, superstar lawyers for families and children and their rights, and equally other non “suspect classes,” Shawn McMillan, Dean Browning-Webb a.k.a. “R.I.C.O. man,” Colbern Stuart, III (officially non-practicing, but nevertheless, like a lion), and right there with “Cole” at California Coalition for Families and Children (“CCFC”), a public benefit corporation, and Michelle’s baby in Minnesota, Family Innocence Project.  “What a long, strange trip it has been,” and we’re still on the ride, though, a few of us sadly far away from the tide, for, as former Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer once spoke, . . .”some things are worth losing for.”  This real mommy adds, for all the right reasons.  For those who still have yet to be sufficiently humbled–educated “lowly wise”–or maybe for those were just not meant to get it, or yet . . . . right with ALMIGHTY GOD  and/or one another putting first orphans, widows, children, and those who cannot provide for themselves, the sick, the hungry, and the meek, the pure as a child at heart, this right way is the REAL definition to practice daily, “in good faith,” “for good cause shown,” “in furtherance of justice,” your u.S constitutional oath as officer of the honorable Federal US district,  “state,” county, civil, probate, and last, but first real “priority” on the calendar, family/dependency/juvenile, and especially ” (‘East Texas’) CPS cluster” courts.

Conscious Being Alliance

THREATS ON FACEBOOK TO RAPE WOMEN DEFENDING ABUSED MOTHERS


Posted on June 28, 2012 8:01 AM
Written by: keith harmon snow
Photography Credits: keith harmon snow
Article URL: http://www.consciousbeingalliance.com/2012/06/threats-on-facebook-to-rape-women-supporting-protective-mothers/


THREATS ON FACEBOOK TO RAPE WOMEN DEFENDING ABUSED MOTHERS
Social Media Increasingly Abets Harassment and Censors Truth

28 June 2012

keith harmon snow

After years of harassment and judicial abuse in the state of Maine, protective mother Lori Handrahan and her supporters face threats of rape and other verbal sexual abuse on social networking media.  Welcome to the new world disorder of social networking, where ethics are meaningless and anyone can get away with practically anything – unless it would seriously help make the world a better place, and then it can be flagged, reported or deleted (by invisible and unaccountable administrators) if it threatens someone’s violent or hateful interests or ‘offends’ the abusers.

Like other social networking media, Facebook appears to be unable to discriminate between abusive men and abusive men’s ‘rights’ organizations and those (mostly women) who are under attack by them. Instead of punishing the abusers and traffickers of children, the system appears more and more to sanction them and support trafficking of children, domestic violence and violence against women.  Want to file a serious compliant with Facebook? Good luck!

SIS Handrahan.jpg

Dr. Lori Handrahan

On May 22, 2012 the abusive and litigious Maine attorney Michael Waxman launched a Facebook post that by June 19th had evolved into a discussion where Jeff Pyle, a Colorado man who appears to love Michael Waxman, posted threats promising to rape and sodomize the several women engaged in a hostile exchange with Waxman for the defense of Lori Handrahan.

While Sunny Kelley in Connecticut and most other protective parents’ stories of judicial abuse and destruction remain disbelieved, unheard and unknown, Lori Handrahan’s efforts to Save Mila have resulted in a very high-profile case garnering national attention — thanks to the Internet and the outrage of thousands of people across the country.  Both mothers Lori Handrahan and Sunny Kelley have not seen their children for months.

Hell for Lori Handrahan came in the form of her daughter Mila being raped by her husband, a foreigner who has now apparently gained citizenship under questionable circumstances.  Like most mothers entrapped and abused by the family court system, Lori Handrahan never technically lost custody of her daughter Mila.  “In June 2009 my daughter Mila came home with a shredded vagina and Igor [husband] was substantiated with raping her,” says Lori Handrahan.  “The courts did nothing.  Mila was 2 years old at the time.”

“The state of Maine has trafficked my child Mila,” Lori Handrahan told me, in January 2012, right before the court forced a gag order upon her and shut down her web site.

Dr. Lori Handrahan is a professor at the School of International Service at American University in Washington D.C.  Dr. Handrahan’s credentials are impeccable, with over 20 years of work in international development and human rights all over the world.  She was a guest on CNN and her op-eds about human rights and sex trafficking were often published in the New York Times. “Now that my child’s life is on the line I can’t get any news coverage at all.  Every single media outlet I’ve gotten interested has killed the story at the last minute.”

Lori and Mila’s case also involves corruption within the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), including the illegal naturalization of Ukrainian and Russian nationals who have stolen Mila away from her loving mother.

While available to discuss her case in early January, Lori Handrahan was later served with a gag order, intimidated into silence out of fear for her daughter’s life, and possibly her own.  Sometime in late January or early February of this year, the web site created to help them — “Saving Mila” — went dead.

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/spurwink-report-of-milas-sex-abuse-report-3

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/milas-picture-of-the-rock-poppa-and-michael-sniff0001?related=1

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/transcript-to-moskowitz-jan-2011-hearing-1-11760752?related=4

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/transcript-to-judge-moskowitz-jan-2011-hearing-2-11760751?related=5

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/trevor-letter-about-waxman0001?related=2

http://www.slideshare.net/ChildabuseMaine/transcript-to-disqual-waxman-part-3-11760749?related=3

CHILD TRAFFICKING IN MAINE

Maine attorney Michael Waxman quite literally gets away with anything he likes in Maine. In the course of her nightmare to recover her child Mila from the alleged abusive father, Igor Malenko, protective mother Lori Handrahan confronted all levels of the system in Maine and was repeatedly stifled by Maine officials.

“I believe that both Michael Waxman and Igor Malenko are both now and have been committing civil contempt of court since May of 2011,” expert investigator Stephen Pickering wrote to Cumberland County District Attorney Stephanie Anderson on February 1, 2012, after Waxman turned the court into a circus of inappropriate verbal and physical aggression on January 31.  While there was no order restricting Handrahan’s visitation with Mila, Waxman and Malenko had blocked all visitation for some time.

According to investigator Stephen Pickering, Waxman stood up and pointed his finger at the judge and raised his voice to the point that “some would describe this as yelling at the judge. Pickering further concluded that both Waxman and Malenko “committed criminal contempt of court on January 31, 2012, by their willful disregard of the judge’s ordering his courtroom as the judge was affirming his order.”

On February 1, 2012, Waxman sent an email to Judy Potter, Lori Handrahan’s attorney, stating: “And the more I think of it, the less I am convinced that this court has any power over ME in any fashion.”

Judge Jeffrey Moskoitz also behaved inappropriately on January 31, 2012, but Moskowitz has a long history of alleged collusion and corruption with attorney Michael Waxman. At the January 31 kangaroo court, Waxman threatened a lawsuit against District Attorney Stephanie Anderson and he filed the lawsuit in early February.  Five witnesses who were present provided affidavits testifying to what occurred in Judge Jeffrey Moskowitz’s court on January 31, 2012.

“The hearing began with Michael Waxman leading the court into confusion over labeling the massive amounts of documents he introduced, of such proportions that it was clear no one had the time to ever read them,” wrote witness Carrie Rockwell.  “He then harangued his client, Igor Malenko, for over an hour, thrusting at him pictures of Igor’s daughters’ anus and vagina, and reading allowed an email Waxman himself wrote to a woman whom he met on Facebook revealing his thought’s about what could be done to Mila’s vagina with a Coke bottle.  All this was done to prove what ten people in the room knew and could prove with certainty was a lie.”

One witness suggested that attorney Michael Waxman appeared to commit perjury, suborning perjury, falsifying evidence, and a conspiracy to commit fraud upon the court.

Now Waxman has created a new Internet site to harass Lori Handrahan and her supporters.  The site, called S.T.E.A.M. — Stopping the Explopitation, Abuse and Murder of our Children — is aligned with an assortment or other organizations, causes and petitions, but is inherently a front for Waxman’s destructive “father’s rights” agenda and self-protection.

STEAM WAXMAN HANDRAHAN .jpg

The S.T.E.A.M. web site is very sloppy.  As early as December 20111, Waxman revealed in casual web posts that a new web site was under design to replace the Facebook page called FOR THE LOVE OF MILA — another page created as a front to present Waxman’s disinformation.  The new S.T.E.A.M. web site was apparently launched in May 2012.

While Lori Handrahan — white, professional and highly accomplished mother — is offered as the primary column for “Featured Abusers for June 2012” (see below) the other abusers of the month are two African-American couples who allegedly killed their children.  Thus the architects of the site have provided two additional examples of violence against children that both fit the societal stereotype of black people as criminals. Contrary to media representations and Hollywood stereotypes about people of color, there are also high rates of domestic violence, rape and murder in white communities.  However, by placing Lori Handrahan next to these two black couples the hidden message is that Lori Handrahan is a violent criminal.

The two African-American alleged murder couples appear with Lori Handrahan on the HOME page.  This is just window dressing.  The web pages were hastily designed to provide a false sense of depth behind the front designed primarily to harass Lori Handrahan, and there are errors and inconsistencies in the web design beyond the HOME page.

For example, the menu at the top of the HOME page and most other pages has four clickable links: HELP – CONTACT US – CASES – HOME.  Deeper inside the web site are numerous “cases” of child abuse that are accessed by clicking on the CASES link in the HOME page menu.  However, as of 29 June 2012 the links for some cases don’t work at all (for example: “CASES PAGE 3”).  More importantly, several of the CASES links lead to pages where the menu at the top of the new page has only three clickable links: HANDRAHAN – HELP – CONTACT US.  This shows the clear intent of the web site.

Naturally, the HANDRAHAN link takes you straight to an extensive posting of disinformation exclusively about Lori Handrahan and this is the heart of the web site. The HANDRAHAN page offers an extensive post — unlike all other sections of the site — packed detail after detail of lies and half-truths fabricated by attorney Michael Waxman and his supporters.

Several of Lori Handrahan’s women supporters are also mentioned on the HANDRAHAN page, and these are some of the same women threatened with rape on the May 2012 Facebook thread.

ScreeHANDRAHAN PAGE STEAM -06-29 at 10.22.54 PM.jpg

“For the second straight month,” S.T.E.A.M.’s HANDRAHAN slam begins, “Lori Handrahan has been unanimously selected as the Child Abuser of the Month. Why?”

The answer is that the web site was created solely as a platform to harass Lori Handrahan and her supporters, to further confuse the story and cover up the hard truth that Lori’s daughter Mila has allegedly been trafficked with the support of the state of Maine, the Department of Homeland Security and attorney Michael Waxman.

As reported on the Saving Mila Facebook page: Mila is being sexually abused, the abusive father received free lawyer services over several years and the girl is barred from leaving this dangerous situation. Waxman has said many times that his estimated cost for legal services for Mila’s father amounts to around $250,000. To cover up his trafficking of Mila, Waxman has escalated the slander against Lori and his threats to have her committed and jailed.

FACEBOOK RAPE THREATS

“How about this cause and other bitches, take care of your own business and shut the FUCK up!” Jeff Pyle posted on the Waxman post on June 19.  A 1982 graduate of Weston High School (MA) who lives in Colorado, Jeff Pyle then sexually berated the women engaged in the discussion (see below) and threatened to “come back there” to find, rape and sodomize them. The post has now been deleted.

PYLE RAPE Handrahan Screen Shot small.jpg

Alerted on June 20 by one of the protective mothers who has been increasingly harassed by Michael Waxman, I responded:
Ladies, it’s not recommended to spend your time communicating with these ugly men.  As you can see, they are mean and nasty and try to compensate for their weakness by threatening women with sexual and other physical violence. Mr. Pyle – look me up, I can offer several solutions to your problems.”

On June 28, I received a notice from Facebook administration notifying me that I am under investigation for my post (now also removed).  There was no way to respond to the pop-up warning message that appeared when I first logged in to Facebook, and disappeared after, and it is impossible to figure out how to communicate with Facebook to challenge the flagging of my post and inform Facebook about their need to investigate Michael Waxman and the Handrahan case.

Online sexism is rampant, but the problem is systemic and institutionalized sexism and support for domestic violence that arises due to online media’s attempts to be socially friendly and compatible to as many users as possible.  While censoring some people and interests, these social media often end up punishing the victims and supporting the abusers.

Major social networking media — Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Google+ and others — have, one way or another, helped to censor Lori and Mila’s story.  The organization Change.org — reputed to be a socially conscious networking entity — still carries a petition created by Michael Waxman the father’s lawyer in Maine, intended to further censor and punish Lori Handrahan.

Facebook makes it impossible to issue a detailed compliant about the hate speech and physical violence threatened by Michael Waxman’s supporter Jeff Pyle.  While the most threatening post by Pyle was removed from the long back-and-forth, the post that I made was also flagged and removed.  Appropriate action by Facebook would include exploring Michael Waxman’s threatening history and behavior toward Lori Handrahan.

It is the same with Change.org.  It seems they will allow a petition by anyone, for anything, no matter that these petition might be created by violent individuals and have violent motives, including harassment.

Media personality Jay Smooth, the host of New York’s longest running hip-hop radio show, WBAI’s Underground Railroad, recently created a video criticizing online sexism and online threats against women.  Smooth was motivated by the recent surge of bullying, abuse and harassment attacks against Anita Sarkeesian whose Feminist Frequency project launched a Kickstarter campaign that came under attack.

“Many abusive men are active online,” comments a chapter organizer for the National Organization for Women (NOW), “and they often jump at the chance to try to intimidate women (especially protective mothers or their supporters) by making vicious and crazy threats, such saying they plan to rape the women, kill them, or otherwise cause them some kind of bodily harm.”

“It’s shocking and very frightening to realize just how many sexist men there are out there — bloggers and vloggers like Anita Sarkeesian often receive hundreds of these types of terrorist threats, almost daily.”

ENDNOTE:

Looking at one of the “human rights” petitions on Change.org that is listed by STEAM as an example of appropriate child abuse groups or movements — We demand changes to child abuse laws and sentencing, we find that the charges called for are suspicious at best and destructive to women at worst.  Most of the petition’s ten points otherwise appear to be reasonable and important suggestions for legislative changes or legislative protocols.  However, note items 6), 9) and 10) on this petition:

6) If a parent has left an abusive partner courts have no right sending a child for anything more then a supervised visit.

Really? What is this petition point actually saying? Courts have no right sending a child back to a protective mother (who has left her abusive partner) for more than a supervised visit? Sounds like the judicial abuse and alleged sexual abuse cases of both Sunny Kelley in Connecticut and Lori Handrahan from Maine, whose children at present are living out a life sentence.

Let’s look at this Change.org “human rights” petition point number 9)

9) In the event a child is claimed to be kidnapped or missing remove the other children in the home immediately place them in foster care.

Really? Does this make sense? Or is it an attempt to criminalize parents — probably the mother will suffer more — for reporting that their child has been kidnapped? Also, there is the question of how removing the other children from the home relates to the typically destructive and often highly profit-driven state foster care systems.  Does this give too much power to the state, an especially scary prospect given the state ‘social services’ and federally funded (Department of Health and Human Services) black holes serving the destructive father’s rights groups in states all over the USA?

The Change.org petition point number 10) is even clearer:

10) If the mother or father are living not wed to someone who is not the childs father or mother and has a known history of violence and the child is harmed or killed the mother should face equal charges for putting her child in danger.

Really? According to everything we have learned about domestic violence and child abuse, it is most often the case that women and children are trapped in abusive relationships and abusive households and fear for their personal safety and their children’s safety on a day-to-day and sometimes minute to minute basis. Women trapped in domestic violence situations by violent fathers are living in constant terror and escape is often considered impossible.  Such facts need to be taken into account and explored during investigations of domestic violence and child abuse/death.

But note that it is “the mother” singled out in this petition point who “should face equal charges” for living not wed to someone who has a known history of violence. This makes no sense, unless it is situated within the aggressive and violent framework of the destructive so-called “father’s rights” movement.

This “human rights” petition is nothing but a movement to give lawyer’s and judges more power to abuse women, especially protective mothers, and their children, by placing them in foster care. (The petition is also written in terrible English.)

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

     Nothing contained in this post or on this blog, Dedicated to the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and our Children Who Want to Come Home, and and especially for my little Julian, could be (mis)construed as “legal advice” of any kind as author of this post is expressly NOT a lawyer, attorney, or legal practitioner.

  • CENSORSHIP and censorship shall be challenged strongly as censorship, being in breach of, among so many other unlawful acts and omissions, is a violation of sometimes described as “Julian’s Real Mummy’s” First Amendment u.S Constitutional right to the free exercise of speech, and also to peaceably assemble herein and also to freely exercise whatever religion, if any, that said natural, American u.S “citizen,” “citizen” meaning fo the purposes of this post. conditionally as i, being natural (wo)man, individual, living and corporeal body,  exclusively reserve the right to revoke or rescind the offer at any and all times, inherently “sovereign” and “elect” in nature, spirit, and essence because imbued with the spirit of our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD. ;
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.;
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by “Julian’s Real Mummy’s” First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the Federa, u.S. Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal,u.S Constitution and its  Bill of Rights, pursuant to the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.;
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.;
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and Author will be happy to follow the law and respect your wishes.

TEXAS BILL TO PASS THROUGH TO “PEACE” OFFICERS, VENDORS MUST DISCLOSE COMMISSIONS EARNED OTHER CPS VENDORS?


Texas House Bill 23


Bill Title: Relating to disclosure of certain relationships with local government officers and vendors; creating criminal offenses.

Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Republican 1-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2015-04-09 – Scheduled for public hearing on . . . [HB23 Detail]

Download: Texas-2015-HB23-Introduced.html


84R10286 SCL-F
By: Davis of Harris H.B. No. 23
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to disclosure of certain relationships with local
government officers and vendors; creating criminal offenses.
       BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
       SECTION 1.  Section 176.001, Local Government Code, is
amended by amending Subdivisions (1), (2), (2-a), (2-b), (3), and
(4) and adding Subdivisions (2-c), (2-d), and (7) to read as
follows:
             (1)  “Agent” means a third party who undertakes to
transact some business or manage some affair for another person by
the authority or on account of the other person. The term includes
an employee.
             (2)  “Family member” means a person related to another
person within the first degree by consanguinity or affinity, as
described by Subchapter B, Chapter 573, Government Code[, except
that the term does not include a person who is considered to be
related to another person by affinity only as described by Section
573.024(b), Government Code].
             (2-a)  “Family relationship” means a relationship
between a person and another person within the third degree by
consanguinity or the second degree by affinity, as those terms are
defined by Subchapter B, Chapter 573, Government Code.
             (2-b) “Gift” means a benefit offered by a person,
including food, lodging, transportation, and entertainment
accepted as a guest.
             (2-c) “Goods” means personal property.
             (2-d) [(2-b)]  “Investment income” means dividends,
capital gains, or interest income generated from:
                   (A)  a personal or business:
                         (i)  checking or savings account;
                         (ii)  share draft or share account; or
                         (iii)  other similar account;
                   (B)  a personal or business investment; or
                   (C)  a personal or business loan.
             (3)  “Local governmental entity” means a county,
municipality, school district, charter school, junior college
district, water district created under Subchapter B, Chapter 49,
Water Code, or other political subdivision of this state or a local
government corporation, board, commission, district, or authority
to which a member is appointed by the commissioners court of a
county, the mayor of a municipality, or the governing body of a
municipality.  The term does not include an association,
corporation, or organization of governmental entities organized to
provide to its members education, assistance, products, or services
or to represent its members before the legislative, administrative,
or judicial branches of the state or federal government.
             (4)  “Local government officer” means:
                   (A)  a member of the governing body of a local
governmental entity;
                   (B)  a director, superintendent, administrator,
president, or other person designated as the executive officer of a
[the] local governmental entity; or
                   (C)  an agent [employee] of a local governmental
entity who is involved in the planning, advertising, selecting, or
contracting of a vendor [with respect to whom the local
governmental entity has, in accordance with Section 176.005,
extended the requirements of Sections 176.003 and 176.004].
             (7)  “Vendor” means a person who enters or seeks to
enter into a contract with a local governmental entity, seeks to
influence the contract award made by a local governmental entity,
or is an agent of a vendor. The term includes an officer or employee
of a state agency when that individual is acting in a private
capacity to enter into a contract. The term does not include a
state agency except for Texas Correctional Industries.
       SECTION 2.  The heading to Section 176.002, Local Government
Code, is amended to read as follows:
       Sec. 176.002.  APPLICABILITY TO [CERTAIN] VENDORS AND OTHER
PERSONS.
       SECTION 3.  Section 176.002(a), Local Government Code, is
amended to read as follows:
       (a)  This chapter applies to a person who is:
             (1)  a vendor [enters or seeks to enter into a contract
with a local governmental entity]; or
             (2)  a local government officer [is an agent] of [a
person described by Subdivision (1) in the person’s business with]
a local governmental entity.
       SECTION 4.  Sections 176.003(a) and (a-1), Local Government
Code, are amended to read as follows:
       (a)  A local government officer shall file a conflicts
disclosure statement with respect to a vendor [person described by
Section 176.002(a)] if:
             (1)  the vendor [person] enters into a contract with
the local governmental entity or the local governmental entity is
considering entering into a contract with the vendor [person]; and
             (2)  the vendor [person]:
                   (A)  has an employment or other business
relationship with the local government officer or a family member
of the officer that results in the officer or family member
receiving taxable income, other than investment income, that
exceeds $2,500 during the 12-month period preceding the date that
the officer becomes aware that:
                         (i)  a contract between the local
governmental entity and vendor [described by Subdivision (1)] has
been executed; or
                         (ii)  the local governmental entity is
considering entering into a contract with the vendor [person]; [or]
                   (B)  has given to the local government officer or
a family member of the officer one or more gifts that have an
aggregate value of more than $100 [$250] in the 12-month period
preceding the date the officer becomes aware that:
                         (i)  a contract between the local
governmental entity and vendor [described by Subdivision (1)] has
been executed; or
                         (ii)  the local governmental entity is
considering entering into a contract with the vendor; or
                   (C)  has a family relationship with the local
government officer [person].
       (a-1)  A local government officer is not required to file a
conflicts disclosure statement in relation to a gift accepted by
the officer or a family member of the officer if the gift is:
             (1)  [given by a family member of the person accepting
the gift;
             [(2)]  a political contribution as defined by Title 15,
Election Code; or
             (2) [(3)]  food[, lodging, transportation, or
entertainment] accepted as a guest.
       SECTION 5.  Section 176.004, Local Government Code, is
transferred to Section 176.003, Local Government Code,
redesignated as Section 176.003(e), Local Government Code, and
amended to read as follows:
       (e)  [Sec. 176.004.  CONTENTS OF DISCLOSURE STATEMENT.] The
commission shall adopt the conflicts disclosure statement for local
government officers for use under this section.  The conflicts
disclosure statement must include:
             (1)  a requirement that each local government officer
disclose:
                   (A)  an employment or other business relationship
described by Subsection (a)(2)(A) [Section 176.003(a)], including
the nature and extent of the relationship; and
                   (B)  gifts accepted by the local government
officer and any family member of the officer from a vendor [person
described by Section 176.002(a)] during the 12-month period
described by Subsection (a)(2)(B) [Section 176.003(a)(2)(B)] if
the aggregate value of the gifts, including lodging,
transportation, or entertainment [excluding gifts described by
Section 176.003(a-1)], accepted by the officer or a family member
from that vendor exceeds $100 [person exceed $250];
             (2)  an acknowledgment from the local government
officer that:
                   (A)  the disclosure applies to each family member
of the officer; and
                   (B)  the statement covers the 12-month period
described by Subsection (a)(2)(B) [Section 176.003(a)]; and
             (3)  the signature of the local government officer
acknowledging that the statement is made under oath under penalty
of perjury.
       SECTION 6.  Sections 176.006(a), (a-1), (b), (c), (d), and
(i), Local Government Code, are amended to read as follows:
       (a)  A vendor [person described by Section 176.002(a)] shall
file a completed conflict of interest questionnaire if the vendor
[person] has a business relationship with a local governmental
entity and:
             (1)  has an employment or other business relationship
with a local government [an] officer of that local governmental
entity, or a family member of the officer, described by Section
176.003(a)(2)(A); [or]
             (2)  has given a local government [an] officer of that
local governmental entity, or a family member of the officer, one or
more gifts with the aggregate value specified by Section
176.003(a)(2)(B), excluding any gift described by Section
176.003(a-1);
             (3)  has a family relationship with a local government
officer of that local governmental entity; or
             (4)  the amount of a contract that is either executed or
under consideration between the vendor and that local governmental
entity exceeds $1 million.
       (a-1)  The completed conflict of interest questionnaire must
be filed with the appropriate records administrator not later than
the seventh business day after the later of:
             (1)  the date that the vendor [person]:
                   (A)  begins discussions or negotiations to enter
into a contract with the local governmental entity; or
                   (B)  submits to the local governmental entity an
application, response to a request for proposals or bids,
correspondence, or another writing related to a potential contract
with the local governmental entity; or
             (2)  the date the vendor [person] becomes aware:
                   (A)  of an employment or other business
relationship with a local government officer, or a family member of
the officer, described by Subsection (a); [or]
                   (B)  that the vendor [person] has given one or
more gifts described by Subsection (a); or
                   (C)  of a family relationship with a local
government officer.
       (b)  The commission shall adopt a conflict of interest
questionnaire for use under this section that requires disclosure
of a vendor’s [person’s] business and family relationships with a
local governmental entity.
       (c)  The questionnaire adopted under Subsection (b) must
require, for the local governmental entity with respect to which
the questionnaire is filed, that the vendor [person] filing the
questionnaire:
             (1)  describe each employment or business and family
relationship the vendor [person] has with each local government
officer of the local governmental entity;
             (2)  identify each employment or business relationship
described by Subdivision (1) with respect to which the local
government officer receives, or is likely to receive, taxable
income, other than investment income, from the vendor [person
filing the questionnaire];
             (3)  identify each employment or business relationship
described by Subdivision (1) with respect to which the vendor
[person filing the questionnaire] receives, or is likely to
receive, taxable income, other than investment income, that:
                   (A)  is received from, or at the direction of, a
local government officer of the local governmental entity; and
                   (B)  is not received from the local governmental
entity; and
             (4)  describe each employment or business relationship
with a corporation or other business entity with respect to which a
local government officer of the local governmental entity:
                   (A)  serves as an officer or director; or
                   (B)  holds an ownership interest of one [10]
percent or more.
       (d)  A vendor [person described by Subsection (a)] shall file
an updated completed questionnaire with the appropriate records
administrator not later than  the seventh business day after the
date of an event that would make a statement in the questionnaire
incomplete or inaccurate.
       (i)  The validity of a contract between a vendor [person
described by Section 176.002] and a local governmental entity is
not affected solely because the vendor [person] fails to comply
with this section.
       SECTION 7.  Section 176.011, Local Government Code, is
redesignated as 176.0065, Local Government Code, and amended to
read as follows:
       Sec. 176.0065  [176.011].  MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS. A
records administrator shall:
             (1)  maintain a list of local government officers of
the local governmental entity and shall make that list available to
the public and any vendor who may be required to file a conflict of
interest questionnaire under Section 176.006; and
             (2)  maintain the statements and questionnaires that
are required to be filed under this chapter in accordance with the
local governmental entity’s records retention schedule.
       SECTION 8.  Chapter 176, Local Government Code, is amended
by adding Section 176.013 to read as follows:
       Sec. 176.013.  ENFORCEMENT. (a) A local government officer
commits an offense under this chapter if the officer:
             (1)  is required to file a conflicts disclosure
statement under Section 176.003; and
             (2)  fails to file the required conflicts disclosure
statement with the appropriate records administrator not later than
5 p.m. on the seventh business day after the date on which the
officer becomes aware of the facts that require the filing of the
statement.
       (b)  A vendor commits an offense under this chapter if the
vendor:
             (1)  is required to file a conflict of interest
questionnaire under Section 176.006; and
             (2)  either:
                   (A)  fails to file the required questionnaire with
the appropriate records administrator not later than 5 p.m. on the
seventh business day after the date on which the vendor becomes
aware of the facts that require the filing of the questionnaire; or
                   (B)  fails to file an updated questionnaire with
the appropriate records administrator not later than 5 p.m. on the
seventh business day after the date of an event that would make a
statement in a questionnaire previously filed by the vendor
incomplete or inaccurate.
       (c)  An offense under this chapter is:
             (1)  a Class C misdemeanor if the contract amount is
less than $1 million;
             (2)  a Class B misdemeanor if the contract amount is at
least $1 million but less than $5 million; or
             (3)  a Class A misdemeanor if the contract amount is at
least $5 million.
       (d)  A local governmental entity may reprimand, suspend, or
terminate the employment of an employee who knowingly fails to
comply with a requirement adopted under this chapter.
       (e)  The governing body of a local governmental entity may,
at its discretion, declare a contract void if the governing body
determines that a violation of this chapter has occurred.
       SECTION 9.  The following provisions of the Local Government
Code are repealed:
             (1)  Sections 176.003(c) and (d);
             (2)  Section 176.005;
             (3)  Sections 176.006(f), (g), and (h); and
             (4)  Section 176.007.
       SECTION 10.  As soon as practicable after the effective date
of this Act, the Texas Ethics Commission shall adopt forms to
implement this Act.
       SECTION 11.  (a) Chapter 176, Local Government Code, as
amended by this Act, applies only to an event requiring disclosure
that occurs on or after the effective date of this Act. An event
requiring disclosure that occurs before the effective date of this
Act is governed by the law applicable to the event immediately
before the effective date of this Act, and the former law is
continued in effect for that purpose.
       (b)  The repeal by this Act of Sections 176.003(c),
176.005(c), and 176.006(f), Local Government Code, does not apply
to an offense committed under those sections before the effective
date of the repeal. An offense committed before the effective date
of the repeal is governed by those sections as they existed on the
date the offense was committed, and the former law is continued in
effect for that purpose. For purposes of this subsection, an
offense was committed before the effective date of the repeal if any
element of the offense occurred before that date.
       SECTION 12.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.
Select area of search.
Bill Number:

Find an exact bill number.
Full Text Search:

Search bill text and data.

Bill Title: Relating to discussion or deliberation regarding certain economic development negotiations by governmental bodies.

  [Could this mean converting private property one’s only child if a single, natural (wo)man sometimes artfully termed “mother” by the “state” and local government where father makes offer/bribe as a vendor and CPS the other governmental entity????]
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

Status: (Introduced) 2015-04-06 – Scheduled for public hearing on . . . [HB2518 Detail]

Download: Texas-2015-HB2518-Introduced.html


84R10335 SRS-F
By: Coleman H.B. No. 2518
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to discussion or deliberation regarding certain economic
development negotiations by governmental bodies.
       BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
       SECTION 1.  Section 551.087, Government Code, is amended to
read as follows:
       Sec. 551.087.  DELIBERATION REGARDING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
NEGOTIATIONS; CLOSED MEETING. This chapter does not require a
governmental body to conduct an open meeting:
             (1)  to discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or
financial information that the governmental body has received from
a business prospect or another governmental entity that the
governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near
the territory of the governmental body and with which the
governmental body or the governmental entity providing the
financial information is conducting economic development
negotiations; or
             (2)  to deliberate the offer of a financial or other
incentive to a business prospect described by Subdivision (1).
       SECTION 2.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.
Select area of search.
Bill Number:

Find an exact bill number.
Full Text Search:

Search bill text and data. [help]

TEXAS JUDGES ON THE TAKE GIVE AWAY|CORRUPT TX


http://www.ppcforchange.com/conspiracy-360th-district-court/

Vaughn Bailey copy

 

Vaughn Bailey, Tarrant County, Texas Attorney near Fort Worth

 

360th-offers-victim-a-deal

http://www.ppcforchange.com/conspiracy-360th-district-court/

Vaughn Bailey copy

Vaughn Bailey, Tarrant County, Texas Attorney near Fort Worth

 

360th-offers-victim-a-deal

For another tragic survival story that began in a Texas family court and a clique of collaborative pseudo-scienters . . . minues the qualifications, , click on the link below to read:

http://www.ppcforchange.com/mothers-quest-lost-infant/

For another tragic survival story that began in a Texas family court and a clique of collaborative pseudo-scienters . . . minues the qualifications, , click on the link below to read:

http://www.ppcforchange.com/mothers-quest-lost-infant/

WHAT’S in a NAME . . . the LONG and SHORT of it: FRAUD Upon the COURT


FRAUD UPON THE COURT

BIRTH CERTIFICATE

The Long and Short of it….

by kate of gaia

It has been a long road to get here. It has been hard to come to terms with many of the lies and fictional realities we have been so carefully trained to believe in. The biggest hurdle of all was in the realising of the need to let everything go and to unpack the camel that it may pass through the eye of the needle of the Emerald City’s walls. A physical reality is a tough one for most to step aside from and seek the inner workings of self and all but it is a necessary step lest one remain in the circular traps so perfectly set for all of us. We live in a world of commerce, a world I call the whore of Babylon both from the physical and spiritual perspectives. In order to be owned, one must give up mind, body and soul and I am most unwilling to do so.
It is a world of make believe fictional characters created for each and every one of us where a few have seen the means to take hold of all the strings of this puppet world where those of the masses unwittingly, yet willingly, perform for these most cunning of “puppet masters”. We have all been deceived where so few, now becoming the many, are awakened from this long lasting sleep having eaten so hungrily of the apple the witch of Babylon has offered.

Oh so many have been duped and beguiled of this mistress of deception where we have fed upon each other to the glee of those pulling your strings. And while we can talk of blame and injustice, it is we who must face the mirror and come to terms with the fact that we, not they, are the true problem. The issue at hand is one of ignorance of self, the unwillingness to see into our own lives and face the mirrors of the darkest reflections. We will fight and we will cling to all that we think of as right and just whilst we, at the same time, are the cause of all our own woes. For me, it was not a matter of how to lay bare the dishonour of so many that was already obvious, it was more a matter of how it was me that was allowing it by being more in dishonour of the truth. Ignorance of the law is not a defence of or from the law, that being the universal, natural kind, not the manmade fictional law that works to mimic it. It is difficult to play any game with an adversary that will change the rules inasmuch as we give them the power to do so. We are as children in this regard. When one grows up, one decides the game unworthy of even taking it out of the box it deserves to remain in, such is the way of Pandora.
So, where to begin explaining this game from its physical and spiritual mirror perspective? I like to begin by reminding myself that the physical realm that surrounds us is the illusion where only cause and effect clues reside. There are no answers in it, none whatsoever. It is merely the game board of consciousness where some have mastered it and use that knowledge for malfeasant purposes, flying in the face of creation while embracing creation at the same time. Some may shout ” Dichotomy!” but the simple truth is, all opposites are the same and only differ in degree of the observers willingness to see it. Yes, the mess you’re in, is your fault if you have the courage to face that. As for the examples of that, one need look no further than the religion of the legal system and, indeed, nowhere else.

The truth of the matter remains that all things legal are all things religion inasmuch as the legal system was borne of it. The earliest courts/churches were and still are the basis of the same systems today where there is no separation of church and state, period. They are one and the same and their purpose has been unwavering in its control of the masses for countless eons. That reign of terror, however, is finally over. Only when one begins to see the connection between church feigning spiritual and state acting as physical can one begin to see the true divide and conquer. What is most profound is that most within positions of assumed power are owned more completely than any slave of the common realms ever could be. A slave understands freedom where one who thinks they are free is the most trapped of all. Even the reference to their religious garb and political robes are called the trappings of office. Nonetheless, the finely programmed egos of these beings keep the clearest of truths just out of range of their most narrow vision. My search was one of a very simple nature in that I had to find the one thing that every human on earth had in common, would take them from cradle to grave in that commonality and, something they would defend to the death for assuring a permanent state of fraud on their part, and no one else’s.

The biggest clue was found at the end of their lives and it can be found on the tombstones of the many that never lived in the eyes of the system. It perfectly matched the only document ever offered freely by any church, state or government. The design of the trap was so perfect in its efficacy, it made us make slaves of ourselves and any attempt to fight for freedom would always result in our own fraud, our own contempt of court and inevitably, our belligerence and circular vengeance. The slavery had to be freely given on our parts and in our ignorance. It had to be something that fed the ego of the belligerents and the coffers of the clergy and all the while, they retained their full honour in universal law standing. While the masses fight for what they think is right, they feed their own fires of hate, discord and division. The more injust the system would get, the harder they would fight empowering the very system that is feeding off of them. The litmus test for this is quite easy to see and it will be the ones fighting this concept that proves the worthiness of the trap rendering it inescapable for the majority. This is the Chinese finger trap in full bloom where the harder you pull to extricate yourself from it, the more it holds on until one tires enough, relaxes their grip and voila, your fingers escape easily. There is a reason why the fangs of a serpent are pointing inward in that the more the prey struggles to free itself, the deeper the fangs sink in and why it is best to avoid the snake in the first place non? So, what could be so simple as to permeate this most perfect Chinese finger trap on humanity?
For the astute and for those that have listened to me speak or read my writings, you already know where I’m going but for those less aware of what I speak of, the answers, was and always will be, the NAME. I will share a few perspectives on this to aid in the observations of the trap where many of you may scoff. Always keep in mind, I care not what you believe and neither does the truth, that’s a simple fact. I have my experiences where this has all been laid bare for me and I have shared this truth for years now, albeit getting easier to share with people seeing this or themselves. You can spend all the time you want in their courtrooms but there is only one certainty you can ever expect and that is the fact that the courts are their game, rigged to their rules and they want everyone to play because it is guaranteed that they will win every time and “lose” a few just to keep the lottery illusion alive that on occasion, someone wins a case or two. This is the same philosophy a carnival gamer uses. They love to let people win their useless junk because the profits far exceed the expenses. Same things with the courts so who is the carnival clown then? There will be many that still won’t get it after they read this but it is my hope and intention that they can swallow enough pride and ego to find the keys that will set them free. The chains that you think are binding you are the very ones that you keep firmly in your grip where all you have to do is let go….but many of you won’t and to your own peril and so be it.

Where the true power of the NAME comes into play is the sudden realisation that everything you’ve worked for, everything you own and everything you will ever own up until you let go, was gotten via fraudulent means using a name that does not belong to you. This is a very tough pill to swallow and many of you are already choking, will spit it up and go on doing what the puppet masters want you to do. You will continue to commit fraud, day after day and you will be happy to do so as long as you keep getting your trinkets and scraps using a stolen identity and fraudulent, worthless pieces of debt paper. The system had to get us to aid and bet in our own fraud to retain the upper hand of honour where we were always coming forward with “unclean hands”. It had to be “sold” to us in such a way as to we would see the benefits and miss the tricks and dive headlong into our own fraud and fight to the death to maintain it. Ah, it is so easy to control a child with treats and they don’t have to be big ones either, just treats is enough most days.
To bring this into perspective, let me share a few fundamental definitions of words for you without going into the deep etymological sources, suffice it to say, been there, done that and cracked the code to the very letters. Let’s take a look at the word “register” for example and what its real meaning is. There are two very clear words there for me, the first being “regis” which is Latin for “to rule” and “ster” which means “creative, divine, feminine essence” and is akin to “star” where you can at once see the relevance of “starr contracts” from Black’s Law 9th edition.

So, the word means quite literally “to rule the divine feminine” or creation herself. Many of you who may be versed somewhat in “legalese” will recognise the term “pro se” which means to speak for yourself in a court setting. That translates into “for himself/herself/itself” and if you don’t believe it, look it up for yourself. The word “prosecute” translates into “do not pursue” in legal realms where its mirror in mainstream think is one of going after someone in court, to prosecute. The truth is, they don’t have to pursue anything because the mere fact that you are in a courtroom and don’t know who you are, is sufficient to convict your sorry ass for contempt and id-entity theft of intellectual property that was freely given to them. I’m sure much of this is not sitting well with you but then it’s the warring nature of the ego to want to fight, flee or freeze since it is ruled by the reptilian brainstem. Only when we decide to raise our level of thinking into the higher brains can we begin to set ourselves free. Allow me to share a few facts as experienced by myself. On that document, the only one ever given to my parents regarding their deal with the devil called the Birth Certificate, it states quite clearly:
“WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY yet go and try to get any state ID without one. If it’s not meant to be used for identity, then what the hell is it for? It also says “CAUTION: THERE ARE OFFENCES RELATING TO FALSIFYING OR ALTERING A CERTIFICATE AND USING OR POSSESSING A FALSE CERTIFICATE. © CROWN COPYRIGHT It can be easily seen that if one were to use this document for such a thing as identification, one would be creating a false certificate and then possessing it. I can get into all measure of what it’s used for such as bonds creation, money creation, allowing for signature hypothecations etc. and on and on but I’m interested only in its fundamental purpose of tying the living spirit to the dead fictional realms. The birth Certificate is actually a Death Certificate.

We can also go on and on discussing all manner of legal attributes as per the hopes of those that designed the game to keep you looking everywhere but within so I won’t even bother and if that’s where you want to go, you’re missing the point yet again. I’ve been where you are, I’ve made the legal arguments ad nauseum and I assure you, that is exactly what the system wants you to do because in doing so, they keep you fighting in their courts, their system and ultimately in their religion of Ba’al worship with the whore of Babylon owning your sorry asses every time. You can talk to me all day about this document and that procedure, this tactic and that remedy illusion but for me, the fact remains; how are you going to do this WITHOUT using their NAME? The fact is, you can’t and it was designed that way. There is but one thing left to do and one question left to ask any court: “Who owns the NAME?” I already know the answer and so do they. The trick is getting you to BE the NAME and DO things in their image of you THEY created.

We can go into the Roman Maxims for things like “silence equates acquiescence” or Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32. where there is also silence upon the deceiver and thus their own acquiescence to committing it knowingly or unknowingly.
Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270. and Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78. I prefer to use simple analogies in that the one doing the stabbing with a knife also turns the knife upon themselves as per the golden rule. In a nutshell, it works like this. Mum and Dad, not knowing any better and trusting in others to not harm or defraud them have been told that it is customary to register their children with the state and/or church, called baptism. Regardless, there is no division of church and state in that they are one and the same as previously stated. The clergy of old were the courts of old and thus the judges and lawyers which became the BAR society and, of course, the governments and lawmakers as a result. In essence, the foxes are guarding all the henhouses. The parents, having done what they thought was right and being trusting never assumed that anyone could be so evil and devious as to spiritually kidnap their children from them and had no real questions to ask and no truths of what was really going on was given.
Shortly thereafter a document called the Long form birth certificate is created which is the original fraud and then a Short form was also created which creates the fictional corporation or dead thing/person/strawman or whatever you want to call it. Bottom line, the Short form is the proof of the fraud. Mum and Dad, being none the wiser as to their actions, keep using the NAME they gave up for adoption to the STATE by addressing their child with it, convincing the child that the NAME is theirs when, in fact, it is not. Mum and Dad are guilty of aiding and abetting their child into fraud absolving the STATE of dishonour UNTIL this disclosure is asked for. Indeed, who owns the NAME now? It certainly isn’t you and the sooner you get that concept, the sooner you’ll stop aiding and abetting in your own frauds and being possessed by your possessions. Did you never wonder why they refer to belongings as possessions or repossessing things?

The original fraud goes back even further with Mum and Dad getting married in a church or through a government office. Did you get married in a church and sign a marriage license? Then, if you did, the church AND the STATE owns your marriage and everything done within the confines of that contract and it IS a contract of a most spiritual nature, have no doubts on that. Now, to get a little deeper into the spiritual traps here, one must ask oneself as to why the system goes after the feminine creation aspect and here’s where I’m going to lose a lot of ego driven uber-programmed churchianity types that can’t let go of the most insidious program of all regarding the patriarchal control of their minds. Dare to read on if you can and see if you can get past all the dogmas and indoctrinations that have been slammed into you since birth.
When one understands the true nature of creation, one will quickly see that it is the feminine that brings forth creation, not the masculine. It’s even spelled out in Black’s Law 9th for you if you can read it. I am adding it here for your perusal with an explanation of its more ethereal and spiritual bindings. * ward of admiralty, A seaman – so called because of the legal view that a seaman, in contractual matters, should be treated as a beneficiary and the other contracting party as a fiduciary because of the perceived inequitability of their bargaining positions. [Cases: Seamen (;::J 1.] I am the stock of my Mother/Father, self-evident in the blood/aether in my lineage/veins, mitochondrial DNA “delta 9 Lucifer delta 10 mdna” from my Mother which is prima facie evidence of my bloodline (rhA+) where my Father is the beneficiary of any/all ascendants borne to him. The Father (semen*) of any/all borne to him render him the beneficiary only, whereas the Mother is fiduciary.

This where one needs eyes to see AND ears to hear….Seaman/Semen is merely the word trickery the courts and the masters of deception revel in. If anyone asks for me “give me your name” I have but one simple answer and that is “no, but I will let you hear my customary calling if you need a sound to reference my physical body by”. Here’s why I will never GIVE anyone anything without my intention to do so willingly because here, as below is also contract, as above. It was said to me once by one of the lawyers from the CITY OF LONDON, STATE BAR MEMBER that “here, it is ALL about contract”. The use of the NAME, without explicit permission from its rightful owners, The CROWN, is engaging in fraud and the use of stolen intellectual property as confirmed, in voice and in face to face conversations with an embassy official of the BRITISH HIGH CONSULATE, OTTAWA, CANADA that it is, IN FACT, fraud to do so and why I was able to procure an emergency passport as a result.
I have been lied to by more so called officials, legal types, judges and politicians than I’d care to count and the one thing that they all have in common is that they know they’re doing it and where I revert to “Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” rendering all frauds, null and void, nunc pro tunc upon its revelation. What I did learn over time was how to ask the right questions to corner them by getting them to be doing me harm otherwise. Questions like “Is it your wish that I commit fraud?” or “Is it your intention to aid and abet me into committing fraud by using a NAME that clearly does not belong to me?”
These are the mirrors they cannot stomach because they know what they are doing, many of them and especially the ones that claim to be “just doing my job”. There is much joy to be found in their frauds however, once they are mirrored back because there is no limitations placed on a fraud regardless of how long it takes to expose it. That is the joy of “nunc pro tunc” or “now for then” which eliminates the time aspect bringing all crimes into the now for all to see. For those that still can’t see the truth in how it is WE who are aiding and abetting in our own fraud, let me clarify it for you further.
Here are a few questions that you need to ask yourself honestly, the truth cannot be denied within no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise. If you cannot face up to these realities, then you are not awake or mature enough to be considered enlightened, sorry to inform you. My mirror informed me nicely and no, I wasn’t happy either. Here they are…..Do you have any government ID whatsoever such as a driver’s license, a passport, or anything of that nature? Do you have a bank account or credit/debit card?
Do you have any loans or mortgages with contracts in the system? Do you feel the incessant need to fight in courts? Do you sign things like checks, applications or any manner of paperwork? In short, do you use the NAME on the birth certificate every day in all your transactions and communications?
If you answered yes to any of these questions then you are committing fraud, are in contempt of court and are seen as a belligerent. People ask how the cops get away with beating people on the street and I say it’s easy; they’re beating up a criminal who insists on committing fraud by virtue of the IDENTIFICATION they carry and how they procured it of their own free will choice to go into a fraudulent contract using a NAME that doesn’t belong to them. Unless of course, you think that writing checks on someone else’s account is a good and lawful thing that is. Anything and everything ever created in your universe using the NAME on the BC DOES NOT belong to you….PERIOD and like Bill Hicks says, “I can hear your inner dialogue, you’re wrong, get over it”……Until you can face up to the fact that you’ve been duped grand scale, you will continue to fight a losing battle with the whores of Babylon because of your “mark of the beast” and they know it. They have you right where they want you; in permanent dishonour until the question of “Who owns the NAME?” is the first question asked if you must go into court. For further understandings of how the courts work and get their power beyond this most basic truth.
In order for the dark principalities to control this place and our lives and minds, they must take our creative spiritual energy to give them the energy these vampires require to continue. No, this is not just a physical game and truth be known, the physical is the smallest percentage of it where the real power lays hidden to the blind. I know many of you may finally start to see the gravity of this situation and are asking yourself what to do as far as getting back into honour.
The first thing that needs to happen is to wake up to this reality and shift your intention. It is too easy to become overwhelmed with all the situations and entanglements you have in this life but have some peace knowing that you have a new perspective as to your slavery and how you’re being made to serve it. Changing ones intention requires the baby steps doctrine and only doing the things you need to do and can do easily, step by step. for some of you, calling up your bank to have a chat with a bank manager regarding who owns the name/account etc. You may wish to ask some CRA or IRS branches some of the tougher questions all the while making sure you commit them into aiding and abetting the frauds. It’s really quite simple that without the NAME’s being used and more importantly, SIGNATURES being given period, this system and its vampires starve literally overnight. For the more spiritually awake and astute, you will already understand that the signature comes AFTER the intent/spiritual contract and not before it. Actions always come after I am going to add another article at the bottom of this essay that is what I sent to various government offices etc. to get my intent out there because I know the power of intent where the cause and effect is already rippling through the universe. Always remember, ye are gods and you’ve been duped out of it for a very long time and have suffered immensely over many lifetimes. Time to wake up once and for all…..the truth is, lose the NAME, end the game so we can all get back to being the incredible creators we are and not the mindless slaves we became. Much love and light, kate of gaia…….
p.s Why it is important to understand what a gift really is: GIFT: a voluntary transfer of property made without consideration, that is, for which no value is received in return. The essential components of a valid completed gift of personal property are: competency of the donor to understand the nature of his act; voluntary intent on the part of the donor to make a gift (called DONATIVE INTENT);

DELIVERY either actual or symbolic;

ACCEPTANCE, actual or imputed; complete divestment of all control by the donor; and a lack of consideration for the gift. A transfer that constitutes a gift may be of significance in several TAX contexts. For example, RECEIPT of a gift is excluded from the GROSS INCOME of the recipient, but the transferor may be subject to the unified estate and gift tax.

DONATIVE INTENT (Black’s 8th): the intent to surrender DOMINION and control over the GIFT that is being made. DOMINION: having BOTH title to AND possession of property; having CONTROL of both ownership and use.
1. Given NAME……incompetently given by parents due to non-disclosure….voluntary only on a deceptive, non-disclosed basis and f

The Long and Short of it….by kate of gaia
It has been a long road to get here. It has been hard to come to terms with many of the lies and fictional realities we have been so carefully trained to believe in. The biggest hurdle of all was in the realising of the need to let everything go and to unpack the camel that it may pass through the eye of the needle of the Emerald City’s walls. A physical reality is a tough one for most to step aside from and seek the inner workings of self and all but it is a necessary step lest one remain in the circular traps so perfectly set for all of us. We live in a world of commerce, a world I call the whore of Babylon both from the physical and spiritual perspectives. In order to be owned, one must give up mind, body and soul and I am most unwilling to do so.
It is a world of make believe fictional characters created for each and every one of us where a few have seen the means to take hold of all the strings of this puppet world where those of the masses unwittingly, yet willingly, perform for these most cunning of “puppet masters”. We have all been deceived where so few, now becoming the many, are awakened from this long lasting sleep having eaten so hungrily of the apple the witch of Babylon has offered. Oh so many have been duped and beguiled of this mistress of deception where we have fed upon each other to the glee of those pulling your strings. And while we can talk of blame and injustice, it is we who must face the mirror and come to terms with the fact that we, not they, are the true problem. The issue at hand is one of ignorance of self, the unwillingness to see into our own lives and face the mirrors of the darkest reflections. We will fight and we will cling to all that we think of as right and just whilst we, at the same time, are the cause of all our own woes.
For me, it was not a matter of how to lay bare the dishonour of so many that was already obvious, it was more a matter of how it was me that was allowing it by being more in dishonour of the truth. Ignorance of the law is not a defence of or from the law, that being the universal, natural kind, not the man-made fictional law that works to mimic it. It is difficult to play any game with an adversary that will change the rules inasmuch as we give them the power to do so. We are as children in this regard. When one grows up, one decides the game unworthy of even taking it out of the box it deserves to remain in, such is the way of Pandora.
So, where to begin explaining this game from its physical and spiritual mirror perspective? I like to begin by reminding myself that the physical realm that surrounds us is the illusion where only cause and effect clues reside. There are no answers in it, none whatsoever. It is merely the game board of consciousness where some have mastered it and use that knowledge for malfeasant purposes, flying in the face of creation while embracing creation at the same time.

Some may shout ” Dichotomy!” but the simple truth is, all opposites are the same and only differ in degree of the observers willingness to see it. Yes, the mess you’re in, is your fault if you have the courage to face that. As for the examples of that, one need look no further than the religion of the legal system and, indeed, nowhere else. The truth of the matter remains that all things legal are all things religion inasmuch as the legal system was borne of it. The earliest courts/churches were and still are the basis of the same systems today where there is no separation of church and state, period. They are one and the same and their purpose has been unwavering in its control of the masses for countless eons. That reign of terror, however, is finally over. Only when one begins to see the connection between church feigning spiritual and state acting as physical can one begin to see the true divide and conquer.
What is most profound is that most within positions of assumed power are owned more completely than any slave of the common realms ever could be. A slave understands freedom where one who thinks they are free is the most trapped of all. Even the reference to their religious garb and political robes are called the trappings of office. Nonetheless, the finely programmed egos of these beings keep the clearest of truths just out of range of their most narrow vision. My search was one of a very simple nature in that I had to find the one thing that every human on earth had in common, would take them from cradle to grave in that commonality and, something they would defend to the death for assuring a permanent state of fraud on their part, and no one else’s. The biggest clue was found at the end of their lives and it can be found on the tombstones of the many that never lived in the eyes of the system. It perfectly matched the only document ever offered freely by any church, state or government. The design of the trap was so perfect in its efficacy, it made us make slaves of ourselves and any attempt to fight for freedom would always result in our own fraud, our own contempt of court and inevitably, our belligerence and circular vengeance. The slavery had to be freely given on our parts and in our ignorance. It had to be something that fed the ego of the belligerents and the coffers of the clergy and all the while, they retained their full honour in universal law standing. While the masses fight for what they think is right, they feed their own fires of hate, discord and division. The more injust the system would get, the harder they would fight empowering the very system that is feeding off of them. The litmus test for this is quite easy to see and it will be the ones fighting this concept that proves the worthiness of the trap rendering it inescapable for the majority. This is the Chinese finger trap in full bloom where the harder you pull to extricate yourself from it, the more it holds on until one tires enough, relaxes their grip and voila, your fingers escape easily. There is a reason why the fangs of a serpent are pointing inward in that the more the prey struggles to free itself, the deeper the fangs sink in and why it is best to avoid the snake in the first place non?
So, what could be so simple as to permeate this most perfect Chinese finger trap on humanity? For the astute and for those that have listened to me speak or read my writings, you already know where I’m going but for those less aware of what I speak of, the answers, was and always will be, the NAME. I will share a few perspectives on this to aid in the observations of the trap where many of you may scoff. Always keep in mind, I care not what you believe and neither does the truth, that’s a simple fact. I have my experiences where this has all been laid bare for me and I have shared this truth for years now, albeit getting easier to share with people seeing this or themselves. You can spend all the time you want in their courtrooms but there is only one certainty you can ever expect and that is the fact that the courts are their game, rigged to their rules and they want everyone to play because it is guaranteed that they will win every time and “lose” a few just to keep the lottery illusion alive that on occasion, someone wins a case or two. This is the same philosophy a carnival gamer uses. They love to let people win their useless junk because the profits far exceed the expenses. Same things with the courts so who is the carnival clown then?
There will be many that still won’t get it after they read this but it is my hope and intention that they can swallow enough pride and ego to find the keys that will set them free. The chains that you think are binding you are the very ones that you keep firmly in your grip where all you have to do is let go….but many of you won’t and to your own peril and so be it. Where the true power of the NAME comes into play is the sudden realisation that everything you’ve worked for, everything you own and everything you will ever own up until you let go, was gotten via fraudulent means using a name that does not belong to you. This is a very tough pill to swallow and many of you are already choking, will spit it up and go on doing what the puppet masters want you to do. You will continue to commit fraud, day after day and you will be happy to do so as long as you keep getting your trinkets and scraps using a stolen identity and fraudulent, worthless pieces of debt paper.
The system had to get us to aid and bet in our own fraud to retain the upper hand of honour where we were always coming forward with “unclean hands”. It had to be “sold” to us in such a way as to we would see the benefits and miss the tricks and dive headlong into our own fraud and fight to the death to maintain it. Ah, it is so easy to control a child with treats and they don’t have to be big ones either, just treats is enough most days. To bring this into perspective, let me share a few fundamental definitions of words for you without going into the deep etymological sources, suffice it to say, been there, done that and cracked the code to the very letters.
Let’s take a look at the word “register” for example and what its real meaning is. There are two very clear words there for me, the first being “regis” which is Latin for “to rule” and “ster” which means “creative, divine, feminine essence” and is akin to “star” where you can at once see the relevance of “starr contracts” from Black’s Law 9th edition. So, the word means quite literally “to rule the divine feminine” or creation herself. Many of you who may be versed somewhat in “legalese” will recognise the term “pro se” which means to speak for yourself in a court setting. That translates into “for himself/herself/itself” and if you don’t believe it, look it up for yourself. The word “prosecute” translates into “do not pursue” in legal realms where its mirror in mainstream think is one of going after someone in court, to prosecute. The truth is, they don’t have to pursue anything because the mere fact that you are in a courtroom and don’t know who you are, is sufficient to convict your sorry ass for contempt and id-entity theft of intellectual property that was freely given to them. I’m sure much of this is not sitting well with you but then it’s the warring nature of the ego to want to fight, flee or freeze since it is ruled by the reptilian brainstem. Only when we decide to raise our level of thinking into the higher brains can we begin to set ourselves free. Allow me to share a few facts as experienced by myself. On that document, the only one ever given to my parents regarding their deal with the devil called the Birth Certificate, it states quite clearly:
“WARNING: A CERTIFICATE IS NOT EVIDENCE OF IDENTITY yet go and try to get any state ID without one. If it’s not meant to be used for identity, then what the hell is it for? It also says “CAUTION: THERE ARE OFFENCES RELATING TO FALSIFYING OR ALTERING A CERTIFICATE AND USING OR POSSESSING A FALSE CERTIFICATE. © CROWN COPYRIGHT
It can be easily seen that if one were to use this document for such a thing as identification, one would be creating a false certificate and then possessing it. I can get into all measure of what it’s used for such as bonds creation, money creation, allowing for signature hypothecations etc. and on and on but I’m interested only in its fundamental purpose of tying the living spirit to the dead fictional realms. The birth Certificate is actually a Death Certificate. We can also go on and on discussing all manner of legal attributes as per the hopes of those that designed the game to keep you looking everywhere but within so I won’t even bother and if that’s where you want to go, you’re missing the point yet again. I’ve been where you are, I’ve made the legal arguments ad nauseum and I assure you, that is exactly what the system wants you to do because in doing so, they keep you fighting in their courts, their system and ultimately in their religion of Ba’al worship with the whore of Babylon owning your sorry asses every time. You can talk to me all day about this document and that procedure, this tactic and that remedy illusion but for me, the fact remains; how are you going to do this WITHOUT using their NAME? The fact is, you can’t and it was designed that way.
There is but one thing left to do and one question left to ask any court: “Who owns the NAME?” I already know the answer and so do they.The trick is getting you to BE the NAME and DO things in their image of you THEY created. We can go into the Roman Maxims for things like “silence equates acquiescence” or Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk. Cent. 32. where there is also silence upon the deceiver and thus their own acquiescence to committing it knowingly or unknowingly. Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270. and Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78. I prefer to use simple analogies in that the one doing the stabbing with a knife also turns the knife upon themselves as per the golden rule. In a nutshell, it works like this. Mum and Dad, not knowing any better and trusting in others to not harm or defraud them have been told that it is customary to register their children with the state and/or church, called baptism. Regardless, there is no division of church and state in that they are one and the same as previously stated. The clergy of old were the courts of old and thus the judges and lawyers which became the BAR society and, of course, the governments and lawmakers as a result. In essence, the foxes are guarding all the henhouses. The parents, having done what they thought was right and being trusting never assumed that anyone could be so evil and devious as to spiritually kidnap their children from them and had no real questions to ask and no truths of what was really going on was given.
Shortly thereafter a document called the Long form birth certificate is created which is the original fraud and then a Short form was also created which creates the fictional corporation or dead thing/person/strawman or whatever you want to call it. Bottom line, the Short form is the proof of the fraud. Mum and Dad, being none the wiser as to their actions, keep using the NAME they gave up for adoption to the STATE by addressing their child with it, convincing the child that the NAME is theirs when, in fact, it is not. Mum and Dad are guilty of aiding and abetting their child into fraud absolving the STATE of dishonour UNTIL this disclosure is asked for. Indeed, who owns the NAME now? It certainly isn’t you and the sooner you get that concept, the sooner you’ll stop aiding and abetting in your own frauds and being possessed by your possessions.
Did you never wonder why they refer to belongings as possessions or repossessing things? The original fraud goes back even further with Mum and Dad getting married in a church or through a government office. Did you get married in a church and sign a marriage license? Then, if you did, the church AND the STATE owns your marriage and everything done within the confines of that contract and it IS a contract of a most spiritual nature, have no doubts on that. Now, to get a little deeper into the spiritual traps here, one must ask oneself as to why the system goes after the feminine creation aspect and here’s where I’m going to lose a lot of ego driven uber-programmed churchianity types that can’t let go of the most insidious program of all regarding the patriarchal control of their minds. Dare to read on if you can and see if you can get past all the dogmas and indoctrinations that have been slammed into you since birth.

When one understands the true nature of creation, one will quickly see that it is the feminine that brings forth creation, not the masculine. It’s even spelled out in Black’s Law 9th for you if you can read it. I am adding it here for your perusal with an explanation of its more ethereal and spiritual bindings. * ward of admiralty, A seaman – so called because of the legal view that a seaman, in contractual matters, should be treated as a beneficiary and the other contracting party as a fiduciary because of the perceived inequitability of their bargaining positions. [Cases: Seamen (;::J 1.] I am the stock of my Mother/Father, self-evident in the blood/aether in my lineage/veins, mitochondrial DNA “delta 9 Lucifer delta 10 mdna” from my Mother which is prima facie evidence of my bloodline (rhA+) where my Father is the beneficiary of any/all ascendants borne to him. The Father (semen*) of any/all borne to him render him the beneficiary only, whereas the Mother is fiduciary. This where one needs eyes to see AND ears to hear….Seaman/Semen is merely the word trickery the courts and the masters of deception revel in.
If anyone asks for me “give me your name” I have but one simple answer and that is “no, but I will let you hear my customary calling if you need a sound to reference my physical body by”. Here’s why I will never GIVE anyone anything without my intention to do so willingly because here, as below is also contract, as above. It was said to me once by one of the lawyers from the CITY OF LONDON, STATE BAR MEMBER that “here, it is ALL about contract”. The use of the NAME, without explicit permission from its rightful owners, The CROWN, is engaging in fraud and the use of stolen intellectual property as confirmed, in voice and in face to face conversations with an embassy official of the BRITISH HIGH CONSULATE, OTTAWA, CANADA that it is, IN FACT, fraud to do so and why I was able to procure an emergency passport as a result.
I have been lied to by more so called officials, legal types, judges and politicians than I’d care to count and the one thing that they all have in common is that they know they’re doing it and where I revert to “Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.” rendering all frauds, null and void, nunc pro tunc upon its revelation. What I did learn over time was how to ask the right questions to corner them by getting them to be doing me harm otherwise. Questions like “Is it your wish that I commit fraud?” or “Is it your intention to aid and abet me into committing fraud by using a NAME that clearly does not belong to me?” These are the mirrors they cannot stomach because they know what they are doing, many of them and especially the ones that claim to be “just doing my job”. There is much joy to be found in their frauds however, once they are mirrored back because there is no limitations placed on a fraud regardless of how long it takes to expose it. That is the joy of “nunc pro tunc” or “now for then” which eliminates the time aspect bringing all crimes into the now for all to see. For those that still can’t see the truth in how it is WE who are aiding and abetting in our own fraud, let me clarify it for you further.
Here are a few questions that you need to ask yourself honestly, the truth cannot be denied within no matter how hard you try to convince yourself otherwise. If you cannot face up to these realities, then you are not awake or mature enough to be considered enlightened, sorry to inform you. My mirror informed me nicely and no, I wasn’t happy either. Here they are…..Do you have any government ID whatsoever such as a driver’s license, a passport, or anything of that nature? Do you have a bank account or credit/debit card? Do you have any loans or mortgages with contracts in the system? Do you feel the incessant need to fight in courts? Do you sign things like checks, applications or any manner of paperwork? In short, do you use the NAME on the birth certificate every day in all your transactions and communications? If you answered yes to any of these questions then you are committing fraud, are in contempt of court and are seen as a belligerent. People ask how the cops get away with beating people on the street and I say it’s easy; they’re beating up a criminal who insists on committing fraud by virtue of the IDENTIFICATION they carry and how they procured it of their own free will choice to go into a fraudulent contract using a NAME that doesn’t belong to them. Unless of course, you think that writing checks on someone else’s account is a good and lawful thing that is. Anything and everything ever created in your universe using the NAME on the BC DOES NOT belong to you….PERIOD and like Bill Hicks says, “I can hear your inner dialogue, you’re wrong, get over it”……Until you can face up to the fact that you’ve been duped grand scale, you will continue to fight a losing battle with the whores of Babylon because of your “mark of the beast” and they know it. They have you right where they want you; in permanent dishonour until the question of “Who owns the NAME?” is the first question asked if you must go into court.
For further understandings of how the courts work and get their power beyond this most basic truth. In order for the dark principalities to control this place and our lives and minds, they must take our creative spiritual energy to give them the energy these vampires require to continue. No, this is not just a physical game and truth be known, the physical is the smallest percentage of it where the real power lays hidden to the blind. I know many of you may finally start to see the gravity of this situation and are asking yourself what to do as far as getting back into honour. The first thing that needs to happen is to wake up to this reality and shift your intention. It is too easy to become overwhelmed with all the situations and entanglements you have in this life but have some peace knowing that you have a new perspective as to your slavery and how you’re being made to serve it. Changing ones intention requires the baby steps doctrine and only doing the things you need to do and can do easily, step by step.
for some of you, calling up your bank to have a chat with a bank manager regarding who owns the name/account etc. You may wish to ask some CRA or IRS branches some of the tougher questions all the while making sure you commit them into aiding and abetting the frauds. It’s really quite simple that without the NAME’s being used and more importantly, SIGNATURES being given period, this system and its vampires starve literally overnight. For the more spiritually awake and astute, you will already understand that the signature comes AFTER the intent/spiritual contract and not before it. Actions always come after thoughts.

If you intend it; it is CONTRACT without another thing being physically done. I am going to add another article at the bottom of this essay that is what I sent to various government offices etc. to get my intent out there because I know the power of intent where the cause and effect is already rippling through the universe. Always remember, ye are gods and you’ve been duped out of it for a very long time and have suffered immensely over many lifetimes. Time to wake up once and for all…..the truth is, lose the NAME, end the game so we can all get back to being the incredible creators we are and not the mindless slaves we became. Much love and light, kate of gaia…….
p.s Why it is important to understand what a gift really is:
GIFT: a voluntary transfer of property made without consideration, that is, for which no value is received in return. The essential components of a valid completed gift of personal property are:
1. competency of the donor to understand the nature of his act; voluntary intent on the part of the donor to make a gift (called DONATIVE INTENT);
2. DELIVERY either actual or symbolic; ACCEPTANCE, actual or imputed; complete divestment of all control by the donor; and a lack of consideration for the gift. A transfer that constitutes a gift may be of significance in several TAX contexts. For example, RECEIPT of a gift is excluded from the GROSS INCOME of the recipient, but the transferor may be subject to the unified estate and gift tax.;
3. DONATIVE INTENT (Black’s 8th): the intent to surrender DOMINION and control over the GIFT that is being made. DOMINION: having BOTH title to AND possession of property; having CONTROL of both ownership and use.
Given NAME……incompetently given by parents due to non-disclosure….voluntary only on a deceptive, non-disclosed basis and fraudulent intent by the deceivers nullifying intent on the “donors”…..nuff said with domini
(as in “A.D.,” “anno domini,”—Christian calendar beginning at the time of Jesus Christ’s, or, “Jeshua’s,” birth, and “M.D.,” “mundial domini”—Gregorian calendar)

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police| CORRUPT TX BILL


IF No Fault Divorce, then No Fault Childhood, Right.  WRONG!

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

Image result for PICS OF KIDS GOING TO JAIL

SEPARATE BUT EQUAL LAWS AGAIN? 

SO MUCH FOR UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON GETTING THE NEW SCHOOL UNIFORM CONTRACTS

NEW RULERS SAY NO MORE SPANKINGS IN SCHOOL . . .  NO MORE CHOICE OF POPS BY THE PRINCIPAL IN LIEU OF AFTER-SCHOOL DETENTION . . . THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD BE TELLING PARENTS AND TEACHERS WHAT TO DO AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, . . . TO “CATCH(MENT ZONE”) THEM WHEN THEIR GUARD IS DOWN???   I CALL THIS THE NEW TWILIGHT ZONE FOR THE NEW NAZIS! 

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

On the bright side, THOUGH, maybe it will actually get them reading, so they better learn it while they still can! 

Click on the link below, or otherwise cut and paste or enter manually into the browser to read more about the surreal life, from Texas below:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/

From the reporters who were actually allowed to inform the “public trust” about the public servant in Pharr, Texas (Hidalgo County) who allegedly raped a teenage girl multiple times while three police officer co-workers watched and “protected,”

Source:  The Free Thought Project, New Bill Would Have Teachers Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children and Report them to Police, Jay Syrmopoulos March 24, 2015

WHEN IN DOUBT, SOUND IT OUT; WHEN IN DOUBT, READ (T/READ)!

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/#88vuAAYXTFSiWlku.99 (where “diagnosis” sounds like dia/g/og/gnossus/gnostic + “dia”/day/dei/deity/god/goddess/de/di/of)

AGE- END- A  21–SUSTAIN ABLE (JOB) GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROFESSIONS–LAW, SOCIAL WORKERS, GOVERNMENT AND CONTRACTED SERVICES, POLICE OFFICERS, AGE- N -CIES, “TEAC HER (HE/R PLACE WITH CHILD)” WARDENS, GRANT WRITERS GALORE–THE RIDDLE OF THE SPHINX IS FINALLY SOLVED! 

PROTECTIVE MOTHERS AND FATHERS, THIS IS WHY THEY CAN’T PULL CRIMINAL “RESPONSIBLE” FATHERS, FOSTER CARERS, AND CPS WORKERS OUT OF JAIL FAST ENOUGH TO CONVERT CUSTODY TO THE “RESPONSIBLE” PARENT, WITHOUT FAIL, AS A MATTER OF LAW AND POLICY, AND TO GET THEM HITCHED TO A WICKED STEPMOMMY OR STEPFATHER WHO COULD NEVER REALLY LOVE YOUR CHILD THE WAY YOU DO, THUS, RESULTING IN THE MAJORITY OF CHILD FATALITIES BEING FROM STEPPARENTS WHO WILL SURELY KEEP THESE KIDS IN THE SYSTEM–CHAIN/GENERATIONAL STYLE-GANG UNTIL THE AGE OF MAJORITY (21, AS IN, AGENDA 21) FOREVER CONFINED AND MADE TO BE “SUBJECTED” TO THE “DIGITAL PLANTATION,” AN ENDLESS CYCLE TO KEEP THE PROFESSIONS IN BUSINESS (AND THEIR TWO MILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL SUMMER DEPOSIT BRIBES FROM THE FARMER’S CLAIMS IN THE 1980’S THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO  HE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE (33) PLUS THOUSAND CLAIMS FOR FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE IN THE MIDWEST THAT ALLEGEDLY, AS REPORTED ANYHOW, IN AS MUCH AS IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE TRUE (OR FALSE)!

THIS IS WHY INSIDERS AND AGENTS HAVE TRIED TO REASSURE SOME OF US, MUCH TO OUR BEWILDERMENT OF COURSE, THAT IF WE LOST CUSTODY IN THESE VERY SIMILAR, PATTERNED MIRROR CASES BEING ALL THE SAME IN ALL DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE US AND OTHER ENGLISH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES NOTORIOUS FOR THE SS, WE WERE DEFINITELY TARGETED AS THE GOOD PARENT WHO THE BAR AND PROFESSIONS HAVE THEORIZED WOULD, AND THOSE WHO HAD IT CERTAINLY DID,  SPEND EVERY LAST DIME THEY BEGGED, BORROWED, AND EARNED, GOING INTO DEBT TO THE ATTORNERS (ATTORNEY MEANS ONE WHO “TURNS OVER PROPERTY,” I BELIEVE WHICH DERIVES FROM THE MIDDLE ENGLISH FORM OF THE WORD) TRYING TO RESCUE THEIR MATERNALLY  DE-PRIVED/FUTURE DE-PRAVED) PRIVATE PROPERTY SOMETIMES REFERRED TO BY THE “STATE” AS “CHILD” FROM THE ALLEGED ABUSER OR ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSER (AS THE “PLAY THERAPISTS” LI-CENSED BY CPS FOR “STATE OF TEXAS,” MARCIA KLEINMAN STYLE, BUT NOT THE MOTHER THEY TRAIN JUDGES, POLICE, AND COURT-APPOINTED/”PONTIFICATED”/ROMAN PONTIFF TO THE POPE,  ATTORNEYS AND GUARD-IANS AND “MENTAL HEAL-TH/E/VALUATORS-UNQUALI-FIED(FEED/FIEFDOM/SERFDOM) TO THE (WO)MAN, JAN SMITH, WHOREPORTS/PURPORTS TO HAVE BEEN THE INVENTOR OF WHAT WE HAVE COME TO KNOW AS THE MODERN CPS “RISK ASSESSMENT” “LEVELS” TREATMENT INDICATORS FOR SIX INSTEAD OF THREE MONTH DI-VERS-ION/ARY TREATMENT PRO-G-RAMS (THINK PROGESTERONE AND MYTHOLOGICAL EGYPTIAN GOD “RAM/SES” OR ARIES IN THE ZODIAC SYSTEM) THOUGH JAN SMITH LOST HE/R GRAND(LODGE)CHILD(PRONOUN-CED CELTIC LIKE KILLED/CHI/CHE/LIFE FORCE)TO T/HE SAM (I AM) SY-STEM DE-SIGN UNDER  PRESSURE F-OM HE/R CPS SUPERVISER TO KEEP T/E PA-RENTS INT/HE MOSTLY SUB-STANCE/STANDING UNDER THE BAR ABUSE SE-R/VICESOR CRIM-IN-AL CON/VICT/IONS NOT NE-CESS-ARILY DE-NOTING THAT ONE IS NOT NECESSARILY A CRIMINAL, BUT IS ONE RATHER WHO INDICATORS FOR LEVELS FUNDING INDICATES CAN BE LEGALLY LEVERAGED FOR FEDERAL STATE BLOCK GRANT “HELPING”/”PROTECTING”/RE-HABBING/RE-INTEGRATING INTO THE WORKFORCE AND FATHER HOOD AND MARRIAGE  (MAKING THEM SUBJECT FOREVER TO THE STATE FAMILY COURTS AND STATE BAR CON THROUGH LICENSE, OR, “LICENTIOUSNESS”/MORAL, CRIMINAL, AND SEXUAL DEPRAVITY OF ORIGINAL SIN, IF NOT N-TO-P” IN S O(W)MAN-Y  O F/OUR CA-SES THAT T/HE $20,000 DE-RIV/ATIVE  ANN-U(ANUS OF THE OTHER HEART) THE $2,000,000,000 F-ARME/RS’ (ARME MEANS FREE/ARMY/LIBERATORS) CLAIMS FROM THE 80’S THAT FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURES ON 330,000  FARM CLAIMS WE-RE/WON BACK BY A GROUP OF ARMY GENERALS AND THE SON OF A FORT COLLINS, COLORADO FARMER WHO STARTED THIS ENTIRE CLAIM WORTH OVER EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS THAT THE FEDERAL US GOVERNMENT SAID THEY WOULD PAY OUT, BUT FOR THE THREE US CHIEF JUSTICES IN CHARGE OF THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, AS ALLEGED IN WELL-DOCUMENTED SEVEN YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH BY A (WO)MAN WHOSE WORK I, Julian’s real mommy, took the liberty of posting on this b-log–“NESARA Law” hid away in Switzerland, the UK, and the Netherlands, I believe so that they could use it to bribe 533 of 535 members of the then Senate, as reported with a $200,000,000 bribe to usher in the agenda of the United Nations, “New World Order,” and overthrow the Federal, US Constitution and Bill of Rights who some  Benevolent “FOUR OR FIVE ‘VISIONARIES'” HAVE , AS REPORTED, BEEN TRYING TO RE-STORE SINCE the 1950’s.  Otherwise I think there is more truth than not, at least at first glance, though author trusts no one truly of this physical versus spiritual, heavenly  whorld/would/horus/the all-seeing eye or inner wisdom derived from the awakening physical, but not spiritual “death” when one experiences the descent of the pineal and pituitary glands from the back of the brain near the cerebellum, perhaps (I have to double-check on that one).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=N2c_UOIsLMQ

IF No Fault Divorce, then No Fault Childhood, Right.  WRONG!

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

Image result for PICS OF KIDS GOING TO JAIL

SEPARATE BUT EQUAL LAWS AGAIN? 

SO MUCH FOR UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON GETTING THE NEW SCHOOL UNIFORM CONTRACTS

NEW RULERS SAY NO MORE SPANKINGS IN SCHOOL . . .  NO MORE CHOICE OF POPS BY THE PRINCIPAL IN LIEU OF AFTER-SCHOOL DETENTION . . . THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD BE TELLING PARENTS AND TEACHERS WHAT TO DO AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, . . . TO “CATCH(MENT ZONE”) THEM WHEN THEIR GUARD IS DOWN???   I CALL THIS THE NEW TWILIGHT ZONE FOR THE NEW NAZIS! 

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

On the bright side, THOUGH, maybe it will actually get them reading, so they better learn it while they still can! 

Click on the link below, or otherwise cut and paste or enter manually into the browser to read more about the surreal life, from Texas below:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/

From the reporters who were actually allowed to inform the “public trust” about the public servant in Pharr, Texas (Hidalgo County/South Texas region close to the border) who allegedly raped a teenage girl multiple times while three police officer co-workers watched and “protected,”

Source:  The Free Thought Project, New Bill Would Have Teachers Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children and Report them to Police, Jay Syrmopoulos March 24, 2015

Read more at:

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD LEGISLATION BY SANTORUM|ALL SINGLE MOTHERS NEED TO READ AND STUDY THIS AND STAY OUT OF COURT AND AWAY FROM CPS AND POLICE


[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. 2830 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 714
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2830

   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2004

Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Bayh) introduced the following bill; 
                     which was read the first time

                           September 23, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy Marriages and Responsible 
Fatherhood Act of 2004''.

         TITLE I--HEALTHY MARRIAGES AND RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD

SEC. 101. PROMOTION OF FAMILY FORMATION AND HEALTHY MARRIAGE.

    (a) TANF State Plans.--Section 402(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 602(a)(1)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                            ``(vii) Encourage equitable treatment of 
                        healthy 2-parent married families under the 
                        program referred to in clause (i).''.
    (b) Healthy Marriage Promotion Grants; Repeal of Bonus for 
Reduction of Illegitimacy Ratio.--Section 403(a)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Healthy marriage promotion grants.--
                    ``(A) Authority.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                        award competitive grants to States, 
                        territories, and Indian tribes and tribal 
                        organizations for not more than 50 percent of 
                        the cost of developing and implementing 
                        innovative programs to promote and support 
                        healthy 2-parent married families.
                            ``(ii) Use of other tanf funds.--A State or 
                        Indian tribe with an approved tribal family 
                        assistance plan may use funds provided under 
                        other grants made under this part for all or 
                        part of the expenditures incurred for the 
                        remainder of the costs described in clause (i). 
                        In the case of a State, any such funds expended 
                        shall not be considered qualified State 
                        expenditures for purposes of section 409(a)(7).
                    ``(B) Healthy marriage promotion activities.--Funds 
                provided under subparagraph (A) and corresponding State 
                matching funds shall be used to support any of the 
                following programs or activities:
                            ``(i) Public advertising campaigns on the 
                        value of marriage and the skills needed to 
                        increase marital stability and health.
                            ``(ii) Education in high schools on the 
                        value of marriage, relationship skills, and 
                        budgeting.
                            ``(iii) Marriage education, marriage 
                        skills, and relationship skills programs that 
                        may include case management for, and referrals 
                        to, programs for parenting skills, financial 
                        management, conflict resolution, and job and 
                        career advancement, for non-married pregnant 
                        women, non-married expectant fathers, and non-
                        married recent parents.
                            ``(iv) Pre-marital education and marriage 
                        skills training for engaged couples and for 
                        couples or individuals interested in marriage.
                            ``(v) Marriage enhancement and marriage 
                        skills training programs for married couples.
                            ``(vi) Divorce reduction programs that 
                        teach relationship skills.
                            ``(vii) Marriage mentoring programs which 
                        use married couples as role models and mentors.
                            ``(viii) Programs to reduce the 
                        disincentives to marriage in means-tested aid 
                        programs, if offered in conjunction with any 
                        activity described in this subparagraph.
                            ``(ix) Training for individuals who will 
                        conduct any of the programs or activities 
                        described in clauses (i) through (viii).
                    ``(C) Voluntary participation.--Participation in 
                programs or activities described in any of clauses 
                (iii) through (vii) of subparagraph (B) shall be 
                voluntary.
                    ``(D) General rules governing use of funds.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The rules of section 
                        404, other than subsection (b) of that section, 
                        shall not apply to a grant made under this 
                        paragraph.
                            ``(ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in 
                        this part or part C shall be construed as 
                        prohibiting a State from using funds made 
                        available under a grant awarded under this 
                        paragraph to award a subgrant or contract to a 
                        fatherhood promotion organization to carry out 
                        programs or activities described in 
                        subparagraph (B).
                    ``(E) Requirements for receipt of funds.--A State, 
                territory, or Indian tribe or tribal organization may 
                not be awarded a grant under this paragraph unless the 
                State, territory, Indian tribe or tribal organization, 
                as a condition of receiving funds under such a grant--
                            ``(i) consults with experts in domestic 
                        violence or with relevant community domestic 
                        violence coalitions in developing such programs 
                        or activities; and
                            ``(ii) describes in the application for a 
                        grant under this paragraph--
                                    ``(I) how the programs or 
                                activities proposed to be conducted 
                                will address, as appropriate, issues of 
                                domestic violence; and
                                    ``(II) what the State, territory, 
                                or Indian tribe or tribal organization, 
                                will do, to the extent relevant, to 
                                ensure that participation in such 
                                programs or activities is voluntary, 
                                and to inform potential participants 
                                that their involvement is voluntary.
                    ``(F) Appropriation.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Out of any money in the 
                        Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
                        appropriated, there are appropriated for each 
                        of fiscal years 2005 through 2006, $100,000,000 
                        for grants under this paragraph.
                            ``(ii) Extended availability of funds.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Funds 
                                appropriated under clause (i) for each 
                                of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 shall 
                                remain available to the Secretary until 
                                expended.
                                    ``(II) Authority for grant 
                                recipients.--A State, territory, or 
                                Indian tribe or tribal organization may 
                                use funds made available under a grant 
                                awarded under this paragraph without 
                                fiscal year limitation pursuant to the 
                                terms of the grant.''.
    (c) Counting of Spending on Non-Eligible Families To Prevent and 
Reduce Incidence of Out-of-Wedlock Births, Encourage Formation and 
Maintenance of Healthy 2-Parent Married Families, or Encourage 
Responsible Fatherhood.--Section 409(a)(7)(B)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)(B)(i)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                                    ``(V) Counting of spending on non-
                                eligible families to prevent and reduce 
                                incidence of out-of-wedlock births, 
                                encourage formation and maintenance of 
                                healthy 2-parent married families, or 
                                encourage responsible fatherhood.--
                                Subject to subclauses (II) and (III), 
                                the term `qualified State expenditures' 
                                includes the total expenditures by the 
                                State during the fiscal year under all 
                                State programs for a purpose described 
                                in paragraph (3) or (4) of section 
                                401(a).''.
    (d) Purposes.--Section 401(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 601(a)(4)) is amended by striking ``two-parent families'' and 
inserting ``healthy 2-parent married families, and encourage 
responsible fatherhood''.

SEC. 102. RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROGRAM.

    (a) Responsible Fatherhood Program.--
            (1) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
                    (A) Nearly 24,000,000 children in the United 
                States, or 34 percent of all such children, live apart 
                from their biological father.
                    (B) Sixty percent of couples who divorce have at 
                least 1 child.
                    (C) The number of children living with only a 
                mother increased from just over 5,000,000 in 1960 to 
                17,000,000 in 1999, and between 1981 and 1991 the 
                percentage of children living with only 1 parent 
                increased from 19 percent to 25 percent.
                    (D) Forty percent of children who live in 
                households without a father have not seen their father 
                in at least 1 year and 50 percent of such children have 
                never visited their father's home.
                    (E) The most important factor in a child's 
                upbringing is whether the child is brought up in a 
                loving, healthy, supportive environment.
                    (F) Children who live without contact with their 
                biological father are, in comparison to children who 
                have such contact--
                            (i) 5 times more likely to live in poverty;
                            (ii) more likely to bring weapons and drugs 
                        into the classroom;
                            (iii) twice as likely to commit crime;
                            (iv) twice as likely to drop out of school;
                            (v) more likely to commit suicide;
                            (vi) more than twice as likely to abuse 
                        alcohol or drugs; and
                            (vii) more likely to become pregnant as 
                        teenagers.
                    (G) Violent criminals are overwhelmingly males who 
                grew up without fathers.
                    (H) Between 20 and 30 percent of families in 
                poverty are headed by women who have suffered domestic 
                violence during the past year, and between 40 and 60 
                percent of women with children receiving welfare were 
                abused sometime during their life.
                    (I) Responsible fatherhood includes active 
                participation in financial support and child care, as 
                well as the formation and maintenance of a positive, 
                healthy, and nonviolent relationship between father and 
                child and a cooperative relationship between parents.
                    (J) States should be encouraged to implement 
                programs that provide support for responsible 
                fatherhood, promote marriage, and increase the 
                incidence of marriage, and should not be restricted 
                from implementing such programs.
                    (K) Fatherhood programs should promote and provide 
                support services for--
                            (i) loving and healthy relationships 
                        between parents and children; and
                            (ii) cooperative parenting.
                    (L) There is a social need to reconnect children 
                and fathers.
                    (M) The promotion of responsible fatherhood and 
                encouragement of healthy 2-parent married families 
                should not--
                            (i) denigrate the standing or parenting 
                        efforts of single mothers or other caregivers;
                            (ii) lessen the protection of children from 
                        abusive parents; or
                            (iii) compromise the safety or health of 
                        the custodial parent;
                but should increase the chance that children will have 
                2 caring parents to help them grow up healthy and 
                secure.
                    (N) The promotion of responsible fatherhood must 
                always recognize and promote the values of nonviolence.
                    (O) For the future of the United States and the 
                future of our children, Congress, States, and local 
                communities should assist parents to become more 
                actively involved in their children's lives.
                    (P) Child support is an important means by which a 
                parent can take financial responsibility for a child 
                and emotional support is an important means by which a 
                parent can take social responsibility for a child.
            (2) Fatherhood program.--Title I of the Personal 
        Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 
        (Public Law 104-193) is amended by adding at the end the 
        following:

``SEC. 117. FATHERHOOD PROGRAM.

    ``(a) In General.--Title IV (42 U.S.C. 601-679b) is amended by 
inserting after part B the following:

               ```PART C--RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROGRAM

 ```SEC. 441. RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD GRANTS.

    ```(a) Grants to States To Conduct Demonstration Programs.--
            ```(1) Authority to award grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--The Secretary shall award 
                grants to up to 20 eligible States to conduct 
                demonstration programs to carry out the purposes 
                described in paragraph (2).
                    ```(B) Eligible state.--For purposes of this 
                subsection, an eligible State is a State that submits 
                to the Secretary the following:
                            ```(i) Application.--An application for a 
                        grant under this subsection, at such time, in 
                        such manner, and containing such information as 
                        the Secretary may require.
                            ```(ii) State plan.--A State plan that 
                        includes the following:
                                    ```(I) Project description.--A 
                                description of the programs or 
                                activities the State will fund under 
                                the grant, including a good faith 
                                estimate of the number and 
                                characteristics of clients to be served 
                                under such projects and how the State 
                                intends to achieve at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in paragraph (2).
                                    ```(II) Coordination efforts.--A 
                                description of how the State will 
                                coordinate and cooperate with State and 
                                local entities responsible for carrying 
                                out other programs that relate to the 
                                purposes intended to be achieved under 
                                the demonstration program, including as 
                                appropriate, entities responsible for 
                                carrying out jobs programs and programs 
                                serving children and families.
                                    ```(III) Records, reports, and 
                                audits.--An agreement to maintain such 
                                records, submit such reports, and 
                                cooperate with such reviews and audits 
                                as the Secretary finds necessary for 
                                purposes of oversight of the 
                                demonstration program.
                            ```(iii) Certifications.--The following 
                        certifications from the chief executive officer 
                        of the State:
                                    ```(I) A certification that the 
                                State will use funds provided under the 
                                grant to promote at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in paragraph (2).
                                    ```(II) A certification that the 
                                State will return any unused funds 
to the Secretary in accordance with the reconciliation process under 
paragraph (5).
                                    ```(III) A certification that the 
                                funds provided under the grant will be 
                                used for programs and activities that 
                                target low-income participants and that 
                                not less than 50 percent of the 
                                participants in each program or 
                                activity funded under the grant shall 
                                be--
                                            ```(aa) parents of a child 
                                        who is, or within the past 24 
                                        months has been, a recipient of 
                                        assistance or services under a 
                                        State program funded under part 
                                        A, D, or E of this title, title 
                                        XIX, or the Food Stamp Act of 
                                        1977; or
                                            ```(bb) parents, including 
                                        an expectant parent or a 
                                        married parent, whose income 
                                        (after adjustment for court-
                                        ordered child support paid or 
                                        received) does not exceed 150 
                                        percent of the poverty line.
                                    ```(IV) A certification that the 
                                State has or will comply with the 
                                requirements of paragraph (4).
                                    ```(V) A certification that funds 
                                provided to a State under this 
                                subsection shall not be used to 
                                supplement or supplant other Federal, 
                                State, or local funds that are used to 
                                support programs or activities that are 
                                related to the purposes described in 
                                paragraph (2).
                    ```(C) Preferences and factors of consideration.--
                In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary 
                shall take into consideration the following:
                            ```(i) Diversity of entities used to 
                        conduct programs and activities.--The Secretary 
                        shall, to the extent practicable, achieve a 
                        balance among the eligible States awarded 
                        grants under this subsection with respect to 
                        the size, urban or rural location, and 
                        employment of differing or unique methods of 
                        the entities that the eligible States intend to 
                        use to conduct the programs and activities 
                        funded under the grants.
                            ```(ii) Priority for certain states.--The 
                        Secretary shall give priority to awarding 
                        grants to eligible States that have--
                                    ```(I) demonstrated progress in 
                                achieving at least 1 of the purposes 
                                described in paragraph (2) through 
                                previous State initiatives; or
                                    ```(II) demonstrated need with 
                                respect to reducing the incidence of 
                                out-of-wedlock births or absent fathers 
                                in the State.
            ```(2) Purposes.--The purposes described in this paragraph 
        are the following:
                    ```(A) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                marriage promotion.--To promote marriage or sustain 
                marriage through activities such as counseling, 
                mentoring, disseminating information about the benefits 
                of marriage and 2-parent involvement for children, 
                enhancing relationship skills, education regarding how 
                to control aggressive behavior, disseminating 
                information on the causes of domestic violence and 
                child abuse, marriage preparation programs, premarital 
                counseling, marital inventories, skills-based marriage 
                education, financial planning seminars, including 
                improving a family's ability to effectively manage 
                family business affairs by means such as education, 
                counseling, or mentoring on matters related to family 
                finances, including household management, budgeting, 
                banking, and handling of financial transactions and 
                home maintenance, and divorce education and reduction 
                programs, including mediation and counseling.
                    ```(B) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                parenting promotion.--To promote responsible parenting 
                through activities such as counseling, mentoring, and 
                mediation, disseminating information about good 
                parenting practices, skills-based parenting education, 
                encouraging child support payments, and other methods.
                    ```(C) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                fostering economic stability of fathers.--To foster 
                economic stability by helping fathers improve their 
                economic status by providing activities such as work 
                first services, job search, job training, subsidized 
                employment, job retention, job enhancement, and 
                encouraging education, including career-advancing 
                education, dissemination of employment materials, 
                coordination with existing employment services such as 
                welfare-to-work programs, referrals to local employment 
                training initiatives, and other methods.
            ```(3) Restriction on use of funds.--No funds provided 
        under this subsection may be used for costs attributable to 
        court proceedings regarding matters of child visitation or 
        custody, or for legislative advocacy.
            ```(4) Requirements for receipt of funds.--A State may not 
        be awarded a grant under this section unless the State, as a 
        condition of receiving funds under such a grant--
                    ```(A) consults with experts in domestic violence 
                or with relevant community domestic violence coalitions 
                in developing such programs or activities; and
                    ```(B) describes in the application for a grant 
                under this section--
                            ```(i) how the programs or activities 
                        proposed to be conducted will address, 
as appropriate, issues of domestic violence; and
                            ```(ii) what the State will do, to the 
                        extent relevant, to ensure that participation 
                        in such programs or activities is voluntary, 
                        and to inform potential participants that their 
                        involvement is voluntary.
            ```(5) Reconciliation process.--
                    ```(A) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--
                Each eligible State that receives a grant under this 
                subsection for a fiscal year shall return to the 
                Secretary any unused portion of the grant for such 
                fiscal year not later than the last day of the second 
                succeeding fiscal year, together with any earnings on 
                such unused portion.
                    ```(B) Procedure for redistribution.--The Secretary 
                shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
                redistributing to eligible States that have expended 
                the entire amount of a grant made under this subsection 
                for a fiscal year any amount that is returned to the 
                Secretary by eligible States under subparagraph (A).
            ```(6) Amount of grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), 
                the amount of each grant awarded under this subsection 
                shall be an amount sufficient to implement the State 
                plan submitted under paragraph (1)(B)(ii).
                    ```(B) Minimum amounts.--No eligible State shall--
                            ```(i) in the case of the District of 
                        Columbia or a State other than the Commonwealth 
                        of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin 
                        Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the 
                        Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 
                        receive a grant for a fiscal year in an amount 
                        that is less than $1,000,000; and
                            ```(ii) in the case of the Commonwealth of 
                        Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, 
                        Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of 
                        the Northern Mariana Islands, receive a grant 
                        for a fiscal year in an amount that is less 
                        than $500,000.
            ```(7) Definition of state.--In this subsection, the term 
        ``State'' means each of the 50 States, the District of 
        Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States 
        Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of 
        the Northern Mariana Islands.
            ```(8) Authorization of appropriations.--Out of any money 
        in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
        appropriated, there are appropriated $45,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for purposes of making grants to 
        eligible States under this subsection.
    ```(b) Grants to Eligible Entities To Conduct Demonstration 
Programs.--
            ```(1) Authority to award grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--The Secretary shall award 
                grants to eligible entities to conduct demonstration 
                programs to carry out the purposes described in 
                subsection (a)(2).
                    ```(B) Eligible entity.--For purposes of this 
                subsection, an eligible entity is a local government, 
                local public agency, community-based or nonprofit 
                organization, or private entity, including any 
                charitable or faith-based organization, or an Indian 
                tribe (as defined in section 419(4)), that submits to 
                the Secretary the following:
                            ```(i) Application.--An application for a 
                        grant under this subsection, at such time, in 
                        such manner, and containing such information as 
                        the Secretary may require.
                            ```(ii) Project description.--A description 
                        of the programs or activities the entity 
                        intends to carry out with funds provided under 
                        the grant, including a good faith estimate of 
                        the number and characteristics of clients to be 
                        served under such programs or activities and 
                        how the entity intends to achieve at least 2 of 
                        the purposes described in subsection (a)(2).
                            ```(iii) Coordination efforts.--A 
                        description of how the entity will coordinate 
                        and cooperate with State and local entities 
                        responsible for carrying out other programs 
                        that relate to the purposes intended to be 
                        achieved under the demonstration program, 
                        including as appropriate, entities responsible 
                        for carrying out jobs programs and programs 
                        serving children and families.
                            ```(iv) Records, reports, and audits.--An 
                        agreement to maintain such records, submit such 
                        reports, and cooperate with such reviews and 
                        audits as the Secretary finds necessary for 
                        purposes of oversight of the demonstration 
                        program.
                            ```(v) Certifications.--The following 
                        certifications:
                                    ```(I) A certification that the 
                                entity will use funds provided under 
                                the grant to promote at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in subsection 
                                (a)(2).
                                    ```(II) A certification that the 
                                entity will return any unused funds to 
                                the Secretary in accordance with the 
                                reconciliation process under paragraph 
                                (3).
                                    ```(III) A certification that the 
                                funds provided under the grant will be 
                                used for programs and activities that 
                                target low-income participants and that 
                                not less than 50 percent of the 
                                participants in each program or 
                                activity funded under the grant shall 
                                be--
                                            ```(aa) parents of a child 
                                        who is, or within the past 
24 months has been, a recipient of assistance or services under a State 
program funded under part A, D, or E of this title, title XIX, or the 
Food Stamp Act of 1977; or
                                            ```(bb) parents, including 
                                        an expectant parent or a 
                                        married parent, whose income 
                                        (after adjustment for court-
                                        ordered child support paid or 
                                        received) does not exceed 150 
                                        percent of the poverty line.
                                    ```(IV) A certification that the 
                                entity has or will comply with the 
                                requirements of paragraph (3).
                                    ```(V) A certification that funds 
                                provided to an entity under this 
                                subsection shall not be used to 
                                supplement or supplant other Federal, 
                                State, or local funds provided to the 
                                entity that are used to support 
                                programs or activities that are related 
                                to the purposes described in subsection 
                                (a)(2).
                    ```(C) Preferences and factors of consideration.--
                In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary 
                shall, to the extent practicable, achieve a balance 
                among the eligible entities awarded grants under this 
                subsection with respect to the size, urban or rural 
                location, and employment of differing or unique methods 
                of the entities.
            ```(2) Restriction on use of funds.--No funds provided 
        under this subsection may be used for costs attributable to 
        court proceedings regarding matters of child visitation or 
        custody, or for legislative advocacy.
            ```(3) Requirements for use of funds.--The Secretary may 
        not award a grant under this subsection to an eligible entity 
        unless the entity, as a condition of receiving funds under such 
        a grant--
                    ```(A) consults with experts in domestic violence 
                or with relevant community domestic violence coalitions 
                in developing the programs or activities to be 
                conducted with such funds awarded under the grant; and
                    ```(B) describes in the application for a grant 
                under this section--
                            ```(i) how the programs or activities 
                        proposed to be conducted will address, as 
                        appropriate, issues of domestic violence; and
                            ```(ii) what the entity will do, to the 
                        extent relevant, to ensure that participation 
                        in such programs or activities is voluntary, 
                        and to inform potential participants that their 
                        involvement is voluntary.
            ```(4) Reconciliation process.--
                    ```(A) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--
                Each eligible entity that receives a grant under this 
                subsection for a fiscal year shall return to the 
                Secretary any unused portion of the grant for such 
                fiscal year not later than the last day of the second 
                succeeding fiscal year, together with any earnings on 
                such unused portion.
                    ```(B) Procedure for redistribution.--The Secretary 
                shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
                redistributing to eligible entities that have expended 
                the entire amount of a grant made under this subsection 
                for a fiscal year any amount that is returned to the 
                Secretary by eligible entities under subparagraph (A).
            ```(5) Authorization of appropriations.--Out of any money 
        in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
        appropriated, there are appropriated $30,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for purposes of making grants to 
        eligible entities under this subsection.

```SEC. 442. NATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD 
              PROGRAMS.

    ```(a) Media Campaign National Clearinghouse for Responsible 
Fatherhood.--
            ```(1) In general.--From any funds appropriated under 
        subsection (c), the Secretary shall contract with a nationally 
        recognized, nonprofit fatherhood promotion organization 
        described in subsection (b) to--
                    ```(A) develop, promote, and distribute to 
                interested States, local governments, public agencies, 
                and private entities a media campaign that encourages 
                the appropriate involvement of parents in the life of 
                any child, with a priority for programs that 
                specifically address the issue of responsible 
                fatherhood; and
                    ```(B) develop a national clearinghouse to assist 
                States and communities in efforts to promote and 
                support marriage and responsible fatherhood by 
                collecting, evaluating, and making available (through 
                the Internet and by other means) to other States 
                information regarding the media campaigns established 
                under section 443.
            ```(2) Coordination with domestic violence programs.--The 
        Secretary shall ensure that the nationally recognized nonprofit 
        fatherhood promotion organization with a contract under 
        paragraph (1) coordinates the media campaign developed under 
        subparagraph (A) of such paragraph and the national 
        clearinghouse developed under subparagraph (B) of such 
        paragraph with national, State, or local domestic violence 
        programs.
    ```(b) Nationally Recognized, Nonprofit Fatherhood Promotion 
Organization Described.--The nationally recognized, nonprofit 
fatherhood promotion organization described in this subsection is an 
organization that has at least 4 years of experience in--
            ```(1) designing and disseminating a national public 
        education campaign, as evidenced by the production and 
        successful placement of television, radio, and print public 
service announcements that promote the importance of responsible 
fatherhood, a track record of service to Spanish-speaking populations 
and historically underserved or minority populations, the capacity to 
fulfill requests for information and a proven history of fulfilling 
such requests, and a mechanism through which the public can request 
additional information about the campaign; and
            ```(2) providing consultation and training to community-
        based organizations interested in implementing fatherhood 
        outreach, support, or skill development programs with an 
        emphasis on promoting married fatherhood as the ideal.
    ```(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are 
appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 to 
carry out this section.

```SEC. 443. BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES TO ENCOURAGE MEDIA CAMPAIGNS.

    ```(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ```(1) Broadcast advertisement.--The term ``broadcast 
        advertisement'' means a communication intended to be aired by a 
        television or radio broadcast station, including a 
        communication intended to be transmitted through a cable 
        channel.
            ```(2) Child at risk.--The term ``child at risk'' means 
        each young child whose family income does not exceed the 
        poverty line.
            ```(3) Poverty line.--The term ``poverty line'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community 
        Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any 
        revision required by such section, that is applicable to a 
        family of the size involved.
            ```(4) Printed or other advertisement.--The term ``printed 
        or other advertisement'' includes any communication intended to 
        be distributed through a newspaper, magazine, outdoor 
        advertising facility, mailing, or any other type of general 
        public advertising, but does not include any broadcast 
        advertisement.
            ```(5) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the 50 
        States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 
        Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, 
        and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
            ```(6) Young child.--The term ``young child'' means an 
        individual under age 5.
    ```(b) State Certifications.--Not later than October 1 of each of 
fiscal year for which a State desires to receive an allotment under 
this section, the chief executive officer of the State shall submit to 
the Secretary a certification that the State shall--
            ```(1) use such funds to promote the formation and 
        maintenance of healthy 2-parent married families, strengthen 
        fragile families, and promote responsible fatherhood through 
        media campaigns conducted in accordance with the requirements 
        of subsection (d);
            ```(2) return any unused funds to the Secretary in 
        accordance with the reconciliation process under subsection 
        (e); and
            ```(3) comply with the reporting requirements under 
        subsection (f).
    ```(c) Payments to States.--For each of fiscal years 2005 through 
2006, the Secretary shall pay to each State that submits a 
certification under subsection (b), from any funds appropriated under 
subsection (i), for the fiscal year an amount equal to the amount of 
the allotment determined for the fiscal year under subsection (g).
    ```(d) Establishment of Media Campaigns.--Each State receiving an 
allotment under this section for a fiscal year shall use the allotment 
to conduct media campaigns as follows:
            ```(1) Conduct of media campaigns.--
                    ```(A) Radio and television media campaigns.--
                            ```(i) Production of broadcast 
                        advertisements.--At the option of the State, to 
                        produce broadcast advertisements that promote 
                        the formation and maintenance of healthy 2-
                        parent married families, strengthen fragile 
                        families, and promote responsible fatherhood.
                            ```(ii) Airtime challenge program.--At the 
                        option of the State, to establish an airtime 
                        challenge program under which the State may 
                        spend amounts allotted under this section to 
                        purchase time from a broadcast station to air a 
                        broadcast advertisement produced under clause 
                        (i), but only if the State obtains an amount of 
                        time of the same class and during a comparable 
                        period to air the advertisement using non-
                        Federal contributions.
                    ```(B) Other media campaigns.--At the option of the 
                State, to conduct a media campaign that consists of the 
                production and distribution of printed or other 
                advertisements that promote the formation and 
                maintenance of healthy 2-parent married families, 
                strengthen fragile families, and promote responsible 
                fatherhood.
            ```(2) Administration of media campaigns.--A State may 
        administer media campaigns funded under this section directly 
        or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements with 
        public agencies, local governments, or private entities, 
        including charitable and faith-based organizations.
            ```(3) Consultation with domestic violence assistance 
        centers.--In developing broadcast and printed advertisements to 
        be used in the media campaigns conducted under paragraph (1), 
        the State or other entity administering the campaign shall 
        consult with representatives of State and local domestic 
        violence centers.
            ```(4) Non-federal contributions.--In this section, the 
        term ``non-Federal contributions'' includes contributions by 
        the State and by public and private entities. Such 
        contributions may be in cash or in kind. Such term does not 
        include any amounts provided by the Federal Government, or 
        services assisted or subsidized to any significant extent by 
        the Federal Government, or any amount expended by a State 
        before October 1, 2004.
    ```(e) Reconciliation Process.--
            ```(1) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--Each State 
        that receives an allotment under this section shall return to 
        the Secretary any unused portion of the amount allotted to a 
        State for a fiscal year not later than the last day of the 
        second succeeding fiscal year together with any earnings on 
        such unused portion.
            ```(2) Procedure for redistribution of unused allotments.--
        The Secretary shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
        redistributing to States that have expended the entire amount 
        allotted under this section any amount that is--
                    ```(A) returned to the Secretary by States under 
                paragraph (1); or
                    ```(B) not allotted to a State under this section 
                because the State did not submit a certification under 
                subsection (b) by October 1 of a fiscal year.
    ```(f) Reporting Requirements.--
            ```(1) Monitoring and evaluation.--Each State receiving an 
        allotment under this section for a fiscal year shall monitor 
and evaluate the media campaigns conducted using funds made available 
under this section in such manner as the Secretary, in consultation 
with the States, determines appropriate.
            ```(2) Annual reports.--Not less frequently than annually, 
        each State receiving an allotment under this section for a 
        fiscal year shall submit to the Secretary reports on the media 
        campaigns conducted using funds made available under this 
        section at such time, in such manner, and containing such 
        information as the Secretary may require.
    ```(g) Amount of Allotments.--
            ```(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), of 
        the amount appropriated for the purpose of making allotments 
        under this section for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall allot 
        to each State that submits a certification under subsection (b) 
        for the fiscal year an amount equal to the sum of--
                    ```(A) the amount that bears the same ratio to 50 
                percent of such funds as the number of young children 
                in the State (as determined by the Secretary based on 
                the most current reliable data available) bears to the 
                number of such children in all States; and
                    ```(B) the amount that bears the same ratio to 50 
                percent of such funds as the number of children at risk 
                in the State (as determined by the Secretary based on 
                the most current reliable data available) bears to the 
                number of such children in all States.
            ```(2) Minimum allotments.--No allotment for a fiscal year 
        under this section shall be less than--
                    ```(A) in the case of the District of Columbia or a 
                State other than the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 
                United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and 
                the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 1 
                percent of the amount appropriated for the fiscal year 
                under subsection (i); and
                    ```(B) in the case of the Commonwealth of Puerto 
                Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American 
                Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
                Islands, 0.5 percent of such amount.
            ```(3) Pro rata reductions.--The Secretary shall make such 
        pro rata reductions to the allotments determined under this 
        subsection as are necessary to comply with the requirements of 
        paragraph (2).
    ```(h) Evaluation.--
            ```(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct an 
        evaluation of the impact of the media campaigns funded under 
        this section.
            ```(2) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2006, the 
        Secretary shall report to Congress the results of the 
        evaluation under paragraph (1).
            ```(3) Funding.--Of the amount appropriated under 
        subsection (i) for fiscal year 2005, $1,000,000 of such amount 
        shall be transferred and made available for purposes of 
        conducting the evaluation required under this subsection, and 
        shall remain available until expended.
    ```(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--Out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are 
appropriated $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for 
purposes of making allotments to States under this section.'.
    ``(b) Inapplicability of Effective Date Provisions.--Section 116 
shall not apply to the amendment made by subsection (a) of this 
section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--Section 2 of such Act is amended in the 
table of contents by inserting after the item relating to section 116 
the following new item:

``Sec. 117. Responsible fatherhood program.''.

SEC. 103. RESEARCH, EVALUATIONS, AND NATIONAL STUDIES.

    Section 413 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 613) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Funding for Research, Demonstrations, and Technical 
Assistance.--
            ``(1) Appropriation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Out of any money in the Treasury 
                of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there 
                are appropriated $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2005 through 2006, which shall remain available to the 
                Secretary until expended.
                    ``(B) Use of funds.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) shall be used for the purpose 
                        of--
                                    ``(I) conducting or supporting 
                                research and demonstration projects by 
                                public or private entities; or
                                    ``(II) providing technical 
                                assistance in connection with a purpose 
                                of the program funded under this part, 
                                as described in section 401(a), to 
                                States, Indian tribal organizations, 
                                sub-State entities, and such other 
                                entities as the Secretary may specify.
                            ``(ii) Requirement.--Not less than 80 
                        percent of the funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year shall be 
                        expended for the purpose of conducting or 
                        supporting research and demonstration projects, 
                        or for providing technical assistance, in 
                        connection with activities described in section 
                        403(a)(2)(B). Funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) and expended in accordance 
                        with this clause shall be in addition to any 
                        other funds made available under this part for 
                        activities described in section 403(a)(2)(B).
            ``(2) Secretary's authority.--The Secretary may conduct 
        activities authorized by this subsection directly or through 
        grants, contracts, or interagency agreements with public or 
        private entities.
            ``(3) Requirement for use of funds.--The Secretary shall 
        not pay any funds appropriated under paragraph (1)(A) to an 
        entity for the purpose of conducting or supporting research and 
demonstration projects involving activities described in section 
403(a)(2)(B) unless the entity complies with the requirements of 
section 403(a)(2)(E).''.

SEC. 104. RESCISSION OF HIGH PERFORMANCE BONUS AND BONUS TO REWARD 
              DECREASE IN ILLEGITIMACY RATIO.

    (a) Rescission.--With respect to the amounts appropriated under 
paragraphs (2)(D) and (4)(F) of section 403(a) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)), the amounts remaining available for obligation 
for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2004 are rescinded.
    (b) Budget Scoring.--Notwithstanding section 257(b)(2) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
907(b)(2)), the baseline shall assume that no bonus grants shall be 
made under section 403(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
603(a)(2)) (relating to bonuses to reward decreases in the illegitimacy 
ratio) or under section 403(a)(4) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(4)) 
(relating to high performance bonuses) after fiscal year 2004.
    (c) Application of Budget Savings.--Budget savings resulting from 
the application of subsections (a) and (b) shall be applied to offset 
the costs of making healthy marriage promotion grants under section 
403(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (as amended by section 101(b) of 
this Act), funding research, demonstrations, and technical assistance 
under section 413(k) of the Social Security Act (as added by section 
103 of this Act), and carrying out the responsible fatherhood program 
under part C of title IV of the Social Security Act (as added by 
section 102(a)(2) of this Act).

            TITLE II--EXTENSION OF TANF AND RELATED PROGRAMS

SEC. 201. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 
              BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH MARCH 31, 2005.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, other than the activities authorized by sections 
403(a)(2) and 413(k) of such Act (as amended by sections 101(b) and 
103, respectively, of this Act), and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 
of such Act, shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2002, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) 
of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 
not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made 
pursuant to this authority through the second quarter of fiscal year 
2005 at the level provided for such activities through the second 
quarter of fiscal year 2002. Activities authorized by sections 
403(a)(2) and 413(k) of the Social Security Act (as so amended), and by 
part C of title IV of such Act (as added by section 102(a)(2) of this 
Act)), shall continue through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 in 
accordance with the amendments made by sections 101(b), 102(a)(2), and 
103, respectively, of this Act.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2004'' and inserting ``March 31, 2005''.

SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD 
              WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH 
              SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2002, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the second 
quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided for such activities 
through the second quarter of fiscal year 2002.




                                                       Calendar No. 714

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2830

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 23, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

GRANTS TO THE STATES FOR ACCESS AND VISITATION PROGRAMS| 42 U.S.C. SECTION 669(b)


RE-POST, RE-POST, RE-POST

TITLE 42 – THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE
CHAPTER 7 – SOCIAL SECURITY
SUBCHAPTER IV – GRANTS TO STATES FOR AID AND SERVICES TO NEEDY
FAMILIES WITH CHILDREN AND FOR CHILD-WELFARE SERVICES
Part D – Child Support and Establishment of Paternity

Sec. 669b. Grants to States for access and visitation programs

STATUTE:

(a) In general
The Administration for Children and Families shall make grants
under this section to enable States to establish and administer
programs to support and facilitate noncustodial parents’ access to
and visitation of their children, by means of activities including
mediation (both voluntary and mandatory), counseling, education,
development of parenting plans, visitation enforcement (including
monitoring, supervision and neutral drop-off and pickup), and
development of guidelines for visitation and alternative custody
arrangements.

(b) Amount of grant
The amount of the grant to be made to a State under this section
for a fiscal year shall be an amount equal to the lesser of –

(1) 90 percent of State expenditures during the fiscal year for
activities described in subsection (a) of this section; or

(2) the allotment of the State under subsection (c) of this
section for the fiscal year.

(c) Allotments to States

(1) In general
The allotment of a State for a fiscal year is the amount that
bears the same ratio to $10,000,000 for grants under this section
for the fiscal year as the number of children in the State living
with only 1 biological parent bears to the total number of such
children in all States.

(2) Minimum allotment
The Administration for Children and Families shall adjust
allotments to States under paragraph (1) as necessary to ensure
that no State is allotted less than –

(A) $50,000 for fiscal year 1997 or 1998; or

(B) $100,000 for any succeeding fiscal year.

(d) No supplantation of State expenditures for similar activities
A State to which a grant is made under this section may not use
the grant to supplant expenditures by the State for activities
specified in subsection (a) of this section, but shall use the
grant to supplement such expenditures at a level at least equal to
the level of such expenditures for fiscal year 1995.

(e) State administration
Each State to which a grant is made under this section –

(1) may administer State programs funded with the grant,
directly or through grants to or contracts with courts, local
public agencies, or nonprofit private entities;

(2) shall not be required to operate such programs on a
statewide basis; and

(3) shall monitor, evaluate, and report on such programs in
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.

Source: US HOUSE REP (1/2001)

 

 

 

 

Criminal Enterprise in Harris County (Houston, Texas)


Proof that the Harris County Family and Juvenile Court Judges and PUBLIC SERVANTS, attorneys, court-appointed attorneys and guardian ad-litem for children, clerks, commissioners, prosecutors, police, sheriff’s department, constables, mental health professionals, self-professed child-savers, counselors, safe access and visitation personnel are all in bed together

Exhibit A

HARRIS COUNTY CPS COLLABORATIVE REPORT

 

 

Exhibit B

http://www.hcjpd.org/annual_reports/2011.pdf

Harris County Juvenile Probation Department (Note Key “Stakeholders” and Picture of Judge Lisa Millard of the 310th Court, Not Pictured, but Associate Judge of the 313th Juvenile Court is Stephen Newhouse, former court-appointed amicus for child)

 

 

ARIZONA Battered-Mothers-Testimony-Project-Report


Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project: A Human Rights Approach to Child Custody and Domestic Violence, Arizona Coalition

AZ-Battered-Mothers-Testimony-Project-Report

Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project
2000 – 2004
Directors: Monica Ghosh Driggers, J.D., Carrie Cuthbert, Kim Slote
Funders: The Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project is currently or has been funded in the past by the following institutions: Ford Foundation, Wellesley Centers for Women, Shaler Adams Foundation, Ms. Foundation for Women, Oak Foundation, Claneil Foundation, Harold S. Benenson Memorial Research Fund, Howell Family Charitable Foundation, Tiny Tiger Foundation, Dickler Family Foundation, Mary Joe Gaw Frug Memorial Fund, and Lovett-Woodsum Family Foundation.

Begun in 1999, the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project is the current focus of WRN’s work. This statewide project combines human rights fact-finding, qualitative research, advocacy, and community organizing to document and address the injustices inflicted on battered mothers and their children during family court child custody and visitation litigation.
To our knowledge, the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project is the first human rights initiative to address child custody and domestic violence issues.
The Need for the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project: The 1980’s and 90’s brought a giant leap forward in the ability of battered women to get to long-term safety. Improvements in law enforcement and public awareness, and the expansion of battered women’s services, mean that a battered woman in the year 2003 has a far better chance than she did 20 years ago to protect her rights and regain control over her life. However, much of the progress has not reached the lives of battered women with children, especially where the batterer is the father. Millions of battered women with children find the path to safety and freedom extraordinarily difficult – or impossible – because of the continued ability of the batterer to control and intimidate them through their children, often through family court litigation.
Family courts frequently become an unwitting arm of the batterer, violating the human rights of battered mothers and their children in tragic ways. For example, battered mothers’ and their children’s human rights to freedom from violence and equal protection of the law are violated daily by courts that award batterers custody of the children or unsupervised visitation with them, even where there are outstanding allegations of child abuse. At the same time, battered mothers suffer a range of violations of their economic human rights by a court system that allows batterers to destroy them financially through years of costly litigation, and by a society in which systemic economic inequality between men and women denies many battered mothers access to the affordable, quality legal representation they need. This systemic mistreatment of battered women and their children has received little public attention relative to other intimate partner abuse issues, and is arguably the area in which the U.S. battered women’s movement has made the least progress.
These issues dovetail with an overall bias against mothers in child custody and visitation litigation, documented by the Gender Bias Study commissioned by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts in 1989. The Gender Bias Study found that “mothers are held to a higher standard than fathers and that interests of fathers are given more weight than the interests of mothers and children.” This finding directly contradicts the popular misconception that if gender bias does exist in child custody cases, it is in favor of mothers. Moreover, the Study found that “[s]hared legal custody is being ordered…even when there is a history of spouse abuse” and that “in determining custody and visitation, many judges and family service officers do not consider violence towards women relevant.” Still, no serious steps have been taken by the Massachusetts court system to redress the serious bias revealed by the Gender Bias Study, even though it was the court’s own commission that exposed the problem. It is our contention that these state practices – both actions and failure to act – violate the human rights of battered mothers and their children to bodily integrity, security of person, equal protection of the law, non-discrimination freedom from torture, an adequate standard of living, the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, and other rights as guaranteed under international human rights law.
A project is urgently needed that can document to the public that such abuses are widespread rather than being isolated incidents, that can demonstrate the wide-ranging impacts of these abuses on the lives of women and children, and that can propose and organize to achieve the necessary remedies. Such a project is also needed to give voice to the women who have suffered these abuses, most of whom are isolated by trauma and exhaustion, and are silenced by the fear that the court will retaliate against them and their children if they publicize their experiences. Moreover, this kind of project should be able to serve as the vehicle for organizing grassroots opposition to current state practices towards battered mothers, and for countering the increasing success of right-wing fathers’ rights groups, which focus largely on protecting fathers accused of domestic violence or sexual abuse.
About the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project: Begun in 1999, the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project seeks to assess whether the Massachusetts family court system is acting in accordance with internationally accepted human rights standards and norms in selected cases and to identify and promote the changes necessary to ensure that the family courts meet their human rights obligations.
Broadly speaking, the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project seeks to create a model for the successful application of the international human rights framework in the United States in ways that simultaneously strengthen the work of the global human rights movement.
The Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project is led by a 6-person Steering Committee, a statewide team of 26 volunteer, community-based battered women’s advocates, and a 16-person Advisory Board.
The project is a multi-year effort with four distinct stages:
1. Documentation and research (2000 – 2002). Our human rights documentation and research included taking the in-depth testimonies of 40 battered mothers who experienced family court litigation in 11 of the 14 counties in Massachusetts. In addition, we
a. completed a written survey of 31 advocates working at programs serving battered women and/or children throughout the state;
b. held five focus groups with Massachusetts-based advocates for battered women and children as well as survivors of partner abuse; and
c. conducted interviews with Massachusetts family court judges, probate probation officers, guardians ad litem, court-appointed psychological evaluators, Department of Social Services workers, a representative of the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, and a representative of the Massachusetts Division of Professional Licensure.
2. Human rights tribunal on domestic violence and child custody (May 9, 2002). In honor of Mother’s Day 2002, we launched the BMTP’s public awareness-raising and call to action phase by holding a Human Rights Tribunal on Domestic Violence & Child Custody at the Massachusetts State House. To our knowledge, ours was the first popular human rights tribunal in the world to address domestic violence and child custody issues. The Tribunal focused on the public testimonies of five battered mothers and the responses of four invited speakers from the fields of child advocacy, human rights, and community activism/local government. An 11-minute video about the tribunal can be purchased from the publications office.
3. Battered Mothers Speak Out: A Human Rights Report on Domestic Violence and Child Custody in the Massachusetts Family Courts (November 25, 2002). On November 25, 2002, WRN held a press conference at the Women’s Educational and Industrial Union in Boston, MA, to announce the release of Battered Mothers Speak Out: A Human Rights Report on Domestic Violence and Child Custody in the Massachusetts Family Courts. November 25 was chosen as the date for the press conference because it is International Day Against Violence Against Women and also marks the beginning of an annual global campaign for women’s human rights entitled “The 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence.”
4. Community education and organizing for positive change in the family courts (ongoing). WRN is initiating a number of public education and action events in Massachusetts and nationwide to continue to demand that family courts be reformed in ways that protect the human rights of battered mothers and their children.
Together, the above components of the Battered Mothers’ Testimony Project are designed to:
1. Expose specific problems with the state’s handling of child custody and visitation in situations where the mother is or has been abused by the father.
2. Document the specific harm to women and children involved in domestic violence custody and visitation cases.
3. Serve as a vehicle for public education about and increased media attention to the issues.
4. Give advocates and survivors new skills and opportunities to engage in human rights-directed social change work that will build the foundation for a comprehensive women’s human rights movement in Massachusetts.
5. Serve as a national model for human rights reports on women’s issues in the United States.
6. Bring international attention and visibility to the issues.
Related People:
Monica Ghosh Driggers, J.D.

How Harris and Brazoria County Judges, Attorneys, Coppers, Social Workers, and a Private “Play Therapist” Neglected to “Protect” “Best Interests” of natural, Sovereign woman/”Mother” and her Property/”child” from 2007 to 2012


False Imprisonment.Dec.02.2007.Page 1 of 2

JUSTICE.WALL OF SHAME.NJCOURTCORRUPTION.DEREK SYPHRETT

Treasonous perpetrators OF SEVERE INJUSTICE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and sovereign, natural born,  TEXAS AND U.S.A. CITIZENS of ALMIGHTY GOD, divine Creator, and, SADLY, IN THIS AUTHOR’S CASE, AGAINST AN ADORABLE, HIGHLY INTELLIGENT, PROFOUNDLY WITTY AND COMICAL, SWEET, SUPER-HEALTHY INFANT AND SMALL CHILD WHOSE BRAIN WAS STILL GROWING WHEN SUCH STRESS AND TRAUMA WAS INFLICTED, MY ONLY CHILD, MY SON, NOW AGE 7, BUT STILL 5 1/2 IN MY MIND WHEN HE WAS ABDUCTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW ON MAY 08, 2012–written with Firsthand, Actual Knowledge, and Made in Good Faith as a Caution to Other Vulnerable Families Whose Paths they May Cross:

Kimberly Ann Abernethy, or Kimberly A. Abernethy (Houston, Texas)

Last Name: Abernethy
First Name: Kim
Name License Number License Type Status Expiry Date
ABERNETHY, KIM ANN
50063 Certified Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) Expired, Active 08/31/1995
ABERNETHY, KIM ANN
15946 Licensed Professional Counselor Current, Active 11/30/2015

Tonya Rolland.Assault Attorney.False Imprisonment.Nov.30.2007 001

Tonya Rolland, now Tonya Rolland-McLaughlin, former “Assault Attorney, Worked for former forced-to-resign D.A., Charles/”Chuck” Rosenthal, Harris County, TX (See Racist E-mails, Sex Affair with Secretary, and Drug Problem), “Pay-to-Play” Saboteur /Provacateur Extraordinaire

“When her Deputy Misdemeanor Division Chief announced to Harris County that she wouldn’t answer a Grand Jury’s questions about her job for fear of incriminating herself, she was promoted within the Office.  To this day, that prosecutor’s salary remains approximately $20,000 more a year than her peers with similar experience” ( as posted by “a Harris County Attorney” on Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center, Mon. May 28, 2012).

TONYA ROLLAND.RUNNING FOR CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE

Life Responsible for the Pictures of Joni Faith Saloom, “Julian’s Real Mummy,” Below, Legal Criminal, Guilty of False Imprisonment and Falsifying/Tampering With Government and Police Records, Stalking with Intent to Harm, Failure to Show Proof of Identity or otherwise Impersonating a Public Servant, Violation of Constitutional and Civil Rights of a natural born, U.S. citizen, and her infant son under the color of law in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1985(3), Earned Her Position by Doing the Dirty Work for More Experienced Criminal and Family Court Attorneys and Politico in Harris County, Starting at the D.A.’s Office, part of former D.A., Chuck Rosenthal’s Crew (See Lawrence v. Texas, argued at the U.S. Supreme Court);

www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Concord-private-eye-detailed-dirty-DUI-stings-2373276.php (Suggested Reading for  assault attorney, Tonya Rolland...but wait, you already know how to play the entrapment game, setting people up during paternity proceedings to try to even out the score and balance both sides of the scales, don’t you, Tonya?)   …and the “enhancements” you and your buddies get on assaults and DUI’s don’t hurt, now do they? 

See Tonya Rolland-McClaughlin’s Campaign Contributions at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/campaign-finance/filer/103326/from/1216145/

Judge-Margaret-Stewart-Harris-large

Judge Margaret Stewart Harris, Criminal Court at Law No. 5, Harris County, Texas–best buddies with Tonya Rolland, now Tonya Rolland-McLaughlin (as pictured and incriminated above as alleged by this author with firsthand, actual knowledge)  Marge, what were ya’ thinkin’ trying to hold a new mommy in jail on false charges–“assault–bodily injury–without bail, a teacher with no “priors” in her adult life…during child custody battle…and the perpetrator was your best friend , Tonya Rolland, pictured below?  Your congregation must be so proud of you, ya’ Hippocrite… Pharisee…Harpy!

See Judge Margaret Stewart Harris’ Salary at:  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/county-courts-at-law/14351/ –$145,644

“But beware of the children of men, for they will deliver you to the courts and they will scourge you in their synagogues.”/ “Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing.” (Matthew 7:15) 

Matthew-James-Worrell-mugshot-22658486_400x800

Matthew James Worrell–Stay Away from this “Soccer Coach/Rockstar Dad” if you and your children live in Tomball, Texas!  See Harris County Criminal Record 2005-2006–Intention to Distribute Large Amounts of M.D.M.A., DUI/DWI, five drugs found in his system when he was pulled over and refused a breathalizer, a Felony I charge for which he received deferred adjudication and got out of picking up trash duty with a “doctor’s note”–Just like the Momma’s Boy he is; P.S. Allegations of Sexual Misconduct/Abuse/Assault with a Child Were Covered-Up by Brazoria and Harris County CPS, theirs and the court’s employee, Donna Everson, and of course, Judges Lisa Millard and Conrad Moren in th 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, TX

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/6/005/05c/313/0f6e5f0.jpg

Kim A. Abernethy, or, Kimberly A. Abernethy, licensed professional counselor, “Play Therapist,” licensed marriage an family counselor whose role in masterfully played custody-switching scam That May or May not Have Involved Planting Seeds in My Then Five Year-Old Son’s Head (during “Daddy’s ‘visits'”) to tell Mommy a very bizarre Story Involving multiple sexual abuse allegations from my only child, my son, my life, who, possibly thanks to this fraud for Hire, who never showed her face or a Report in Court, contributed  to my having had no meaningful contact with My son because I believed his allegations, or at least, took them seriously and “reported” like Texas law required; Further, “Miss Kim (pictured here, Photo Source: LinkedIn), as reported by my son upon coming home from a visit with “Daddy” and his wife, said he didn’t like going there because “Miss Kim and “Daddy” said that he ” wasn’t leaving that room until I [he]told them what they wanted,” which turned out to be the name, as reported by my son, of another Male from the Past who Attended the Birth of My Son Because, Much to My Disappointment at the Time, said “father” refused,  a man whom said Father is Apparently Insanely Jealous about, and admitted on court record to making my 5-year old son sit on his lap and go through “Facebook” Photos (emotional abuse for sure); This “Daddy” who, based on knowledge and belief, exhibits all listed narcissistic personality disorder presenting behavior and that of a sociopath with zero remorse, or even the ability to see the harm he daily inflicts on anyone who refuses to indulge his every last whim–also, criminal record for, all at the same time, Intention to Distribute Large Amounts of M.D.M.A., “street drug” name, “Ecstasy, DUI and DWI, and was found to have, including alcohol, five illicit or inappropriate substances in his body when he was pulled over and refused breathalizer, then taken to hospital for blood work in 2005 (Harris County/Houston, Texas); This man and a woman I don’t even know and never had a conversation with, his wife in whose former marital home of the father of her three (3) children by another man, the husband she appears to have divorced for this “Rockstar Dad” in whose home they now reside and receive $2,000/mo. in child support from him and now, child support from me, tells my son to call her “Mommy” and had the bold-faced effrontery to “testify” in court about me, a person whom she had never met, and made accusations regarding my character, even, as any classy woman, calling me a “SLUT” in open court (in between smacking her bubble gum)–Nice Kim, Way to Go Kim, By the Way, Kim, are you ready to have a talk and include me regarding the nature of “therapy” my son received, and by the way Kim, one of your specialties listed is sex therapy; Do all of your clients get referred by bribed CPS agents for retaliatory and legally, emotionally cruel, self-destructive, criminal fathers who alienated his son from his mother for his entire life, yet abandoned us in pregnancy, refused to come to the birth, and tried to kidnap my son on so many documented occasions along with his mother to get back at me for not having the abortion he scheduled over the public Internet with a credit card, misspelling my name on the receipt, without my knowledge or informed consent and threatened to “ruin me” if I had our child–You are some great therapist, you must really understand how to diagnose people and prepare them to terminate rights of a child’s only consistent parent for the first five 1/2 years of his life; Oh, you might want to add in your notes that you refuse to release to anyone that “Daddy” still openly admits on court record to intimate partner stalking, a Federally recognized and dangerous crime, yet he alleges to be “frightened” of me and has needed “‘order’ of of ‘Protection'” for Years…Years in which he maybe participated in my son’s life, again, much to my son’s and to my dismay, only about maybe half of the time; “wolf in sheep’s clothing”--you missed that one Kim, or didn’t you??? You can call me anytime, you obviously have access to my phone number through your perverted, sexually deviant client (Oh, yes, there are things he probably never told you).  Enjoy your life, Kim.  May all your dreams come true, because mine never will–I have lost everything there is to materially lose, but more important, my only child who is a mirror image of me and will always live with the guilt of what you psychos possibly did to him, along with many others ; I have actual,  legal knowledge of what I know my son told me, because I had to listen to it, and then I, not you, Kim, had to take the fall for your possible “coaching” when my son repeated the same story verbatim to multiple police officers who believed him, to his primary care physician, to CPS agent at statewide intake, to Cheryl Harvick, CPS Supervisor, Brazoria County with whom I’m sure you are well-acquainted, and to the Emergency Room Sexual Assault Exam Pediatric Nurse, Doctor, and Mandatory Staff Social Worker (police and social workers interviewed away from me to screen for “coaching.”  These were not the same five thug police who kidnapped him on May 08, 2012 in retaliation because they refused to do their jobs and “protect” my son

Infamous Brazoria County CPS Program Supervisor and Kidnapper/Child Trafficker Operating under the Color of Law and Using Pearland Police Department and Harris County Special Investigator on Crimes Against Children to Cover-UP Sexual Abuse out of Sheer Malice and Retaliation, As Admitted by Her on May 08, 2012 at the Pearland Branch CPS Office

Cheryl Harvick, Notorious Brazoria County and Region 6 CPS Program Supervisor (See Article published in The Houston Press, March 27, 2003, Margaret Downing, “Fostering Abuse…”also on the menu of this blog); on the Board of Brazoria County Alliance for Children along with Sheriff Charles Wagner and Jeri Yenne, Brazoria County Prosecutor; Claims that “Randy”/d/b/a Judge K. Randall Hufstetler in the 300th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, does “whatever” she tells him to do–direct quote from May 08, 2012

See Cheryl Harvick‘s Salary at : http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/cheryl-l-harvick/1436420/$50,002 as of Feb.27, 2013

 

10352740_794094763934648_7135123206051071623_n

Lesly Damian-Murray, Brazoria County CPS Investigator who Alleges That her Ex-Husband Gave Her Son “Shaken Baby Syndrome” and used to beat her up when she was pregnant (See  Khou Channel 11 News online)–So why does she protect other abusers and/or molesters as alleged by my 5 1/2 year old son to many professionals, including, hospital nurse, doctor, police in two counties (not the ones who aided and abetted Lesly’s supervisor, Cheryl Harvick, pictured above, when they kidnapped my son and handed him over to the alleged abuser without any investigation)? By the way, Ms. Damian-Murray, are you related to Denise Damian, Court Administrator in Angleton, TX where you submitted a false affidavit and perjured yourself, omitting crucial details after I complained about you to the Office of Consumer Affairs in Austin, Texas?

LAWRENCE ROTHENBERG

Houston Attorney Lawrence/”Larry” Rothenberg, Legal Kidnapper, Practices Unethically and Unconstitutionally, no Due Process of Law, No Service of Process, Repeatedly, Denial of US Constitutional Rights perpetrated under color of authority of law for “‘state’ of Texas'”  –Charged: BAR member Malfeasance, breach of US Constitutional Oath or Affirmation of Office as Officer of Court and State Bar of Texas (“SBOT”); Dangerous to all (Wo)man and children, especially mothers

See Lesly Damian-Murrays Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/lesly-l-damian-murray/1435390/$33,950 as of February 27, 2013

BRUCE ALLEN BUSKIRK.ATTY

Divorced Family Law Attorney, Bruce Allen Buskirk, who, for his Client at the time, Matthew James Worrell, filed for an emergency ex parte hearing to switch custody when his client learned the mother of only child, age 5 1/2, was doing exactly what the child’s doctor, CPS, and police told he/r she had to do and take him to Texas Children’s Hospital for a Sexual Assault Exam After Child Mad Allegations of Sexual Abuse/Misconduct/Assault while reportedly at the client’s home for court-ordered “visitation that he hadn’t exercised in over a year

\

LISA MILLARD.PHOTO WITH FLAG

Judge Lisa Millard of the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, inter alia, Revictimizer of Women and Vulnerable Children and Discriminator Extraordinaire as alleged by myself, a person with firsthand, actual knowledge of treason, albeit, state-legislated and legal, yet, unlawful in the sense of the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, as Incorporated and Applied, and the Texas and US Constitution, Conflicts of Interest Galore Permeate her Court, Father was a Judge, Dangerous to Children and Parents, but Doing Her Job for “Economic and Social” Policy/Crimes, Racketeering, Extortion, Fraud Very Well for the Texas Legislature, Abandoned “Best Interests” of Children, a shame, this one, I heard from several people, used to be one of the best–Sadly Disappointed That You Kidnapped my property sometimes called ” Child ” for Political Cronyism, Votes, and Funding for the County (Double-Dipping in Safe Access and Visitation money, Misusing Federal Responsible Fatherhood Grants from Health and Human Services), Takes Children Away from Fit, Single Mothers, and many others, regardless of their Individual Situation, Docket-Clearing Master, Relies on her Associate Judge, Ordered to Sign All False Allegations Pertaining to Allegations of Domestic Violence and to Entertain all Ex Parte Motions When Fathers File Emergency Petition to Avoid Child Support and Cover their You-Know-What’s to Cover-Up their Child Abuse and Alienation Against Mothers, a Form of Domestic Violence, and also perceived by others as disability in the workplace and in the courtroom without relief or remedy or assistance in contravention of Federal laws pursuant to the ADA, ADAA , and others,  Disallows Presentation and Fails to Consider Crucial Evidence Involving Children Against Mothers Only, That is, Until She has Already Signed the Father’s Orders, Too Lazy to Prepare by Reading Cases the Night Before, as is Associate Judge, Doesn’t Create Any of Her Own Orders in this Court, Which Is Why Parents Who Can’t Afford Attorneys Have No Chance of Equal Access to Justice, Loathes Pro Se Parties, invidivuals, for Not Having Anyone to Borrow Money from to Hire an Attorney, Hostile at the World, except for her campaign contributors, of course, and her family that she would end up in and institution over if someone made rulings like her in her case and kidnapped her family under the color of law; Note the Lack of Gold Tassels or Gold Fringe on the U.S. Flag in the Portion of the Picture Shown Here, Which, Are Not Lacking in the Flag in Her Courtroom, which Signifies a Flag of Maritime or Martial Law–statutes used to uphold displaying such flag in the courtroom as treason, that is, until Americans Started Being Stripped of Their US  Constitutional rights, liberties, and freedoms without voluntary consent or sufficient knowledgePlease Wake-Up, America! Read the US Constitution and Bill of Rights and Learn them Inside and Out, before it is too late for all of us, and maybe your children or grandchildren, Tell us,  Judge Lisa A. Millard, were you playing “possum” in court in the “best interests” of Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom?  Or do you BAR members (as in barring the doors to equal access to justice and equal protections of the law) refer to it as “The Damon 10,000 Screw, ” or, “The Fix is In,” nowadays?  What is the “New terminology for bribery, extortion, conspiracy, kidnapping under the color of law, discrimination, permitting perjury and hearsay to stand as evidence, denying a child his right to speak to you in an age appropriate manner so as to cover-up allegations of sexual abuse from a 5 1/2 year-old child, fostering improper relations and allowing and being a conflict of interest in your own court,  abuse of procedure, process, power  adoption scams, custody-switching scams in favor of fathers, gender bias (against your own), ex parte communication, taking off your robe and coming down to sarcastically threaten m in the cafeteria on break,  treason, and defying your US Constitutional Oath of Office?

1.  See Judicial Campaign Election contributions for Judge Lisa Millard  at: www.texastribune.org/library/data/campaign-finance/filer/00026758-lisa-a-millard/ (cut and paste the link into your browser or enter manually if you cannot access just by “clicking,” as Judge Millard and/or “state” of Texas and  DFPS for the state of Texas (with subversive co-collaborators) censored through their vendor, “Unspammers,” or a similar company that markets to “states” and especially child “protective” services (Michigan also uses their services).   Note: Judge Lisa Millard runs unopposed he/r private court of record and fraud.

2.  See Judge Lisa Millard’s Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/lisa-a-millard/1499584/$125,000

Judge Lisa Millard and Conrad Moren.pic.310th

The 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas–In this author’s educated and Informed, Unbiased opinion— unbiased as this court, anyway,–Shameless Pharisees–Gaze Upon the Sanhedrin of Houston, Texas Family, Juvenile, and Commitment Courts

See Associate Judge Conrad Moren’s Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/district-courts-management/14373/$127,130

Judge Lisa Millard.pic with children

Wow! Holy Hypocrite! Are these your next targets to generate more revenue for Harris County and Texas?

PROOF THAT JUDGE LISA MILLARD AND CONRAD MOREN OF THE 310TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE OFFICE OF VINCE RYAN, COUNTY ATTORNEY, AND PROSECUTOR WILLIAM SUMPTER FRAZIER AND DONNA EVERSON, ALLEGED “CHILD ADVOCATE, INC.,” ALSO AFFILIATED INAPPROPRIATELY WITH JUDGE LISA MILLARD, DO NOT FULLY SUPPORT PRO-LIFE FAMILY VALUES (IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PLATFORM AND VALUES UPON WHICH MILLARD WAS ELECTED IN PART DUE TO THE FAITH OF ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS FOUNDATION FOR LIFE):

Abortion Slip

Receipt for Abortion for Matt Worrell in 2006 in Houston,TX that he paid for multiple times over the public internet without my, the mother’s, knowledge or consent–Note that my name is even misspelled–Your “sole managing conservator” of my only child, Matthew James Worrell, tried to coerce, threaten, and intimidate and harass me into not choosing life for our son, or else he and his family would “ruin” me, Never Answered the Phone or his door in my Pregnancy or showed up at the birth, Not on Birth Certificate, No Acknowledgement of Paternity Which I at One Point offered for him to sign, even though he always alleged he was the father and never questioned it, No voluntary relinquishment of parental rights with sufficient knowledge–YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID, this piece of evidence, and many more, were filed by court clerks and myself as a forced pro se party respondent–You have no respect for life and Mothers!

WILLIAM SUMPTER FRAZIER.PICTURE

William Sumpter Frazier, 310th Court, Harris County, Texas Prosecutor and Attorney for CPS and Harris County Attorney, Vince Ryan

See Assistant Harris County Attorney William Sumpter Frazier‘s Salary at: http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/county-attorney/14346/–$114,055 (although other incentives are available to recruit and retain experienced prosecutors as promised in writing)


Sidear–
Mr. Bill, I’m disappointed in you.  I hear from Huffman natives that your daughter is an incredibly good and intelligent person. Does she get it from her mother?

County Attorney Vince Ryan’s (Vincent Reed Ryan’s) Salary: $177, 591

County Judge and Chairman of Children’s Commissioners’ Court, Judge Ed Emmett’s Salary–$159, 695

DONNA EVERSON AND STEPHEN NEWHOUSE PIC.Crossroads_45th_Annual_Luncheon_11_t620x620_c620x620

As Both Pictured in Glasses, Donna Everson, dual-role Court-Appointed Guardian Ad-Litem and Attorney Ad-Litem of Choice for CPS and the 310th Court, Harris County, Texas, and Associate Judge Stephen Edward Newhouse, 313th Juvenile Court Judge, Harris County, Texas, formerly, amicus attorney for children in suits affecting the parent child relationship

Associate Judge Stephen Newhouse’s salary, as reported in The Texas Tribune, was $126,649 as of March 21, 2012 (http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/stephen-edward-newhouse/1267518/).

Court-appointed dual-role guardian ad-litem and attorney ad litem for children in termination of parental rights cases, Donna Everson, contributed over $14,000.00 to Judge Lisa Millard’s (unopposed) Judicial  Election Campaign. 

Donna Everson’s very good friend and colleague, court-appointed attorney for parents and sinecure, former judge, Ms. Ronnie Harrison, was another extremely close campaign contributor to Judge Lisa Millard in the 310th Court of Harris County, Texas.

One simply must copy the following URL and paste in one’s Internet browser to watch a display of the hypocrisy of Houston Attorney, Ms. Ronnie Harrison--a former associate judge–praise former Harris County “Judge” Denise Pratt:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OHmNfsgs3c  (Thank you to Attorney Greg Enos, for this jewel of a video).  It is always a pleasure reading The Mongoose.

 

JULIA LOVORN

Houston Attorney, Julia Lovorn–She likes to Play Dirty…in court, or so I hear!  Firsthand Knowledge: She advised my son’s criminal father and his co-dependent mother to kidnap my infant under the color of law in 2007 (See Log from Cypresswood Drive location for Justice of the Peace, Spring, TX  on January 30, 2007).

John Nichols, Sr

Attorney, John Nichols, Sr., who advertises on his website that he employes “CPS supervisors with twelve years experience on his staff,” as well as step-parent adoptions, termination of parental rights, and “High Net Worth Divorce Cases”–I hear he plays way dirtier than Julia Lovorn…in Court!  See Why Every Attorney I have Spoken to has Gasped in Horror and Expressed Fear in Going Against Him ; Never Loses a Case, Read Why in Documents Presented Below, or, at least, in this author’s opinion

JOHN F. NICHOLS.TEXAS MILITARY.PAGE 2

Why Mr. Nichols, Sr., and possibly “Bo” Nichols, Jr., Never Lose a Case for Fathers (See also H.H.S.D. federal grant funding for Responsible Fatherhood Programs to Take Away  Children from Fit Single or Young Mothers for Economic state policy

JOHN F. NICHOLS.TEXAS MILITARY.PAGE 3

 

Matthew-James-Worrell-mugshot-22658486_400x800

Matt Worrell, or, Matthew James Worrell, Mugshot from Crime in Lewisville, Texas, Late 1990’s, Public Photo, Courtesy of Mugshots.com, shown in good faith so as to warn others of this potentially dangerous man, as alleged by his 5 1/2 year old son, who was not investigated, yet the allegations of his son, as charged, were reported directly to this author by multiple police officers as guilty, in their professional and personal opinions (sources can be revealed, by protecting them in the name of discretion and respect for their profession–the good ones who wanted to help my son, and, strangely, the one who helped CPS kidnap my son?)

Officer Paul Elton

Pearland Police

NOT PICTURED BELOW, But also Guilty as Charged, inter alia, in Conspiracy Against Joni Faith Saloom and Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom and violation of First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment  Amendment US Constitutional rights acting under the color of law, complicit in kidnapping of a 5 1/2 year old child, my son and only child, and with ill will, by this natural born, “Sovereign,” U.S. citizen and REAL mommy of Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom:

1.     Officer Paul Elton, Pearland Police Department under Captain J.C. Doyle and City of Pearland in Brazoria County, Texas under Sheriff Charles Wagner’s jurisdiction:

ALSO NOT PICTURED BELOW:

2.      Sergeant William Lilly, Appointed by Sheriff Adrian Garcia, Harris County Sheriff’s Office, Special Investigations Crimes Against Children Unit--a CPS and court puppet as it is probable that all “community” and “collaborative” “partner” stakeholders who benefit from a fiduciary relationship undisclosed to the public it is charged with serving (see also federal R.I.C.O. statute, Racketeering Inspired Corrupt Organization):

See Sergeant William Lilly’s Salary at: http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/william-d-lilly/348239/–$79,256

3. Tonya Clay, Children’s Assessment Center/C.A.C. Program Director, also implicated in the case of Hall v. Dixon.

4.  Debra Hatley, Children’s Assessment Center/C.A.C. Program Supervisor

5. Robin Nelson, formerly Robin Gray due to Marital Dissolution, Caseworker III at the Children’s Assessment Center

6. Sandra Rosinski-Russell–implicated as a defendant in Gates v. Texas Department of Family and Regulatory Services, 2008

7.  Karen Coblentz, Brazoria County CPS Program Director

 

Judge K. Randall, or, “Randy,” Hufstetler, 300th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas presiding over an adoption proceeding

Smiling at the little girl or the $30,000 plus per child adoption?  You be the judge, real America.  To those of you who have experience with this judge, please comment below.

By the way, “Randy,” is Priscilla Hufstetler of the Pearland Police Department, also in Brazoria County, Texas, related to you?  Is that possibly one of the reasons Officer Paul Elton of the Pearland Police Department is so eager to “remove” children from fit parents and place them with alleged pedophiles?

“Randy,” the next time you sign an order based on a knowingly false and retaliatory affidavit (as it is routine practice and procedure by certain daily litigants in your courtroom), thus, one that could not logically be reliable or contain probable cause, to search a child against Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment (US)Constitutional , fundamental, natural, unalienable, and common law and natural parental and property sometimes called “children’s” rights,  without a hearing or giving any kind of notice or warning, remember me and my son–not that you ever met us or invited us to your courtroom.  By the way, I read that you discriminate.  Is that true?  Do you promote improper relationships for profit in your courtroom also?

 

 DISCLAIMER:  This post is made in good faith  and in the best interests of my property sometimes referred to as “child,” and intended solely for the purpose of educational and general knowledge and/or for entertainment purposes.  Should anyone mentioned herein desire a correction and/or retraction for any reason in opposition  to this blog’s author’s firsthand, actual knowledge based on facts and reasonable belief at the time of published post, certified/verified testimony, circumstantial, and demonstrative evidence, contact blog’s author in writing with certified/verified documentation and wet-ink signature detailing all arguments with factual and legal bases for such request(s) and any and/all controverting evidence.   Any such person would naturally  have access to author of this blog’s address.

Retaliation, official oppression, abuse of office, abuse of discretion, failure t disclose as a fiduciary to the “Public Trust,” false imprisonment, “kidnapping,” interference and violation and conspiracy to interfere with and violate (and neglect to protect) with (US) Constitutional rights of natural born “sovereign,” “elect” American “citizens” of our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD, inter alia will serve as further support and evidence that facts, opinions, and beliefs herein expressed are valid and justified.

Furthermore, author of this blog herein exercises he/r First Amendment fundamental well-established as a matter of fact and law rights, freedoms and liberties (as incorporated and applied via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights to the US Constitution) to freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceable assembly, and freedom to freely associate and to bring redress for grievances to the government without fear of or actual retribution or retaliation.

 

 

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.