Robin’s Story, and also for Matthew, Laura, and Christopher|Rockwall/Dallas, Texas


Sixteen Years Without Children and Life to Go

Robin Karr’s Story, and also for Laura, Matthew, and brother, Christopher Karr, who will not be silenced, that you shall come home to your Real Mommy who Refuses and Refused Offer of Silence–No Con tract, Judges!

Robin Karr.Rockwall.TX.Judge Cynthia Kent.any relation to federal impeached judge Samuel Kent who my sons paternal aunt was law clerk for.Supervised_Visit_Police_Station.242215910_std

Robin Karr with Baby Laura and Matthew Duckworth near Rockwall, Texas (near Fort Worth/Dallas, Texas)

Robin Carr.Rockwall.Tx.family court fraud and abuse.me-matthew-and-laura-2004-150x150

JUSTICE.WALL OF SHAME.NJCOURTCORRUPTION.DEREK SYPHRETT

 

JUDGE CYNTHIA KENT.SMITH COUNTY TX.TYLER.KIDNAPPER OF ROBIN KARR'S CHILDREN NEAR ROCKWALL TX SIXTEEN YEARS NO CONTACT

 Judge Cynthia (Stevens) Kent, ret., 114th court

Tyler, Texas

(SMITH COUNTY)

 Judge Sue Pirtle,

 NOT PICTURED FOR FEAR OR COWARDICE LEST S/HE, TOO, SHALL BE JUDGED BY GOD ALMIGHTY

Former Judge Sitting by Assignment (Visiting Judge)

State of Texas

January 2000 – Present (15 years 4 months)State of Texas (Region I)

Family, Civil, Criminal

DID WE HAVE THE SAME JUDGE, OR

JUST THE SAME FRAUDULENT FAMILY COURT R.I.C.O.

COURT CON?

 

The haunting melody of the nostalgic voice of the untimely, tragically gone, but not forgotten songstress, Karen Carpenter’s recording of “Yesterday Once More” is the soundtrack for the paralyzing feeling that what all of us mommies  who are still  reading  so strongly knew we were surely “imagining,” but could not be, the rote rehearsal style routine practice and patterned protocol and procedure suborned and commissions pre-packaged, pre-priced, pre-screened, pre-determined outcomes, the levels funding based kidnappings of our sweet little healthy, happy, adoptable children by the family courts in Texas, below:

Judge Cynthia Kent Grants Custody to an Abuser

 

January 5, 2000
Judge Cynthia Kent
c/o Elaine Holmes

RE: Cause No. 1-98-435 (382nd District Court, Rockwall County, Texas)
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF EDWARD NEIL DUCKWORTH AND
ROBIN LEE DUCKWORTH AND THE INTEREST OF MATTHEW NAKAI
DUCKWORTH AND LAURA DANIELLE DUCKWORTH MINOR CHILDREN

Dear Judge Kent,

I am the co-founder of Children And Loving Parents (CALP)-a chartered non-profit organization located near Rockwall Texas. I am writing in an effort, to appeal to your knowledge, your wisdom, your faith, and your conscious. I am writing on behalf of Robin Duckworth, however, I am not writing at her request. This letter serves two purposes:

1) To serve as evidence in the Duckworth file that CALP is very concerned about the integrity of both the judicial system’s actions and the actions of CASA and CPS in Robin’s case, and;

2) to bring to surface a few facts that you may have never known at the time you rendered your verdict.

We believe that the Duckworth case has been filled with trickery, deceit, mockery, and cruelty -none of which are desirable attributes for our legal and judicial systems.

I am sure that you agree. Unfortunately, the one’s who have suffered are the innocent children and their grieving mother.

We attended many of the hearings regarding this case, including the last part of the final hearing that you presided over. I couldn’t help but notice your references to family and the importance of parents in the lives of their children.

Without a doubt, CALP agrees with you- if the parent is a safe and good influence upon the children. Yet, we are perplexed and saddened at the many successful attempts to thwart Robin Duckworth’s good intentions.

Even worse, we are upset that he court system has not recognized these ‘tricks’ used by Ed Duckworth and his attorney to intentionally make Robin’s life miserable.

My question is this. What would you do as a mother to protect your children if you thought they were living in an unstable and unsafe environment?

Even a stubborn, proud, ‘never ask for help’ man would humble himself to ask every available person for help – again and again. You and I probably wouldn’t do this for ourselves, but we would for our children. Isn’t this exactly what Robin has done? Is this so wrong?

At what point did Robin act so inappropriate that she deserved to have her children kept from her. Did she break the law? No. (She was put in jail for crying and not leaving the courtroom when Judge Pirtle and Trish Verde refused to advise her as to when she could have her next visitation. Is this really ‘irrational’ when a mother hasn’t seen or held her children in a very long time?

By the way, why was she arrested for criminal trespass when there were still many other people in the courthouse? Why weren’t the other people that were present arrested for trespassing?)

Does Robin have a history of running away with the children? No. Does she have a history of hurting the children? No. Does she have a history of disobeying the courts? No. (Ed’s attorney stated that Robin had told the Kentucky court that she would not abide by the visitation decree from her first marriage. She may or may not have said that .. but, what did she do? She abided by the visitation decree very well. She even notified, in writing, the Kentucky court within 2 weeks of when she moved to Houston. We are in possession of that letter. Unbelievably, Judge Pirtle did not allow that letter to be submitted into evidence.)

Now let’s compare the history of Ed and Robin. Robin graduated high school and college with honors. Ed barely passed high school. After almost 6 years in college he dropped out with a GP A below 2.0. Who held a job and supported the family?

Robin did. She worked at Dillard’s and excelled as a departmental manager. Ed failed to hold a job, including one stint as a car salesman. When they moved to Kentucky, Robin continued working at another clothing store. Ed attempted a gig as a local police officer, however he quit when faced with being tired for shooting and killing a chained dog.

While living in Kentucky Ed filed for divorce. In his affidavit to the court Ed stated Robin should be named the fit and proper caretaker of the children! He never alleged Robin of being unfit in any way as a mother.

However, wanting to salvage their marriage, Robin replied to the court that she did not believe their marriage to be beyond repair. (Wouldn’t anyone that takes their vows before God in a serious manner do all they could to save the marriage? Robin did – Ed didn’t.) Just think if Robin had given up as easily as Ed had, she would be the managing conservator of Matthew and Laura at this time.

Instead, Ed, his attorney, and the Texas judicial system have raked Robin over the coals and treated her like a criminally insane parent. Robin has always been the reliable provider for the children, yet she has been punished and ridiculed for her faith.

The reason: Supposedly she said something to Ed on a tape that was later played to Melody East, an unlicensed social worker with CASA. Melody East then recommended to Judge Pirtle that Robin have only supervised visitation because she expressed ‘alarming’ religious beliefs and had made ‘alarming’ remarks.

One such remark was, “I hope God takes your lives if you continue to harm the children.” How did this statement start ridiculous allegations that Robin might harm her children?

Personally, I also wish that God would remove all child abusers from the earth. Does this make me a danger to children? No. It doesn’t make Robin a danger to her children either.

Also, Melody East never completed the social study. She never interviewed Robin’s mother or Robin’s other references. Incredulously Melody never spoke to the number one witness Christopher Karr. Christopher is Robin’s son from her first marriage.

Christopher witnessed Earnest Duckworth’s (Ed’s father) verbal, mental and physical abuse first hand. In fact, Christopher had written several letters to friends about the abuse well before Robin moved out of the Duckworth house.

Wouldn’t these letters be undeniable evidence that abuse was taking place? Wouldn’t Christopher’s testimony have been the most important evidence in this case?

Yet, Melody East never spoke to Christopher or Robin’s other witnesses. In addition, Judge Pirtle would not allow Christopher’s letters into evidence.

Even mare appalling- Robin’s witnesses were never allowed to testify. All of her witnesses came to trial on Feb. 26, 1999. Robin had at least 4 witnesses including her mother, one cousin, Christopher, and a close friend from Houston who had known Robin and Ed when they lived there. Robin’s witnesses traveled a combined distance of almost 3000 miles.

Unbelievably, Judge Pirtle made no offer to let Robin’s witnesses testify since they had come such a great distance. Instead, Judge Pirtle allowed Ed’s attorney, Charles Schuerenburg, to ask questions (stall for time) to Melody East, Tish Verde, and others. Judge Pirtle knew that Robin could not afford to fly her witnesses down a second time.

We believe that Judge Pirtle knowingly and purposefully hindered Robin’s right to a fair trial by not giving her witnesses the opportunity to testify. Judge Pirtle even scheduled the second half of the trial nearly two weeks away, instead of the following Monday, insuring that Robin’s witnesses would not testify.

In addition, sanctions were imposed against Robin and her attorney for filing a supposedly ‘frivolous’ report to CPS and requesting a Protective Order concerning abuse that Robin felt had occurred at the hands of Ed’s father. (Perhaps, Judge Kent, you were not knowledgeable of all the facts when you sanctioned Robin. That is what we hope.)

Doesn’t state law require that a person must report confirmed or suspected abuse to a child?

Mr. Duckworth’s attorney tried to make Robin look like a liar, because she didn’t report the abuse at the time it happened. Instead, he stated that she was now conveniently making it up since there was a battle for the children. How absurd!

The facts show that Robin and Ed were living in the home of Mr. Duckworth at that believe they can protect their children until they can develop an escape plan away from the abuse. Once again, the facts show that Robin moved back to Kentucky shortly after the abuse.

Doesn’t the fact that every time Robin saw her children with substantial bruises (I have pictures.) and reoccurring sickness during each visitation also give cause for concern, suspicion and reporting?

Doesn’t the fact that the two children have been to the doctor and/or hospital 31 times in 10 months give rise to concern and suspicion? Doesn’t the fact that she witnessed abuse while living with Ed’s parents cause concern?

Doesn’t the fact that Christopher, Robin’s oldest son, wrote letters concerning the abuse to friends before the court case started (I have copies) give cause for concern and suspicion?

Doesn’t the fact that Christopher also signed an affidavit confirming the abuse give cause for concern and suspicion?

Betty Hable, director of the Ombudsman’s office, has even confirmed that CPS has concerns that the paternal grandfather was physically abusive toward Matthew.

We are very troubled that you fined and penalized Robin for reporting suspected abuse when she was faced with disobeying the law if she didn’t report her suspicions! We are even more upset with the fact that Robin is reprimanded from making any other allegations of suspected or confirmed abuse. I ask, is this justice?

How could this happen? How did Robin get fined for doing what is right? I know we all make mistakes. I’m willing to admit that I do. I hope that you too are willing to admit that you made a mistake in your judgements against Robin. I hope even more that you will do all you can in your judicial authority to correct this wrong and make it right. Robin is not an insane mother making improper allegations. She is a protective, caring, loving mother that wants to see her children in a safe, nurturing environment. Once again I ask. what would you do .. not as a judge – but as a Christian and a mother?

Now Robin faces yet another obstacle – meeting the demands of a visitation decree that is both confusing and extremely burdensome. In your judgement you stated that you believed Robin had a medical problem that required medication. Then, being sure of your evaluation, you based the decree upon Robin seeing a psychiatrist and taking the medicine that they would prescribe her. But what was to happen when Robin’s nationally acclaimed psychiatrist did not find Robin to be in need of medication- but only finds her to be severely depressed due to missing her children (a natural response for a concerned, loving mother)?

In addition, you required Robin to line up a psychiatrist within a month. Finding a psychologist is relatively easy but a psychiatrist can take months! (My wife and I have been searching for a psychiatrist to evaluate our daughter’s ADHD. The shortest waiting list we found was 5 months!)

It took Robin a month to line up her psychiatrist. ‘This automatically made her miss the first date (July 1) you had based her visitation rights upon.

However, since acquiring a psychiatrist she has tried to do everything stated concerning her psychiatric evaluations.

However, Ed’s attorney has written a letter stating that they will seek to have her thrown in jail for not following the order. In addition. Robin has not been able to afford trips to Texas to see her children.

She has another son that she must take care of. His father has not been paying child support, which makes things even more difficult for Robin. With the psychiatrist and expenses she has been forced to rely only upon phone calls to stay in her children’s lives.

But this has been made even more difficult due to the fact that Ed will not answer the phone and has turned off his answering machine – all in an effort to distance Robin’s children from her.

However, through all of this, Robin saved enough money to buy birthday and Christmas gifts and a plane ticket to Dallas during November. Once again, Robin did everything she thought she was supposed to do according to the visitation decree.

She sent letters to Ed and the District Clerk. by Nov. 1, 1999, concerning her psychiatric evaluation(s) so that she could see her children on Nov. 13·14.

She sent all letters certified mail. She took 4 days off work to come to Rockwall to see her children, even though Ed’s attorney, Charles Schuerenberg, threatened to get a bench warrant for her arrest if she came to Rockwall.

Despite all this, she still came to see her babies. If that’s not true love I don’t know what is. Upon arriving in Rockwall, Robin gave my wife and I a notarized statement to act as the competent adults to pick up the children -just as stated in the decree. We felt this would
definitely be better for the children since it would avoid any possible conflicts between Ed and Robin. Upon arriving at Ed’s house, Ed absolutely refused to hand over the children.

Ed then ran back into his house and called the police. When the police arrived Ed fabricated a lie and told the officers that he had spoken to Robin’s psychiatrist the day before and that her psychiatrist was sending a second letter forbidding Robin to see the children! We then asked the officers to ask Ed if he would allow Robin to see the children for a supervised visitation the next day.

The officers told my wife and I that Ed made it clear to them that he would never let Robin see the children again no matter what! The officers then advised us that we needed to keep a good paper trail of what had occurred. We were then told that Robin needed to go to the police station and file “Interference with Child Custody”, which is what she did.

Robin was never allowed to see her babies. Can you believe she has never been allowed to celebrate either of Laura’s birthdays? She has never celebrated Christmas with her either.

How discouraged would this make you feel as a mother? Yet, Robin somehow finds the courage and desire to hang in there. Robin loves and misses her children deeply.
Now Robin’s good intentions are once again being turned against her. Charles Schuerenberg has written Robin to threaten her again. He is using the visitation decree that he wrote, against her.

He stated that he intends to have her thrown in jail. I believe this is revenge for Robin filing “Interference with Child Custody” against Ed. What Ed did was wrong and downright mean!

Robin came 1200 miles to see her children, hold them, love them, and give them gifts.
Your honor, please listen to your heart on this matter. Robin is really doing her best. If shemoves here from Kentucky, her older son can’t see his dad. Either way, she gets slammed.

So she does her best. You even stated in your final words of the hearing that the order periods of possession would “be subject to very definitely financial ability.”

This tells me that you were trying to recognize Robin’s peril in paying for psychiatric sessions, making expensive trips to Texas, taking off from work, and juggling all the issues.

We are asking that you reconsider your order. We don’t believe that you ever meant to say Robin could not see her children in November if she didn’t get every psychiatric report completed in July.

It seems to us that you were saying Robin’s visitations were to be based upon her complying with her psychiatrist’s orders then submitting that compliancy letter from the psychiatrist before she attempted visitation.

If your order were interpreted in any other way then Robin’s inability to see a psychiatrist by July 1, 1999 would prohibit her from ever seeing her children again.

I do not believe that you is what you intended. However, Ed’s attorney is trying to have Robin thrown in jail based upon his manipulation of the visitation decree.

Robin had no choice but to file “Interference with Child Custody” against Ed. His actions as dictated by Texas state law are a criminal act, not a civil act.

Therefore, Robin had aresponsibility to file a report even though she did not obtain leave of court to do so. Robin’s report to the Rockwall police was not merely a ‘complaint’ but was a witness’ statement to a felony crime. The police made the choice to ask the D.A. ‘s office to bring charges against Ed.

We hope and pray that you will see things the same and not allow your instinct as a mother, a Christian, and a parent, to be clouded by your judicial experience in today’s corrupt society.

Sincerely,
Derek S.
Co-Founder and V.P.

Read also, http://janiemcqueen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Judgee-Pirtle-Wanted-for-Kidnapping.pdf

1.     Click on the link below to read mother and author, Robin Karr’s provocative case supported by strong evidence against, generally, but not limited to, “‘state’ of Texas,” and also on behalf of all maternally deprived mothers and children, being natural (wo)man and individuals,

http://www.motherswithoutcustodyworld.com

2.     Click on the link below to read Kentucky Senator Virgil Moore’s scathing letter against and addressed to, among other public officials, “state” and local Texas and social services and county officials on behalf of parents Doug and Kathie Harliss and their “business or commercial assets,”

http://www.motherswithoutcustodyworld.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/Kentuky_State_Senator_Letter_about_Texas_Taking_Children.250130237.pdf\

Mothers Without Custody World

Laura Turns Sweet 16

 

 

Robin Karr.precious Laura found.on facebook

Robin Karr’s Baby Laura, Sixteen Years Later, Found Picture on Facebook.com

Dear Laura, will you ever know how much your real Mommy, Robin Karr, loved, adored, and missed you every second of every minute of every day and painful, agonizing, most likely sleepless nights?  How could you?

Dear Robin, will you ever know what your little girl felt or the pain she felt without you?

How could she?

I I pray and hope with all ;my heart and real mommy of little Julian’s soul that you, Laura have come home to Mommy, whatever age.

From one to another mother whose child bought and sold  just shall surely find them out.

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

Author of this blog, Dedicated to the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and our Children Who Want to Come Home, and Especially to My Little Julian, is not a lawyer, attorney, or legal practitioner, therefore, no information contained herein this post and/or blog could be (mis)construed as “legal advice.”  Anyone who exercises he/r rights, and private property sometimes called “child” for deceptive, possibly malicious or retaliatory, and profiteering/privateering and in the “best interests” . . . of the “state” Texas General and other Funds at one’s own peril, risk, and/ or self-fulfillment.  The choice is yours.

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the uS Constitution and  Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, uS Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement/demand, then contact Author of this blog immediately as fair notice and due diligence requires so that Author shall act lawfully and reasonably with expedience pursuant to any supplemental knowledge.

A RECORD OF U.S. FAMILY COURTS SACRIFICING MOTHERS & CHILDREN


RE-POSTED/RE-BLOGGED AS DEPICTED BELOW,

A RECORD OF U.S. FAMILY COURTS SACRIFICING MOTHERS & CHILDREN

Family Courts Behind an Epidemic of Pedophilia & Judicial Abuse

Posted 23 January 2013

The below-referenced chart lists over 75 family court cases in Connecticut where children’s safety and well being has been jeopardized by unethical and even illegal activities of court professionals who routinely target, extort and exploit Connecticut
mothers.  In many of these cases, where mothers reported a father’s violent crimes against her family, the mother eventually lost custody to the wealthier father when he — the real perpetrator — accused her of alienation.  Violent fathers almost always won sole or joint custody of victims, and in some cases these fathers even went on to become mass murderers.  Insurance companies and the State are being defrauded by medical and mental health professionals who are routinely rewarded handsomely for submitting false claims that misdiagnose fit and loving mothers and their children with mental disorders they do not have; they are also providing diagnosis and treatment plans that are considered illegitimate by the AMA and APA.  Meanwhile, the same professionals justify their billing by deliberately recommending to judges the placement of children in the care of violent fathers, even rapists, and by shielding these offenders from criminal prosecution that might otherwise keep children safe.  The effect is that the whole family becomes damaged and in need of treatment, and are subsequently required to obtain ongoing court affiliated medical and legal professional services.

Some of these cases were outlined in the May 2012 Conscious Being Alliance story A Life Sentence.  The summary of cases spans the past 20 years, with older and newer cases, and where many cases

were drawn out over a decade, or more.

CT COURT CASES HISTORIES & SUMMARIES:

Click link here:
CT Cases Spreadsheet (2-28-2013).xlsx

PHOTO:
MAX LIBERTI.  (See: LIBERTI V. LIBERTI summary.)

 

MAx-Liberti-Photo.jpg

Written by: keith harmon snow

Categories: ,

 

16 Comments

melissa harris | January 29, 2013 2:57 PM

This has happened to me I would like to be part of this also where do I file complaints against lawyers n family service division I reported to the mediators supervision but nothing . So I want to file above the court .my case was in Hartford ct. Thank u for your time sincerely Melissa Harris 860-977-3941 cell or home 860-206-9208 Donna yanofsky I give full permission to talk to her on my behalf

adrienne mcglone | February 12, 2013 5:31 PM

• Give a gift of your signature as support in the battle to stop the corruption in probate and family courts that harm and destory our children and families. Join the Petition Signature-A-Thon.

http://www.change.org/petitions/the-governor-of-ma-help-get-child-home
http://www.alexissneedshelp.blogspot.com/

Amy Andersen | February 14, 2013 1:39 PM

Exactly this happened to me also!! I lost custody of my daughter to my abusive ex husband for one reason ONLY,, HE IS VERY WEALTHY! I never so much as received a parking ticket. What happened to my daughter and I was COMPLETELY ILLEGAL IN EVERY WAY! I want very much to be part of this, but I do not know where to start or who to contact. Melissa, I would like to speak with you also if you are willing. Maby we can share information because we both are going through the same nightmare! Please call me and let me know what I can do and where I can start.
Respectfully,
Amy Andersen (203) 269-6114

Jodi Baker | February 24, 2013 4:33 PM

The same situation happened to me. I am looking to make changes in the CT family court system especially New Haven County.

Kendra | April 26, 2013 7:33 PM

Below is a proposed class action lawsuit we can file at 95 Washington Street. Melissa, do you want to take the lead?

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT
COUNTY OF HARTFORD
————————————————————-x VERIFIED COMPLAINT
JANE DOE 1- XXX
Plaintiff, Index No.:
-against-

Dr. Howard Krieger; Dr. Kenneth Robson,
Dr. Sidney Horowitz; Atty. Steven Dembo;
Atty. Noah Eisenhandler, Jane Does 1-IV and
John Does I-IV.
Defendants
—————————————————————x
SIRS:
The Plaintiffs complaining of the Dr. Howard Krieger; Dr. Kenneth Robson; Dr. Sidney Horowitz; Atty. Steven Dembo; Atty. Noah Eisenhandler; Jane Does 1-IV and John Does I-IV (hereinafter “Defendants”), sets forth and alleges upon information and belief as follows:
1. That at all times hereinafter mentioned Plaintiffs are normal, healthy parents who have endured abnormal and unfathomable circumstances in child custody proceedings.
2. That at all times hereinafter mentioned Defendants intentionally inflicted emotional suffering on Plaintiffs and defamed Plaintiffs for the benefit of increasing conflict in child custody disputes for financial gain and/or job security.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION IN INTENTIONAL INFLICTION
OF EMOTIONAL SUFFERING

3. Plaintiff repeats, reiterates and re-alleges the allegations listed in paragraphs “1” through “2” as though more fully alleged herein.
4. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013, Defendants emotionally abused Plaintiffs via heinous conduct beyond the standards of civilized decency.
5. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013, Defendants advocated and endorsed the use of domestic abuse and domestic discipline in child custody proceedings.
6. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013, Defendants aided and abetted fathers in feigning allegations to place plaintiffs under supervised visitation or otherwise reduce their access to children, alleging “mental illness”, “emotional abuse” or “parental alienation”.
7. That at all times relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants slandered, abused, ridiculed, harassed, ignored, humiliated, threatened, attacked and/or financially devastated Plaintiffs.
8. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants blatantly disregarded the rules, manipulated information, falsified evidence, harassed and bullied Plaintiffs.
9. That at all times relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants financial, emotional and legal abuse of Plaintiffs was intentional, deliberate and/or reckless.
10. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants used the fruits of their abuse to claim that Plaintiffs were “erratic, unstable and unpredictable”.
11. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants endorsed the wealthier parent as primary parents to keep their revenue steam coming via fathers contesting custody of children against stay at home mothers.
12. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013, Plaintiffs sustained severe emotional damages and loss of custody of their children in monetary amounts in excess of all of the jurisdictional limits of the lower courts.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION IN UNJUST ENRICHMENT

13. Plaintiff repeats reiterates and re-alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs “1” though “12” as though more fully set forth herein.
14. That at all times relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants increased conflict in custody disputes for the benefit of their professional fees, job security and/or revenue stream.
15. That at all relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants were unjustly enriched by receiving professional fees, income or expenses on account of their improper conduct.
16. That prior to April 26, 2013, Defendants Dr. Howard Krieger and Dr. Sidney Horowitz were sanctioned for committing insurance fraud against Aetna Insurance.
17. Plaintiffs seek restitution of attorney fees and expert fees incurred as a result of defendants’ unjust enrichment, which is in excess of all of the jurisdictional limits of the lower courts.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION IN DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER

18. Plaintiff repeats reiterates and re-alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs “1” though “17” as though more fully set forth herein.
19. That at all times relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants published false statements about Plaintiffs.
20. That at all times relevant times prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants’ false statements lowered the characters of Plaintiffs in the eyes of others.
21. That at all relevant time prior to April 26, 2013 Defendants slandered, abused, ridiculed, harassed, ignored, humiliated, threatened, attacked and/or financially devastated Plaintiffs in an attempt to substantiate their false statements.
22. That Defendants intentionally inflicted emotional harm on Plaintiffs by facing them with an abusive ex-husband, fear of their children being harmed or removed and a bombardment of medico-legal allegations to substantiate their allegations of “erratic, unstable and unpredictable” behaviors.
23. That Plaintiffs’ were damaged by Defendants’ false statements and intentional infliction of emotional suffering in amounts in excess of the jurisdictional limits of the lower courts.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION IN DISCRIMINATION

24. Plaintiffs repeat reiterate and re-allege the allegations contained in paragraphs “1” though “23” as though more fully set forth herein.
25. That Plaintiffs have been discriminated against on account of being stay at home mothers prior to the commencement of litigation. Defendants sided with the parent who had the most money to purchase their children.
26. That Plaintiffs sustained damages in excess of the jurisdictional limits of the lower courts on account of this unlawful socio-economic discrimination.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully requests that this Court enter an award:
(a) Enjoining and permanently restraining Defendants from intentionally inflicting emotional suffering, discriminating against and defaming the characters of Plaintiffs;
(b) Awarding Plaintiffs’ damages in excess of twenty (20) million dollars;
(c) Awarding Plaintiffs’ attorney fees and expert fees involved in pressing this action;
(d) Granting such other and further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper.

Yours etc

________________________________

VERIFICATION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF HARTFORD )
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
being duly sworn, deposes and says: We are the plaintiffs in the within action; We have read the foregoing complaint and know the contents thereof; the same is true to my knowledge, except as to the matters stated therein to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters we believe them to be true.

__________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sworn to before me on this
day of April 2013

Notary Public, State of Connecticut

___________________

T. Moore | April 27, 2013 10:05 AM

My case is still pending … I’m ready to keep up the battle and win the war … it’s been years and I refuse to just walk away – I’ve been w/one of the above Dr. during “Special Masters” …

kendra | April 27, 2013 11:47 AM

Attorneys with a strategy which involves inflicting emotional and financial pain on mothers to make them “erratic, unstable and unpredictable” should be reported to the Grievance Committee so that they are disbarred for a violation of Rule 8.4 (4) for conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. The precedence their strategy sets is that a man is encouraged to abuse the mother of his children so that the attorneys can keep their revenue stream going despite the impact this has on mothers and resultantly on their children. Grievance forms can be found here:
http://www.jud.ct.gov/webforms/forms/gc006.pdf

Kendra | April 27, 2013 12:01 PM

Amy – You can add in defendants Judge Pulver and Atty Hilscher. As you reside in Connecticut, the action can be venued in Connecticut. We may have to bring it in Federal District Court and add in the Constitutional arguments.

Kendra | April 27, 2013 12:02 PM

Amy – You can add in defendants Judge Pulver and Atty Hilscher. As you reside in Connecticut, the action can be venued in Connecticut. We may have to bring it in Federal District Court and add in the Constitutional arguments.

Kendra | April 27, 2013 12:03 PM

Amy – You can add in defendants Judge Pulver and Atty Hilscher. As you reside in Connecticut, the action can be venued in Connecticut. We may have to bring it in Federal District Court and add in the Constitutional arguments.

Colleen Kerwick | June 1, 2013 3:52 PM

Here is a link to my Confessions of a Stepford Wife blog. Feel free to check into my path as I find the silver lining from my journey through the Connecticut Court System. Whatever doesn’t kill us makes us stronger so I’m hoping that this will be a happy story of transformation and growth.

Sara Burns | June 28, 2013 8:00 PM

I have a significant background in Business Communications and PR and would like to contribute my files for case … amazing how many people can abuse the system for years with a documented list of offenses and still be able to misuse the system to their private advances.

Concerned Mother | August 23, 2013 9:41 PM

A person is guilty under 2011 Connecticut Code Title 53 Crimes Chapter 939
Sec. 53-21 (3) if they “permanently transfer the legal or physical custody of a child under the age of sixteen years to another person for money or other valuable consideration”… such person “shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of which five years of the sentence imposed may not be suspended or reduced by the court”. Has anyone asked the DA to issue a warrant for the arrest of some members of the custody business?

Ron | July 19, 2014 11:38 AM

Keith, This is information which is tragically in sync with what I’ve read from other researchers regarding pedophilia rings and subsequent cover-ups occurring WORLDWIDE. Have you read Dave McGowan’s work entitled “Pedophocracy”? It’s not surprising one bit to learn that the courts are involved in the corruption as are politicans—ETC. I am reminded also of the late Ted Gunderson, former FBI agent who became Aware, shall we say–are you aware of his investigations regarding child abuse? What is bad, evil in society is vigorously protected and encouraged by the System.

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

     Nothing contained in this post or on this blog, Dedicated to the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and our Children Who Want to Come Home, and and especially for my little Julian, could be (mis)construed as “legal advice” of any kind as author of this post is expressly NOT a lawyer, attorney, or legal practitioner.

  • CENSORSHIP and censorship shall be challenged strongly as censorship, being in breach of, among so many other unlawful acts and omissions, is a violation of sometimes described as “Julian’s Real Mummy’s” First Amendment u.S Constitutional right to the free exercise of speech, and also to peaceably assemble herein and also to freely exercise whatever religion, if any, that said natural, American u.S “citizen,” “citizen” meaning fo the purposes of this post. conditionally as i, being natural (wo)man, individual, living and corporeal body,  exclusively reserve the right to revoke or rescind the offer at any and all times, inherently “sovereign” and “elect” in nature, spirit, and essence because imbued with the spirit of our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD. ;
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.;
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by “Julian’s Real Mummy’s” First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the Federa, u.S. Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal,u.S Constitution and its  Bill of Rights, pursuant to the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.;
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.;
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and Author will be happy to follow the law and respect your wishes.
Name:
Email Address:
URL:
Remember Personal Info?
Comments:
Captcha:

Donate to this Project

Search

Disabled Mother Deprived of Her Children, Discriminatory Hate Crimes in U.S.


Disabled Mother Deprived of Her Children,

Discriminatory Hate Crimes in U.S.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6lCpBwDt1o&feature=player_detailpage

Posted by: Mamasuntwinkle on Youtube.com, April 15, 2010mamasuntwinkle

Uploaded on Apr 15, 2010

Fighting for a Disabled Mother’s Right to See Her Children; After a Mother’s Brain Injury Following Childbirth, Her Family Fights for Her to See Her Triplets. April 14, 2010, ABC news. Growing up, Abbie Dorn always dreamed of becoming a mother. Now, at age 34, she is the mother of three healthy toddlers. Her home is filled with pictures of the children, triplets named Esti, Reuvi and Yossi.

But in the 4 years since her children were born, Dorn has not been able to talk to them. She can’t hold them or watch them play. That’s because Dorn endured severe brain damage following their birth.
Now, while her children run and play in their Los Angeles home, Dorn’s family, more than 2,500 miles away in Myrtle Beach, S.C., is locked in a legal battle with the children’s father to grant Dorn the right to see her children.
The family’s lawsuit, which could make its way to a courtroom by May, could become a landmark in defining what it means to be a parent, especially when that parent is disabled.
After graduating from college in Ohio and becoming a chiropractor in Atlanta, she married Dan Dorn, a devoutly religious man who shared her beliefs in Orthodox Judaism. They settled in Los Angeles near his family, and began to plan a family of their own. But Dorn struggled to conceive. After turning to fertility treatments, she finally received word in the fall of 2005 that she was expecting triplets. “She was so excited to be pregnant, she was beginning to say, ‘I don’t know if I’ll ever get to be a mother,'” Dorn’s mother, Susan Cohen, said.
Happiness turned to heartbreak after Dorn delivered the three children. What happened in the hospital in the hours after the triplets were born is not clear. And the case was eventually settled out of court for more than $7 million. What the family does know is that Dorn began bleeding internally. Her injury was not caught soon enough, and after a series of missteps, Dorn’s brain was deprived of oxygen, leaving her severely brain damaged. Since the day her three children were born, Dorn has required around-the-clock care. She can’t speak or move on her own, and she remains in bed unless one of her caretakers moves her to a chair. Dorn spent nearly a year in hospital and rehabilitation care in California near her children.
On the anniversary of his wife’s injury, Dan called Dorn’s parents. “He said, ‘Well I need to move on,'” said Paul Cohen. Dorn’s husband eventually divorced her in 2007. In court documents, his attorney said he was “faced with the necessity of beginning to rebuild his life.”
Since the divorce, Abbie Dorn has been moved to her parents’ home in Myrtle Beach, where she undergoes a daily regime of therapies and rehab.
Dorn’s now ex-husband has refused to bring the children to see her. They said he refuses to send videos or to allow Dorn to see the children via webcam.
Dan’s attorneys argue that exposing the children to their severely disabled mother would traumatize them. Medical experts hired by his attorneys to review her records said she would never recover.
But Dorn’s parents say Dan Dorn’s experts are looking at old records, and that after years of rehabilitation, it is clear she has brain function, can understand when people talk to her and can read short passages. Having devoted the past five years to her rehabilitation, Susan and Paul Cohen believe their daughter communicates through her eyes. They say when Dorn has one long blink it means “yes.” When she is in pain, she cries out. When she is happy, they say, she can smile. Her eyes follow movements in the room. Her caretakers say several times a day she will say “yeah” or “no” in response to direct questions.
Legal Battle Over Children of a Disabled Parent
ABC News spent a day with Dorn and watched her undergo therapy. When asked if seeing her children was important to her, Dorn replied with a long blink.
“A mother needs to see her children, she gave them life,” Paul Cohen said. “Her blood is in their veins. These children need to know they have a mommy and she needs to know her children are growing.”
The family’s lawyer argues that Dorn has rights that have been ignored. “Abbie has a right, a constitutional, legal right to have her parents, her own representatives, to request visitation on her behalf,” Lisa Helfend, an attorney for Dorn and her parents, said.
Dorn’s mother believes her daughter is still “there,” saying Dorn cries, smirks and even smiles. “I know that Abbie is there … it’s well beyond a mother’s love,” Susan Cohen said.
“If all she can say to them is one or two words and show in her eyes how much she loves them, I think that will mean a great deal to those children,” Susan Cohen said.
ABC News’ requests for an interview with Dan Dorn were declined.

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/brain-injur…

Terri Schindler Schiavo Foundation
http://www.terrisfight.org/

The ex-husband is an ignorant fool.  Children do better if they are exposed to all kinds of people, including the disabled.  Understanding prevents bigotry and discrimination of people just because they don’t look like us.  He’s not only doing a great wrong to his ex-wife, he is doing an equally great wrong to his children.

She probably could have recovered a lot more if she had her children around her! This is horrible!!

Recovery would be significantly enhanced if she were enabled to see her children on a regular basis

Come on let her see her children she gave them life his really being a jerk …

So sad 😦😦😸

Sadly, the disabled are NOT respected in the United States, regardless if parent or child.

well  then that needs to change now would be a good time.

What comes around goes around. God will make him pay

Tear jerker 😦

DAN IS A EFFING BASTARD!! SOME HUSBAND!! HE COULD NOT EVEN STAY FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE. MEN, IF YOU DO THIS EVIL TO THE WOMAN YOU MARRY AND SHE GETS SICK LIKE THAT, YOU WILL GO TO HELL AND YOUR CHILDREN WILL HATE YOU IN THE END JUST AS THE CHILDREN WILL HATE DAN. AND THEY WILL. I AM GLAD THEY TELEVISED THIS BECAUSE THE KIDS WILL SEE THIS IN TIME> THEY SHOULD KEEP THIS ON DVD SO THAT THE KIDS WILL GET THIS IN A LIVING WILL THROUGH HER ATTORNEY. PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO THIS FAMILY AND LET THEM KNOW. I AM REALLY ANGRY ABOUT THIS ANSD EVERY ONE OF YOU SHOULD BE ALSO!!!!!!!!!!!DAN IS A BASTARD AND HE LIED WHEN HE TOOK HIS VOWS. THIS MOTHER HAS THE RIGHT TO VISIT WITH HER CHILDREN WHEN HER PARENTS OR REPRESENTATIVE IS PRESENT. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO DEVISE A COMPREHENSIVE LIVING WILL FOR EACH CHILD TO BE GIVEN WHEN THEY TURN OF AGE TO SHOW THEM THAT THEIR MOMMY ALMOST DIED FOR THEM! UGH!! THIS PISSES ME OFF, DAN IS EVIL!!!

HOW CAN WE HELP THIS WOMAN!!!!!!! SOMEBODY?????

NOT FAIR! DAD let those children KNOW THEIR MOTHER!

“You have no right to have a lawyer, you have no right to have your home, all your families possessions fraudulently taking from you and put on the lawn with a free sign. Forced into homelessness, just after major spine surgeries with no immunity. Using a walker You are NOT allowed to speak while a plaintiff.  Evidence will be refused. All motions DENIED. You have no right to protect your child, against the school that excludes her, provokes her to hysteria ,forces her into a dark cement room, not allowed to call home. Your concerns, ideas, inputs  ignored because “you are disabled your disability has a negative affect on your daughter” you have no right to speak, have witnesses, the only right you have is to be emotionally, verbally violated, slandered, discriminated, blamed for your disability, we  lie to you and about you, and include the invented “mental”  disabilities .  Your disabled child used as a pawn, weapon, because you made formal complaints against abuse to your family and for that, the child you love and care for is fraudulently judicially kidnapped. you are locked out of your paid apartment on the way back from your doctor regardless of how much physical pain you are in, how exhausted you are, how hungry you are. We stop you from getting medical attention even though you claimed you lost the use of your legs, and needed to get to your doctor. instead you are detained in your hot car ,humiliated, interrogated, sweat soaking your clothes. we even called your doctor, force you to have a blood test, charge you w a dwi, even though you don’t drink,  we take the car you only drove 6  times, you have no money so your car is impounded, your SSI DI is still going to the “benefits coordinator” That was forced to resign for violating the laws and rules of a paid rep payee. In the letter of resignation she stated “you are incompetent”, yet she was caught defrauding SSI di and paid too. after the embarrassing charge for the DWI, release you , barely able to walk, sick, in unbearable physical, emotional pain. because “you are disabled” Its dark out , nowhere to go, so sick you don’t remember collapsing, then several days later waking in critical condition in a ICU, the doors closed due to the severe community acquired pneumonia you have and the shock. your temp reaches 104.8. a spine doctor comes in and says “you are not a candidate for surgery” then leaves after giving some mediation for the unbearable pain caused by reconstructed spine surgeries, that were unsuccessful. You “missed the court date because you are on a ventilator, so your license  is suspended . Your daughter is in a foster home. As soon as you move closer to her she is moved across the state. You can only see your child under “supervision” because you tried to protect your child and for that you are a “bad parent” you and your child are hated because of the way you look. You are female with obvious physical differences YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS in the State of New Hampshire. The only right you have is to be tortured. A year has passed, still looking for a permanent 2 bedroom home . You just went trough more landlord hell who at the last minute after receiving money changed his mind ,he didn’t want to “clean his chimney”, He didn’t like the idea that you may have a paid helper. In VT. Everything I ever believed of was told is nothing but a LIE!  A American disabled  mom with a American  disabled child TORTURED BY HATE.

No doubt that bastard would have walked if his kids were disabled too! The new generation is much more accepting than the ones that institutionalised and hid our disabled people. He is cruel. Give them the option of loving their mum. No doubt they can, even if he is too shallow.

Wow really what happened to “for better or for worse”? Dads a dick…

what happened to the vows” in sickness and in  heatlh? A child will loves his/her mom no matter what. Dad is so wrong.I hope she gets to see her kids soon.

Don’t EVER keep the truth from a child, regardless of what that truth is. I’ve seen first had what happens when people lie.

awesome parents, not so awesome husband. parents should check out Family Hope Center http://www.familyhopecenter.org/
Show more

CORRUPT MN FAMILY COURTS FORCE KIMBERLY SPERLING AND FAMILY TO SEEK ASYLUM, CANADA GRANTED.


Kimberly sperling

Kimberly Sperling, a former Minnesota Mom Forced by Corrupt Minnesota Family Courts to Seek Political Refugee Status in Canada, Granted.

“Why Is There No Safety?”

Kimberly Sperling Interview on “Speechless” with Host, Tim Kinley, Minnesota

 Click the link below to watch video, or cut and paste into your browser or enter manually if necessary.

 www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgvN3Cfn6EI

 

Video of Kimberly Sperling Interview with Host of “Speechless,” Tim Kinley in Minnesota Speaking on the Corrupt Family Courts that Terrorize Families and Children and Allow Abusers and Alleged Pedophiles and Alleged Organized Crime Members to Have Full/”Sole” “Custody” or “Conservatorship” of Private Property deceptively called children for profit by the “states” and local county government  and unified/collaborative–“conspiratorial”–family court Kids-for-Cash RICO racket, like so many other “states” in the US.

Read, also, http://carvercountycorruption.com/court-docs-sperling-v-sperling/

Here, One Family’s True Story,

Friday, July 15, 2011

I. Running For Our Lives

In February 2010, my daughter and I fled the United States of America. On that day, along with other material, I gave to Immigration Agents a handwritten letter explaining that because of the level of government persecution that we had endured for over four (4+) years in the United States of America (and the large number of government officials involved in our personal situation), that I felt we would “never be allowed safety, security, privacy, emotional well-being or justice.”

We had been deprived of our Human Rights, US Constitutional Rights, “State” Rights, and even the Judicial Code of Conduct had been violated repeatedly in our case, and for several years. The repercussions to the agencies involved when we fled the United States was too large, and so, therefore, the persecution of my family and me would only continue. Since we left the United States, the government has further proved this to be a true statement.

We arrived at the border with only one suitcase each, unprepared but hopeful, toting 6+ file boxes of evidence and supporting documentation, tapes, pictures, videos, etc. of the plight we had been through. We had been relentlessly persecuted, terrorized, threatened and harassed by criminals, my ex-husband’s attorney, the court system, the police, and seemingly every governmental agency in the United States physically and/or through inaction.

I had contacted all of the available government agencies from the local level up to county, state, and federal levels and in various capacities about crimes against our person, property and abuse of the children. I questioned the apparent lack of help and action from the agencies and begged, sometimes desperate, for help. This had been going on for several years and as we continued to reach out for help from anyone and everyone, the persecution and crimes against us only ever increased. We would be put in our place, was the message, and no one intended to do anything ever

My family and my situation is extremely severe, and has lasted more than six years (6+) now, only ever- increasing in intensity. Looking back, it’s hard to believe any of us have survived.  It is even harder to believe the lack of support and help. I know we are not alone. In fact, I personally know three (3) other women with the same sinister circumstances; women who are balanced individuals, excellent parents, and who are gifts to their children and society.

They are all mothers who are givers, lovers, communicators and honest individuals. Each of us has something in common, abusive ex-husbands with personality disorders and long lists of un-prosecuted crimes seemingly facilitated and covered up by the government.

Somehow something very unexplained had taken place in all of our lives, something that defies all reason and logic and which has lead to queries as to if my ex husband is a CIA Informant or a Freemason from seasoned investigators in two (2) countries.

UPDATE NOVEMBER 2012:

I am still in Canada with my daughter. My other posts have been removed. A book is currently in progress.

Synopsis:

I’m a real life mom that has to take on the jobs of an investigator, attorney, social worker, therapist and police officer and find a way to secretly flee from the U.S to save one(1) child in hopes of saving the other two (2) children, and also getting them out.   My ex-husband is a criminal into drugs and pornography, and the government is covering for him. Court cases are rigged  as court orders routinely falsified with police reports that contradict all other witness accounts and documents.

December 2012 UPDATE:

A link to the book: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ATCCKS4 

“THE PROJECT PART I: THE CIA INFORMANT”

After 7 days online my book climbed from the bottom to the top 34K Best Sellers rank for Amazon and #72 for true crime. The book is now being heavily sabotaged (since Wednesday night Jan 2, 2013), has a blogspot fake promotional site that is not Amazon’s, and delays in ranking reports. My author account was also hacked showing virtually no sales. This makes me feel more motivated to finish telling this story. Thank you, criminals and government– you’ve proved my point.

Please watch for my newest book, THE PROJECT PART II, which will be out mid February 2013.

THE PROJECT PART I: THE CIA INFORMANT Investigations into “The System” of crimes and abuse Carver County Corruption

Posted by MomTo3 at 9:35 PM

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Labels: amazon, book, CIA, Colombia, corruption, cover up, drugs, FBI, federal, fraud, Government, human rights, Investigator, IRS, money, organized crime, Persecution, Police, THE PROJECT PART I: THE CIA INFORMANT, Witness

http://mn.gov/web/prod/static/lawlib/live/archive/ctapun/0804/opa070980-0429.pdf

Mother Confronts Convicted KIDS-FOR-CASH Judge, Mark Ciavarella


Mother Sandy Fonzo Confronting Convicted Kids-for-Cash Judge Mark Ciavarella in Luzerne County, Pennsylania after Son Committed Suicide after False Commitment to Juvenile Detention Center like 4,000 other Juveniles Wrongfully Ripped Away from Parents, Families, Friends, and Schools for a Corrupt Judge’s $1,000,000 Kickback–None of the “Players” in Court Spoke Up, but rather, they all “played along.”

Mother Confronts Convicted

KIDS-FOR-CASH Judge, Mark Ciavarella

Luzerne County, PA 

“My son was my life, that’s all I had, and now it’s gone. I don’t have that same life. I don’t exist right now,” Fonzo told CNN.– We hear you, Sandy, and our hearts go out to you and your loss, the world’s loss.  I am so sorry.  This MUST STOP!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=wLahyYcu5BE

Uploaded on Feb 21, 2011    

Mother blames Pa. judge for her son’s death, yells at him as he exits court.For more, click here: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id…

 ABC News

Sandy Fonzo’s Beloved Son, Now Deceased, Committed Suicide after being Sentenced by Kids-for-Cash Judge Mark Ciavarella to Juvenile Jail

 

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,



TEXAS SHERIFF PUNCHES TO PUNISH PREGNANT (WO)MAN


EXCLUSIVE:  Texas Sheriff Deputy Punches Pregnant Woman

EXCLUSIVE:

Texas Sheriff Deputy Punches Pregnant Woman

According to the homeowner, as soon as she requested to view the court order a second time “the police forced their way into the house.”  She was pinned in the corner of the kitchen and that’s where the video starts. You can clearly see the 38 week pregnant women as she screams for help and reminds them she’s pregnant.

“I am pregnant!!!”

You can also hear the kids crying in the background as the CPS employee holds off the rest of the family while the officers assault her. She said she was in extreme pain because her stomach was pressed on the counter top. Shortly after that you can clearly see one of the officers punch the women twice in the back.
After releasing this story, I was contacted by a close friend of the victim  and she was able to provide some additional updates, none of which is good news…

She was taken to jail and her son was placed in foster care even though there were family members willing to care for the child. She was charged with assaulting a police officer although she denies any assault took place. While in jail she repeatedly asked to have her injuries examined and documented and was fearful for her unborn child. The jail nurse said she didn’t want to get involved fearing for her own job. No prenatal care was offered either. She was segregated because she was pregnant in an isolation cell where she slept on bare concrete and blankets and the lights were left on 24 hours a day. She was awakened every 15 minutes not because she made any threats of self harm but because that was the procedure in the isolation cells. She remained there for 6 days and when released she immediately went to her OB/GYN. They were able to take pictures of her injuries still present 8 days after the attack. They were also able to verify that these injuries were not present before as they saw her the day before the incident. They also documented that she lost weight while in captivity, not a good thing for a pregnant woman. She gave birth to another son soon after being released and once again CPS swooped in and confiscated the newborn at the hospital and placed him with a family member with severely restricted visits destroying the bonding and breastfeeding process.

Police officers will occasionally find themselves in situations where tensions are high and should use every means necessary to deescalate those tensions to resolve issues with civility.  However, it is becoming common place for police officers to quickly resort to violence, whether it be against peaceful people, or animals, and escalate the situation .

BrettSanders.me has obtained photos of the aftermath which shows bruising on the woman’s stomach as well as her legs.
11118285_992568190768367_1435692965_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11130717_992568180768368_943166541_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11125984_992568187435034_215817104_n

961648_992568184101701_1132891512_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please call the Hunt County Sheriff’s Department and let them know you have seen the video and pictures and this behavior is not acceptable.  Ask for  Chief Buddy Oxford:

(903) 453-6800

Also, go by and leave them a comment on their Facebook page. They need to hear from us!

This article is brought to you by our sponsor, Private Internet Access.  Encrypt your internet usage and support this site at the same time!

Share

Brett Sanders is a liberty activist, Bitcoin advocate, voluntaryist and investigative journalist based in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. His work has been featured on CBS 11, Photography Is Not a Crime, CopBlock.org, and TheLibertyBeat.com

 “Welcome to Hunt, TX”

http://www.hill-country-visitor.com/Cities/Hunt.html

Hunt, Texas is located at the junction of the north and south forks of the Guadalupe River, in the heart of the Texas Hill Country, where the rugged limestone hills separate the coastal plain from the Edwards Plateau. It was named for the friend of the founder, Alvie Joy in 1912. Alvie Joy built the first post office for Hunt, Texas residents, who were mostly farmers and shingle makers. Dating from the 1920’s private camps were built along the banks of the river and still thrive every season.

The Stonehenge II replica was built on the North Fork north of Hunt; in the summer of 2012, Stonehenge II it was moved to the front yard of the Point Theater in nearby Ingram. Stonehenge II is 60 percent as tall as the original, and 90 percent as large in circumference. Along with the replica of Stonehenge are Easter Island-type statues. Take Texas 39 to Hunt.

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

Related Postsx

Karl Lentz 136 – Keeping your claim in common law, and handling a complaint


Karl Lentz 136 – Keeping your claim in common law, and handling a complaint

https://youtu.be/KUtXBqsekYM

Craig Lynch

Published on Mar 2, 2014

To Donate:
http://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/…
Keeping your claim in common law, and handling a complaint
Karl Lentz’s website:
www.broadmind.org
to order invoice pads, training DVD’s, workshops, seminars etc.:
www.unkommonlaw.co.uk
Karl Lentz’s Talkshoe call:
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/…
Word Nerds (Gus Breton’s call):
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/…
CalmInLaw’s community call (Mike’s call):
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/…
Angela Stark’s website page on Karl Lentz:
http://privateaudio.homestead.com/Kar…
Youtube Channel page:
https://www.youtube.com/user/765736/v…
http://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/…

Category
Education

License
Standard YouTube License

Karl Lentz – Know the (Common) Law, Protect Yourself From Their Lies..


Karl Lentz – Know the (Common) Law, Protect Yourself From Their Lies.. (Video)

https://youtu.be/Yrd09qIiqZE

The Richie Allen Show
Published on Dec 10, 2014
Please Help Support The Richie Allen Show

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/th…

http://richieallenshow.com/
Tune in at 8pm GMT

http://www.davidicke.com/radio/player
www.FabRadioInternational.com

Talk Radio Europe on FM

Tune in at 8pm Bst
www.DavidIcke.com
www.FabRadioInternational.com

Talk Radio Europe on FM

Contact The Show

Email Richie@RichieAllenShow.com
Twitter: twitter.com/RichieAllenShow

License
Standard YouTube License

The Richie Allen Show

 

CPS Whistleblower Exposes CPS Corruption (Video)


re-posting, re-posting, re-posting

CPS Whistleblower Exposes CPS Corruption (Video)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HbMmWryH0vE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=61n0mlA8m9w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=EBaQwM1BmVA

MOM HAD NO REASONS TO “COACH” WHISTLE BLOWER KIDS


#BarnetPolice #Cover-Ups #EllaDraper: I had no reasons to coach #WhistleblowerKids

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=aCj5pCg3P1s

LITTLE GIRL WHO ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE IN OHIO DIES IN FIRE WITH GRANDPARENTS RIGHT BEFORE TRIAL, MOM LOSES ENTIRE FAMILY


LITTLE GIRL WHO ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSE IN OHIO DIES IN FIRE WITH GRANDPARENTS RIGHT BEFORE TRIAL, MOM LOSES ENTIRE FAMILY

THIS WAS NOT AN ACCIDENT.  YET ANOTHER CALL TO ACTION, ANOTHER MESSAGE THAT THIS COUNTRY IS NOT RIGHT WITH GOD OR THEIR OWN CONSCIOUSNESS.  FOR OTHERS, HOWEVER, THEIR CONSCIOUS AWAKENING HAS TAKEN ITS TOLL BEING FORCED TO WITNESS INJUSTICE AND TRAGEDY INVOLVING LITTLE CHILDREN AND BABIES.  THIS MUST STOP TODAY!

PLEASE DO YOUR PART AND FIGHT PUBLIC CORRUPTION, ESPECIALLY INVOLVING CPS, POLICE OFFICERS, CORRUPT JUDGES OF FAMILY COURT FRAUD AND “JUVENILE JUSTICE” SCAMS PURSUANT TO THEIR DIRECTION FROM THE STATE LEGISLATURES AND ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE AND SECRETARY OF STATE.  FIGHT FAMILY COURT FRAUD, FOSTER CARE FRAUD, AND ABUSE AND “DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” BY PROXY.  THIS LITTLE GIRL DESERVES THAT RESPECT, AND SO DO OUR CHILDREN WHILE THEY STILL LIVE AND HAVE A CHANCE.  AS TO TERRORISTIC PARENTS–FATHERS–WHO LEGALLY ABUSE FIT MOTHERS AND CHILDREN WITH BLOOD MONEY, MAY GOD HELP THEM NOW THAT THEY AND THE STEP-PARENTS CONDONING SUCH EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT BEHAVE AND CHANGE NOW WITH EARS TO HEAR AND EYES TO SEE, OR MAY JUSTICE TRULY BE SERVED BY THE LORD UPON THEM THAT WE RIGHTFULLY AND LAWFULLY BRING OUR BABIES AND CHILDREN HOME BEFORE THIS HAPPENS.

MAY THE “TRAINING, POLICY REFORM, AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT”ALSO CEASE.  CEASE ALL INCENTIVES TO CORRUPTION BY TRULY “ERRING ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION.”  ABOLISH CPS AND COLLABORATIVE COURTS AND COLLABORATIVE–CONSPIRATORIAL–MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING THAT COMPEL “COMMUNITY PARTNER”/FIRST REPORTER/”COMMUNITY KEY STAKEHOLDERS'” ACTIVE “COLLABORATION” AND INTERFERENCE IN YOUR CHILD PRIVATE PROPERTY TODAY!

A MILLION TEARS SHED FOR THE MOTHER OF THIS BEAUTIFUL LITTLE GIRL, AND MAY GOD HELP YOU COPE WITH THIS UNIMAGINABLE EVIL THAT, NEVERTHELESS, APPEARS TO BE EVERYWHERE.  I AM SO SORRY FOR YOUR TRAGIC LOSS, AND THE WORLD’S.

http://www.nbcnews.com/watch/nbc-news-channel/alleged-sex-abuse-victim-dies-in-fire-before-trial-420632131587

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police| CORRUPT TX BILL


IF No Fault Divorce, then No Fault Childhood, Right.  WRONG!

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

Image result for PICS OF KIDS GOING TO JAIL

SEPARATE BUT EQUAL LAWS AGAIN? 

SO MUCH FOR UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON GETTING THE NEW SCHOOL UNIFORM CONTRACTS

NEW RULERS SAY NO MORE SPANKINGS IN SCHOOL . . .  NO MORE CHOICE OF POPS BY THE PRINCIPAL IN LIEU OF AFTER-SCHOOL DETENTION . . . THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD BE TELLING PARENTS AND TEACHERS WHAT TO DO AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, . . . TO “CATCH(MENT ZONE”) THEM WHEN THEIR GUARD IS DOWN???   I CALL THIS THE NEW TWILIGHT ZONE FOR THE NEW NAZIS! 

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

On the bright side, THOUGH, maybe it will actually get them reading, so they better learn it while they still can! 

Click on the link below, or otherwise cut and paste or enter manually into the browser to read more about the surreal life, from Texas below:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/

From the reporters who were actually allowed to inform the “public trust” about the public servant in Pharr, Texas (Hidalgo County) who allegedly raped a teenage girl multiple times while three police officer co-workers watched and “protected,”

Source:  The Free Thought Project, New Bill Would Have Teachers Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children and Report them to Police, Jay Syrmopoulos March 24, 2015

WHEN IN DOUBT, SOUND IT OUT; WHEN IN DOUBT, READ (T/READ)!

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/#88vuAAYXTFSiWlku.99 (where “diagnosis” sounds like dia/g/og/gnossus/gnostic + “dia”/day/dei/deity/god/goddess/de/di/of)

AGE- END- A  21–SUSTAIN ABLE (JOB) GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROFESSIONS–LAW, SOCIAL WORKERS, GOVERNMENT AND CONTRACTED SERVICES, POLICE OFFICERS, AGE- N -CIES, “TEAC HER (HE/R PLACE WITH CHILD)” WARDENS, GRANT WRITERS GALORE–THE RIDDLE OF THE SPHINX IS FINALLY SOLVED! 

PROTECTIVE MOTHERS AND FATHERS, THIS IS WHY THEY CAN’T PULL CRIMINAL “RESPONSIBLE” FATHERS, FOSTER CARERS, AND CPS WORKERS OUT OF JAIL FAST ENOUGH TO CONVERT CUSTODY TO THE “RESPONSIBLE” PARENT, WITHOUT FAIL, AS A MATTER OF LAW AND POLICY, AND TO GET THEM HITCHED TO A WICKED STEPMOMMY OR STEPFATHER WHO COULD NEVER REALLY LOVE YOUR CHILD THE WAY YOU DO, THUS, RESULTING IN THE MAJORITY OF CHILD FATALITIES BEING FROM STEPPARENTS WHO WILL SURELY KEEP THESE KIDS IN THE SYSTEM–CHAIN/GENERATIONAL STYLE-GANG UNTIL THE AGE OF MAJORITY (21, AS IN, AGENDA 21) FOREVER CONFINED AND MADE TO BE “SUBJECTED” TO THE “DIGITAL PLANTATION,” AN ENDLESS CYCLE TO KEEP THE PROFESSIONS IN BUSINESS (AND THEIR TWO MILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL SUMMER DEPOSIT BRIBES FROM THE FARMER’S CLAIMS IN THE 1980’S THAT WERE SUPPOSED TO GO TO  HE THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE (33) PLUS THOUSAND CLAIMS FOR FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE IN THE MIDWEST THAT ALLEGEDLY, AS REPORTED ANYHOW, IN AS MUCH AS IT MAY OR MAY NOT BE TRUE (OR FALSE)!

THIS IS WHY INSIDERS AND AGENTS HAVE TRIED TO REASSURE SOME OF US, MUCH TO OUR BEWILDERMENT OF COURSE, THAT IF WE LOST CUSTODY IN THESE VERY SIMILAR, PATTERNED MIRROR CASES BEING ALL THE SAME IN ALL DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE US AND OTHER ENGLISH-SPEAKING COUNTRIES NOTORIOUS FOR THE SS, WE WERE DEFINITELY TARGETED AS THE GOOD PARENT WHO THE BAR AND PROFESSIONS HAVE THEORIZED WOULD, AND THOSE WHO HAD IT CERTAINLY DID,  SPEND EVERY LAST DIME THEY BEGGED, BORROWED, AND EARNED, GOING INTO DEBT TO THE ATTORNERS (ATTORNEY MEANS ONE WHO “TURNS OVER PROPERTY,” I BELIEVE WHICH DERIVES FROM THE MIDDLE ENGLISH FORM OF THE WORD) TRYING TO RESCUE THEIR MATERNALLY  DE-PRIVED/FUTURE DE-PRAVED) PRIVATE PROPERTY SOMETIMES REFERRED TO BY THE “STATE” AS “CHILD” FROM THE ALLEGED ABUSER OR ALLEGED SEXUAL ABUSER (AS THE “PLAY THERAPISTS” LI-CENSED BY CPS FOR “STATE OF TEXAS,” MARCIA KLEINMAN STYLE, BUT NOT THE MOTHER THEY TRAIN JUDGES, POLICE, AND COURT-APPOINTED/”PONTIFICATED”/ROMAN PONTIFF TO THE POPE,  ATTORNEYS AND GUARD-IANS AND “MENTAL HEAL-TH/E/VALUATORS-UNQUALI-FIED(FEED/FIEFDOM/SERFDOM) TO THE (WO)MAN, JAN SMITH, WHOREPORTS/PURPORTS TO HAVE BEEN THE INVENTOR OF WHAT WE HAVE COME TO KNOW AS THE MODERN CPS “RISK ASSESSMENT” “LEVELS” TREATMENT INDICATORS FOR SIX INSTEAD OF THREE MONTH DI-VERS-ION/ARY TREATMENT PRO-G-RAMS (THINK PROGESTERONE AND MYTHOLOGICAL EGYPTIAN GOD “RAM/SES” OR ARIES IN THE ZODIAC SYSTEM) THOUGH JAN SMITH LOST HE/R GRAND(LODGE)CHILD(PRONOUN-CED CELTIC LIKE KILLED/CHI/CHE/LIFE FORCE)TO T/HE SAM (I AM) SY-STEM DE-SIGN UNDER  PRESSURE F-OM HE/R CPS SUPERVISER TO KEEP T/E PA-RENTS INT/HE MOSTLY SUB-STANCE/STANDING UNDER THE BAR ABUSE SE-R/VICESOR CRIM-IN-AL CON/VICT/IONS NOT NE-CESS-ARILY DE-NOTING THAT ONE IS NOT NECESSARILY A CRIMINAL, BUT IS ONE RATHER WHO INDICATORS FOR LEVELS FUNDING INDICATES CAN BE LEGALLY LEVERAGED FOR FEDERAL STATE BLOCK GRANT “HELPING”/”PROTECTING”/RE-HABBING/RE-INTEGRATING INTO THE WORKFORCE AND FATHER HOOD AND MARRIAGE  (MAKING THEM SUBJECT FOREVER TO THE STATE FAMILY COURTS AND STATE BAR CON THROUGH LICENSE, OR, “LICENTIOUSNESS”/MORAL, CRIMINAL, AND SEXUAL DEPRAVITY OF ORIGINAL SIN, IF NOT N-TO-P” IN S O(W)MAN-Y  O F/OUR CA-SES THAT T/HE $20,000 DE-RIV/ATIVE  ANN-U(ANUS OF THE OTHER HEART) THE $2,000,000,000 F-ARME/RS’ (ARME MEANS FREE/ARMY/LIBERATORS) CLAIMS FROM THE 80’S THAT FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURES ON 330,000  FARM CLAIMS WE-RE/WON BACK BY A GROUP OF ARMY GENERALS AND THE SON OF A FORT COLLINS, COLORADO FARMER WHO STARTED THIS ENTIRE CLAIM WORTH OVER EIGHT TRILLION DOLLARS THAT THE FEDERAL US GOVERNMENT SAID THEY WOULD PAY OUT, BUT FOR THE THREE US CHIEF JUSTICES IN CHARGE OF THE SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, AS ALLEGED IN WELL-DOCUMENTED SEVEN YEARS WORTH OF RESEARCH BY A (WO)MAN WHOSE WORK I, Julian’s real mommy, took the liberty of posting on this b-log–“NESARA Law” hid away in Switzerland, the UK, and the Netherlands, I believe so that they could use it to bribe 533 of 535 members of the then Senate, as reported with a $200,000,000 bribe to usher in the agenda of the United Nations, “New World Order,” and overthrow the Federal, US Constitution and Bill of Rights who some  Benevolent “FOUR OR FIVE ‘VISIONARIES'” HAVE , AS REPORTED, BEEN TRYING TO RE-STORE SINCE the 1950’s.  Otherwise I think there is more truth than not, at least at first glance, though author trusts no one truly of this physical versus spiritual, heavenly  whorld/would/horus/the all-seeing eye or inner wisdom derived from the awakening physical, but not spiritual “death” when one experiences the descent of the pineal and pituitary glands from the back of the brain near the cerebellum, perhaps (I have to double-check on that one).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=N2c_UOIsLMQ

IF No Fault Divorce, then No Fault Childhood, Right.  WRONG!

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

Image result for PICS OF KIDS GOING TO JAIL

SEPARATE BUT EQUAL LAWS AGAIN? 

SO MUCH FOR UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON GETTING THE NEW SCHOOL UNIFORM CONTRACTS

NEW RULERS SAY NO MORE SPANKINGS IN SCHOOL . . .  NO MORE CHOICE OF POPS BY THE PRINCIPAL IN LIEU OF AFTER-SCHOOL DETENTION . . . THAT THE STUDENTS SHOULD BE TELLING PARENTS AND TEACHERS WHAT TO DO AND NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND, . . . TO “CATCH(MENT ZONE”) THEM WHEN THEIR GUARD IS DOWN???   I CALL THIS THE NEW TWILIGHT ZONE FOR THE NEW NAZIS! 

Teachers to Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children then Report to Police

CORRUPT TEXAS

BILL SPONSORED BY TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE, JASON VILLALBAS (R-DALLAS)

On the bright side, THOUGH, maybe it will actually get them reading, so they better learn it while they still can! 

Click on the link below, or otherwise cut and paste or enter manually into the browser to read more about the surreal life, from Texas below:

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/bill-teachers-diagnose-psychological-issues-children-report-police/

From the reporters who were actually allowed to inform the “public trust” about the public servant in Pharr, Texas (Hidalgo County/South Texas region close to the border) who allegedly raped a teenage girl multiple times while three police officer co-workers watched and “protected,”

Source:  The Free Thought Project, New Bill Would Have Teachers Diagnose Psychological Issues in Children and Report them to Police, Jay Syrmopoulos March 24, 2015

Read more at:

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

Forced Adoption: Cameron, It’s Time To Say Sorry


 

 

Hopefully, US follows suit to inquire, conduct due diligence, and return children, . . . but not “to take” more or ask for more money other than to compensate the survivors.

 

Researching Reform

Stemming from a former Australian Prime Minister’s heartfelt apology to Australian women who lost their children in the 50’s and 60’s to forced adoption (all for the crime of being unmarried), a movement in the UK to see our government does the same is now underway.

After hearing Julian Gillard’s now famous apology to the nation for taking babies away from mothers in Australia solely because they were single, Veronica Smith, a retired nurse who also lost her child to forced adoption in the 60’s in Britain decided to set up the MAA, or Movement for an Adoption Apology. There is a movement already in Australia, called the National Apology for Forced Adoptions (which celebrated its two-year anniversary last week), but none at present for women who lost their children at the hands of British forced adoption policy during that period.

For the 500,000 women in Britain who lost their…

View original post 76 more words

I Am The Witness, Motu Proprio, Toto Genere


Image result for picture of a witness

I Am The Witness, Motu Proprio, Toto Genere;Image result for picture of a witness

“Any/all words, letters, numbers, sigils etc. et al contained in this document are of my own interpretation phonetically only where no assumption/presumption shall be made visually/sonically/otherwise except (X7) by/of/from/for me alone;

Inasmuch as any/all things LEGAL are, in fact, not reality under/of/for/by ROMAN CIVIL/PHOENICIAN LAW, any/all attempts past, present, future to entice, seduce, coerce, aid, abet, deceive, procure, threaten, force etc et al me, the living witness motu proprio toto genere was, is, will be deemed HIGH TREASON against creation itself commonly inferred as god;

1. Any/all LEGAL NAME/S, TITLES, OFFICES, RANKS, etc. et al are UNLAWFUL and not reality and all who claim to be such a thing are, in fact, DEAD BY CONSENT where all who seek such a thing from another living soul is PREMEDITATED WITH INTENT TO COMMIT MURDER to aid, abet COMMISSIONS thereof;

2. Any/all spoken with voice, written via spelling and/or via any/all means of contact/communication/s are, in fact, prima facie evidence/s of INTENT to COMMIT fraud, high treason, enticement to slavery, mail fraud etc et al by any/all that do so willfully, knowingly, unknowingly, by commission/omission where ignorance of truth cannot/shall not/will not be proclaimed as a defense;

3.  Any/all use, claim, action of a LEGAL NAME STATUS, PERSONA via writing, speaking, acting in the role of is FRAUD, FALSE PERSONATION, IMPERSONATION WITH INTENT TO DECEIVE etc where any/all claims to the contrary are silent inasmuch as the DEAD BY CONSENT has no voice;

4. Any/all physical, spiritual connections created at any/all REGISTRATION OFFICES, OFFICERS was, is, will be DEEMED FRAUD, WITH INTENT where the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is prima facie evidence/s of such INTENT inasmuch as it exists (X-cysts) where the owners, creators, perpetrators in its continuance are by commission, omission, knowingly, unknowingly aiding, abetting, coercing, forcing, enticing, seducing, any/all living beings into SUICIDE via INTENT TO COMMIT PREMEDITATED MURDER to procure living energy for the lifetime of any/all souls

connected to this fraud;

Let it be known that any/all crimes/criminals associating with the LEGAL NAME/S, TITLES, OFFICES, OFFICERS, CROWN CORPORATION ASSOCIATION etc et al and the assuming, presuming, forcing, coercing, seducing, threatening of another etc et al by, for, of associating any/all who proclaim, claim, make known verbally, written and/or any/all means of communicating this fact are doing so with INTENT to commit any/all crimes listed in any/all STATUTES, ACTS, LEGISLATION they are bound to by willful OATH/S;

In laymen’s terms, everyone who claims to be party to any/all things LEGAL are, in fact fiction and dead by your own consent where I am the living, lawful witness to these crimes perpetrated against humanity/mankind worldwide. The assumption and presumption of this fictional realm is based solely in PHOENICIAN law where sound is the master of all creation. While you may or may not be aware, the fact that you are using any/all LEGAL IDENTIFICATION has you fully liable/responsible as an accused versus a living witness where you bear false witness against your fellow beings.

You are under spiritual contract via the fraudulent BIRTH CERTIFICATE where the SEAL is placed upon touching any/all documents depositing DNA where you and your parents/children are bound by that self-same DNA. The G.I.F.T. known as the GIVEN NAME is the GAMETE INTRA-FALLOPIAN TRANSFER or the inception of life itself where all human life begins as FEMALE. Thus the true meaning of REGISTER which is REGIS/to rule and STER/divine feminine creation itself whereupon a DEBT BOND is created placing everyone in SLAVERY as a result. The DEBT BOND value is set based upon how you and your children are GRADED/GRAY-DEAD where the more money you have, the more debt your children get bound in LEGALLY.

Legal is NOT lawful where the maxim of law that states legality is not reality should suffice, even for the most retarded of you reading this. Yes, you, are not only enslaved physically and spiritually but your children are too. You are bought and paid for with your deal with the Whore of Babylon COMMERCE/PHOENICIAN LAW/LEX MERCHANTORIUM/ADMIRALTY LAW via your MARK OF THE BEAST commonly called LEGAL NAME/S. I pity you; I really do because you are lost at sea

literally, allegorically, anagogically and spiritually inasmuch as your paycheck/money is the very price of your soul you settle on every day. The more you worship money and worship gathering it, the more you are spiritually enslaved, bought and paid for since this is your contract with the darkest of principalities. Please be advised henceforth that any/all actions you continue to do with this knowledge or previously without, regardless if you read this or not, you are bound by my intent where I, the living witness proclaim it and where you, the dead by consent spiritually have no voice to say otherwise. I grant you the golden rule where

Legal is NOT lawful where the maxim of law that states legality is not reality should suffice, even for the most retarded of you reading this. Yes, you, are not only enslaved physically and spiritually but your children are too. You are bought and paid for with your deal with the Whore of Babylon COMMERCE/PHOENICIAN LAW/LEX MERCHANTORIUM/ADMIRALTY LAW via your MARK OF THE BEAST commonly called LEGAL NAME/S. I pity you; I really do because you are lost at sea

literally, allegorically, anagogically and spiritually inasmuch as your paycheck/money is the very price of your soul you settle on every day. The more you worship money and worship gathering it, the more you are spiritually enslaved, bought and paid for since this is your contract with the darkest of principalities. Please be advised henceforth that any/all actions you continue to do with this knowledge or previously without, regardless if you read this or not, you are bound by my intent where I, the living witness proclaim it and where you, the dead by consent spiritually have no voice to say otherwise. I grant you the golden rule where all your actions of intent laid bare have you already judged by, of, for and in your actions past, present and future.`

p.s. I look forward to privately prosecuting each and every one of you or until enough get their due via the golden rule mirror to wake you up to your crimes against humanity…..sealed, sent with INTENT, the witness I am.”

Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia – I Am The Witness Motu Proprio Toto Genere [12/07/2013]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=31sTtH8Vm1Y

 

Published on Dec 9, 2013

Outside The Box With Kate Of Gaia on Critical Mass Radio recorded on December 7, 2013
Guests: Tracy, & Santos Bonacci
I Am The Witness Motu Proprio Toto Genere

“Kate Of Gaia is a two spirit Gemini dragon, radio show host, researcher and investigative journalist digging deep into the illusions of this reality. She has spent her life thus far in a full learning capacity with stages as a singer songwriter, writer, poet, diver, pilot, etc with the last many years spent exposing the lies within religions, politics, legal land etc.
She chooses to encompass as many aspects of this reality as possible to get the broadest perspective that she can.”
“Kate hosts an Open Forum style radio show called ‘Outside The Box’
where thoughts and ideas are shared, on any given topic or subject that is the flavour of the moment.
Kate now refers to her shows as ‘episodes’ and also likes to think of them as
‘nightly gatherings’ .
Broadcasting 7 nights a week at
7pm-9pm EST/Midnight-2am GMT
all ‘episodes’ are geared for the listeners to really get involved so that they are the guest speakers.
So join and share with Kate by tuning-in and calling-in.
You are always welcome.
You can listen to Kate live on air, and find the archived recordings of all her previous broadcasts here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/critical…

http://kateofgaia.wordpress.com
https://www.facebook.com/kate.rene.5
http://www.youtube.com/user/kateofgaia
Kate’s One Stop Truth Doc – http://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com…
The Long & Short Of It By Kate Of Gaia – http://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com…
Santos Bonacci’s Site – http://universaltruthschool.com/
http://criticalmassradio.co.uk/

FRAUD UPON THE COURT: PSYCHOLOGY WHISTLEBLOWER (SHORT VIDEO)


FRAUD UPON THE COURT: PSYCHOLOGY WHISTLEBLOWER (SHORT VIDEO)

Click on the link below to watch a short, but incredibly elucidating video testimonial by former CPS caseworker from Washington State who claims to have invented the modern CPS risk assessment for levels and indicators Title IV-D Social Security funding fraud to traffic children.  Jan Smith asks that we forward a copy of this to every Legislator, judge, court-appointed specialist, parent, and everyone we know to warn them that their children and grandchildren could  be  next, as were Smith’s  in her retirement from child protective services.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2c_UOIsLMQ&feature=player_detailpage

FRAUD


 FRAUD

* I have marked sections/parts/sentences that were referenced or derived from the book referenced here with an asterisk including the page number.

I recently (and synchronistically) received a document from a friend I had lost touch with over the last 3 years. Greg attached a pdf document entitled “Sirenames” . On opening this document, it presents a well-researched history of “Names” and was printed some time in 1860’s. It is titled “SURNAMES & SIRENAMES. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF CERTAIN FAMILY & HISTORICAL NAMES: With REMARKS ON THE ANCIENT RIGHT OF THE CROWN TO SANCTION AND VETO THE ASSUMPTION OF NAMES and AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF THE NAMES BUGGEY AND BUGG.” BY JAMES FINLAYSON. * (pg 22 – it would seem it was written in 1863 “This was the law in 1160, the same law was held as binding in 1290, and it ought to be so held in 1863.”

This document when considered in the context of what we know about the legal name, will (unfortunately for some) burst all the bubbles of the “freeman” and “Sovereignty” movements where the general consensus is that we have a “Legal fiction” name and a “private name” and that somehow and by some process we can access a TRUST of some sort and that we as beneficiaries are being denied access to it. There is also a consensus (which I too admittedly believed), that the correct process could free us from this matrix by rejecting contracts in the fiction name whilst simultaneously claiming its benefits. The fact of the matter is, and the essay title of sorts referenced above will make it ABUNDANTLY clear that the FICTION name is a FRAUD from beginning to finish. It will make it clear that you should have NOTHING TO DO with this fraud and that it never had and never will have anything to do with YOU.

Kate of Gaia can genuinely now say. ”I told ya so”…and she may even throw in “you left brained monkeys!” for our entertainment. 

You may also begin to see that any resistance by the courts is FEIGNED resistance to make you beLIEve that there is credence to the freeman and sovereignty argument. This is how they keep you IN the SYSTEM searching for a “solution” when there is none. If you don’t want your bubble burst and you want to continue playing in the matrix, then by all means…stop reading.

It is argued in the book referenced above, that the Ancient right of || the Crown and Parliament to grant license and have a prescriptive right to sanction all assumptive surnames before they can be considered legal * (pg 22) , and that any such sanctions should be carefully considered for its implications from the perspective that *a man’s name is a man’s property, just as much as houses and lands are property.* (Introduction. Pg3)

He gives a detailed & historical account of sire-names and surnames, their antiquity, purpose, use and abuse.

It is important to understand this, so that you may fully comprehend how you participate IN A FRAUD (which was in some parts of the world punishable by death) every time you use a name that is LICENSED to someone else, namely the State.

First, let’s establish some historical facts, then we’ll examine the modern use of the name. Hopefully this will serve to create a clearer picture from which you will be able to “see” the MAGNITUDE of the FRAUD you are in participating in when you assume the LEGAL NAME, including the magnitude of the FRAUD perpetuated AGAINST YOU by CRIMINALS of the highest order.

It outlines and points to a well-known fact that *every person of any position, even in the most barbarous of ages, has had at least two names* (pg. 8) and no; it’s not your “LEGAL” name and your “PRIVATE” name. * The first being that which the person would be known amongst his family (the private name), otherwise known as a home name.* (pg 8) In my case for instance, my family and friends know me as Rena. This is a prototype of my Christian name being Irini or Irene.

However, as we “come of age” and *embark in the turmoils of life, another name would be given either from a personal defect, some characteristic trait, or from circumstances by which one would be known among his own people, a public name. This name became the first and most honoured surname of the bearer.* (pg 8)

*” I, THE LORD, HAVE EVEN CALLED THEE BY THAT NAME. I HAVE SURNAMED THEE.” Isaiah xiv. 4.*(front cover title page)

These “public names” could convey information about broad genealogical lineage as well as a certain individuals personality or physical characteristics.

For instance, GEORGIOU imbues a child or individual with the lineage having come from a family of landowners as farmers; whereas if the same name where preceded with PAPA to make the surname PAPAGEORGIOU, it now describes the same lineage with the additional information being an ancestry of priesthood.

Surnames, Sire-names & Family Names were often used in combination to precisely describe the individual in question.

*Mons. A. Bockh deciphered a contract of sale effected in Egypt , which bore the names of the contracting parties, being not only described in the deeds by their proper names, but by a detailed description of their physical peculiarities. (Salverte, 67.)* (pg. 5 – introduction)

In commerce, a good name was paramount in which a good name gave real value to a contract or agreement.

The usage of a proper names was also paramount in recognising kin and the same stringent laws were enforced by the Court of Chivalry, or *sanctioned by the Earl Marshal’s Court, particularly on the occasion of Jousts and Tournaments which debarred any person from entering chivalry, who had dared to take upon himself the surname of another illegally or without Crown sanction or license. Not only this, but no Knight of France, Scotland, or Spain, would demean himself by raising a lance with a man who bore not his lawful name and arms. From these instances of fact, the writings in the book referenced above conclude to prove that this usage was established and recognized by the King in the year 1106.* (pg 22)

In matters of honour, a name served to remind people, *with perfect accuracy of detail, of the various events which had led either to a firm alliance or to deadly enmity between two tribes. Such was the influence of their recollections, that two warrior chiefs who chanced to meet in battle would conceal their names, lest they should be suggestive of some common tie of kin or friendship, which might furnish an excuse for avoiding the encounter. * (pg 17)

*A still more honourable fear dictated a rule, that no stranger who claimed hospitality should be asked his name before the expiration of three whole days, under pain of the most severe punishment the law could inflict. During that time, all hereditary hatred that a name might rekindle had to lie

dormant. During that time a generous hospitality had to take the place of a thirst for revenge.* (pg 17)

*The most notable instance is that of the exchange of the name of Bugg for Howard. Mr. Bugg could not have been aware of the origin of his name, for if he had been, he might have exchanged it for one out of many to which he had an undoubted right, without infringing, as he clearly had done, upon the property of a noble house “for a man’s name is a man’s property, just as much as houses and lands are property.”* (Introduction pg 3)

*”there are three crowns—the crown of the law, the crown of the priesthood, and the Crown of Royalty; but the Crown of a good name is superior to them all.” Talmud.* (Title pg)

*The idea that a man may assume what surname and as many surnames as he pleases is erroneous, where to affect that change is a confession of wrong in the event that it is not ancestral. * (pg 24) In our times, a man can change his name indiscriminately and at any time, for any reason by simply making the application and paying the appropriate fee. This should in the very least raise alarm as to why the free trade of name changes are bordering on the prostitution of names. A far cry from times past.

*The illegal and unsanctioned assumption of names was not even tolerated in the days of Shakespeare, where in the play “Taming of the Shrew.” He says: Petrucio.—” Why, how now gentleman ! why, this is flat knavery, to take upon him another man’s name.”—Act. 5. Sc. 1.* (pg 24)

It was further held to be unlawful to assume a name that was unsanctioned or illegal for the purpose of protecting a good name.

*As soon as a woman had become the mere toy of public debauchery, it was enacted by law that she should change her name. It was taken for granted that she had only been reduced to such a state of disgrace by some kind of force, and it was not thought right that she should prostitute both her person and the name which allied her to some honourable family. * (pg 26)

Today most people assume that the birth of a living child is a registrable event. The birth IS NOT the registrable event. The Birth event and the Birth registration are two DISTINCT and explicitly separate events. The criminals however, use this opportune moment to obtain a sanctioned License in the form of a DERIVATIVE of the NAME from your parents amidst the excitement and confusion of this wonderful joyous event.

Our existing Statutes requiring such a registration, are causing in fact to make what was, and has been accepted as a CRIME for millennia, LAW. The CRIME of deceiving a sovereign into granting SANCTION to a NAME that the licensee will with malice and aforethought use to COMMIT FRAUD.

This is the modern equivalent of a commoner assuming by SANCTIONED LICENSE from a SOVEREIGN the surname of ROYALTY for the sole purpose of claiming by NAME and therefore by ANCESTARY and FACT – a pecuniary interest in the estate of the sovereign; Effectively giving the deceitful licensee rights to the ancestral genetic property (body), characteristics and DEEDS (titles etc), and the PHYSICAL properties of the surname (the material wealth acquired by that sire-name).

The Birth Certificate application does not ask your parents for your family sire-name or patronymic name. Instead of the dignity and honour of your family sire-name, the state only asks for your GIVEN name but then ADDS your FAMILY name and encourages you to use it as a SURNAME. The State has effectively created a license for itself for the ASSUMED NAME, which you throughout your lifetime assume as your own.

It was decreed that people *were not bound to recognise the illegal assumption of a name.* (pg 27) A name without Royal license or sanctioning was by all accounts illegal and *no amount of twisting the law bound others to accept that assumption.* (pg 27)

It was believed and it remains true to this day that “Free Trade” in names would be detrimental to society at large. *What right has any man to the property of another? A family name is an inseparably invested property.* (pg 28)

You only need to look at today’s strict trademark laws that punish enterprising criminals who attempt to use a name to trade off of the good name of a well-known brand, even if by loose association.

However, *Genealogy in name (illegally assumed), implies Surnames such in fact; that if an abuse of this nature is tolerated, it will eventually become a serious difficulty as the custodians of their own good names would be inflicted a great injustice upon those families* (pg 28) who might unfortunately happen to have their name stolen or prostituted.

*Convicts* for instance, who sought to assume a new name to escape their past and *make a new course of life* (pg 25) , sought to procure a license from the Sovereign to change their name. *In France an express law relative to the false assumption of surnames and changes of names was enacted (II. Germinal of the year XI);

Art. IV.—Every person who has any reason for changing his name, shall address a demand to Government stating his motives. Art. V.—The Government shall decide in the form prescribed by the regulations of public administrations.

The Prussian provincial law (Landrecht), part ii., The Law title xx., s. 14, 406, enacts, “Whoever, even without illegal intention, assumes a family name, or arms without right, shall be forbidden the assumption under pain of an arbitrary, but express fine and this punishment, in case of transgression, shall be readily awarded to him.”

A Decree of the 30th October, 1816 also enacts ” Since experience has taught us that the bearing of assumed or invented names is injurious to the security of civil intercourse, as well as to the efficiency of the police force, we hereby order the following :

  1. No one shall under pain of a fine of from five to fifty thalers, or of a proportionate imprisonment, make use of a name which does not belong to him. 2. If this assumption * (pg 25) *or invention of a name takes place with intent to deceive, the regulations of the general penal law come into force.”

There is also a Royal Cabinet order of the 15th of April, 1822 to the effect, that no one may alter his family or general name without permission of the Sovereign.

“I (The King) do not consider it necessary, on the report of the Ministry of the 27th of March, to promulgate any further decree on the unchangeableness

of family or general names, but determine hereby that no one shall be allowed to alter his family or general name without permission of the Sovereign, under pain of a fine of fifty thalers or four weeks’ imprisonment, even where the act does not proceed from any unlawful intention.” Coll. of Laws of 1822, No. 7.,S. 108.

In Scotland, formerly, the false assumption of a Sire-name was equal to the false assumption of coat armour, which was punished as forgery. On reference to Brown’s Pari. Cases, p. 194, or to the Archceologia Papers, vol. 18, p. Ill, it will be found that the decision of Sir Joseph Jekyll to allow the assumed use of a name was reversed by the House of Lords. The Peers said upon their deciding the matter, “that the individual ought to have inherited by birth, or have obtained an Assumptive AUTHORITY for using the name”* (pg 26)

So what does all this mean in terms of your birth certificate, the NAME fraud and the crime you are committing & perpetuating against not only yourself, but your ancestors?

Instead of history, let’s now fast forward into today’s use of the name.

As many of you may already be aware, the system we are being ruled and governed under is not what we all think it is. It has very little to do with the elected members of the parliament because the Governance of the land mass we refer to as Australia, is a Corporate Business Trust and is therefore under the same rules that control international commerce, the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1936 US , Hague-Visby Rules and the Uniform Commercial Code.

This is true by virtue of the fact that the business trust, being the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA is registered in the District of Columbia as a foreign corporation with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, making also what we refer to as States – quasi States; since they too are registered in the District of Columbia.

These States then require by Statute the registration of a Live born. The Birth Registration form IS NOT the registration/declaration of a LIVE BORN creation of source, but is the granting of a license to the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA to use a derivative of your sire-name as a PUBLIC ENTITY for the exclusive use of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and their quasi states. Your parents being the sovereigns (kings or queens) granting sanction to its use and license.

More precisely, the State licenses a derivative of your sire-name, with the sanctioning being obtained via your parents through the Birth Registration form. Your parents inadvertently participate in the States (usually successful) attempt to deny you your incorporeal and corporeal hereditaments of your ancestors’ personal and property rights. Your parents are then led to believe that the derivative license of the name and YOU are one in the same thing.

This belief serves to have you accept that you are the product of the political subdivision of the sovereign state of the Commonwealth of Australia, giving you, the living man/woman ONLY the LEGAL rights and title to your personal property.

Your LEGAL rights are bound within the same parameters as those that govern the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA…and since you have ASSUMED A NAME that is LICENSED to the State, you too accept to be governed within the LEGAL bounds of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA because YOU have bound yourself to the LICENSED NAME.

When however, you use your ancestral name and not the name LICENSED to the State, you are not restricted to the legal bounds of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. In any case the use of a NAME LICENSED TO ANOTHER (in this case the state) is CLEARLY currently AND historically a criminal offense.

You may wonder however, how the state derives any benefit from licensing a derivative of your ancestral or sire-name? The very things that made it illegal and punishable historically to use an unsanctioned name also applies today, namely the use of a sire-name to gain pecuniary interest in any ancestral estate, in other words to exact FRAUD. This is evident by virtue of the fact that the separate quasi states use the license of the assumed name, which was obtained from your parents, WITH THE INTENT TO DECIEVE AND COMMIT FRAUD via its eventual use as collateral to back state debts when they access funds on the Capital Markets off-shore.

The license is valuable collateral because almost 100% of the population will fall for the name scam by agreeing to utilise the ASSUMED NAME licensed by the state, thus you assume BOTH the role of obligor to the state debts AND the role of he who AIDS & ABETS the FRAUD by using an unsanctioned and illegal name licensed to the STATE, NOT YOU!

Again, I repeat for your benefit that the criminals use the opportune moment of your birth, amidst the excitement and confusion of this joyous event to obtain a sanctioned LICENSE in the form of a DERIVATIVE of the NAME from your parents. The STATE is secure in the knowledge for the continuance of the scam since your parents will forever TIE the BIRTH CERTIFICATE, to the event of your birth, instead of the REAL event, which is was the STATES LICENSING of an ASSUMED NAME SANCTIONED by your parents.

The issuance of a BIRTH CERTIFICATE is the issuance of a RECIEPT verifying THE AGREEMENT to allowing the derivative of your Sire-name to be licensed by the state. The details completed by your parents GIVE the derivative that they are LICENSING to the state. The purpose of encouraging you to USE this name is many-fold.

1.YOU become a willing participant and party to the use of a name NOT licensed to you, but licensed to the State – A criminal has zero standing in accusing another of the same crime. 1.The State has licensed a name that has no LIVING representative of that CORPORATE FICTION NAME they have acquired a license to. They need a LIVING man or WOMAN to perpetrate the CRIME against the NAME, the sire-name, so that they can extract the wealth and benefits through the ASSUMED NAME for and on behalf of the State which has LICENSED said name. 2.Since appointing a representative with no apparent connection to the ASSUMED NAME would make it OBVIOUS that the purpose of the birth registration and birth certificate is to gain a LICENSE. The States coerces you from an early age to ALWAYS use your SURNAME (the license), never your family name, sire-name etc , so that it eventually becomes habitual to the extent that you equate this licensed name as YOU. 3.Your consistent use of a name NOT licensed to you, is designed to implicate you in the CRIME of using an ASSUMED NAME WITHOUT LICENSE. YOU are now a CRIMINAL with NO protection of your true ancestral name, heritage or the LAW.

It was the intent of the state to coerce and deceive your parents in the granting of the licence for an ASSUMED NAME for the purpose of obtaining pecuniary interest from the patronymic ESTATE and PROPERTY, directly FROM THE DESCENDANT THEMSELVES, whilst at the same time encouraging and insisting on your use of an UNLICENSED ASSUMED NAME in order to implicate you in the CRIME of AIDING & ABETTING the FRAUD.  

REFUSING the NAME not licensed to you is YOUR DUTY. Revoking the LICENSE or not PERMITTING its use in connection with YOU is not only your RIGHT since it was borne in FRAUD, but your DUTY in protecting the good name of your ancestors.

The Babylon whore should be more aptly named the BABYLON PIMP. The PIMP feeds the lustful greed ONLY by furnishing the name. It is up to the prostitute to fulfil the duty of the name, by answering to it and furnishing it with a “body”. It stands to reason then, that when we present our “bodies” in service to the name, it is WE who become the prostitute in service the Babylon PIMP.

We all inadvertently become collectively or individually the Babylon Whores when we assume the name FRAUD.

By rena from the sire-name Georgiou and family Iliades, sometimes known as mincess, kepala pisang or chicken legs 

Resources & References: SURNAMES & SIRENAMES. THE ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF CERTAIN FAMILY & HISTORICAL NAMES: With REMARKS ON THE ANCIENT RIGHT OF THE CROWN TO SANCTION AND VETO THE ASSUMPTION OF NAMES and AN HISTORICAL ACCOUNT OF THE NAMES BUGGEY AND BUGG. – BY JAMES FINLAYSON. http://www.forgottenbooks.com/books/Surnames_Sirenames_1000494186

The Sire Name Fraud (audio/video) with additional commentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=BxeQ2V9n4rw&feature=youtu.be

Kate of Gaia official web site http://kateofgaia.wordpress.com & original document is here http://kateofgaia.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/thesirenamefraud.pdf

OUTSIDE OF THE BOX FORUM – CRITICAL MASS RADIO – http://www.blogtalkradio.com/criticalmassradioonline/2014/06/29/outside-the-box-open-forum

 

 

FAIR USE AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND WARNING (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

CENSORSHIP IS A CRIME, AND SO IS THE “AS IS PHILOSOPHY” THAT ANYONE WOULD USE TO JUSTIFY IT IN COMMITTING SUCH A CRIME AND HIGH TREASON, AMONG OTHER THINGS.

1) CONTRIBUTOR TO THIS BLOG AND AUTHOR IS NOT A LAWYER, ATTORNEY, PARALEGAL, LEGAL PRACTITIONER, OR ADVOCATE, THUS, NONE OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS POST COULD POSSIBLY BE USED AS LEGAL ADVICE.  IT IS EXPLICITLY NOT THE INTENT.  ONE WOULD, HYPOTHETICALLY, USE AT ONE’S OWN RISK AND PERIL IN REALITY.

2)  THIS POST IS MADE IN GOOD FAITH.

3)  THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS POST AND ON THIS BLOG IS SOLELY FOR ACADEMIC RESEARCH PURPOSES AND/OR ENTERTAINMENT AND SHOULD EXPRESSLY NOT BE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES.  IT IS PROTECTED BY 17 USC, SECTION 107 (“FAIR USE”).

4)  THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR OF THIS POST IS “KATE OF GAIA.”

 

Please Help Save Kendall (Short Video)


donnellyjustice

When you are finished watching this video, please visit: www.savekendall.com

View original post

Angel’s Story, for Little Angel Buddy (Video)


Angel’s Story, for Little Angel Buddy

(Video)

Cleburne, Texas

0902_buddy_cook001

Photo Source: Courtesy of Family and WFAA

 ANGEL COOK’S

Testimony to the Texas Sunset Commission for Department of Family and Protective Services for the “state of Texas”

Click on the link below or otherwise cut and pastor manually enter into your browser to watch and to hear how Texas “protected” little angel Buddy Cook when they lied–omitted and misrepresented to cause injury and harm to a little boy–about his medical history prior to his passing one morning for  which they wrongfully and deliberately charged Buddy’s loving adoptive mother, Angel Cook and he/r husband, David.  This lead to a year of He___ ___ (double hockey stick) for Angel, David, and their seven healthy children, minus little angel, Buddy, but a lifetime more.  Pictures of Buddy readily available on the public Internet show a beautiful, lovable, adorable little boy who was much adored.  To Buddy’s  mommies, so sorry for your loss, and the world’s.

The world must know that hundreds of thousands of mothers and children, and not just adoptive families, are intentionally and recklessly made to endure and survive the same hostility and destructive retribution from terrorist cell called child protective services, social services, or, just commonly “CPS.”  We survive with you, Angel, without our children from our own bodies–real, private property.

CPS DOES NOT NEED ANY MORE FUNDING!  BUT THE PARENTS WHOSE LIVES IT DELIBERATELY AND RECKLESSLY DESTROYS CERTAINLY DOES FOR THE DEBILITATING LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD, AFFECTIONS, ANGUISH, TIME, SELF-DEFENSE, DEFENSE AGAINST FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF CHILD ABUSE, WORSE, AND TORTURE! REPORT WASTE, FRAUD, AND INEFFICIENCY IN GOVERNMENT TODAY! 

Unlike Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors which monitors DPSS, the local version of child protective and social services, Texas does not compensate or “settle” with its intended grant and funding, state “victims.”  But remember that you are not a victim, but rather a survivor as “victims” legally get “protected,” even when it hurts, is completely unnecessary, and sometimes kills innocent children and families.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=3TxQcDJVW3c

 

Click on the link to read more details about Angel and Buddy Cook and their family in Texas at:

http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/2014/09/02/adoptive-parents-cleared-wesley-cook/15001007/.

http://www.star-telegram.com/news/local/community/fort-worth/article4470414.html

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently, and lawfully.

ABANDON SHIP! COMMON LAW “MAGISTRATE” JUMPS (SHORT VIDEO)


ABANDON SHIP!

common law magistrate jumps (Short Video)

Click on the link below, or otherwise cut and paste or manually enter into your browser to view Mr. Harley Williamson practice his common law constitutional rights in a “magistrate” “court” in Australia.  Harley shows that he does not desire to “contract” with corporate security guards for the “queen” when, at bench, Queen informs Harley that he/r court is not a court of common law.  When Queen attempts to “remove” Harley from his own People’s court of record, it appears that Queen abandons ship.  Nice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_oIR_nhV5s

“The only issue with the way he handled it is he argued with them.

You are right you have every right to claim common law and when the judge left the room, you should have called for the clerk to note that the judge had abandoned ship and you are now in control of the court and dismissed the case!”

http://wp.me/pXLdg-uP

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

The Contributor this post is not a lawyer, attorney, paralegal, advocate, or any other kind of legal practitioner, therefore nothing posted herein should be construed as “legal advice” and should expressly not be relied upon in any alleged or legislative court of law or corporation of a joint public-private nature. 

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

Tim Fortescue From ‘Westminster’s Secret Service’ BBC 1995


Freemasonry, Kidnapping and Murder


Freemasonry, Kidnapping and Murder

From all accounts Maureen Spalek was the model mother, caring for her three children in the best way she possibly could. Life was pretty routine for Maurine, until she had a falling out with her high-level Freemason Husband:
 
“once married to an individual who told her openly that he was an untouchable high level Freemason. After a major disagreement and subsequent divorce her children were illegally taken after a visit to hospital for one of her children who was knocked over by a motor cycle in suspicious circumstances. The nurse involved wrote a report saying that Maureen was unstable and an unfit mother. The children were immediately taken in to care and very soon after adopted. Maureen has had independent reports stating that she is perfectly fit.” (Source)
 
When Maureen took her 4 year old with a broken leg to the hospital, she was forced to wait for over 24 hours before they would even treat him. Long enough to make any mother worth her salt angry enough to spit nails. When Maureen complained about this gross neglect, she was written up by the nurse in charge as being “defiant towards authority”.
 
The Nurse also wrote other derogatory comments about Maureen and filed her report with Social Services. As a result, all 3 of Maureen’s children were taken into custody by Social Services and placed in Foster homes. Maureen’s children were kidnapped and placed with other families without so much as a hearing to validate the seriousness of the Nurse’s report.
 
This ties into the recent events that involve Hollie and Anne Greig, whose home was broken into by police, ransacked as if by vandals, computers stolen and her locks changed. All because one lone and certified “nut-job”, who has befriended the pedophile gang that raped Hollie, and is still at large, wrote a letter to Social Services.
 
So, if you are a high ranking Freemason or close friends with a pedophile rape gang, UK Social Services is on your side. However, if you are a poor defenseless woman divorced from a high-level Freemason, or a little girl that was gang-raped repeatedly for years by a Pedophile gang, don’t bother complaining to the “authorities”. Unless you want more of the same.
 
After her children were taken by police, Maureen Spalek went to the Foster home to make sure they were not being mistreated. She rang the bell, no-one answered, she went away. The Foster parents called police and 7 police cars showed up on Maureen’s doorstep, kicked in her door, and hauled her off to jail.
 
As of this writing, no police cars have showed up or kicked the doors down of any of the alleged pedophiles in the Hollie Greig case. Not one. Maureen was denied legal representation and wasn’t charged until after she had spent some time in a cold dank prison cell reserved for loving mothers concerned about their children’s welfare.
 
The children of Maureen Spalek were put up for adoption. It appears that Nurse who wrote the report had a guilty conscience over the whole affair and was getting ready to “spill the beans” to Maureen.
 
“However, the nurse was murdered before she could speak to her. An individual was convicted of the murder and sentenced. Maureen attempted to get a visiting pass to the prison in an attempt to find out if this person did murder the nurse and why. Before she could make the visit the prisoner was killed in prison. Maureen is receiving daily harassment from Cheshire and Mersyside police organized through the untouchable masonic connections, she has also been the victim of corrupt judges and medical staff.” (Ibid)
 
 
The man who murdered the Nurse was identified as a “Contract Killer”. In other words, it is believed he was paid to kill the Nurse by someone who was very threatened by the direction things were going. He to had a twinge of remorse and was preparing to “name names” to Maureen. It looks like he was murdered as well. The prison stated he died “under suspicious circumstances”.
 
Yes, there are many ways to die, in “Merry Old Free-masonic England”. One could get hit by a car, or contract a terminal illness. It appears that quickest route to the funeral home involves the refusal to cover-up for the crimes of those that are connected to people in power.
 
To get arrested and thrown in “the clink” all you need to do is expose powerful Pedophiles, like Robert Green, or send your child a birthday card, like Maureen Spalek. Yes, Maureen Spalek was arrested once more for the horrific crime of sending a birthday card to her son. The son she painfully brought into this world. The son whose diapers she changed. The son who she fed and taught to walk. The son who was unlawfully kidnapped by the State.
 
Undoubtedly, as we speak, the police have placed surveillance on Maureen’s home (probably similar to the surveillance that tipped them off to the change of heart experienced by the now dead Nurse and her dead killer) where they monitor her night-time prayers for any mention of the names of her kidnapped children.
 
Still a third case has come to my attention. This one involves a Joseph Wallace, who demanded that the City of Glasgow explain to him why his son was permitted to be supervised by a State employee with a record of child molestation. It appears that Joseph’s son was also victimized by this animal. The Glasgow city attorney responded that the matter really wasn’t their concern and implied that somehow, if this employee they apparently hired to work around children, had child molestation in his past, it was Joseph’s duty and not theirs to discover it.
 
We can see now the genuine concern that our politicians have for our children. They are hard at work throwing journalists like Robert Green, or birthday card senders, like Maureen Spalek, in jail. Apparently they cannot afford to provide either Robert or Maureen with legal counsel because their lawyers are to busy helping to orchestrate a cover-up so horrific it defies imagination.
 
The only weapon we the people have is exposure. Please donate and help make this happen. Every penny will go towards helping publicize the Hollie Greig and Maureen Spalek case all across the internet.  

Grazzini-Rucki v. JUDGE David Knutson, US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Reply Brief


Grazzini-Rucki v. Judge David L. Knutson

US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Reply Brief

 GRAZZINI-RUCKI REPLY BRIEF IN THE US EIGTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AGAINST JUDGE DAVID L. KNUTSON, MN FAMILY COURT JUDGE BELOW (FIRST LINK)

https://www.scribd.com/embeds/257912195/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&show_recommendations=true

CORRUPT LINKS TO VIDEOS PERTAINING TO THE GRAZZINI-RUCKI CASE AND LAWYER MICHELLE MACDONALD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyCfGMoXX4Y

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQC_dNJRJmc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AHZzHy9qFs

 

Click on the link above to read the reply brief filed by Attorney Michelle MacDonald in the US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for Minnesota mother Sandra Grazzini-Rucki.  “Sam” hasn’t seen he/r children in over two years pursuant to Federally and (US) Constitutionally impermissible post-judgment court “orders,” though Grazzini-Rucki was not noticed of any such “orders” until s/he received a call one morning telling he/r that s/he had to vacate he/r home in which s/he raised five children with only the clothes she could carry by Noon, or to otherwise be arrested.  Sandra, or, “Sam,” the epitome of a church-going “soccer mom” with no criminal history, no mental health issues, and no alcohol or substance abuse problems was as stunned as all Real Americans reading this post should be. 

Sandra was informed that s/he could no longer be a part of he/r children’s life, he/r ex-husband, the children’s father, David Rucki, reportedly a character with a shady livelihood, as per Sandra, was given sole custody of the five children, one of whom, last Author read on Carver County Corruption website (founded by another similarly deprived and violated mother, Lea Banken-Dannewitz, also of Minnesota), one of Sandra’s teenage daughters had allegedly run away from he/r father’s home.  To make matters more complex, David Rucki’s sister and he/r daughter moved into Sandra’s home where s/he had raised a happy family and lived for almost two decades without incident or injury to the children.  Apparently, though Author has not read any court papers as they are most likely confidential (naturally)with regard to the matter to confirm, and not that Author would want to invade the privacy of a another most likely shell-shocked mother also like  the  Author of this post and website who has not been “permitted’ any meaningful contact with he/r only child, a little boy who is now eight years old, in almost three years pursuant to similarly perplexing “orders” issued by a similarly situated family court of fraud in Harris County, Texas in Houston by Judge Lisa A. Millard and Associate Judge Conrad Moren, David Rucki’s sister not only took over Sandra’s home and moved in with he/r own family, but was reportedly given custody of Sandra’s children because father David Rucki , as reported, did not want it.  Real Responsible!

 

Thank your Creator today for Real lawyers and family advocates like Michelle MacDonald, who is working on various projects such as the Family Innocence Project and has a website called Family Court.com who happened upon Sandra and decided to take he/r case pro bono.  Together, they have been through quite the ride and even submitted multiple briefs to the Highest Court in all the Land, the US Supreme Court, on writ of certiorari which can be found on the blog . 

 

Author of  (DEDICATED TO) The Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and Our Children Who Want to Come Home , was excited to learn today that Ms. MacDonald has joined forces with California Coalition for Families and Children, which is also trying to eradicate the judicially created, thus, judicially legislated doctrine of “judicial ‘immunity.'”  Michelle is fighting in the US Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals federal district while Mr. Colbern Stuart, president of California Coalition (“CCFC”) has been fighting the Good fight for families and freedom in the Federal US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals District following the US Third Circuit Court’s landmark decision against Kids for Cash Judge Mark Ciavarella and Mike Conahan in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania that set precedent which is binding and persuasive within the Third Circuit Court region that encompasses Pennsylvania and New Jersey.    Good luck!

 

Go  to www.weightiermatters.com for the latest on California Coalition for Families and Children 9th Circuit Court Action, or Check out Michelle’s website http://www.macdonaldlawfirm.com/.

MAP OF THE US FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT REGIONS WHICH MAKE THE LAWS FOR THEIR TERRITORIES

ANOTHER NEW JERSEY MOM, ANOTHER NOBLE FIGHT AGAINST SOCIAL SERVICES AND COLLABORATIVE POLICE


ANOTHER NEW JERSEY MOM,

ANOTHER NOBLE FIGHT AGAINST

SOCIAL SERVICES

Michelle Mammaro
Michelle Mammaro with daughter, Daniella (Phillipsburg, New Jersey)

A Federal District Court in Trenton, New Jersey ruled that Department of YOuth and Family Services (“DYFS”)–New Jersey’s child protective services agency–is not eligible for good faith, or, “qualified,” “immunity.”  The state attorney general’s office intends to appeal this decision, although, as reported, there is no precedent on the books for an interlocutory (pre-trial) appeal on a decision against qualified–“good faith”–“immunity” for injunctive relief that requires reform of the child protective services agency. 

New Jersey is located within the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the seat of which is in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  Mother, Michelle Mammaro of Phillipsburg, age 29, reports that he/r  five year old daughter, Daniella, was parentally kidnapped by he/r father, Damon Mammaro.  Child protective services “DYFS” and Watchung Police re-victimized Michelle and Daniella with a protracted service plan and allegedly lied and misrepresented facts and timelines to the court to capitalize on the situation for the agency’s quota and treasury.

The trend is an egregious one that plagues the New America, and the impunity of social workers everywhere can only be said to “shock the collective conscience” and reeks of callous indifference and recklessness unparalleled in the history of this Republic USA.

To Read about the Details in this story, click here http://www.nj.com/warrenreporter/index.ssf/2015/01/dyfs_employees_fabricated_evid.html#incart_river.

Source: The Warren Reporter,N.J. mom says ‘DYFS’ employees fabricated evidence in parental rights case, Emily Cummins,
January 21, 2015 at 4:17 PM, updated January 23, 2015 at 3:00 PM  http://www.nj.com/warrenreporter/index.ssf/2015/02/attorney_general_to_appeal_nj.html

Warrants for Arrest and Secret High Court Hearing for the Mother Pt 1of2


Social Action 2014


Sabine McNeill ~ SIGN the petition: http://is.gd/LCNm7L
London, United Kingdom

18 Feb 2015 — You can’t either imagine or make it up, dear Supporters!

https://victimsunite.files.wordpress…. But I’ve gone through this gradual shock therapy ever since I started http://victims-unite.net in August 2010.

First of all, there are Warrants for Arrest against the mother and myself. But I have already received very nice support from a solicitor who phoned the Police on my behalf.

Secondly, I have the report below from yesterday – OUTSIDE the Royal Courts of Justice. Since the mother was not there, no McKenzie Friend was allowed, not on behalf of the grandparents either.

However, a solicitor was found ‘from nearby’ who is now studying the bundle.

I can assure you that nobody knows the case as well as I do, as I have spent a lot of time with Ella since November. As a systems analyst I look…

View original post 400 more words

All Public Officers are Trustees


Freedom Documents

(For Frank ‘Austin’ England) aka Austin
 

ALL PUBLIC OFFICERS ARE TRUSTEES

EXPANDED TEXT 

Black’s Law Dictionary, Abridged 6th Edition, p. 1230:
Public Office “Essential characteristics of a ‘public office’ are:
(1) Authority conferred by law,
(2) Fixed tenure of office, and
(3) Power to exercise some of the sovereign functions of government.
(4) Key element of such test is that “officer is carrying out a sovereign function’.
(5) Essential elements to establish public position as ‘public office’ are:
(a)Position must be created by Constitution, legislature, or through authority   conferred by legislature.
(b)Portion of sovereign power of government must be delegated to position,
(c)Duties and powers must be defined, directly or implied, by legislature or through legislative authority.
(d)Duties must be performed independently without control of superior power other than law, and
(e)Position must have some permanency.”
[Black’s Law Dictionary, Abridged 6th Edition, p. 1230]

63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers…

View original post 3,509 more words

CONNIE AND AALIYAH’S NIGHTMARE (VIDEO)


CONNIE AND AALIYAH’S NIGHTMARE  (VIDEO)

On knowledge and belief, a young man who had the courage to stand up for mothers and children who were being emotionally, physically, and, as reported, sexually abused (the little girl ) by perpetrator named and who attempts to defend himself below, received four consecutive ten year sentences it what may or may not have been a traditional Texas entrapment scheme of cover-up of blatant and egregious government abuse, crime, treason, and backwoods shenanigans the likes of which have been portrayed on movies such as Deliverance and Broke Back Mountain.  His name is Joey Dauben, that is, the young man who fearlessly reported out of Ellis County, Texas for the Ellis County Observer, his baby publication that they stole from him.  Although author of this blog has zero firsthand, knowledge of exact , events, experience with these people and these schemes are in he/r area of expertise as he/r own son may or may not have been a victim of this brand of alleged deviant monster(s) in the same state, and is aware of so many other similar stories nationwide and worldwide.  The fact that said reporter was convicted for the very same crimes he purported to be exposing does not help the government and law enforcement’s case.  WARNING—SENSITIVE, GRAPHIC MATERIAL NOT SUITABLE FOR CHILDREN (VIEWER AND READER DISCRETION IS ADVISED).

THE TRUTH IN THESE KINDS OF CASES IS INTENTIONALLY SET UP TO BE VIRTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO LAWFULLY ADJUDICATE  BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT–IT IS THE NATURE OF THE VERY CRIME AND GANG-STALKING RING MENTALITY AND TACTICS, BUT THE AUTHOR OF THIS POST CHOOSES TO PUT INFORMATION OUT THERE AND CHALLENGE REAL AMERICANS, AND ESPECIALLY REAL MOMMIES AND DADDIES of the REAL America WHO HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY DEPRIVED OF ALL THEY LOVED AND CARED ABOUT IN THIS WORLD, THEIR CHILDREN, AND MUCH MORE SO THAT IT IS NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE (BUT FOR GOD) TO BUY THEM BACK FROM THIS SAME EVIL SYSTEM, ON KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF AND INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE, to READ, READ, READ, AND READ SOME MORE, AND TO DRAW ONE’S OWN CONCLUSIONS TO SOMEDAY ARRIVE OR PREPARE TO ARRIVE AT THE REAL TRUTH, AND THE “GREY” AREA IN-BETWEEN.

 Watch

“Daddy’s Worm” © Copyright SaveAaliyah.comPublished on Youtube.com by endpedophilia on April 11, 2009 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=krihOkBsEt4

 GO TO HTTP://SAVEAALIYAH.COM TO HELP GET THIS CHILD OUT OF THE HANDS OF A CHILD MOLESTER. NEW DOCUMENTS UP ON THE SITE. Connie has taken a polygraph that will be available on the site, Youtube License

DA Scott Owens with wife Laura, son Gentry and daughter Dessie [PDF | Click Here to Read, Download, View or Print | AOL IM Chat Conversations w/ DA Scott Owens; Dustin Thompson; Shane Crowe; Glenn Sacks; Teri C. Stoddard]

Exposing the Unfruitful Works of Darkness

PlacerTheCountyObserver

https://placercountyo.wordpress.com/2011/12/18/dustin-thompson-threatens-to-murder-connie-bedwell/

https://placercountyo.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/pic-conniebedwell.jpg

Connie Bedwell: Placer County officials are threatening her with jail if she doesn’t remove the Daddy’s Worm video or SaveAaliyah.com. The Placer County Observer urges its readers to mirror every bit of that Web site and re-broadcast and re-publish that video all over the place.

https://placercountyo.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/thepco_aolimconvo.pdf

https://placercountyo.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/pic-judgeordernobodyonconniesbehalf.jpg

http://saveaaliyah.com/timothy_bedwells_public_case

Govt Ties to Child Sex Trafficking: Special Report, Published on Youtube.com by TheAlexJonesChannelThe Alex Jones Channel on August 08, 2013, Youtube License,

Click on the link below to watch.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaGOsQRuCfw&feature=youtube_gdata_playe

http://youtu.be/BaGOsQRuCfw

Aug 8, 2013

The youngest child was 13 years old, the agency said.

The raids resulted in the arrest of 150 “pimps” involved in the commercial exploitation of both adults and children, said Ronald Hosko, assistant director of the FBI’s criminal investigative division.

It was the FBI’s largest action to date focusing on the recovery of sexually exploited children, and took law enforcement agencies to streets, motels, casinos and social media platforms, Hosko said. He said he hoped it would focus attention on sex trafficking, “this threat that robs us of our children.”  The pimps preyed in particular on troubled children, including children from broken homes, authorities said. In some of the cases, they used a popular online classified site, Backpage, to sell the children for sex, authorities said.
Stay in the know – Follow Alex on Twitter: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
‘Like’ Alex on FACEBOOK – https://www.facebook.com/AlexanderEme...
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.com/
http://www.infowars.net/

RETALIATION BY POLICE AND CPS (short video)


RE-POSTING, RE-POSTING, RE-POSTING

Harassment by Cops and CPS

Simply for Speaking Out AND POSTING ABUSE OF POWER

Click on the following link to WATCH the corrupt and highly abusive, yet ever so ubiquitous malicious and retaliatory shenanigans of one who identifies herself as “Lindsay” or “Lindsey” “from ‘Family Services,'” “Bekah Devon or Deban,”  ” with Children and Family Services ( because of a report of some ‘concerns,'” because s/he saw the mother’s “videos” of their operation, and then there is he who identifies himself as “Officer Swanson,” who apparently thought it was a dire emergency to violently bust into a large, beautiful new home, at first refusing to identify himself as properly and timely demanded by the mother,  where everyone inside (mother and daughters) was at peace–daughters were taking a nap–to . . . turn the water faucet on and off.?  So, basically from this author’s point-of-view, all that was accomplished was fear, naturally defensive reaction typical of any animal backed into a cage and ambushed, the mother’s private property sometimes described as “children” for monetary purposes by the “state” were made to endure unnecessary, preventable sleep deprivation, exposed to violence, stigmatization of being forced to associate with a criminal element by force of law, and their slumber was haunted and traumatized by visions of some strange, alien perpetrating Neo-Nazi skinhead whose eyes were practically popping out of his head with roid’ rage, or something, to help account for his unnecessary roughness codified as assault or violence, at least, in some states.  The  two oompa-loompa killer bimbo pseudo-social workers donning tight clothing and the air of eau du’ stinky . . . witch, however, will no doubt make for many more nightmares, more sleep deprivation, and if not present before, fear, loathing, and mockery, and utter distrust and irreverence for any and all forms of legal code enforcement, but u.S. unconstitutional, thus, unlawful, hostile foreign “authority.”

That being said, “Officer Swanson” is welcome to join those of us who are truly innocent, wrongfully persecuted mothers of legally, unlawfully kidnapped, essentially missing little boys where there was no good cause or provocation–save for, . . . but you must know what the Good Book says about the root of it.  Author would be pleased for Officer Swanson to accompany he/r to the real perpetrator’s home and take back that which has been violently, cruelly beyond belief, and in the most deviant, perverted, twisted, manipulative, deceptive, and truly unprovoked manner that perhaps only an experienced peace or police officer must understand . . . stripped away.  By all means, you are welcome to stay in character for that little mission or rendezvous.

Talk about a new kind of training for responsible, criminal, but conveniently and timely . . .healthy . . . married fathers who live double lives.  One can only dream of the officer curriculum the creative, passionate, and committed mothers of lost and wrongfully kidnapped children might “imagine,” being that they are presumed, as are the same “high conflict” fathers whose favorite abuse is legal, “delusional” by re-“victimizing” back-engineered design.

HTTPS://YOUTU.BE/5EYWEJ77IUC

Posted September 19, 2014, “Unlawful Entry, CPS and Police,” as uploaded to Youtube.com and reported by Donnelly Keaton Burns’ real mommy, Sharon Burns (real father, Bill Burns) at http://donnellyjustice.me/2015/02/16/harassment-by-cops-and-cps-simply-for-speaking-out-and-posting-abuse-of-power/on www.donnellyjustice.com (your time would be well spent to visit this website)

If the link above is disabled for any reason, simply cut and paste the title or the link, or otherwise enter manually into your browser to search.

FAIR USE NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

(PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

Author of this post and blog, Dedicated to the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and our Children who Want to Come Home, but especially to my little jewel, most precious julian, emphasizes that author is not a lawyer, is not an attorney, nor a legal practitioner or paralegal.  Expressly, there is not,any “legal advice,” and nothing herein or on this blog could possibly, therefore, or, rather, should expressly not be miscontrued as “legal advice.”

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in unambiguous GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and its Bill of Rights, pursuant to the freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the freedom to peaceably assemble (in this peaceful forum).
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

The Lebensborn Program Pt. I: Nazi Program to Breed ‘Master Race’


Family Court Injustice

Family Court Injustice has been documenting events and real life stories of children stolen from their families by unjust courts or through government and judicial abuses of power. This article about the Lebensborn Program (1935-1945), Nazi Occupied Europe gives a glimpse into the Nazi eugenics program to create a “master race” that also included kidnapping and murder in it’s policies. Equally horrendous is the persecution of women participating in Lebensborn, and their innocent children, after the War ended. A dark chapter from history is the Lebensborn Program or Registered Society Lebensborn (1935-1945), Nazi Occupied Europe. Under the Lebensborn program, women (mostly unmarried) who were approved by the Nazi party to be racially pure were encouraged to get pregnant with SS officers, and high ranking Nazi officials in order to breed a “master race”.While some of the women chose to keep their children, a majority gave their children over to state…

View original post 1,349 more words

Mother Seeks Protective Order Against BRAZORIA COUNTY CPS (TX)


MOTHER FORCED TO SEEK PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST BRAZORIA COUNTY CPS IN TEXAS

Image result for CPS WORKER WOMAN STEALING CHILD AND GETTING CAUGHT PIC

 

 

Click on the link below to watch.

http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/18/11534526/?fb_ref=Default

Child Protective Services is being ordered to stay away from a child, due to what happened to the girl while she was in the agency’s custody.
KHOU Staff, KHOU.com 10:21 p.m. CDT September 28, 2011
CONNECTTWEETLINKEDINCOMMENTEMAILMORE

HOUSTON Child Protective Services is being ordered to stay away from a child, due to what happened to the girl while she was in the agency s custody.

Jaime Brown, the girl s mother, said it s been a long fight.

I felt very helpless. Very helpless, and very alone, she said.

Brown s daughter was taken from her by Child Protective Services in July of 2009, because of allegations of neglect.

Brown claims it is all a big mix-up.

I was horrified. I did not know what was happening. I wanted to help her and I couldn’t, she said.

After 18 months in a CPS overseen group home 14-year-old Christianne ran.

The case worker called (her) mom and said she ran away, but you find her, you can keep her, said Julie Ketterman, the Brown s attorney.

That is exactly what her mother did. After Brown found her daughter and made sure that she was safe, her attorney went to court turning the tables on CPS asking for a protective order against Child Protective Services, because of what allegedly happened when Christianne was in CPS’s care.

She was beat up quite a bit. There was the running away. She has braces and the wires were literally falling off of her teeth, Ketterman said.

In August of this year the Brazoria County court ruled in her favor granting a protective order saying:

(CPS) engaged in conduct constituting family violence and good cause exists for issuance of a protective order…in best interest of the child.

It is a one-page ruling with big potential impact.

It could snowball, said Ketterman.

That is because if you apply CPS’s own rules when it comes to child placement, CPS may now have a problem.

If there is a finding of child abuse or neglect or family violence, then you no longer qualify to have a child placed, said Ketterman.

Now it is the agency itself that now has this finding of abuse. A hearing in Brazoria County could make the order against CPS permanent for two years. We contacted CPS and the agency told us simply that they would be answering the allegations in court.

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

IT’S TOO MUCH: ACT ON YOUR CONSCIENCE! (SHORT VIDEO)


It’s too much!

Sabine McNeill Petition Committee (Video)

 

“It’s Too Much!  Act on Your Conscience!”

I agree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=VNvQFlFy9Cs

 
The Holy Bible reads,
“And He has said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.” Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may dwell in me. Therefore I am well content with weaknesses, with insults, with distress, with persecutions, with difficulties, for Christ’s sake; for when I am weak, then I am strong.” 2 Corinthians 12:9-10

This means that when we are weak, we can be easily overtaken. When we reach out for God’s grace and mercy, He fills us with it and makes us stronger in a holy way. But at the same time, that weakness without God, can open us up to making weak choices through evil temptations.

Take a moment to think about your weaknesses. What holds you back from being your best self? Have there been times when you were too busy to let God lead your life? Were there times when you felt helpless or alone? God asks us to let go of our pride and let Him shine through our lives. :

  “Many years ago, large packs of wolves roamed the countryside in Ukraine, making travel in that part of the world very dangerous. These wolf packs were fearless. They were not intimidated by people nor by any of the weapons available at that time. The only thing that seemed to frighten them was fire.

Consequently, travelers who found themselves away from cities developed the common practice of building a large bonfire and keeping it burning through the night. As long as the fire burned brightly, the wolves stayed away. But if it were allowed to burn out and die, the wolves would move in for an attack. Travelers understood that building and maintaining a roaring bonfire was not just a matter of convenience or comfort; it was a matter of survival.”
We do not have to protect ourselves from wolf packs as we travel the road of life today, but, in a spiritual sense, we do face the devious wolves of Satan in the forms of temptation, evil, and sin. We live in dangerous times when these wolves roam the spiritual countryside in search of those who may be weak in faith or feeble in their conviction.
Saint Peter said “Be of sober spirit, be on the alert. Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Peter 5:8).
We are all vulnerable to attack. However, we can strengthen ourselves with the protection provided by a burning testimony that, like a bonfire, has been built adequately and maintained carefully. Because none of us are perfect, we all make mistakes and create bad habits. These bad habits and sins can be like a bucket of water on our souls burning for Christ, if we don’t repent. By taking the time to cleanse ourselves spiritually, we can grow and become stronger.

 

 

PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ROD CLASS ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING


U.S. COAST GUARD HEARING OFFICE DETACHMENT
CG HO MS 7160
4200 WILLSON BLVD, SUITE 600
ARLINGTON, VA 20598-7160
PHONE:(202) 493-6870 FAX: 202-493-6924

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD
ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

IN THE NAME of the People of the united States of America
Rodney Dale; Class U.S.N. Veteran
Carl; Weston Private Attorney Generals P.O. Box 435 CASE #______________ High Shoal, North Carolina 28077 (704) 742 3123
Petitioners

Vs Administrative Law Judge ___________________
Date issued________
UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION

CORPORATION LAW FIRM LAW OFFICER ERIC HOLDER U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenues, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001
DEFENDANTS

PRAYER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING; PETITION FOR REDRESS; BILL OF RIGHTS, ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES 1787 CONSTITUTION & 1789 BILL OF RIGHTS; ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES CODE: TITLE 5 FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, TITLE 5. SECTION 3331 OATH OF OFFICE, TITLE 5 SECTION 7311, TITLE 18 SECTIONS 241, 242, 1001, 1346, 1502, 1918, 2331, 1952,1954, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, TITLE 10 SECTION 333; VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE I SECTION 6, ARTICLE II SECTION 4, ARTICLE III SECTION 3, AMENDMENT XI & AMENDMENT XIV

PURPOSE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING—
NATURE & CAUSE

Due to the number of personnel involved in this action, Petitioners Rodney Dale; Class & Carl; Weston, file this Nature and Cause for a Prayer for Administrative Hearing. In order to save time, money, paperwork, and avoid a long drawn-out hearing, prayer is for the defendant’s Legal Representative, Eric Holder, to appear at this Administrative Hearing and speak on defendant’s behalf. The Law Officer Eric Holder (ATTORNEY GENERAL), along with his agents, are the legal advisors for all personnel working under the authority of UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, aka UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION.
When any action For or Against the UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, or aka UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION, becomes an issue in any hearing, whether Administrative or Judicial, it is the job of the Law Officer Eric Holder to represent and answer all issues of misconduct, bad behavior, and wrongful acts. Where there are any misrepresentations, Civil Rights violations, Constitutional issues, R.I.C.O. actions, or statutory violations against the American People, Law Officer Eric Holder is the designated legal counsel for ALL the personnel belonging to this Corporation. Law Officer Eric Holder is the designated official to answer any and all charges against personnel working within this Corporation, including any claims of wrongdoing or misconduct regarding their job descriptions that result in violations to the American people.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

This UNITED STATES COAST GUARD / DHS Administrative Court has Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Personal Jurisdiction over all DEFENDANTS that come under the following: Title 5 USC, Section §3331, Oath of Office, Title 22 CFR 92.12-92.30 Government Organization and Employees; U.S. Constitution Article II par. 9 “Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath…”; and Article XI par. 3 “shall be bound by oath…”; the Fourteenth Amendment. Section 3; the following War and Emergency Power Acts: The National Emergency Act of 1933, Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933, and the use of a Military Gold Fringe Flag under Martial Law and all public offices comes under the same standing under Title 10 USC as military personnel by and through their Oath to the same Constitution.

TABLE OF AUTHORITY FOR REDRESS

Constitution of 1787

1. Article I section 6 clause 2:

“they shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session”, and Section 8 par. 17: “to exercise Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square)…”

2. Article II section 1 par. 6:

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States…”, and par. 8: “before he enter on the Execution of his Office…”

3. Article III section 3 par. 1 and 2:

“Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”
“The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”

 

4. Article IV

Section 1 – Each State to Honor all others

“Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.”

Section 2 – State citizens, Extradition

“The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.”

Section 4 – Republican government

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.”

 

5. Article VI – Debts, Supremacy, Oaths

“All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

BILL OF RIGHTS – 1789

6. Amendment I.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

7. Amendment XII – Trial by Jury in Civil Case.

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

8. Amendment IX – Construction of Constitution.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

9. Amendment X – Powers of the States and People.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

10. Amendment XI – Judicial Limits.

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

 

11. Amendment XIV – Citizenship Rights.

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 3.

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4.

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT

12. Title 5 USC, Part I

Chapter 5, Subchapter II

Section § 551. Definitions
For the purpose of this subchapter—

(1) “agency” means each authority of the Government of the United States, whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency, but does not include—

(A) the Congress;

(B) the courts of the United States;

(C) the governments of the territories or possessions of the United States;

(D) the government of the District of Columbia;

or except as to the requirements of section 552 of this title—

(E) agencies composed of representatives of the parties or of representatives of organizations of the parties to the disputes determined by them;

(F) courts martial and military commissions;

(G) military authority exercised in the field in time of war or in occupied territory;

(10) “sanction” includes the whole or a part of an agency—

(A) prohibition, requirement, limitation, or other condition affecting the freedom of a person;

(B) withholding of relief;

(C) imposition of penalty or fine;

(D) destruction, taking, seizure, or withholding of property;

(E) assessment of damages, reimbursement, restitution, compensation, costs, charges, or fees;

(F) requirement, revocation, or suspension of a license; or

(G) taking other compulsory or restrictive action;

(11) “relief” includes the whole or a part of an agency—

(A) grant of money, assistance, license, authority, exemption, exception, privilege, or remedy;

(B) recognition of a claim, right, immunity, privilege, exemption, or exception; or

(C) taking of other action on the application or petition of, and beneficial to, a person;

13. Title 6, Chapter 1

Section § 113.Other officers

(c) Commandant of the Coast Guard

To assist the Secretary in the performance of the Secretary’s functions, there is a Commandant of the Coast Guard, who shall be appointed as provided in section 44 of title 14 and who shall report directly to the Secretary. In addition to such duties as may be provided in this chapter and as assigned to the Commandant by the Secretary, the duties of the Commandant shall include those required by section 2 of title 14.

14. Title 14, Part I, Chapter 5—Functions and Powers

b) The officers of the Coast Guard insofar as they are engaged, pursuant to the authority contained in this section, in enforcing any law of the United States shall:

(1) be deemed to be acting as agents of the particular executive department or independent establishment charged with the administration of the particular law; and

(2) be subject to all the rules and regulations promulgated by such department or independent establishment with respect to the enforcement of that law.

EMERGENCY WAR POWER ACT

15. Title 50, Chapter 34

Subchapter III, Section § 1631

§ 1631. Declaration of national emergency by Executive order;

authority;

publication in Federal Register;

transmittal to Congress

When the President declares a national emergency, no powers or authorities made available by statute for use in the event of an emergency shall be exercised unless and until the President specifies the provisions of law under which he proposes that he, or other officers will act. Such specification may be made either in the declaration of a national emergency, or by one or more contemporaneous or subsequent Executive orders published in the Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress.

 

16. Title 50

Chapter 33

Section § 1541
§ 1541. Purpose and policy

(a) Congressional declaration

It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Congressional legislative power under necessary and proper clause

Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer hereof.

(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to

(1) a declaration of war,

(2) specific statutory authorization, or

(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

MARTIAL LAW

17. In strict dictionary terms, martial law is the suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country is “under martial law,” we mean to say that the military is in control of the area that it acts as the police, as the courts, as the legislature. The degree of control might vary – a nation may have a civilian legislature but have the courts administered by the military. Or the legislature and courts may operate under civilian control with a military ruler. In each case, martial law is in effect, even if it is not called “martial law.”

MILITARY FLAG WITH GOLD FRINGE

18. Martial Law Flag “Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. Chapter 1, §§ 1, 2, & 3;

Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R. 6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy.” 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.

19. President Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive Order No. 10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated, purportedly, that: “A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides.”

20. FLAG Martial law; The use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulation no. 260-10.” 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483, 485.

21. Any courtroom that displays such a flag behind the Judge is a military courtroom which is operating under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or statute law. Restrictions.

22. Title 4 U.S.C. Section § 3 provides that anything added to the Title 4 USC, Sections §§ 1, 2 American Flag such as gold fringe MUTILATES the Flag and carries a one-year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of Title 36 USC, Section § 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and, purportedly, represents “color of military law” jurisdiction and when placed on the Title 4 USC Sections §§ 1, 2 Flag, mutilates the Flag and suspends the Constitution. (Refer to Title 18 USC, Section § 242, see Black’s Law Dictionary).

23. As provided by Title 36 USC SECTION § 173 and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-1(b), the Flag of the united States of America is defined and described in Title 4 USC §§ 1, 2. Civilians must use the Title 4 USC Sections §§ 1, 2 Flag (see Title 36 USC Section §173 and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-7) and when military flags are displayed by Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2, and Title 36 USC, Section § 175.

24. Title 5 USC, Part I, Chapter 3, Section § 301. Departmental regulations.
The head of an Executive department or military department may prescribe regulations for the government of his department, the conduct of its employees, the distribution and performance of its business, and the custody, use, and preservation of its records, papers, and property. This section does not authorize withholding information from the public or limiting the availability of records to the public.

25. Title 5 USC, Part I,

Chapter 3, Section § 305.

Systematic agency review of operations

(7) the National Security Agency, Department of Defense.

 

26. Title 5 USC, Part I,

Chapter 6, Section § 606.

Effect on other law

The requirements of sections 603 and 604 of this title do not alter in any manner standards otherwise applicable by law to agency action.

27. Title 5 USC, Part II,

Chapter 13, Section § 1305.

Administrative law judges

For the purpose of sections 3105, 3344, 4301 (2)(D), and 5372 of this title and the provisions of section 5335 (a)(B) of this title that relate to administrative law judges, the Office of Personnel Management may, and for the purpose of section 7521 of this title, the Merit Systems Protection Board may investigate, prescribe regulations, appoint advisory committees as necessary, recommend legislation, subpoena witnesses and records, and pay witness fees as established for the courts of the United States.

TITLE 5—GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES

DUTIES OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

28. Title 42 USC,

Section § 3742.

Duties and functions of Director

The Director shall have the following duties:

(1) Providing funds to eligible States, units of local government, and nonprofit organizations pursuant to subchapters V and XII-B of this chapter.

(2) Establishing programs in accordance with part B of subchapter V of this chapter and, following public announcement of such programs, awarding and allocating funds and technical assistance in accordance with the criteria of part B of subchapter V of this chapter, and on terms and conditions determined by the Director to be consistent with part B of subchapter V of this chapter.

(3) Cooperating with and providing technical assistance to States, units of local government, and other public and private organizations or international agencies involved in criminal justice activities.

(4) Providing for the development of technical assistance and training programs for State and local criminal justice agencies and fostering local participation in such activities.

(5) Encouraging the targeting of State and local resources on efforts to reduce the incidence of drug abuse and crime and on programs relating to the apprehension and prosecution of drug offenders.

(6) Establishing and carrying on a specific and continuing program of cooperation with the States and units of local government designed to encourage and promote consultation and coordination concerning decisions made by the Bureau affecting State and local drug control and criminal justice priorities.

(7) Preparing recommendations on the State and local drug enforcement component of the National Drug Control Strategy which shall be submitted to the Associate Director of the Office on National Drug Control Policy.

In making such recommendations, the Director shall review the statewide strategies submitted by such States under subchapter V of this chapter, and shall obtain input from State and local drug enforcement officials.

The recommendations made under this paragraph shall be provided at such time and in such form as the Director of National Drug Control Policy shall require. (8) Exercising such other powers and functions as may be vested in the Director pursuant to this chapter or by delegation of the Attorney General or Assistant Attorney General.

TITLE 5 USC, PART I, CHAPTER 5, SUBCHAPTER II—

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

29. Title 5 USC, Part I, 5, Subchapter II,

Section § 552.

Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

(C) rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained, and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations;

30. Title 5 USC, Part I,

Chapter 7, Section § 702.

Right of review

A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof. An action in a court of the United States seeking relief other than money damages and stating a claim that an agency or an officer or employee thereof acted or failed to act in an official capacity or under color of legal authority shall not be dismissed nor relief therein be denied on the ground that it is against the United States or that the United States is an indispensable party. The United States may be named as a defendant in any such action, and a judgment or decree may be entered against the United States: Provided, That any mandatory or injunctive decree shall specify the Federal officer or officers (by name or by title), and their successors in office, personally responsible for compliance. Nothing herein
(1) affects other limitations on judicial review or the power or duty of the court to dismiss any action or deny relief on any other appropriate legal or equitable ground; or
(2) confers authority to grant relief if any other statute that grants consent to suit expressly or impliedly forbids the relief which is sought.

31. Title 5, Part I,

Chapter 7,

Section § 703.

Form and venue of proceeding

The form of proceeding for judicial review is the special statutory review proceeding relevant to the subject matter in a court specified by statute or, in the absence or inadequacy thereof, any applicable form of legal action, including actions for declaratory judgments or writs of prohibitory or mandatory injunction or habeas corpus, in a court of competent jurisdiction. If no special statutory review proceeding is applicable, the action for judicial review may be brought against the United States, the agency by its official title, or the appropriate officer. Except to the extent that prior, adequate, and exclusive opportunity for judicial review is provided by law, agency action is subject to judicial review in civil or criminal proceedings for judicial enforcement.

32. Title 5, Part I, Chapter 7,

Section § 706.

Scope of review

To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action. The reviewing court shall—
(1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and
(2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be—
(A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law;
(B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity;
(C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right;
(D) without observance of procedure required by law;
(E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or
(F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court.
In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error.

33. Title 5

Part III, Subpart B, Chapter 33

Subchapter II

Section § 3331. Oath of office

An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law.

34. Title 10

Subtitle A, Part I, Chapter 15

Section § 333. Interference with State and Federal law.

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

AUTHORITY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
35. Title 18 USC

Part I, Chapter 1, Section § 4.

Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

PATRIOT ACT H.R. 3162

36. PATRIOT ACT

H.R. 3162 SEC. 104.

REQUESTS FOR MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO ENFORCE PROHIBITION IN CERTAIN EMERGENCIES.

Title 18, Part I, Chapter 113B,

Section § 2332e.

Requests for military assistance to enforce prohibition in certain emergencies.

The Attorney General may request the Secretary of Defense to provide assistance under section 382 of title 10 in support of Department of Justice activities relating to the enforcement of section 2332a of this title during an emergency situation involving a weapon of mass destruction. The authority to make such a request may be exercised by another official of the Department of Justice in accordance with section 382 (f)(2) of title 10.

SEC. 1002. SENSE OF CONGRESS (a) FINDINGS- Congress finds that–

(1) all Americans are united in condemning, in the strongest possible terms, the terrorists who planned and carried out the attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, and in pursuing all those responsible for those attacks and their sponsors until they are brought to justice;

Title 18, Part I

Chapter 113B

Section § 2331. Definitions

(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that—

(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended—

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and

(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.

SEC. 223.

CIVIL LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES

Sec. 2712.

Civil actions against the United States

(a) Section 2520 of title 18, United States Code, is amended–

(1) in subsection (a), after `entity’, by inserting `, other than the United States;
(2) by adding at the end the following:

(f) ADMINISTRATIVE DISCIPLINE-

If a court or appropriate department or agency determines that the United States or any of its departments or agencies has violated any provision of this chapter, and the court or appropriate department or agency finds that the circumstances surrounding the violation raise serious questions about whether or not an officer or employee of the United States acted willfully or intentionally with respect to the violation, the department or agency shall, upon receipt of a true and correct copy of the decision and findings of the court or appropriate department or agency promptly initiate a proceeding to determine whether disciplinary action against the officer or employee is warranted. If the head of the department or agency involved determines that disciplinary action is not warranted, he or she shall notify the Inspector General with jurisdiction over the department or agency concerned and shall provide the Inspector General with the reasons for such determination.’;

TITLE 10 UCMJ

37. Title 10, Subtitle A

Part II, Chapter 47, Subchapter VII

Section § 842.

Art. 42. Oaths

(a) Before performing their respective duties, military judges, members of general and special courts-martial, trial counsel, assistant trial counsel, defense counsel, assistant or associate defense counsel, reporters, and interpreters shall take an oath to perform their duties faithfully. The form of the oath, the time and place of the taking thereof, the manner of recording the same, and whether the oath shall be taken for all cases in which these duties are to be performed or for a particular case, shall be as prescribed in regulations of the Secretary concerned. These regulations may provide that an oath to perform faithfully duties as a military judge, trial counsel, assistant trial counsel, defense counsel, or assistant or associate defense counsel may be taken at any time by any judge advocate or other person certified to be qualified or competent for the duty, and if such an oath is taken it need not again be taken at the time the judge advocate or other person is detailed to that duty.

38. Title 18, Part I

Chapter 67

Section § 1385.
Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

ARMY MANUAL
39. FM 27-5 Military Government and Civil Affairs

40. Title 5 USC, Part III—Employees
Subpart A—General Provisions
Subpart F—Labor Management and Employee Relations
Chapter 73—Suitability, Security, and Conduct
Subchapter II – Employment Limitations
Section § 7313. Riots and civil disorders

An individual convicted by any Federal, State, or local court of competent jurisdiction of –
(1) inciting a riot or civil disorder;
(2) organizing, promoting, encouraging, or participating in a riot or civil disorder; (3) aiding or abetting any person in committing any offense specified in clause (1) or (2); or
(4) any offense determined by the head of the employing agency to have been committed in furtherance of, or while participating in, a riot or civil disorder;

shall, if the offense for which he is convicted is a felony, be ineligible to accept or hold any position in the Government of the United States or in the government of the District of Columbia for the five years immediately following the date upon which his conviction becomes final. Any such individual holding a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia on the date his conviction becomes final shall be removed from such position.

(b) For the purposes of this section, “felony” means any offense for which imprisonment is authorized for a term exceeding one year.

Title 18 USC—Crimes and Criminal Procedure
Chapter 93—Public Officers and Employees

Section § 1918.

Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the Government

Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—

(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or

(4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both.

OVERTHROW OF A CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT

41. Title 5, Part III

Subpart F Chapter 73,

Subchapter II, § 7311.

Loyalty and striking.

An individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—

(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(2) is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(3) participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia; or

(4) is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia.

CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY AND MANDATE TO BRING SUIT

PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AUTHORITY GRANTED BY CONGRESS

CONGRESSIONAL ENACTMENT FROM THE 31ST CONGRESS.

Proceedings in vindication of civil rights (SEE DOCUMENT)

Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I,

Section § 1983

Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

Title 42, Chapter 21

Subchapter I, Section § 1988

Proceedings in vindication of civil rights

(a) Applicability of statutory and common law

The jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters conferred on the district courts by the provisions of titles 13, 24, and 70 of the Revised Statutes for the protection of all persons in the United States in their civil rights, and for their vindication, shall be exercised and enforced in conformity with the laws of the United States, so far as such laws are suitable to carry the same into effect; but in all cases where they are not adapted to the object, or are deficient in the provisions necessary to furnish suitable remedies and punish offenses against law, the common law, as modified and changed by the constitution and statutes of the State wherein the court having jurisdiction of such civil or criminal cause is held, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, shall be extended to and govern the said courts in the trial and disposition of the cause, and, if it is of a criminal nature, in the infliction of punishment on the party found guilty.

(b) Attorney’s fees
In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92–318 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.], the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq.], title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], or section 13981 of this title, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney’s fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer’s jurisdiction.
(c) Expert fees
In awarding an attorney’s fee under subsection (b) of this section in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of section 1981 or 1981a of this title, the court, in its discretion, may include expert fees as part of the attorney’s fee.

PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AUTHORITY GRANTED BY CONGRESS

Another excellent example of the “private attorney general” provisions is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. RICO allows average citizens (private attorneys general) to sue those organizations that commit mail and wire fraud as part of their criminal enterprise. To date, there are over 60 federal statutes that encourage private enforcement by allowing prevailing plaintiffs to collect attorney’s fees.

Private Attorney General authority; The U.S. Congress codified the private attorney general principle into law with the enactment of Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Award Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The Senate Report on this statute stated that The Senate Committee on the Judiciary wanted to level the playing field so that private citizens, who might have little or no money, could still serve as “private attorneys general” and afford to bring actions, even against state or local bodies, to enforce the civil rights laws. The Committee acknowledged that, “[i]f private citizens are to be able to assert their civil rights, and if those who violate the Nation’s fundamental laws are not to proceed with impunity, then citizens must have the opportunity to recover what it costs them to vindicate these rights in court.”

Where a plaintiff wins his or her lawsuit and is considered the “prevailing party,” § 1988 acts to shift fees, including expert witness fees [at least in certain types of civil rights actions, under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, even if not in § 1983 actions], and to make those who acted as private attorneys general whole again, thus encouraging the enforcement of the civil rights laws. The Senate reported that it intended fee awards to be “adequate to attract competent counsel” to represent client with civil rights grievances. S. Rep. No. 94-1011, p. 6 (1976). The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted the act to provide for the payment of a “reasonable attorney’s fee” based on the fair market value of the legal services.

The two parties who are petitioning the Administrative Hearing Court, both hold documents certifying their status as Private Attorneys General. Rodney Dale; Class did go to the United States Committee on the Judiciary, both on the House side and Senate side, and did get his document received and stamped to Act as a Private Attorney General, even though he was not required to do so. Carl; Weston has filed into the Oklahoma Secretary of State for his Private Attorney General document and it too has been received and stamped by officials. (SEE DOCUMENTS ATTACHED)
Both have Authority to Act as Attorneys General for the People to bring such an issue before the Military Administrative Hearing Court.

PARTIES TO ACTION

Parties to action Rodney Dale; Class & Carl; Weston, here known as Petitioners; UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or aka UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION with legal authority and representation of the employees of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION by ERIC HOLDER, hereafter referred to as Defendants.

COMPLAINT

NOW, COMES, before this Administrative Hearing Court, Rodney Dale; Class and Carl; Weston as Private Attorneys General, the Petitioners on behalf of the People of the united States of America and for ourselves, to set forth the Acts that are unbecoming of Public Officials, who, sworn to uphold through their Oath of office, the Constitution of 1787 as created by our forefathers. Such Acts unbecoming that of Public Officials are being carried out under the War and Emergency Power Act, The National Emergency Act, the Trading with the Enemy Act, Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933, all under Title 50 USC, emblematically through the use of a Military Gold Fringe Flag signifying Martial Law. The Petitioners come before this Administrative Hearing Court to address and to seek remedy for violations under Title 5 USC, violations of the Constitution of 1787, and of all of the above named statutes. Such Acts are committed by the Defendants deceptively impersonating as military courts under the Gold Fringe Flag with such violations as follows: Constitutionally protected rights, federal and state statute violation under Title 10 Section §333, the overthrow of a Constitutional form of government under Title 5 USC sec. §7311 and Title 18 USC sec. §1918, violation of honest service under Title 18 USC sec. §1346, and to default the civilian population into fraudulent debt disguised as Acts of War. The Defendants have used the bankruptcy of 1933 HJR 192 Executive Order 6102 to use civilian labor as credit or collateral as security for satisfaction of a debt.

The Petitioners make claim of injury by the defendants by the use or misuse of military martial law. The court allows the people to believe that the gold fringe flag was an admiralty flag under UCC for contract law. The military and the Coast Guard both know that an Admiralty Flag has a blue field with white stars. Because this issue deals with administrative abuse under a Gold Fringe Flag, this administrative hearing court has the only jurisdiction to hear such a case as it involves acts of TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES by those who are abusing their offices of public authority. The Petitioners will bring forth a second issue also of injury under the misuse of the Gold Fringe Flag The Courts and its Court officers are aware of this.

The Petitioners do have two other cases pending in the District of Columbia, one in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under Case # 2009 CA 005391 B with Judge BRIAN F HOLEMAN, filed July 29, 2009, and the other in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CASE #: 1:09-cv-02151-HHK with Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Formerly Civil Action No. 7868-09 in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Both of these cases are against the UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION. The Judges in both cases are not responding in a timely manner.

In Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. Allstate Insurance Co., a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the federal class action rule, Civil Procedure Rule 23, trumped a New York law prohibiting class actions that seek to recover statutory penalties or minimal recoveries. In that case, the Court upheld a class action lawsuit filed against a corporation. The private individual holds the same rights when filing suit against a corporation.

The Petitioners will also point out the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution.
Amendment XI

The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
All “judicial power” of the “inferior courts” comes from the Judiciary Act of 1789, as did the Attorney General position. “Judicial power” comes from Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. The Eleventh Amendment removed all “judicial power” in law, equity, treaties, contract law, and the right of the State to bring suit against the People. The positions of Attorney General and Prosecutor, of both the United States and the several states, come under the Judicial branch, not the Executive branch of the government. All attorneys come under the Judicial branch and are judicial officers under the Supreme Court, not under the Secretary of State as licensed professionals, which means they can only represent the Court and not the People or the State. The Eleventh Amendment removed all “judicial power” from the “inferior courts” and the prosecutor’s office as well as from all court officers in law, equity, and so forth. The Eleventh Amendment also makes a foreign state separation from the positions of the Public Office positions to throw off the People. The People have Eleventh Amendment immunity, because there is NO “JUDICIAL POWER” of the “inferior courts” AND the People have FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.

Article III, Sec. 2

U.S. Constitution

“The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;–between a State and Citizens of another State;–between Citizens of different States;–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.”

Eleventh Amendment

“The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”

The Judges and their Court Officers and defendants are aware that the Eleventh Amendment removed all “Judicial Power” from the Courts, turning them into Administrative hearing courts with no “judicial power” to rule in OR on law, equity, treaties, contract law OR issues between the State OR the UNITED STATES and its People. The Judges and the Court Officers are aware, as are the Petitioners, that the authority delegated by Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America was amended and revoked by the Eleventh Amendment on February 5th, 1795.

The Judges and Court Officers and defendants are aware that the Offices of Attorney General and Prosecutor were created under the same Judiciary Act, as were the “inferior courts.” When the Eleventh Amendment removed “Judicial Power” from the Courts, it also removed “judicial power” from the prosecution. Any prosecution done in law, equity, contract law, treaties or claims by the State against the People now constitutes Putative Fraud and Dishonest Service due to the salary contract that the public official has with the People to perform his/her duties as a Hearing Officer and Prosecution Officer. These contracts of these Public Officers are private contracts under the Constitution, Article I, II, and III and under the Compensation clause for services to the People.
It is a fact that a pleading cannot be placed before a court that does not hold “judicial power” and 12 (b) (1) or 12 (b) (2) of the FRCP and the Civil Rules of Procedure clearly describe why there is no “judicial power”. The Courts and their officers are aware of this problem when they bring the American People into a court that does not hold judicial power, but instead, is adjourned under martial law, with the gold fringe military flag displayed used as a covert signal.

Count I.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the united States Constitution: Did with full knowledge by taking a false oath to the Constitution, with the intent of depriving the civilian population of life, liberty, property, justice, and not to insure domestic tranquility for the said civilian population.

Count II.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: Did with full knowledge place the people into servitude through their labor and lives for the public debt by borrowing against the civilian population and forcing the civilian population to pay back such public debt created by the Defendants for their personal gain and profit.

Count III.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: Did with full knowledge and intent set out to default the civilian population by flying a Gold Fringe Flag in all civilian courts depriving the people of a fair and impartial hearing and any defense in the Courts, by denying the Constitution, Federal and State Statutes, and Administrative procedures as and denying them a defense in the Courts.
The Eleventh Amendment, created by the Defendant, clearly shows that judicial power of the United States “shall not” be “construed” to “extend “to any suit in “law“ or “equity.”The Eleventh Amendment revokes Article III section 2 stating Judicial power shall extend to all cases in “law and equity.” Under the use of the Gold Fringe Flag, the Federal and States Courts now use Military authority to deprive the civilian population of “ALL RIGHTS,” using Military Authority under Martial Law.

Count IV.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to uphold and defend the united States Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies: Did overthrow the people’s Constitutional government under the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, Executive Order 6102 and HJR 192 on June 5th 1933 and the 49 Stat. 3097; Treaty Series 881. CONVENTION ON RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES on Dec 26, 1933. Thereby creating a new UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION under Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933.

Count V.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: The Defendants did with full knowledge and intent set out to default the civilian population, of their sovereignty, denying them of their property rights, denying their inalienable rights, and denying their rights to a Republican form of government.

Count VI.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: The Defendants have with full knowledge and intent deprived the civilian population of a Constitutional form of government for failure to follow the Jefferson’s Manual Rules and Practices of the House of Representatives on how the enactments are to be passed. House Joint Resolutions are not law or statutes, just resolutions. (Resolution (law), a written motion adopted by a deliberative body)

Count VII.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution. The Defendants have with intent deprived the civilian population of a Constitutional form of government for failure to follow the Senate Manual Rules and Practices of the Senate on how the enactments are to be passed. Senate Joint Resolutions are not law or statutes, just a resolution. (Resolution (law), a written motion adopted by a deliberative body)
Definition of; A joint resolution is often used when Congress needs to pass legislation to solve a limited or temporary problem. For example, it is used as a temporary measure to provide continuing appropriations for government programs when annual appropriations bills have not yet been enacted. This type of joint resolution is called a continuing resolution.
Another use of joint resolutions is to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Resolutions proposing constitutional amendments must be approved by two-thirds of both houses. They do not require the president’s signature, but instead become law when they are ratified by three-fourths of the states.

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Count VIII.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: The Defendants did swear a false Oath to the Constitution and did with intent set out to defraud the civilian population by declaring and signing into affect a non –National Emergency to continue the fraud and abuse upon the civilian population to create hardship, deprive the people of their jobs, their liberty and have now placed the civilian population in fear of their lives and their family members’ lives. These acts are intended to create civil unrest among the people, in order to invoke acts of violence and civil disorder.

Count IX.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution, by such acts constituting insurrection and rebellion of these Public Officials who swear such an Oath to the Constitution and to the People. Now a Fourteenth Amendment Bounty placed against the public debt can be applied to those Public Officials who have taken part in such an overthrow of the people’s Constitutional and Republican form of government as incorporated in the 1787 Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment was passed by those who held Public office in 1868 and gives the Remedy to pay back all public debt created by the Defendants.

Count X.

Acts unbecoming of a Public Official(s) under a sworn Oath to the Constitution: The text below comes from OUR Declaration of Independence. Those who hold these public offices sworn to such an oath are in violation of the very foundation of OUR Declaration of Independence. Those defendants who hold such public office have willfully and with intent, set out to destroy the peace and tranquility of the people in this nation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
1.He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

2. For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

3. For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

4. For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:
5. He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
6. He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.
7. He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature
8. For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:
9. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
10. In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
11. Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

12. We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

RELIEF CAN BE FOUND IN FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

The Petitioners’ relief sought comes from the fourteenth amendment section 4 of the Constitution: bounties against public debt for insurrection and rebellion against a constitutional form of government. All public debt created by the defendants who work for or are retired from the legislative, judicial, or executive branches, as found in the Constitution under Article I, II, and III, will be required to forfeit all pay, all real property, all bank accounts and etc., in order to clear the public debt created by the defendants.

This Administrative Court under the Administrative Procedure Act 60 stat 237 S.7 of 1946 has the power to grant such a demand under Title 5 section 551 sanctions. The Administrative Court has the power to make the people whole before such injury created by the defendants. This is the purpose of an Administrative Hearing: to correct the abuse and misuse of public office when it becomes harmful and dangerous to the best interest of the public.

What this means is this: Any profit or gain by these Public Officials by misuse or abuse of such public office which has created a public debt over and beyond normal cost, can now be collected from those public officials through a performance bond, including their homes, personal items, stocks, bonds, bank accounts, birth certificate accounts, retirements, bonuses, and pensions being paid to a spouse, and etc., to be used to pay back the public debt created by that official. Title 5 USC under section 551 also gives more detail and the Petitioners expect to provide further information at the time of the hearing.

CONCLUSION

The Petitioners have come before this Administrative Hearing Court to address Constitutional violations by those who hold Public offices under Title 5 of the UNITED STATES CODES; GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION AND EMPLOYEES. The Public Officials under our Constitution and under Federal Administrative Procedures and Statutes are required to swear such an Oath to uphold the Constitution of the united States at all cost. As of this date, those falling under Title 5 have failed to do so and have overthrown such foundation for which this Nation stands.

Since 1933 this Nation has been under a declared National Emergency under the War Power Act. The President every two years has declared a State of Emergency. In all public buildings, Federal and State Courtrooms, churches, in all Capital office building in the hallways of Congress and etc., the Military Gold Fringe Flag flies as a symbol of Military Authority ruling over this Nation. The floor of the united States Congress is one of the few place in which Old Glory hangs as a symbol of non-military jurisdiction. The Petitioners have come to the only Administrative Authority that would have jurisdiction under Homeland Security and the United States Coast Guard Administrative Hearing Court, to place such an issue. This is a National emergency an act of terrorism upon the civilian population of the united States of America. Because if this Nation is in a State of Emergency then those under Title 5 have committed an act of Treason, insurrection or rebellion by denying the protection of rights as found in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, Federal and State statutes to the people. If this nation is not in a state of Emergency then those public officials flying the Gold Fringe Flag have now violated Title 4 by flying the fourth color now impersonating Military authority in order to pillage and plunder the civilian population at gunpoint.

There is enough Cause to have this Administrative Court hear this case. The Petitioners, if need be, can invoke a grand jury indictment to be placed before this Administrative Court. Reminder, if needed: Article III, Section 3 of the 1787 Constitution states that the testimony of two witnesses to acts of treason is enough to have such a hearing before the Administrative Court.
Private Attorney General Seal
________________________
Rodney Dale; Class U.S.N. Veteran C/o P. O. Box 435 High Shoals, N.C. 28077 Private Attorney General 704 742 3123

________________________
Petitioner; Carl; Weston
2851 N. Hwy 66, #18
Catoosa, Ok. 74015
Private Attorney General
PHONE #918 407 1287
PROOF OF SERVICE
Petitioners Rodney Dale; Class and Carl; Weston, as Private Attorney Generals, come before the U.S. COAST GUARD HEARING OFFICE DETACHMENT, CG HO MS 7160, 4200 WILLSON BLVD, SUITE 600 ARLINGTON, VA 20598-7160 with this Administrative Complaint to be heard and filed into the record of this Administrative Court. The Petitioners now file with the Administrative Clerk: PRAYER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING; PETITION FOR REDRESS; BILL OF RIGHTS, ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATION OF THE UNITED STATES 1787 CONSTITUTION & 1789 BILL OF RIGHTS; ADMINISTRATIVE VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES CODES: TITLE 5 FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT, TITLE 5. SECTION 3331 OATH OF OFFICE, TITLE 5 SECTION 7311, TITLE 18 SECTIONS 241, 242, 1001, 1346, 1502, 1918, 2331, 1952,1954, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, TITLE 10 SECTION 333; VIOLATION OF US CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE I SECTION 6, ARTICLE II SECTION 4, ARTICLE III SECTION 3, AMENDMENT XI & AMENDMENT XIV, to have it placed into the record on this day of ____________ and month of ________________ in the year of our Lord 2010 AD, to be filed and placed on a docket sheet, and to be heard before the Administrative Court. The Defendant, Eric Holder, will be served in three ways: by special carrier, by USPS and by private mailing.

________________________
Rodney Dale; Class U.S.N. Veteran C/o P. O. Box 435 High Shoals, N.C. 28077 Private Attorney General 704 742 3123

________________________
Petitioner; Carl; Weston
2851 N. Hwy 66, #18
Catoosa, Ok. 74015
Private Attorney General
PHONE #918 407 1287
cc:
UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION
CORPORATION LAW FIRM LAW OFFICER ERIC HOLDER U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001

Defendant
Other party being served with a notification of the complaint:

Secretary Janet Napolitano
Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, DC 20528

Rep. Bennie G. Thompson
U.S. House of Representatives
Committee on Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20515

Coast Guard Headquarters Commandant,
U.S. Coast Guard
2100 Second Street,
SW Washington, DC 20593

  • OTHER DOCUMENTS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE:

1.  ROD CLASS.THE NAME GAME IN COURT.GREAT ANSWER HERE.RECIPIENT OF THE REGISTERED BC

2.  Class_Indt

3.  ROD CLASS.SuiJuris.FULL OATH OF A FREEMAN

4.  ROD CLASS.AMRP.PETITION_IN_PROHIBITION

5. ROD CLASS.CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO DOJ.NEW.additional_criminal_complaints

6.  FARM CLAIMS HISTORY

7.  ROD CLASS.WRIT OF ERROR.DISMISSAL.Original_Template_for_Dismiss_Under_FSIA_with_definitions

8.ROD CLASS.SUI JURIS.Declatory_Judgment_prosesu_vs_juris

9.  ROD CLASS.MOTIN TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT.Class_Willful_Fraud

10.  ROD CLASS.Drivers_License_and_Plates_Rod_Class_5_9_10

11.  ROD CLASS.RAY SERVERS.CITIZEN IS DEAD.CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.Cong_Record- WITH VOL COVER June13,1967-citizen_is_dead[1]

12.  ROD CLASS.Class_Competency_Order

13.  ROD CLASS.OH.11th amendment document Ohio AG

14.  ROD CLASS.POLICE.PRIVATE CONTRACTORS.NC.DALLAS LETTERS

15.  ROD CLASS.AMRP.PETITION_IN_PROHIBITION

16.  ROD CLASS.Chap CLIII..An Act to Provide More Efficient Govt

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,

Author of this post is not a legal practitioner or licensed attorney, lawyer, paralegal, or advocate in any way.  Therefore, one should not construe any information in this post or on this site of any kind of legal advice.  One would interpret or use information at one’s own risk, legal liability, and peril.

(1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.

(2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

(3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

(4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

THE FUTURE OF WAR (CIRCA 2025), NASA REPORT


FUTURE STRATEGIC ISSUES/ FUTURE WAR

(CIRCA 2025)

https://i1.wp.com/www.stopthecrime.net/docs/death%20to%20humans.jpg

“EXPECTED REACTION: THEY WOULD NOT DO THIS TO US” (PAGE 113)

Click on the link below to watch and read about the planned death of American . . . but for GOD.

 http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/nasa-thefutureof-war.pdf

BY: DENNIS M. BUSHNELL, CHIEF SCIENTIST

NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER

Link to view explanation of the report on Youtube:

USA INC, Nasa War Document Depopulation & You – Deborah Tavares Conspiracy Con

Click on the link below to learn more about the planned silent war and attack on Americans and our families.

To view Anthony J. Hilder channel at the bottom of the page where it says not available in your country, change your country to UK if you are in the USA. Youtube is partially censoring Mr. Hilders channel. A rtunes video. Nasa Future Of War Document can be seen on http://stopthecrime.net/ Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars PDF link is there also. Filmed at Conspiracy Con with Trevor Coppola and Anthony J Hilder. This is the original film that is being mirrored around the net. Support the Free World Film Works Film Crew so more videos like this can be made. anthonyjhilder@hotmail.com

(If you are in the USA and cant see Mr Hilders Channel on YouTube go to the bottom of your youtube page and change your country and you should be able to see the Channel)
(Disclaimer: Views presented here are not necessarily those of the video maker and are presented for informational and educational purposes only as part of alternative media)
.

  • Category

  • License

    • Standard YouTube License
        • FAIR USE AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

        • Author of this post is not a legal practitioner or licensed attorney, lawyer, paralegal, or advocate in any way.  Therefore, one should not construe any information in this post or on this site of any kind of legal advice.  One would interpret or use information at one’s own risk, legal liability, and peril.

      (1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.

      (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

      (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

      (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

Children Describe Satanic Ritual Abuse and Sacrifice (Video, 2 min.)


 Children Describe Satanic Ritual Abuse and Sacrifice

(Video, 2 min.)

 

ART.CLASSIC. CHILD SACRIFICE

http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/children-describe-satanic-ritual-abuse-sacrifice-video/?utm_source=wysija&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=video+Email

 

WHY IAN JOSEPHS Advises Mothers NOT to Report the Crimes of Abusive Fathers: You Lose your Children!


WHY IAN JOSEPHS Advises Mothers

to NOT  Report the Crimes of child (and even sexual and sra) abusers:

You Lose your Children!

https://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/about/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dH1olDX9z3A

        • FAIR USE AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):
        • Author of this post is not a legal practitioner or licensed attorney, lawyer, paralegal, or advocate in any way.  Therefore, one should not construe any information in this post or on this site of any kind of legal advice.  One would interpret or use information at one’s own risk, legal liability, and peril.

      (1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.

      (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

      (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

      (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

70 YEAR OLD CARTOON PREDICTS THE FUTURE (VIDEO)


70 YEAR OLD CARTOON PREDICTS THE FUTURE

250px-Cultural_Revolution_poster

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=_se8c-wN35M

I can’t believe that our children, and ourselves, are the generation(s) that have to experience the truth of the grand lie, an illusion.  We have to at least work to preserve the memories of what the world once at least purported to be.  Click on the link  to watch this fifty year-old cartoon that appears to have predicted the future, or read the sign ed treaties they never told us about.  This piece will be for the time capsule one should be making with any children one still has, or in anticipation of the ones we must keep praying and fighting to bring home to their real mommies and daddies of the Real America instead of “community baby-sitters” and foster and adoptive parents and “responsible” fathers (and fake mommies by proxy).

Source:

50 YEAR OLD CARTOON PREDICTS THE FUTURE !!! NWO !!!

 

 

FAIR USE AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

(1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.

(2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

(3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

(4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

Cherie’s Story, and also for Saam (VIDEO)


Cherie’s Story, and also for Saam (VIDEO)

 

JUSTICE.DEVIL AND JUDGE.DEREK SYPHRETT.NJCOURTCORRUPTION

 

For those of us out there enduring unbelievable pain at the unnecessary loss of our children, our property being extensions of our own living body, Real Mommy Cherie Safapou offers he/r own testimony about the sadistic and cruel abuse of family court fraudsters and government abuse commissioned by a vile ex-husband, Mr. Doroodian and Marin County, California.  I continue to pray for each and every one of us whose stories come across so poignantly in whatever medium be available to us even bereft as we have been driven, though only temporarily.

Watch  by clicking on the link below or cutting and pasting into your browser.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAHgqW_lyEM

Terroristic Divorce

Published on Oct 19, 2013

How corrupt Nazi-like Marin Family Court has torn apart a mother and her son more @ http://terroristicdivorce.com

  • Music

  • “Aurora Liminalis” by William Basinski and Richard Chartier, William Basinski, Richard Chartier

    • Standard YouTube License
    • Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED): 
    • (1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.(2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.(3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.(4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

Jennie’s Story (VIDEO) and Mine in CORRUPT TX


Jennie’s Story (VIDEO), the Same as  Mine in CORRUPT TX

JUSTICE.COP WITH BOBBY CLUB AND SMILE

It would appear from reading some of the hate mail on the Internet that there are those who would prefer to re-victimize those who cannot “protect” themselves from the wickedness of the courts and family and juvenile justice system in the state of Texas.  Such individual is misguided, lacking in direct knowledge and experience, and/or is otherwise equally culpable to the degree she participates in wickedness and harassment that could only be motivated by less weightier matters than justice, mercy, and faith being lit from below.  If there is something missing to the story here, author of this post is happy to listen and try to help.

Thus, Jennie Morton’s story from Montgomery County, Texas (just north of Houston).  I corroborate he/r truths and experience with local judges and terroristic and incestuous cabals that dwell in the hallowed halls of the Pharisees and  justice denied.

Interview: Jennie Morton with Bill Windsor of Lawless America

lawlessamericalawlessamerica

Click on the link below to watch and know that you are not alone out there if this is also your situation and/or others you know. 

Interview: Jennie Morton with Bill Windsor of Lawless America.

This is unedited video filmed for Lawless America…The Movie. The comments are those of the subject.

Lawless America is a documentary film that is exposing government corruption, judicial corruption, and law enforcement corruption. For more information, see http://www.LawlessAmerica.comwww.YouTube.com/lawlessamerica www.facebook.com/billwindsor1http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/ — email Bill@LawlessAmerica.com

LEGAL NOTICE: LAWLESS AMERICA IS A TRADEMARK. THE NAME AND LOGO MAY NOT BE USED WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM BILL WINDSOR, 110 E CENTER STREET #1213, MADISON, SD 57042. LAWLESS AMERICA VIDEOS ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT, AND THE VIDEOS MAY NOT BE USED WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION. ALL CONTENTS POSTED HERE AND ON WWW.LAWLESSAMERICA.COM, WWW.LAWLESSAMERICA.ORG, WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/LAWLESSAMERICA, WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/LAWLESSAMERICA2, AND WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/BILLWINDSOR1 ARE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT.

Published on Jun 29, 2012

He went to jail a normal functional man. 12 days later went out in a body bag. Autopsy says Heart Disease and Hepatitis B and C. The second opinion from a different Pathologist tells a different story

License

    • Standard YouTube License

NEXT, Read Houston’s Helium page for specific details of Jennie’s torturers for more of the story.

https://houstonhelium.wordpress.com/category/the-jennie-morton-case/ . . .

Click on the link below to read about Jennie’s friend and judicial applicant to replace crooked, as alleged, Judge Tracy Gilbert (male pictured below under Wall of Shame in Jennie’s case, and her three children), Jessica Siegel, who was falsely imprisoned as a direct result, on knowledge, circumstantial evidence, and belief, because she dared to be friends with Jennie Morton, who was anathematized by an insanely jealous and psychopathic ex-husband and possible mason, Nick Morton, as alleged by Jennie in h/er interview for Lawless America in the video above).

http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/courier/news/judge-applicant-arrested-as-she-files-for-th/article_184b8d75-d0b5-5556-bf4d-6a6e908bf774.html 

BUT SEE Jennie’s book titled, Standing Strong, published January 2013, on Amazon.com by clicking on the following link.Go to "Standing Strong" page

http://www.amazon.com/Standing-Strong-Jennie-Morton/dp/0615730698

JUSTICE.WALL OF SHAME.NJCOURTCORRUPTION.DEREK SYPHRETT

 

lynn esposito.law-firm-the-law-office-of-lynn-e-esposito-pc-photo-1404740

Attorney Lynn Esposito, Spring, Texas (North Houston)

JENNIE MORTON CASE.JUDGE KATHLEEN HAMILTON.259TH.CONROE.images

JUDGE KATHY HAMILTON OF THE 259TH COURT IN CONROE, TEXAS (MONTGOMERY COUNTY)

JENNIE MORTON CASE.LAURA MARBURGER.PIC.random.mg

LAURA MARBURGER, ATTORNEY, CONROE, TEXAS (MONTGOMERY COUNTY)

Facebook © 2015

JENNIE MORTON, OLD FACEBOOK PICTURE

Jennie MortonState Bar of Texas

Standing Strong Go to "Standing Strong" page

TITLE OF JENNIE’S BOOK AVAILABLE AT

http://www.amazon.com/Standing-Strong-Jennie-Morton/dp/0615730698

My name is Jennie Morton and I have been through one of the most horrible atrocities that any Mother or Parent should ever have to experience. While in the last few years I have spent almost $200,000 in attorney fees, lost my job, been bullied from the town that I lived in for over 12 years, and suffered abuse by proxy in every facet possible that my ex could imagine. My life was similar to the movie “Sleeping with the Enemy.” As I went through the process I uncovered many unethical questionable practices by many of the people/officials that were supposed to protect me and my family. My ex’s family was highly political and used the system to protect their son. My ex was a narcissistic stalker who would stop at nothing to hurt/harm me and or anyone around me. I tried to get a protective order multiple times, had numerous 911 phone calls, pressed harassment charges, and even went to the D.A. only to be turned around and told that I needed to go through the court system. I was always turned away or the cops would not arrest nor ticket my ex with anything. I had never dealt with a system that would turn their backs on an abuse victim just because of whom my ex’s family was. My life was threatened and so were my friends. My husband had lost two jobs and also had been assaulted by my ex twice and the cops would do nothing. I spent more time documenting the things that were happening than any average adult should ever have to consider. My friends were being harassed on their jobs by him, I was being watched by the police, watched by my neighbors, and my phone was tapped. I could not depend on the cops for relief or any other Montgomery county official. I contacted the FBI, safe houses, wanted to invoke the Governor’s rule, and called the Texas Rangers all to no avail. I ended up in two courts by two different fathers both going at me when I left my ex and spent more days in court litigation activities than on my full-time job. After all my efforts to protect my family and my children I lost both of my children due to unethical legal actions.
I went through a mourning process that lasted a few months/a few moves and practically became a vagrant with my daughter of 13 still living with me. I have always been an overachiever and began to start thinking how could I possibly have ended up in this situation as just the prior year I was a busy mom, my children had everything they needed and more than most and I ranked top in the Nation within my pharmaceutical company. I sat out to come up with a plan and prayed that something would come my way. I realized that I needed to change the way I thought of myself and came up with a 21 day program to retrain my thought process. I began writing my book “Standing Strong” and became involved with a group of like parents who sought out for reform in the Montgomery County, Texas area. One of the ways to create change is through not only education but also through our very own electoral process. We found a candidate willing to run for the 418th family court, as no one else seemed to want to challenge the incumbent. That person was Jessica Siegel and as she filled and filed her candidacy form there was a slight mistake of a month answer was left unanswered. She was removed from the election however through a process was able to be eligible for another filing period in which she refilled and was arrested by a Texas Ranger. Jessica and I sat out to Washington as this was the catalyst for reform that I had waited for so long. I was a victim of abuse and am now turning it into an empowering premise for parents around the world.

 THE STORIES OF CORRUPTION IN TEXAS DO NOT END WITH JENNIE’S STORY.  CHECK THIS OUT BELOW!   SOME OF THE PARALLELS IN ALL OF OUR STORIES ARE UNCANNY.

Jail Death Montgomery County, Texas

 Published on Dec 31, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SeVQRAwaRYo

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED): 

(1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.

(2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

(3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

(4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

Whistle Blower Jan Smith Exposes How Parents Can Be Falsely Diagnosed, Children Taken


“Keep in mind, that most of the people you are dealing with, could not pass a psychological evaluation themselves..and probably have quite a few indicators of various differential diagnoses and personality disorders.”Jan Smith, Court Psychology Whistle Blower, Activist and Lobbyist for Family Rights and Children’s Rights

 

Washington State: Jan Smith offers this whistle blower video to give insight on the corruption and failures in the court’s use of psychological evaluations, and how parents can be incorrectly diagnosed, or determined to be an unfit or unsafe parent based on false, unscientific diagnostic methods. Jan was a chemical dependency counselor for 11 years, and has admitted to submitting false and fraudulent reports to the Court as part of her job.

 

Jan admitted that her “unscientificdiagnostic procedure is now widely used throughout Washington state and has resulted in countless children being taken from their families, and put into foster care or adopted into other families.
See Video at: http://youtu.be/N2c_UOIsLMQ

 

 HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

Jan says she worked for an organization that did not want to use widely recognized scientific tools used to diagnose clients because the diagnosis may not support putting a client into a long- term treatment program (which would be profitable). The old method made it easier to put a person into a 1 or 2 year program, with little evidence to justify why, thus generating business. Jan says when the new methods were implemented, using better scientific tools, she would often get an assessment whose results indicated minimal or no treatment. Then her supervisor would change and/or alter the assessment in order to get that client into treatment, even if it was not medically necessary. To save her job (Jan says she was motivated to do this because she was a desperate single mom), Jan created her own procedure to manufacture criteria and exaggerate information so that the assessment supported the desired treatment program. When submitted to the courts, the reports often did not raise questions, even though it was the job of the judge and the defense attorneys to ask questions. Jan says her reports were “totally unscientific” and “pretty much fraudulent”, designed to increase treatment which would drum up business.

 

WHY?
Jan says “the system is scandalous, is fraudulent and is financially based”.   Soon, other agencies utilized Jan’s fraudulent assessment methods. When a client sought a second opinion, Jan’s assessment was brought in, and if the other agencies liked her work, they would copy it until it became standard procedures to use indicators to “bump up” or mandate or coerce treatment, even if those methods do not match sound scientific practices.

Other tactics used include to embellish life history” to create a negative picture of the parent, and to justify the false diagnosis.   According to Jan, professionals have a “god like” status and not usually questioned in court, especially when supported by a social worker, GAL, defense attorney or judge.

Jan says that if a court cannot get a diagnosis on a client, that indicators will be used to invent or create a diagnosis. Use of indicators is NOT a valid way to diagnose or detect mental illness or risk of harm.

Families are being destroyed by these fraudulent practices. So you have an agency, and prosecutors unethically taking indicators from the field of psychology and using it unscientifically to falsely diagnose or label a parent. The defense attorneys, judges, CASA workers are not questioning it but pushing these false diagnosis through the system, so there is no protection for the families.   Children are unjustly stolen from their families.   Parents are labeled for life with mental illness or other problems that, in reality, have never existed.

People who do have disabilities or need help, are not getting the help or support they need. Children are being taken from families, never to be seen again. Jan says this is a “human and civil rights violation”. The public is deliberately being lied to and misled so they believe the system is just, and to avoid detection of the true harm being done due to systematic failures, greed and corruption.

Further, situation depression, anxiety, stress, grief/loss as a result of injustice and the forced removal of their children, is also used against the parents to justify the false diagnosis–and require the removal of children. Jan says the system profits from selling children, that foster care and adoption is big business for the state.

 

HOW TO STOP OR PREVENT THIS?

 

Jan offers these suggestions…this is NOT to take the place of legal  or medical advice.   Please seek help from an appropriate professional with questions about your own situation.

-Get collateral witnesses

-Get confidentiality statements, DO NOT allow hearsay into the assessment

-When a court official, judge, social worker, GAL is asking you to take multiple (3,4,5) assessments until they get the diagnosis they want, report that person to the State Auditors Office for “duplication of services”.   Duplication of services is fraud–it involves a court official asking for multiple assessments because they do not like the positive (negative) result from the first assessment so, they embellish, lie, exaggerate and otherwise seek someone who will back up their opinion. Opinion is NOT a valid means to determine a diagnosis. If that does not happen with one psychological assessment, then they seek another and another until the desired outcome is achieved.

-Understand your rights. You have a right to refuse a psych evaluation. If you choose to participate in a psychological evaluation, you have the right to request a copy of that evaluation.   DO NOT take or consent to take another psych evaluation until you get the results and paperwork from the first eval, otherwise you will not be able to defend yourself. If you have a defense attorney refusing to give you a copy of your paperwork, file a complaint on them.

File complaints against anyone requesting multiple psych evaluations for “Duplication of Services” this is illegal, this is fishing for a diagnosis not a valid medical diagnosis. You may also consider filing a complaint with the State Auditor, the Judicial Board or other relevant agency.

“FRAUD UPON THE COURT PSYCHOLOGY WHISTLE BLOWER” by Jan Smith, YouTube, 11/16/2012: http://youtu.be/N2c_UOIsLMQ

See also Jan Smith’s congressional testimony to Bill Windsor of Lawless America about how he/r grandchildren were stolen and family devastated due to government corruption and abuse:

*****************************

One Response to “Digging For Dirt: Whistle Blower Jan Smith Exposes How Parents Can Be Falsely Diagnosed, Children Taken”

Judicial Racketeering RICO ACT (VIDEO)| FULL DISCLOSURE.NET


Judicial Racketeering

R.I.C.O  ACT

by  www.fulldisclosure.net

 JUSTICE.BILL OF RIGHTS WITH VOID STAMP.LAWLESS AMERICA.bill-of-rights-void-indusladies-com-200w_200_225

Click on the link below to watch and listen to Lawyer Richard Fine ( former anti-trust attorney for DOJ in Washington, D.C.) explain the what, why, and how the Judiciary system in America (crediting their business  model to the California Judiciary) intentionally subverts their own system as falsely advertised to the “Public Trust” fiduciary account through traditional Federal R.I.C.O.  Act (Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970) predicate crimes denial of due process of law, misprision, and High treason as a matter of law and fact.

That he speaks  to the Real America that is willing to listen and react from a jail cell admits hard proof legally presumed, judgment affirmed without consideration.