Rare Victory – Protective Mom Finally Wins Protection for Daughter!| Nelly and Noulenns’ Story


Real Mommy Nelly with daughter, Nouenn

 

 

Rare Victory – Protective Mom Finally Wins

Protection for Daughter!


8 Years and A Quarter Million Dollars Later – Nelly Gets Sole Custody

  HOPE FOR PROTECTIVE MOTHERS


On November 26th 2014, after 8 years of struggle both in the US and in France, the Quimper Family Court Judge gave me custody of my daughter, Noluenn, in France. Her father will be allowed to meet her 2 hours every two weeks in a supervised setting in Quimper, but right now, his visitations are suspended.”


Protective Mom, Nelly

Nelly and Noluenn’s story fits the Pattern of most Court Licensed Abuse cases: Child discloses sexual abuse; evidence disregarded; biased judge finds mom to be alienating; judge grants father full custody.

But Nelly fled the U.S. to France after which the biased and corrupt CLA Judge issued an arrest warrant.

Fortunately this story has a happy ending.

Congratulations to Nelly and Noluenn who are both safe in France!

Nelly, Never Without her Daughter

To read the English version, click on the first link below, or otherwise cut-and-paste into your browser or enter manually.

http://mothersoflostchildren.org/2014/11/after-american-court-fails-mother-france-provides-justice/

En Francaise,
http://www.letelegramme.fr/bretagne/enfance-nelly-jamais-sans-sa-fille-27-05-2014-10184147.php

See also, case of actress Kelly Rutherford’s case in which children have been taken to France by wealthy father, a case recently taken on by lawyer Wendy Murphy:

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/gossip-girl-kelly-rutherford-takes-deported-kids-battle/story?id=24960793

Image result for kelly Rutherford caseImage result for kelly Rutherford caseImage result for kelly Rutherford case

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

Author of this blog, Dedicated to the Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, and our Children Who Want to Come Home, and Especially to My Little Julian, is not a lawyer, attorney, or legal practitioner, therefore, no information contained herein this post and/or blog could be (mis)construed as “legal advice.”  Anyone who exercises he/r rights, and private property sometimes called “child” for deceptive, possibly malicious or retaliatory, and profiteering/privateering and in the “best interests” . . . of the “state” Texas General and other Funds at one’s own peril, risk, and/ or self-fulfillment.  The choice is yours.

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the uS Constitution and  Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, uS Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement/demand, then contact Author of this blog immediately as fair notice and due diligence requires so that Author shall act lawfully and reasonably with expedience pursuant to any supplemental knowledge.

RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD LEGISLATION BY SANTORUM|ALL SINGLE MOTHERS NEED TO READ AND STUDY THIS AND STAY OUT OF COURT AND AWAY FROM CPS AND POLICE


[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. 2830 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 714
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2830

   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 22, 2004

Mr. Santorum (for himself and Mr. Bayh) introduced the following bill; 
                     which was read the first time

                           September 23, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy Marriages and Responsible 
Fatherhood Act of 2004''.

         TITLE I--HEALTHY MARRIAGES AND RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD

SEC. 101. PROMOTION OF FAMILY FORMATION AND HEALTHY MARRIAGE.

    (a) TANF State Plans.--Section 402(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 602(a)(1)(A)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                            ``(vii) Encourage equitable treatment of 
                        healthy 2-parent married families under the 
                        program referred to in clause (i).''.
    (b) Healthy Marriage Promotion Grants; Repeal of Bonus for 
Reduction of Illegitimacy Ratio.--Section 403(a)(2) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Healthy marriage promotion grants.--
                    ``(A) Authority.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The Secretary shall 
                        award competitive grants to States, 
                        territories, and Indian tribes and tribal 
                        organizations for not more than 50 percent of 
                        the cost of developing and implementing 
                        innovative programs to promote and support 
                        healthy 2-parent married families.
                            ``(ii) Use of other tanf funds.--A State or 
                        Indian tribe with an approved tribal family 
                        assistance plan may use funds provided under 
                        other grants made under this part for all or 
                        part of the expenditures incurred for the 
                        remainder of the costs described in clause (i). 
                        In the case of a State, any such funds expended 
                        shall not be considered qualified State 
                        expenditures for purposes of section 409(a)(7).
                    ``(B) Healthy marriage promotion activities.--Funds 
                provided under subparagraph (A) and corresponding State 
                matching funds shall be used to support any of the 
                following programs or activities:
                            ``(i) Public advertising campaigns on the 
                        value of marriage and the skills needed to 
                        increase marital stability and health.
                            ``(ii) Education in high schools on the 
                        value of marriage, relationship skills, and 
                        budgeting.
                            ``(iii) Marriage education, marriage 
                        skills, and relationship skills programs that 
                        may include case management for, and referrals 
                        to, programs for parenting skills, financial 
                        management, conflict resolution, and job and 
                        career advancement, for non-married pregnant 
                        women, non-married expectant fathers, and non-
                        married recent parents.
                            ``(iv) Pre-marital education and marriage 
                        skills training for engaged couples and for 
                        couples or individuals interested in marriage.
                            ``(v) Marriage enhancement and marriage 
                        skills training programs for married couples.
                            ``(vi) Divorce reduction programs that 
                        teach relationship skills.
                            ``(vii) Marriage mentoring programs which 
                        use married couples as role models and mentors.
                            ``(viii) Programs to reduce the 
                        disincentives to marriage in means-tested aid 
                        programs, if offered in conjunction with any 
                        activity described in this subparagraph.
                            ``(ix) Training for individuals who will 
                        conduct any of the programs or activities 
                        described in clauses (i) through (viii).
                    ``(C) Voluntary participation.--Participation in 
                programs or activities described in any of clauses 
                (iii) through (vii) of subparagraph (B) shall be 
                voluntary.
                    ``(D) General rules governing use of funds.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The rules of section 
                        404, other than subsection (b) of that section, 
                        shall not apply to a grant made under this 
                        paragraph.
                            ``(ii) Rule of construction.--Nothing in 
                        this part or part C shall be construed as 
                        prohibiting a State from using funds made 
                        available under a grant awarded under this 
                        paragraph to award a subgrant or contract to a 
                        fatherhood promotion organization to carry out 
                        programs or activities described in 
                        subparagraph (B).
                    ``(E) Requirements for receipt of funds.--A State, 
                territory, or Indian tribe or tribal organization may 
                not be awarded a grant under this paragraph unless the 
                State, territory, Indian tribe or tribal organization, 
                as a condition of receiving funds under such a grant--
                            ``(i) consults with experts in domestic 
                        violence or with relevant community domestic 
                        violence coalitions in developing such programs 
                        or activities; and
                            ``(ii) describes in the application for a 
                        grant under this paragraph--
                                    ``(I) how the programs or 
                                activities proposed to be conducted 
                                will address, as appropriate, issues of 
                                domestic violence; and
                                    ``(II) what the State, territory, 
                                or Indian tribe or tribal organization, 
                                will do, to the extent relevant, to 
                                ensure that participation in such 
                                programs or activities is voluntary, 
                                and to inform potential participants 
                                that their involvement is voluntary.
                    ``(F) Appropriation.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Out of any money in the 
                        Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
                        appropriated, there are appropriated for each 
                        of fiscal years 2005 through 2006, $100,000,000 
                        for grants under this paragraph.
                            ``(ii) Extended availability of funds.--
                                    ``(I) In general.--Funds 
                                appropriated under clause (i) for each 
                                of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 shall 
                                remain available to the Secretary until 
                                expended.
                                    ``(II) Authority for grant 
                                recipients.--A State, territory, or 
                                Indian tribe or tribal organization may 
                                use funds made available under a grant 
                                awarded under this paragraph without 
                                fiscal year limitation pursuant to the 
                                terms of the grant.''.
    (c) Counting of Spending on Non-Eligible Families To Prevent and 
Reduce Incidence of Out-of-Wedlock Births, Encourage Formation and 
Maintenance of Healthy 2-Parent Married Families, or Encourage 
Responsible Fatherhood.--Section 409(a)(7)(B)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)(B)(i)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                                    ``(V) Counting of spending on non-
                                eligible families to prevent and reduce 
                                incidence of out-of-wedlock births, 
                                encourage formation and maintenance of 
                                healthy 2-parent married families, or 
                                encourage responsible fatherhood.--
                                Subject to subclauses (II) and (III), 
                                the term `qualified State expenditures' 
                                includes the total expenditures by the 
                                State during the fiscal year under all 
                                State programs for a purpose described 
                                in paragraph (3) or (4) of section 
                                401(a).''.
    (d) Purposes.--Section 401(a)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 601(a)(4)) is amended by striking ``two-parent families'' and 
inserting ``healthy 2-parent married families, and encourage 
responsible fatherhood''.

SEC. 102. RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROGRAM.

    (a) Responsible Fatherhood Program.--
            (1) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
                    (A) Nearly 24,000,000 children in the United 
                States, or 34 percent of all such children, live apart 
                from their biological father.
                    (B) Sixty percent of couples who divorce have at 
                least 1 child.
                    (C) The number of children living with only a 
                mother increased from just over 5,000,000 in 1960 to 
                17,000,000 in 1999, and between 1981 and 1991 the 
                percentage of children living with only 1 parent 
                increased from 19 percent to 25 percent.
                    (D) Forty percent of children who live in 
                households without a father have not seen their father 
                in at least 1 year and 50 percent of such children have 
                never visited their father's home.
                    (E) The most important factor in a child's 
                upbringing is whether the child is brought up in a 
                loving, healthy, supportive environment.
                    (F) Children who live without contact with their 
                biological father are, in comparison to children who 
                have such contact--
                            (i) 5 times more likely to live in poverty;
                            (ii) more likely to bring weapons and drugs 
                        into the classroom;
                            (iii) twice as likely to commit crime;
                            (iv) twice as likely to drop out of school;
                            (v) more likely to commit suicide;
                            (vi) more than twice as likely to abuse 
                        alcohol or drugs; and
                            (vii) more likely to become pregnant as 
                        teenagers.
                    (G) Violent criminals are overwhelmingly males who 
                grew up without fathers.
                    (H) Between 20 and 30 percent of families in 
                poverty are headed by women who have suffered domestic 
                violence during the past year, and between 40 and 60 
                percent of women with children receiving welfare were 
                abused sometime during their life.
                    (I) Responsible fatherhood includes active 
                participation in financial support and child care, as 
                well as the formation and maintenance of a positive, 
                healthy, and nonviolent relationship between father and 
                child and a cooperative relationship between parents.
                    (J) States should be encouraged to implement 
                programs that provide support for responsible 
                fatherhood, promote marriage, and increase the 
                incidence of marriage, and should not be restricted 
                from implementing such programs.
                    (K) Fatherhood programs should promote and provide 
                support services for--
                            (i) loving and healthy relationships 
                        between parents and children; and
                            (ii) cooperative parenting.
                    (L) There is a social need to reconnect children 
                and fathers.
                    (M) The promotion of responsible fatherhood and 
                encouragement of healthy 2-parent married families 
                should not--
                            (i) denigrate the standing or parenting 
                        efforts of single mothers or other caregivers;
                            (ii) lessen the protection of children from 
                        abusive parents; or
                            (iii) compromise the safety or health of 
                        the custodial parent;
                but should increase the chance that children will have 
                2 caring parents to help them grow up healthy and 
                secure.
                    (N) The promotion of responsible fatherhood must 
                always recognize and promote the values of nonviolence.
                    (O) For the future of the United States and the 
                future of our children, Congress, States, and local 
                communities should assist parents to become more 
                actively involved in their children's lives.
                    (P) Child support is an important means by which a 
                parent can take financial responsibility for a child 
                and emotional support is an important means by which a 
                parent can take social responsibility for a child.
            (2) Fatherhood program.--Title I of the Personal 
        Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 
        (Public Law 104-193) is amended by adding at the end the 
        following:

``SEC. 117. FATHERHOOD PROGRAM.

    ``(a) In General.--Title IV (42 U.S.C. 601-679b) is amended by 
inserting after part B the following:

               ```PART C--RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROGRAM

 ```SEC. 441. RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD GRANTS.

    ```(a) Grants to States To Conduct Demonstration Programs.--
            ```(1) Authority to award grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--The Secretary shall award 
                grants to up to 20 eligible States to conduct 
                demonstration programs to carry out the purposes 
                described in paragraph (2).
                    ```(B) Eligible state.--For purposes of this 
                subsection, an eligible State is a State that submits 
                to the Secretary the following:
                            ```(i) Application.--An application for a 
                        grant under this subsection, at such time, in 
                        such manner, and containing such information as 
                        the Secretary may require.
                            ```(ii) State plan.--A State plan that 
                        includes the following:
                                    ```(I) Project description.--A 
                                description of the programs or 
                                activities the State will fund under 
                                the grant, including a good faith 
                                estimate of the number and 
                                characteristics of clients to be served 
                                under such projects and how the State 
                                intends to achieve at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in paragraph (2).
                                    ```(II) Coordination efforts.--A 
                                description of how the State will 
                                coordinate and cooperate with State and 
                                local entities responsible for carrying 
                                out other programs that relate to the 
                                purposes intended to be achieved under 
                                the demonstration program, including as 
                                appropriate, entities responsible for 
                                carrying out jobs programs and programs 
                                serving children and families.
                                    ```(III) Records, reports, and 
                                audits.--An agreement to maintain such 
                                records, submit such reports, and 
                                cooperate with such reviews and audits 
                                as the Secretary finds necessary for 
                                purposes of oversight of the 
                                demonstration program.
                            ```(iii) Certifications.--The following 
                        certifications from the chief executive officer 
                        of the State:
                                    ```(I) A certification that the 
                                State will use funds provided under the 
                                grant to promote at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in paragraph (2).
                                    ```(II) A certification that the 
                                State will return any unused funds 
to the Secretary in accordance with the reconciliation process under 
paragraph (5).
                                    ```(III) A certification that the 
                                funds provided under the grant will be 
                                used for programs and activities that 
                                target low-income participants and that 
                                not less than 50 percent of the 
                                participants in each program or 
                                activity funded under the grant shall 
                                be--
                                            ```(aa) parents of a child 
                                        who is, or within the past 24 
                                        months has been, a recipient of 
                                        assistance or services under a 
                                        State program funded under part 
                                        A, D, or E of this title, title 
                                        XIX, or the Food Stamp Act of 
                                        1977; or
                                            ```(bb) parents, including 
                                        an expectant parent or a 
                                        married parent, whose income 
                                        (after adjustment for court-
                                        ordered child support paid or 
                                        received) does not exceed 150 
                                        percent of the poverty line.
                                    ```(IV) A certification that the 
                                State has or will comply with the 
                                requirements of paragraph (4).
                                    ```(V) A certification that funds 
                                provided to a State under this 
                                subsection shall not be used to 
                                supplement or supplant other Federal, 
                                State, or local funds that are used to 
                                support programs or activities that are 
                                related to the purposes described in 
                                paragraph (2).
                    ```(C) Preferences and factors of consideration.--
                In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary 
                shall take into consideration the following:
                            ```(i) Diversity of entities used to 
                        conduct programs and activities.--The Secretary 
                        shall, to the extent practicable, achieve a 
                        balance among the eligible States awarded 
                        grants under this subsection with respect to 
                        the size, urban or rural location, and 
                        employment of differing or unique methods of 
                        the entities that the eligible States intend to 
                        use to conduct the programs and activities 
                        funded under the grants.
                            ```(ii) Priority for certain states.--The 
                        Secretary shall give priority to awarding 
                        grants to eligible States that have--
                                    ```(I) demonstrated progress in 
                                achieving at least 1 of the purposes 
                                described in paragraph (2) through 
                                previous State initiatives; or
                                    ```(II) demonstrated need with 
                                respect to reducing the incidence of 
                                out-of-wedlock births or absent fathers 
                                in the State.
            ```(2) Purposes.--The purposes described in this paragraph 
        are the following:
                    ```(A) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                marriage promotion.--To promote marriage or sustain 
                marriage through activities such as counseling, 
                mentoring, disseminating information about the benefits 
                of marriage and 2-parent involvement for children, 
                enhancing relationship skills, education regarding how 
                to control aggressive behavior, disseminating 
                information on the causes of domestic violence and 
                child abuse, marriage preparation programs, premarital 
                counseling, marital inventories, skills-based marriage 
                education, financial planning seminars, including 
                improving a family's ability to effectively manage 
                family business affairs by means such as education, 
                counseling, or mentoring on matters related to family 
                finances, including household management, budgeting, 
                banking, and handling of financial transactions and 
                home maintenance, and divorce education and reduction 
                programs, including mediation and counseling.
                    ```(B) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                parenting promotion.--To promote responsible parenting 
                through activities such as counseling, mentoring, and 
                mediation, disseminating information about good 
                parenting practices, skills-based parenting education, 
                encouraging child support payments, and other methods.
                    ```(C) Promoting responsible fatherhood through 
                fostering economic stability of fathers.--To foster 
                economic stability by helping fathers improve their 
                economic status by providing activities such as work 
                first services, job search, job training, subsidized 
                employment, job retention, job enhancement, and 
                encouraging education, including career-advancing 
                education, dissemination of employment materials, 
                coordination with existing employment services such as 
                welfare-to-work programs, referrals to local employment 
                training initiatives, and other methods.
            ```(3) Restriction on use of funds.--No funds provided 
        under this subsection may be used for costs attributable to 
        court proceedings regarding matters of child visitation or 
        custody, or for legislative advocacy.
            ```(4) Requirements for receipt of funds.--A State may not 
        be awarded a grant under this section unless the State, as a 
        condition of receiving funds under such a grant--
                    ```(A) consults with experts in domestic violence 
                or with relevant community domestic violence coalitions 
                in developing such programs or activities; and
                    ```(B) describes in the application for a grant 
                under this section--
                            ```(i) how the programs or activities 
                        proposed to be conducted will address, 
as appropriate, issues of domestic violence; and
                            ```(ii) what the State will do, to the 
                        extent relevant, to ensure that participation 
                        in such programs or activities is voluntary, 
                        and to inform potential participants that their 
                        involvement is voluntary.
            ```(5) Reconciliation process.--
                    ```(A) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--
                Each eligible State that receives a grant under this 
                subsection for a fiscal year shall return to the 
                Secretary any unused portion of the grant for such 
                fiscal year not later than the last day of the second 
                succeeding fiscal year, together with any earnings on 
                such unused portion.
                    ```(B) Procedure for redistribution.--The Secretary 
                shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
                redistributing to eligible States that have expended 
                the entire amount of a grant made under this subsection 
                for a fiscal year any amount that is returned to the 
                Secretary by eligible States under subparagraph (A).
            ```(6) Amount of grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), 
                the amount of each grant awarded under this subsection 
                shall be an amount sufficient to implement the State 
                plan submitted under paragraph (1)(B)(ii).
                    ```(B) Minimum amounts.--No eligible State shall--
                            ```(i) in the case of the District of 
                        Columbia or a State other than the Commonwealth 
                        of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin 
                        Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the 
                        Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 
                        receive a grant for a fiscal year in an amount 
                        that is less than $1,000,000; and
                            ```(ii) in the case of the Commonwealth of 
                        Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, 
                        Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of 
                        the Northern Mariana Islands, receive a grant 
                        for a fiscal year in an amount that is less 
                        than $500,000.
            ```(7) Definition of state.--In this subsection, the term 
        ``State'' means each of the 50 States, the District of 
        Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States 
        Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of 
        the Northern Mariana Islands.
            ```(8) Authorization of appropriations.--Out of any money 
        in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
        appropriated, there are appropriated $45,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for purposes of making grants to 
        eligible States under this subsection.
    ```(b) Grants to Eligible Entities To Conduct Demonstration 
Programs.--
            ```(1) Authority to award grants.--
                    ```(A) In general.--The Secretary shall award 
                grants to eligible entities to conduct demonstration 
                programs to carry out the purposes described in 
                subsection (a)(2).
                    ```(B) Eligible entity.--For purposes of this 
                subsection, an eligible entity is a local government, 
                local public agency, community-based or nonprofit 
                organization, or private entity, including any 
                charitable or faith-based organization, or an Indian 
                tribe (as defined in section 419(4)), that submits to 
                the Secretary the following:
                            ```(i) Application.--An application for a 
                        grant under this subsection, at such time, in 
                        such manner, and containing such information as 
                        the Secretary may require.
                            ```(ii) Project description.--A description 
                        of the programs or activities the entity 
                        intends to carry out with funds provided under 
                        the grant, including a good faith estimate of 
                        the number and characteristics of clients to be 
                        served under such programs or activities and 
                        how the entity intends to achieve at least 2 of 
                        the purposes described in subsection (a)(2).
                            ```(iii) Coordination efforts.--A 
                        description of how the entity will coordinate 
                        and cooperate with State and local entities 
                        responsible for carrying out other programs 
                        that relate to the purposes intended to be 
                        achieved under the demonstration program, 
                        including as appropriate, entities responsible 
                        for carrying out jobs programs and programs 
                        serving children and families.
                            ```(iv) Records, reports, and audits.--An 
                        agreement to maintain such records, submit such 
                        reports, and cooperate with such reviews and 
                        audits as the Secretary finds necessary for 
                        purposes of oversight of the demonstration 
                        program.
                            ```(v) Certifications.--The following 
                        certifications:
                                    ```(I) A certification that the 
                                entity will use funds provided under 
                                the grant to promote at least 2 of the 
                                purposes described in subsection 
                                (a)(2).
                                    ```(II) A certification that the 
                                entity will return any unused funds to 
                                the Secretary in accordance with the 
                                reconciliation process under paragraph 
                                (3).
                                    ```(III) A certification that the 
                                funds provided under the grant will be 
                                used for programs and activities that 
                                target low-income participants and that 
                                not less than 50 percent of the 
                                participants in each program or 
                                activity funded under the grant shall 
                                be--
                                            ```(aa) parents of a child 
                                        who is, or within the past 
24 months has been, a recipient of assistance or services under a State 
program funded under part A, D, or E of this title, title XIX, or the 
Food Stamp Act of 1977; or
                                            ```(bb) parents, including 
                                        an expectant parent or a 
                                        married parent, whose income 
                                        (after adjustment for court-
                                        ordered child support paid or 
                                        received) does not exceed 150 
                                        percent of the poverty line.
                                    ```(IV) A certification that the 
                                entity has or will comply with the 
                                requirements of paragraph (3).
                                    ```(V) A certification that funds 
                                provided to an entity under this 
                                subsection shall not be used to 
                                supplement or supplant other Federal, 
                                State, or local funds provided to the 
                                entity that are used to support 
                                programs or activities that are related 
                                to the purposes described in subsection 
                                (a)(2).
                    ```(C) Preferences and factors of consideration.--
                In awarding grants under this subsection, the Secretary 
                shall, to the extent practicable, achieve a balance 
                among the eligible entities awarded grants under this 
                subsection with respect to the size, urban or rural 
                location, and employment of differing or unique methods 
                of the entities.
            ```(2) Restriction on use of funds.--No funds provided 
        under this subsection may be used for costs attributable to 
        court proceedings regarding matters of child visitation or 
        custody, or for legislative advocacy.
            ```(3) Requirements for use of funds.--The Secretary may 
        not award a grant under this subsection to an eligible entity 
        unless the entity, as a condition of receiving funds under such 
        a grant--
                    ```(A) consults with experts in domestic violence 
                or with relevant community domestic violence coalitions 
                in developing the programs or activities to be 
                conducted with such funds awarded under the grant; and
                    ```(B) describes in the application for a grant 
                under this section--
                            ```(i) how the programs or activities 
                        proposed to be conducted will address, as 
                        appropriate, issues of domestic violence; and
                            ```(ii) what the entity will do, to the 
                        extent relevant, to ensure that participation 
                        in such programs or activities is voluntary, 
                        and to inform potential participants that their 
                        involvement is voluntary.
            ```(4) Reconciliation process.--
                    ```(A) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--
                Each eligible entity that receives a grant under this 
                subsection for a fiscal year shall return to the 
                Secretary any unused portion of the grant for such 
                fiscal year not later than the last day of the second 
                succeeding fiscal year, together with any earnings on 
                such unused portion.
                    ```(B) Procedure for redistribution.--The Secretary 
                shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
                redistributing to eligible entities that have expended 
                the entire amount of a grant made under this subsection 
                for a fiscal year any amount that is returned to the 
                Secretary by eligible entities under subparagraph (A).
            ```(5) Authorization of appropriations.--Out of any money 
        in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise 
        appropriated, there are appropriated $30,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for purposes of making grants to 
        eligible entities under this subsection.

```SEC. 442. NATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD 
              PROGRAMS.

    ```(a) Media Campaign National Clearinghouse for Responsible 
Fatherhood.--
            ```(1) In general.--From any funds appropriated under 
        subsection (c), the Secretary shall contract with a nationally 
        recognized, nonprofit fatherhood promotion organization 
        described in subsection (b) to--
                    ```(A) develop, promote, and distribute to 
                interested States, local governments, public agencies, 
                and private entities a media campaign that encourages 
                the appropriate involvement of parents in the life of 
                any child, with a priority for programs that 
                specifically address the issue of responsible 
                fatherhood; and
                    ```(B) develop a national clearinghouse to assist 
                States and communities in efforts to promote and 
                support marriage and responsible fatherhood by 
                collecting, evaluating, and making available (through 
                the Internet and by other means) to other States 
                information regarding the media campaigns established 
                under section 443.
            ```(2) Coordination with domestic violence programs.--The 
        Secretary shall ensure that the nationally recognized nonprofit 
        fatherhood promotion organization with a contract under 
        paragraph (1) coordinates the media campaign developed under 
        subparagraph (A) of such paragraph and the national 
        clearinghouse developed under subparagraph (B) of such 
        paragraph with national, State, or local domestic violence 
        programs.
    ```(b) Nationally Recognized, Nonprofit Fatherhood Promotion 
Organization Described.--The nationally recognized, nonprofit 
fatherhood promotion organization described in this subsection is an 
organization that has at least 4 years of experience in--
            ```(1) designing and disseminating a national public 
        education campaign, as evidenced by the production and 
        successful placement of television, radio, and print public 
service announcements that promote the importance of responsible 
fatherhood, a track record of service to Spanish-speaking populations 
and historically underserved or minority populations, the capacity to 
fulfill requests for information and a proven history of fulfilling 
such requests, and a mechanism through which the public can request 
additional information about the campaign; and
            ```(2) providing consultation and training to community-
        based organizations interested in implementing fatherhood 
        outreach, support, or skill development programs with an 
        emphasis on promoting married fatherhood as the ideal.
    ```(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are 
appropriated $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 to 
carry out this section.

```SEC. 443. BLOCK GRANTS TO STATES TO ENCOURAGE MEDIA CAMPAIGNS.

    ```(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ```(1) Broadcast advertisement.--The term ``broadcast 
        advertisement'' means a communication intended to be aired by a 
        television or radio broadcast station, including a 
        communication intended to be transmitted through a cable 
        channel.
            ```(2) Child at risk.--The term ``child at risk'' means 
        each young child whose family income does not exceed the 
        poverty line.
            ```(3) Poverty line.--The term ``poverty line'' has the 
        meaning given such term in section 673(2) of the Community 
        Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)), including any 
        revision required by such section, that is applicable to a 
        family of the size involved.
            ```(4) Printed or other advertisement.--The term ``printed 
        or other advertisement'' includes any communication intended to 
        be distributed through a newspaper, magazine, outdoor 
        advertising facility, mailing, or any other type of general 
        public advertising, but does not include any broadcast 
        advertisement.
            ```(5) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the 50 
        States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto 
        Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, 
        and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
            ```(6) Young child.--The term ``young child'' means an 
        individual under age 5.
    ```(b) State Certifications.--Not later than October 1 of each of 
fiscal year for which a State desires to receive an allotment under 
this section, the chief executive officer of the State shall submit to 
the Secretary a certification that the State shall--
            ```(1) use such funds to promote the formation and 
        maintenance of healthy 2-parent married families, strengthen 
        fragile families, and promote responsible fatherhood through 
        media campaigns conducted in accordance with the requirements 
        of subsection (d);
            ```(2) return any unused funds to the Secretary in 
        accordance with the reconciliation process under subsection 
        (e); and
            ```(3) comply with the reporting requirements under 
        subsection (f).
    ```(c) Payments to States.--For each of fiscal years 2005 through 
2006, the Secretary shall pay to each State that submits a 
certification under subsection (b), from any funds appropriated under 
subsection (i), for the fiscal year an amount equal to the amount of 
the allotment determined for the fiscal year under subsection (g).
    ```(d) Establishment of Media Campaigns.--Each State receiving an 
allotment under this section for a fiscal year shall use the allotment 
to conduct media campaigns as follows:
            ```(1) Conduct of media campaigns.--
                    ```(A) Radio and television media campaigns.--
                            ```(i) Production of broadcast 
                        advertisements.--At the option of the State, to 
                        produce broadcast advertisements that promote 
                        the formation and maintenance of healthy 2-
                        parent married families, strengthen fragile 
                        families, and promote responsible fatherhood.
                            ```(ii) Airtime challenge program.--At the 
                        option of the State, to establish an airtime 
                        challenge program under which the State may 
                        spend amounts allotted under this section to 
                        purchase time from a broadcast station to air a 
                        broadcast advertisement produced under clause 
                        (i), but only if the State obtains an amount of 
                        time of the same class and during a comparable 
                        period to air the advertisement using non-
                        Federal contributions.
                    ```(B) Other media campaigns.--At the option of the 
                State, to conduct a media campaign that consists of the 
                production and distribution of printed or other 
                advertisements that promote the formation and 
                maintenance of healthy 2-parent married families, 
                strengthen fragile families, and promote responsible 
                fatherhood.
            ```(2) Administration of media campaigns.--A State may 
        administer media campaigns funded under this section directly 
        or through grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements with 
        public agencies, local governments, or private entities, 
        including charitable and faith-based organizations.
            ```(3) Consultation with domestic violence assistance 
        centers.--In developing broadcast and printed advertisements to 
        be used in the media campaigns conducted under paragraph (1), 
        the State or other entity administering the campaign shall 
        consult with representatives of State and local domestic 
        violence centers.
            ```(4) Non-federal contributions.--In this section, the 
        term ``non-Federal contributions'' includes contributions by 
        the State and by public and private entities. Such 
        contributions may be in cash or in kind. Such term does not 
        include any amounts provided by the Federal Government, or 
        services assisted or subsidized to any significant extent by 
        the Federal Government, or any amount expended by a State 
        before October 1, 2004.
    ```(e) Reconciliation Process.--
            ```(1) 3-year availability of amounts allotted.--Each State 
        that receives an allotment under this section shall return to 
        the Secretary any unused portion of the amount allotted to a 
        State for a fiscal year not later than the last day of the 
        second succeeding fiscal year together with any earnings on 
        such unused portion.
            ```(2) Procedure for redistribution of unused allotments.--
        The Secretary shall establish an appropriate procedure for 
        redistributing to States that have expended the entire amount 
        allotted under this section any amount that is--
                    ```(A) returned to the Secretary by States under 
                paragraph (1); or
                    ```(B) not allotted to a State under this section 
                because the State did not submit a certification under 
                subsection (b) by October 1 of a fiscal year.
    ```(f) Reporting Requirements.--
            ```(1) Monitoring and evaluation.--Each State receiving an 
        allotment under this section for a fiscal year shall monitor 
and evaluate the media campaigns conducted using funds made available 
under this section in such manner as the Secretary, in consultation 
with the States, determines appropriate.
            ```(2) Annual reports.--Not less frequently than annually, 
        each State receiving an allotment under this section for a 
        fiscal year shall submit to the Secretary reports on the media 
        campaigns conducted using funds made available under this 
        section at such time, in such manner, and containing such 
        information as the Secretary may require.
    ```(g) Amount of Allotments.--
            ```(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), of 
        the amount appropriated for the purpose of making allotments 
        under this section for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall allot 
        to each State that submits a certification under subsection (b) 
        for the fiscal year an amount equal to the sum of--
                    ```(A) the amount that bears the same ratio to 50 
                percent of such funds as the number of young children 
                in the State (as determined by the Secretary based on 
                the most current reliable data available) bears to the 
                number of such children in all States; and
                    ```(B) the amount that bears the same ratio to 50 
                percent of such funds as the number of children at risk 
                in the State (as determined by the Secretary based on 
                the most current reliable data available) bears to the 
                number of such children in all States.
            ```(2) Minimum allotments.--No allotment for a fiscal year 
        under this section shall be less than--
                    ```(A) in the case of the District of Columbia or a 
                State other than the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the 
                United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and 
                the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, 1 
                percent of the amount appropriated for the fiscal year 
                under subsection (i); and
                    ```(B) in the case of the Commonwealth of Puerto 
                Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American 
                Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
                Islands, 0.5 percent of such amount.
            ```(3) Pro rata reductions.--The Secretary shall make such 
        pro rata reductions to the allotments determined under this 
        subsection as are necessary to comply with the requirements of 
        paragraph (2).
    ```(h) Evaluation.--
            ```(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct an 
        evaluation of the impact of the media campaigns funded under 
        this section.
            ```(2) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2006, the 
        Secretary shall report to Congress the results of the 
        evaluation under paragraph (1).
            ```(3) Funding.--Of the amount appropriated under 
        subsection (i) for fiscal year 2005, $1,000,000 of such amount 
        shall be transferred and made available for purposes of 
        conducting the evaluation required under this subsection, and 
        shall remain available until expended.
    ```(i) Authorization of Appropriations.--Out of any money in the 
Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are 
appropriated $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2006 for 
purposes of making allotments to States under this section.'.
    ``(b) Inapplicability of Effective Date Provisions.--Section 116 
shall not apply to the amendment made by subsection (a) of this 
section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--Section 2 of such Act is amended in the 
table of contents by inserting after the item relating to section 116 
the following new item:

``Sec. 117. Responsible fatherhood program.''.

SEC. 103. RESEARCH, EVALUATIONS, AND NATIONAL STUDIES.

    Section 413 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 613) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(k) Funding for Research, Demonstrations, and Technical 
Assistance.--
            ``(1) Appropriation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Out of any money in the Treasury 
                of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there 
                are appropriated $100,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
                2005 through 2006, which shall remain available to the 
                Secretary until expended.
                    ``(B) Use of funds.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) shall be used for the purpose 
                        of--
                                    ``(I) conducting or supporting 
                                research and demonstration projects by 
                                public or private entities; or
                                    ``(II) providing technical 
                                assistance in connection with a purpose 
                                of the program funded under this part, 
                                as described in section 401(a), to 
                                States, Indian tribal organizations, 
                                sub-State entities, and such other 
                                entities as the Secretary may specify.
                            ``(ii) Requirement.--Not less than 80 
                        percent of the funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) for a fiscal year shall be 
                        expended for the purpose of conducting or 
                        supporting research and demonstration projects, 
                        or for providing technical assistance, in 
                        connection with activities described in section 
                        403(a)(2)(B). Funds appropriated under 
                        subparagraph (A) and expended in accordance 
                        with this clause shall be in addition to any 
                        other funds made available under this part for 
                        activities described in section 403(a)(2)(B).
            ``(2) Secretary's authority.--The Secretary may conduct 
        activities authorized by this subsection directly or through 
        grants, contracts, or interagency agreements with public or 
        private entities.
            ``(3) Requirement for use of funds.--The Secretary shall 
        not pay any funds appropriated under paragraph (1)(A) to an 
        entity for the purpose of conducting or supporting research and 
demonstration projects involving activities described in section 
403(a)(2)(B) unless the entity complies with the requirements of 
section 403(a)(2)(E).''.

SEC. 104. RESCISSION OF HIGH PERFORMANCE BONUS AND BONUS TO REWARD 
              DECREASE IN ILLEGITIMACY RATIO.

    (a) Rescission.--With respect to the amounts appropriated under 
paragraphs (2)(D) and (4)(F) of section 403(a) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)), the amounts remaining available for obligation 
for any fiscal year after fiscal year 2004 are rescinded.
    (b) Budget Scoring.--Notwithstanding section 257(b)(2) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 
907(b)(2)), the baseline shall assume that no bonus grants shall be 
made under section 403(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
603(a)(2)) (relating to bonuses to reward decreases in the illegitimacy 
ratio) or under section 403(a)(4) of that Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(4)) 
(relating to high performance bonuses) after fiscal year 2004.
    (c) Application of Budget Savings.--Budget savings resulting from 
the application of subsections (a) and (b) shall be applied to offset 
the costs of making healthy marriage promotion grants under section 
403(a)(2) of the Social Security Act (as amended by section 101(b) of 
this Act), funding research, demonstrations, and technical assistance 
under section 413(k) of the Social Security Act (as added by section 
103 of this Act), and carrying out the responsible fatherhood program 
under part C of title IV of the Social Security Act (as added by 
section 102(a)(2) of this Act).

            TITLE II--EXTENSION OF TANF AND RELATED PROGRAMS

SEC. 201. EXTENSION OF THE TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES 
              BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THROUGH MARCH 31, 2005.

    (a) In General.--Activities authorized by part A of title IV of the 
Social Security Act, other than the activities authorized by sections 
403(a)(2) and 413(k) of such Act (as amended by sections 101(b) and 
103, respectively, of this Act), and by sections 510, 1108(b), and 1925 
of such Act, shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2002, notwithstanding section 1902(e)(1)(A) 
of such Act, and out of any money in the Treasury of the United States 
not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as 
may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and payments may be made 
pursuant to this authority through the second quarter of fiscal year 
2005 at the level provided for such activities through the second 
quarter of fiscal year 2002. Activities authorized by sections 
403(a)(2) and 413(k) of the Social Security Act (as so amended), and by 
part C of title IV of such Act (as added by section 102(a)(2) of this 
Act)), shall continue through the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 in 
accordance with the amendments made by sections 101(b), 102(a)(2), and 
103, respectively, of this Act.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 403(a)(3)(H)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(3)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2004'' and inserting ``March 31, 2005''.

SEC. 202. EXTENSION OF THE NATIONAL RANDOM SAMPLE STUDY OF CHILD 
              WELFARE AND CHILD WELFARE WAIVER AUTHORITY THROUGH 
              SEPTEMBER 30, 2004.

    Activities authorized by sections 429A and 1130(a) of the Social 
Security Act shall continue through March 31, 2005, in the manner 
authorized for fiscal year 2002, and out of any money in the Treasury 
of the United States not otherwise appropriated, there are hereby 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary for such purpose. Grants and 
payments may be made pursuant to this authority through the second 
quarter of fiscal year 2005 at the level provided for such activities 
through the second quarter of fiscal year 2002.




                                                       Calendar No. 714

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2830

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to promote 
 healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 23, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

KIDS FOR CASH: DCF AND TITLE IV-E FEDERAL ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM


CORRUPT CT

Re-Blogged

Home / Corruption / DCF Enhancement Title IV-E Federal Entitlement Program
DCF Enhancement Title IV-E Federal Entitlement Program
kids for cash

DCF Enhancement Title IV-E Federal Entitlement Program

REVENUE ENHANCEMENT
Title IV-E Federal Entitlement Program    16-3
POLICY
The Department of Children and FamiliesRevenue Enhancement Office (REO) shall establish
Title IV-E eligibility at the time a child enters the care and custody of DCF. For those children
determined to be initially eligible, a re-determination of eligibility shall be completed on an annual
basis throughout the child’s entire placement episode.
Definitions
Child care institution means a private child caring facility or a public child caring facility that accommodates
no more than 25 children and that is licensed or approved by the state in which it is located. The term includes
independent (but supervised) living settings for youth age 18 years and older. The term does not include detention faci
lities, forestry camps, training schools or any other facility operated primarily for the detention of children who are determined to be delinquent.
Constructive removal means a paper removal of custody from the parents or legal guardian under certain circumstances.
Eligibility month means the month in which a petition or motion was filed that led to the court-ordered removal
of a child or the month in which a voluntary placement agreement was signed. This month serves as the starting point
to determine whether the child meets eligibility criteria.
Foster family home means a home licensed or approved to provide 24- hour out-of-home care to children. The term includes foster homes, group homes, residential treatment centers and other similar facilities.
Judicial determination means a court ruling or order signed by a judge.
Placement episode means a period of continuous out-of-home placement triggered by the removal of a child.
 Note: These definitions are paraphrased. Please refer to the Code of Federal Regulations for the text
Criteria for
Eligibility
Title IV-E eligibility shall be determined by the following factors:
physical or constructive removal of a child from his or her home;
age of the child, including verification of birth and citizenship;
legal authority;
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) criteria test;
placement in a foster family home or child care institution
FIND MORE ON:
 http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0CFIQFjAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ct.gov%2Fdcf%2Flib%2Fdcf%2Fpolicy%2Fpdf%2F16030000.pdf&ei=mX2gVNjbE8e3oQSAq4L4Dg&usg=AFQjCNFV0iImp7cGU7J6Gl3hOVLF0GbSMg&sig2=88fzmYLOwXyGf04uFLeKNg&bvm=bv.82001339,d.cGU&cad=rja

JAIL SOLVES NOTHING IN PAYMENT DISPUTE| CORRUPT CT


CORRUPT CT

December 28, 2014

RE-BLOGGED

Home / Connecticut Family Court’s / Jail Solves Nothing In Payment Dispute
Jail Solves Nothing In Payment Dispute
debtors prison

Jail Solves Nothing In Payment Dispute

Jail Solves Nothing In Payment Dispute

March 15, 2011|By Rick Green

I went to debtors’ court, aka Magistrate Harris T. Lifshitz’s family court in Hartford, to see how a man could end up in jail because he’s broke.

Recall the story of Gerald Frazee, the former CEO now living in Simsbury who, when his business career in California imploded, failed to make disputed support payments to his ex-wife and ended up in Lifshitz’s courtroom.

Frazee was sent to jail for two months, largely because Magistrate Lifshitz believes the formerly high-flying businessman was hiding the approximately $167,000 he may or may not owe to his wife.

Frazee says he doesn’t owe his wife any money and points to a court ruling in California that supports his case. I don’t know the answer to this, but state law is clear that we don’t send people to debtors’ prison. Incarceration should be used only for brief periods for nonpayment of child or spousal support.

This isn’t a problem for Lifshitz, who has a habit of throwing real and alleged deadbeats in the slammer for weeks and months. A judge once found him “clearly erroneous” for jailing a man because he couldn’t pay the full child support he owed. Others told me similar tales about appearing before Lifshitz.

“Connecticut case law is clear that a civil contempt order must be remedial and coercive, and not punitive,” Superior Court Judge Richard Dyer ruled in 2008 after Lifshitz jailed a man who couldn’t come up with $56,353.

“The issue here is not an inability to pay. It’s a refusal to pay,” Lifshitz chided Frazee one afternoon in court recently, when he explained that he had carefully reviewed Frazee’s finances and found evidence of ability to pay. “That’s why this called for incarceration.”

“You have resources other than a job,” Lifshitz said.

Frazee, who is 63, has been out of work since 2008. He claims no income and no assets.

Suspecting that Frazee was hiding cash or other financial resources, Lifshitz sent Frazee to jail from Dec. 23 until late February, finally freeing him because of a chronic blood-clotting condition that threatens the Simsbury man’s life. The two-month jail stay — including five days at Dempsey Hospital at taxpayer expense — produced no new money from Frazee.

Instead, Frazee sat in jail and was unable to work or look for employment. He could not respond to a job offer from a Philadelphia company that would have provided him with the income he needed to make the payments that landed him in court in the first place.

“The magistrate believes Mr. Frazee is hiding assets,” Frazee’s tax attorney, Richard Convicer, wrote state Rep. Linda Schofield, D-Simsbury, recently. “While such a conclusion is possible, I know of no evidence supporting it.”

“The fact that a citizen can be locked up for nearly two months based on an unsupported suspicion lacking any factual basis is deeply disturbing and a situation which our judicial system should not tolerate,” Convicer wrote.

When Lifshitz freed Frazee, he issued a “confinement order,” remanding him to the “custody” of his present wife and forbidding him from leaving his home for anything other than to search for a job and to go to church. Lifshitz joked that there would be “bed checks every night” before sending Frazee home with his wife.

When Lifshitz sent Frazee to jail in December, it was for his failure to come up with $85,000 of the $167,000 he owes stemming from a long dispute with his ex-wife in California. Frazee and his lawyer, Oliver Dickins, say Lifshitz has been unwilling to consider the possibility that Frazee is broke.

“This is such a frustrating thing,” Frazee told me. “The problem is how do you prove you don’t have something?”

“I paid $124,000 in child support. If I was trying to get out of that, why would I do that? It was up to 2003, that was until my son turned 18.”

Frazee and his lawyer are now appealing to Superior Court to intervene and dismiss the entire matter. Frazee hopes to start work soon for a Philadelphia lighting company that still has an executive-level job for him. Although he disputes owing his ex-wife any money, Frazee said he would start making payments to her in order to satisfy the court — and stay out of jail. However, he says he does not have the tens of thousands of dollars in back payments and interest that Lifshitz wants immediately.

Lifshitz, meanwhile, is up for appointment by Gov. Dannel P. Malloy for another three-year term. For now, debtors’ court remains in session.

 

 

Kids For Cash Film Demonstrative Evidence Filed With United States District Court


Kids For Cash Film Demonstrative Exhibit Filed With United States District Court

www.weightiermatter.com/divorce/kids-cash-film-demonstrative-exhibit-now-available/4167/

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

How Harris and Brazoria County Judges, Attorneys, Coppers, Social Workers, and a Private “Play Therapist” Neglected to “Protect” “Best Interests” of natural, Sovereign woman/”Mother” and her Property/”child” from 2007 to 2012


False Imprisonment.Dec.02.2007.Page 1 of 2

JUSTICE.WALL OF SHAME.NJCOURTCORRUPTION.DEREK SYPHRETT

Treasonous perpetrators OF SEVERE INJUSTICE AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and sovereign, natural born,  TEXAS AND U.S.A. CITIZENS of ALMIGHTY GOD, divine Creator, and, SADLY, IN THIS AUTHOR’S CASE, AGAINST AN ADORABLE, HIGHLY INTELLIGENT, PROFOUNDLY WITTY AND COMICAL, SWEET, SUPER-HEALTHY INFANT AND SMALL CHILD WHOSE BRAIN WAS STILL GROWING WHEN SUCH STRESS AND TRAUMA WAS INFLICTED, MY ONLY CHILD, MY SON, NOW AGE 7, BUT STILL 5 1/2 IN MY MIND WHEN HE WAS ABDUCTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW ON MAY 08, 2012–written with Firsthand, Actual Knowledge, and Made in Good Faith as a Caution to Other Vulnerable Families Whose Paths they May Cross:

Kimberly Ann Abernethy, or Kimberly A. Abernethy (Houston, Texas)

Last Name: Abernethy
First Name: Kim
Name License Number License Type Status Expiry Date
ABERNETHY, KIM ANN
50063 Certified Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) Expired, Active 08/31/1995
ABERNETHY, KIM ANN
15946 Licensed Professional Counselor Current, Active 11/30/2015

Tonya Rolland.Assault Attorney.False Imprisonment.Nov.30.2007 001

Tonya Rolland, now Tonya Rolland-McLaughlin, former “Assault Attorney, Worked for former forced-to-resign D.A., Charles/”Chuck” Rosenthal, Harris County, TX (See Racist E-mails, Sex Affair with Secretary, and Drug Problem), “Pay-to-Play” Saboteur /Provacateur Extraordinaire

“When her Deputy Misdemeanor Division Chief announced to Harris County that she wouldn’t answer a Grand Jury’s questions about her job for fear of incriminating herself, she was promoted within the Office.  To this day, that prosecutor’s salary remains approximately $20,000 more a year than her peers with similar experience” ( as posted by “a Harris County Attorney” on Life at the Harris County Criminal Justice Center, Mon. May 28, 2012).

TONYA ROLLAND.RUNNING FOR CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE

Life Responsible for the Pictures of Joni Faith Saloom, “Julian’s Real Mummy,” Below, Legal Criminal, Guilty of False Imprisonment and Falsifying/Tampering With Government and Police Records, Stalking with Intent to Harm, Failure to Show Proof of Identity or otherwise Impersonating a Public Servant, Violation of Constitutional and Civil Rights of a natural born, U.S. citizen, and her infant son under the color of law in violation of 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and 1985(3), Earned Her Position by Doing the Dirty Work for More Experienced Criminal and Family Court Attorneys and Politico in Harris County, Starting at the D.A.’s Office, part of former D.A., Chuck Rosenthal’s Crew (See Lawrence v. Texas, argued at the U.S. Supreme Court);

www.sfgate.com/crime/article/Concord-private-eye-detailed-dirty-DUI-stings-2373276.php (Suggested Reading for  assault attorney, Tonya Rolland...but wait, you already know how to play the entrapment game, setting people up during paternity proceedings to try to even out the score and balance both sides of the scales, don’t you, Tonya?)   …and the “enhancements” you and your buddies get on assaults and DUI’s don’t hurt, now do they? 

See Tonya Rolland-McClaughlin’s Campaign Contributions at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/campaign-finance/filer/103326/from/1216145/

Judge-Margaret-Stewart-Harris-large

Judge Margaret Stewart Harris, Criminal Court at Law No. 5, Harris County, Texas–best buddies with Tonya Rolland, now Tonya Rolland-McLaughlin (as pictured and incriminated above as alleged by this author with firsthand, actual knowledge)  Marge, what were ya’ thinkin’ trying to hold a new mommy in jail on false charges–“assault–bodily injury–without bail, a teacher with no “priors” in her adult life…during child custody battle…and the perpetrator was your best friend , Tonya Rolland, pictured below?  Your congregation must be so proud of you, ya’ Hippocrite… Pharisee…Harpy!

See Judge Margaret Stewart Harris’ Salary at:  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/county-courts-at-law/14351/ –$145,644

“But beware of the children of men, for they will deliver you to the courts and they will scourge you in their synagogues.”/ “Beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing.” (Matthew 7:15) 

Matthew-James-Worrell-mugshot-22658486_400x800

Matthew James Worrell–Stay Away from this “Soccer Coach/Rockstar Dad” if you and your children live in Tomball, Texas!  See Harris County Criminal Record 2005-2006–Intention to Distribute Large Amounts of M.D.M.A., DUI/DWI, five drugs found in his system when he was pulled over and refused a breathalizer, a Felony I charge for which he received deferred adjudication and got out of picking up trash duty with a “doctor’s note”–Just like the Momma’s Boy he is; P.S. Allegations of Sexual Misconduct/Abuse/Assault with a Child Were Covered-Up by Brazoria and Harris County CPS, theirs and the court’s employee, Donna Everson, and of course, Judges Lisa Millard and Conrad Moren in th 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, TX

https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrink_80_80/p/6/005/05c/313/0f6e5f0.jpg

Kim A. Abernethy, or, Kimberly A. Abernethy, licensed professional counselor, “Play Therapist,” licensed marriage an family counselor whose role in masterfully played custody-switching scam That May or May not Have Involved Planting Seeds in My Then Five Year-Old Son’s Head (during “Daddy’s ‘visits'”) to tell Mommy a very bizarre Story Involving multiple sexual abuse allegations from my only child, my son, my life, who, possibly thanks to this fraud for Hire, who never showed her face or a Report in Court, contributed  to my having had no meaningful contact with My son because I believed his allegations, or at least, took them seriously and “reported” like Texas law required; Further, “Miss Kim (pictured here, Photo Source: LinkedIn), as reported by my son upon coming home from a visit with “Daddy” and his wife, said he didn’t like going there because “Miss Kim and “Daddy” said that he ” wasn’t leaving that room until I [he]told them what they wanted,” which turned out to be the name, as reported by my son, of another Male from the Past who Attended the Birth of My Son Because, Much to My Disappointment at the Time, said “father” refused,  a man whom said Father is Apparently Insanely Jealous about, and admitted on court record to making my 5-year old son sit on his lap and go through “Facebook” Photos (emotional abuse for sure); This “Daddy” who, based on knowledge and belief, exhibits all listed narcissistic personality disorder presenting behavior and that of a sociopath with zero remorse, or even the ability to see the harm he daily inflicts on anyone who refuses to indulge his every last whim–also, criminal record for, all at the same time, Intention to Distribute Large Amounts of M.D.M.A., “street drug” name, “Ecstasy, DUI and DWI, and was found to have, including alcohol, five illicit or inappropriate substances in his body when he was pulled over and refused breathalizer, then taken to hospital for blood work in 2005 (Harris County/Houston, Texas); This man and a woman I don’t even know and never had a conversation with, his wife in whose former marital home of the father of her three (3) children by another man, the husband she appears to have divorced for this “Rockstar Dad” in whose home they now reside and receive $2,000/mo. in child support from him and now, child support from me, tells my son to call her “Mommy” and had the bold-faced effrontery to “testify” in court about me, a person whom she had never met, and made accusations regarding my character, even, as any classy woman, calling me a “SLUT” in open court (in between smacking her bubble gum)–Nice Kim, Way to Go Kim, By the Way, Kim, are you ready to have a talk and include me regarding the nature of “therapy” my son received, and by the way Kim, one of your specialties listed is sex therapy; Do all of your clients get referred by bribed CPS agents for retaliatory and legally, emotionally cruel, self-destructive, criminal fathers who alienated his son from his mother for his entire life, yet abandoned us in pregnancy, refused to come to the birth, and tried to kidnap my son on so many documented occasions along with his mother to get back at me for not having the abortion he scheduled over the public Internet with a credit card, misspelling my name on the receipt, without my knowledge or informed consent and threatened to “ruin me” if I had our child–You are some great therapist, you must really understand how to diagnose people and prepare them to terminate rights of a child’s only consistent parent for the first five 1/2 years of his life; Oh, you might want to add in your notes that you refuse to release to anyone that “Daddy” still openly admits on court record to intimate partner stalking, a Federally recognized and dangerous crime, yet he alleges to be “frightened” of me and has needed “‘order’ of of ‘Protection'” for Years…Years in which he maybe participated in my son’s life, again, much to my son’s and to my dismay, only about maybe half of the time; “wolf in sheep’s clothing”--you missed that one Kim, or didn’t you??? You can call me anytime, you obviously have access to my phone number through your perverted, sexually deviant client (Oh, yes, there are things he probably never told you).  Enjoy your life, Kim.  May all your dreams come true, because mine never will–I have lost everything there is to materially lose, but more important, my only child who is a mirror image of me and will always live with the guilt of what you psychos possibly did to him, along with many others ; I have actual,  legal knowledge of what I know my son told me, because I had to listen to it, and then I, not you, Kim, had to take the fall for your possible “coaching” when my son repeated the same story verbatim to multiple police officers who believed him, to his primary care physician, to CPS agent at statewide intake, to Cheryl Harvick, CPS Supervisor, Brazoria County with whom I’m sure you are well-acquainted, and to the Emergency Room Sexual Assault Exam Pediatric Nurse, Doctor, and Mandatory Staff Social Worker (police and social workers interviewed away from me to screen for “coaching.”  These were not the same five thug police who kidnapped him on May 08, 2012 in retaliation because they refused to do their jobs and “protect” my son

Infamous Brazoria County CPS Program Supervisor and Kidnapper/Child Trafficker Operating under the Color of Law and Using Pearland Police Department and Harris County Special Investigator on Crimes Against Children to Cover-UP Sexual Abuse out of Sheer Malice and Retaliation, As Admitted by Her on May 08, 2012 at the Pearland Branch CPS Office

Cheryl Harvick, Notorious Brazoria County and Region 6 CPS Program Supervisor (See Article published in The Houston Press, March 27, 2003, Margaret Downing, “Fostering Abuse…”also on the menu of this blog); on the Board of Brazoria County Alliance for Children along with Sheriff Charles Wagner and Jeri Yenne, Brazoria County Prosecutor; Claims that “Randy”/d/b/a Judge K. Randall Hufstetler in the 300th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, does “whatever” she tells him to do–direct quote from May 08, 2012

See Cheryl Harvick‘s Salary at : http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/cheryl-l-harvick/1436420/$50,002 as of Feb.27, 2013

 

10352740_794094763934648_7135123206051071623_n

Lesly Damian-Murray, Brazoria County CPS Investigator who Alleges That her Ex-Husband Gave Her Son “Shaken Baby Syndrome” and used to beat her up when she was pregnant (See  Khou Channel 11 News online)–So why does she protect other abusers and/or molesters as alleged by my 5 1/2 year old son to many professionals, including, hospital nurse, doctor, police in two counties (not the ones who aided and abetted Lesly’s supervisor, Cheryl Harvick, pictured above, when they kidnapped my son and handed him over to the alleged abuser without any investigation)? By the way, Ms. Damian-Murray, are you related to Denise Damian, Court Administrator in Angleton, TX where you submitted a false affidavit and perjured yourself, omitting crucial details after I complained about you to the Office of Consumer Affairs in Austin, Texas?

LAWRENCE ROTHENBERG

Houston Attorney Lawrence/”Larry” Rothenberg, Legal Kidnapper, Practices Unethically and Unconstitutionally, no Due Process of Law, No Service of Process, Repeatedly, Denial of US Constitutional Rights perpetrated under color of authority of law for “‘state’ of Texas'”  –Charged: BAR member Malfeasance, breach of US Constitutional Oath or Affirmation of Office as Officer of Court and State Bar of Texas (“SBOT”); Dangerous to all (Wo)man and children, especially mothers

See Lesly Damian-Murrays Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/lesly-l-damian-murray/1435390/$33,950 as of February 27, 2013

BRUCE ALLEN BUSKIRK.ATTY

Divorced Family Law Attorney, Bruce Allen Buskirk, who, for his Client at the time, Matthew James Worrell, filed for an emergency ex parte hearing to switch custody when his client learned the mother of only child, age 5 1/2, was doing exactly what the child’s doctor, CPS, and police told he/r she had to do and take him to Texas Children’s Hospital for a Sexual Assault Exam After Child Mad Allegations of Sexual Abuse/Misconduct/Assault while reportedly at the client’s home for court-ordered “visitation that he hadn’t exercised in over a year

\

LISA MILLARD.PHOTO WITH FLAG

Judge Lisa Millard of the 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, inter alia, Revictimizer of Women and Vulnerable Children and Discriminator Extraordinaire as alleged by myself, a person with firsthand, actual knowledge of treason, albeit, state-legislated and legal, yet, unlawful in the sense of the Federal, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, as Incorporated and Applied, and the Texas and US Constitution, Conflicts of Interest Galore Permeate her Court, Father was a Judge, Dangerous to Children and Parents, but Doing Her Job for “Economic and Social” Policy/Crimes, Racketeering, Extortion, Fraud Very Well for the Texas Legislature, Abandoned “Best Interests” of Children, a shame, this one, I heard from several people, used to be one of the best–Sadly Disappointed That You Kidnapped my property sometimes called ” Child ” for Political Cronyism, Votes, and Funding for the County (Double-Dipping in Safe Access and Visitation money, Misusing Federal Responsible Fatherhood Grants from Health and Human Services), Takes Children Away from Fit, Single Mothers, and many others, regardless of their Individual Situation, Docket-Clearing Master, Relies on her Associate Judge, Ordered to Sign All False Allegations Pertaining to Allegations of Domestic Violence and to Entertain all Ex Parte Motions When Fathers File Emergency Petition to Avoid Child Support and Cover their You-Know-What’s to Cover-Up their Child Abuse and Alienation Against Mothers, a Form of Domestic Violence, and also perceived by others as disability in the workplace and in the courtroom without relief or remedy or assistance in contravention of Federal laws pursuant to the ADA, ADAA , and others,  Disallows Presentation and Fails to Consider Crucial Evidence Involving Children Against Mothers Only, That is, Until She has Already Signed the Father’s Orders, Too Lazy to Prepare by Reading Cases the Night Before, as is Associate Judge, Doesn’t Create Any of Her Own Orders in this Court, Which Is Why Parents Who Can’t Afford Attorneys Have No Chance of Equal Access to Justice, Loathes Pro Se Parties, invidivuals, for Not Having Anyone to Borrow Money from to Hire an Attorney, Hostile at the World, except for her campaign contributors, of course, and her family that she would end up in and institution over if someone made rulings like her in her case and kidnapped her family under the color of law; Note the Lack of Gold Tassels or Gold Fringe on the U.S. Flag in the Portion of the Picture Shown Here, Which, Are Not Lacking in the Flag in Her Courtroom, which Signifies a Flag of Maritime or Martial Law–statutes used to uphold displaying such flag in the courtroom as treason, that is, until Americans Started Being Stripped of Their US  Constitutional rights, liberties, and freedoms without voluntary consent or sufficient knowledgePlease Wake-Up, America! Read the US Constitution and Bill of Rights and Learn them Inside and Out, before it is too late for all of us, and maybe your children or grandchildren, Tell us,  Judge Lisa A. Millard, were you playing “possum” in court in the “best interests” of Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom?  Or do you BAR members (as in barring the doors to equal access to justice and equal protections of the law) refer to it as “The Damon 10,000 Screw, ” or, “The Fix is In,” nowadays?  What is the “New terminology for bribery, extortion, conspiracy, kidnapping under the color of law, discrimination, permitting perjury and hearsay to stand as evidence, denying a child his right to speak to you in an age appropriate manner so as to cover-up allegations of sexual abuse from a 5 1/2 year-old child, fostering improper relations and allowing and being a conflict of interest in your own court,  abuse of procedure, process, power  adoption scams, custody-switching scams in favor of fathers, gender bias (against your own), ex parte communication, taking off your robe and coming down to sarcastically threaten m in the cafeteria on break,  treason, and defying your US Constitutional Oath of Office?

1.  See Judicial Campaign Election contributions for Judge Lisa Millard  at: www.texastribune.org/library/data/campaign-finance/filer/00026758-lisa-a-millard/ (cut and paste the link into your browser or enter manually if you cannot access just by “clicking,” as Judge Millard and/or “state” of Texas and  DFPS for the state of Texas (with subversive co-collaborators) censored through their vendor, “Unspammers,” or a similar company that markets to “states” and especially child “protective” services (Michigan also uses their services).   Note: Judge Lisa Millard runs unopposed he/r private court of record and fraud.

2.  See Judge Lisa Millard’s Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/state-of-texas/lisa-a-millard/1499584/$125,000

Judge Lisa Millard and Conrad Moren.pic.310th

The 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas–In this author’s educated and Informed, Unbiased opinion— unbiased as this court, anyway,–Shameless Pharisees–Gaze Upon the Sanhedrin of Houston, Texas Family, Juvenile, and Commitment Courts

See Associate Judge Conrad Moren’s Salary at :  http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/district-courts-management/14373/$127,130

Judge Lisa Millard.pic with children

Wow! Holy Hypocrite! Are these your next targets to generate more revenue for Harris County and Texas?

PROOF THAT JUDGE LISA MILLARD AND CONRAD MOREN OF THE 310TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS AND THE OFFICE OF VINCE RYAN, COUNTY ATTORNEY, AND PROSECUTOR WILLIAM SUMPTER FRAZIER AND DONNA EVERSON, ALLEGED “CHILD ADVOCATE, INC.,” ALSO AFFILIATED INAPPROPRIATELY WITH JUDGE LISA MILLARD, DO NOT FULLY SUPPORT PRO-LIFE FAMILY VALUES (IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PLATFORM AND VALUES UPON WHICH MILLARD WAS ELECTED IN PART DUE TO THE FAITH OF ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS FOUNDATION FOR LIFE):

Abortion Slip

Receipt for Abortion for Matt Worrell in 2006 in Houston,TX that he paid for multiple times over the public internet without my, the mother’s, knowledge or consent–Note that my name is even misspelled–Your “sole managing conservator” of my only child, Matthew James Worrell, tried to coerce, threaten, and intimidate and harass me into not choosing life for our son, or else he and his family would “ruin” me, Never Answered the Phone or his door in my Pregnancy or showed up at the birth, Not on Birth Certificate, No Acknowledgement of Paternity Which I at One Point offered for him to sign, even though he always alleged he was the father and never questioned it, No voluntary relinquishment of parental rights with sufficient knowledge–YOU KNOW WHAT YOU DID, this piece of evidence, and many more, were filed by court clerks and myself as a forced pro se party respondent–You have no respect for life and Mothers!

WILLIAM SUMPTER FRAZIER.PICTURE

William Sumpter Frazier, 310th Court, Harris County, Texas Prosecutor and Attorney for CPS and Harris County Attorney, Vince Ryan

See Assistant Harris County Attorney William Sumpter Frazier‘s Salary at: http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/departments/county-attorney/14346/–$114,055 (although other incentives are available to recruit and retain experienced prosecutors as promised in writing)


Sidear–
Mr. Bill, I’m disappointed in you.  I hear from Huffman natives that your daughter is an incredibly good and intelligent person. Does she get it from her mother?

County Attorney Vince Ryan’s (Vincent Reed Ryan’s) Salary: $177, 591

County Judge and Chairman of Children’s Commissioners’ Court, Judge Ed Emmett’s Salary–$159, 695

DONNA EVERSON AND STEPHEN NEWHOUSE PIC.Crossroads_45th_Annual_Luncheon_11_t620x620_c620x620

As Both Pictured in Glasses, Donna Everson, dual-role Court-Appointed Guardian Ad-Litem and Attorney Ad-Litem of Choice for CPS and the 310th Court, Harris County, Texas, and Associate Judge Stephen Edward Newhouse, 313th Juvenile Court Judge, Harris County, Texas, formerly, amicus attorney for children in suits affecting the parent child relationship

Associate Judge Stephen Newhouse’s salary, as reported in The Texas Tribune, was $126,649 as of March 21, 2012 (http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/stephen-edward-newhouse/1267518/).

Court-appointed dual-role guardian ad-litem and attorney ad litem for children in termination of parental rights cases, Donna Everson, contributed over $14,000.00 to Judge Lisa Millard’s (unopposed) Judicial  Election Campaign. 

Donna Everson’s very good friend and colleague, court-appointed attorney for parents and sinecure, former judge, Ms. Ronnie Harrison, was another extremely close campaign contributor to Judge Lisa Millard in the 310th Court of Harris County, Texas.

One simply must copy the following URL and paste in one’s Internet browser to watch a display of the hypocrisy of Houston Attorney, Ms. Ronnie Harrison--a former associate judge–praise former Harris County “Judge” Denise Pratt:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OHmNfsgs3c  (Thank you to Attorney Greg Enos, for this jewel of a video).  It is always a pleasure reading The Mongoose.

 

JULIA LOVORN

Houston Attorney, Julia Lovorn–She likes to Play Dirty…in court, or so I hear!  Firsthand Knowledge: She advised my son’s criminal father and his co-dependent mother to kidnap my infant under the color of law in 2007 (See Log from Cypresswood Drive location for Justice of the Peace, Spring, TX  on January 30, 2007).

John Nichols, Sr

Attorney, John Nichols, Sr., who advertises on his website that he employes “CPS supervisors with twelve years experience on his staff,” as well as step-parent adoptions, termination of parental rights, and “High Net Worth Divorce Cases”–I hear he plays way dirtier than Julia Lovorn…in Court!  See Why Every Attorney I have Spoken to has Gasped in Horror and Expressed Fear in Going Against Him ; Never Loses a Case, Read Why in Documents Presented Below, or, at least, in this author’s opinion

JOHN F. NICHOLS.TEXAS MILITARY.PAGE 2

Why Mr. Nichols, Sr., and possibly “Bo” Nichols, Jr., Never Lose a Case for Fathers (See also H.H.S.D. federal grant funding for Responsible Fatherhood Programs to Take Away  Children from Fit Single or Young Mothers for Economic state policy

JOHN F. NICHOLS.TEXAS MILITARY.PAGE 3

 

Matthew-James-Worrell-mugshot-22658486_400x800

Matt Worrell, or, Matthew James Worrell, Mugshot from Crime in Lewisville, Texas, Late 1990’s, Public Photo, Courtesy of Mugshots.com, shown in good faith so as to warn others of this potentially dangerous man, as alleged by his 5 1/2 year old son, who was not investigated, yet the allegations of his son, as charged, were reported directly to this author by multiple police officers as guilty, in their professional and personal opinions (sources can be revealed, by protecting them in the name of discretion and respect for their profession–the good ones who wanted to help my son, and, strangely, the one who helped CPS kidnap my son?)

Officer Paul Elton

Pearland Police

NOT PICTURED BELOW, But also Guilty as Charged, inter alia, in Conspiracy Against Joni Faith Saloom and Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom and violation of First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment  Amendment US Constitutional rights acting under the color of law, complicit in kidnapping of a 5 1/2 year old child, my son and only child, and with ill will, by this natural born, “Sovereign,” U.S. citizen and REAL mommy of Julian Jacob Worrell of Genealogy Saloom:

1.     Officer Paul Elton, Pearland Police Department under Captain J.C. Doyle and City of Pearland in Brazoria County, Texas under Sheriff Charles Wagner’s jurisdiction:

ALSO NOT PICTURED BELOW:

2.      Sergeant William Lilly, Appointed by Sheriff Adrian Garcia, Harris County Sheriff’s Office, Special Investigations Crimes Against Children Unit--a CPS and court puppet as it is probable that all “community” and “collaborative” “partner” stakeholders who benefit from a fiduciary relationship undisclosed to the public it is charged with serving (see also federal R.I.C.O. statute, Racketeering Inspired Corrupt Organization):

See Sergeant William Lilly’s Salary at: http://www.texastribune.org/library/data/government-employee-salaries/harris-county/william-d-lilly/348239/–$79,256

3. Tonya Clay, Children’s Assessment Center/C.A.C. Program Director, also implicated in the case of Hall v. Dixon.

4.  Debra Hatley, Children’s Assessment Center/C.A.C. Program Supervisor

5. Robin Nelson, formerly Robin Gray due to Marital Dissolution, Caseworker III at the Children’s Assessment Center

6. Sandra Rosinski-Russell–implicated as a defendant in Gates v. Texas Department of Family and Regulatory Services, 2008

7.  Karen Coblentz, Brazoria County CPS Program Director

 

Judge K. Randall, or, “Randy,” Hufstetler, 300th Judicial District Court, Brazoria County, Texas presiding over an adoption proceeding

Smiling at the little girl or the $30,000 plus per child adoption?  You be the judge, real America.  To those of you who have experience with this judge, please comment below.

By the way, “Randy,” is Priscilla Hufstetler of the Pearland Police Department, also in Brazoria County, Texas, related to you?  Is that possibly one of the reasons Officer Paul Elton of the Pearland Police Department is so eager to “remove” children from fit parents and place them with alleged pedophiles?

“Randy,” the next time you sign an order based on a knowingly false and retaliatory affidavit (as it is routine practice and procedure by certain daily litigants in your courtroom), thus, one that could not logically be reliable or contain probable cause, to search a child against Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment (US)Constitutional , fundamental, natural, unalienable, and common law and natural parental and property sometimes called “children’s” rights,  without a hearing or giving any kind of notice or warning, remember me and my son–not that you ever met us or invited us to your courtroom.  By the way, I read that you discriminate.  Is that true?  Do you promote improper relationships for profit in your courtroom also?

 

 DISCLAIMER:  This post is made in good faith  and in the best interests of my property sometimes referred to as “child,” and intended solely for the purpose of educational and general knowledge and/or for entertainment purposes.  Should anyone mentioned herein desire a correction and/or retraction for any reason in opposition  to this blog’s author’s firsthand, actual knowledge based on facts and reasonable belief at the time of published post, certified/verified testimony, circumstantial, and demonstrative evidence, contact blog’s author in writing with certified/verified documentation and wet-ink signature detailing all arguments with factual and legal bases for such request(s) and any and/all controverting evidence.   Any such person would naturally  have access to author of this blog’s address.

Retaliation, official oppression, abuse of office, abuse of discretion, failure t disclose as a fiduciary to the “Public Trust,” false imprisonment, “kidnapping,” interference and violation and conspiracy to interfere with and violate (and neglect to protect) with (US) Constitutional rights of natural born “sovereign,” “elect” American “citizens” of our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD, inter alia will serve as further support and evidence that facts, opinions, and beliefs herein expressed are valid and justified.

Furthermore, author of this blog herein exercises he/r First Amendment fundamental well-established as a matter of fact and law rights, freedoms and liberties (as incorporated and applied via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights to the US Constitution) to freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of peaceable assembly, and freedom to freely associate and to bring redress for grievances to the government without fear of or actual retribution or retaliation.

 

 

Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

  • CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
  • (1)  This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
  • (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
  • (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
  • (4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.