SCIENTISTS DISCOVER CHILDREN’S CELLS LIVING IN MOTHER’S BRAIN FOR FORTY-FIFTY YEARS AFTER CONCEPTION, EVEN WHEN CHILD NOT CARRIED FULL-TERM
Click on the link above to read about how a child’s cells are found forty to fifty (40-50) years after its conception in natural, biological mother’s body. Scientists have even linked a protective function to these biological stakeholder cells that the US family court system would be wise to support, and the “states.” It appears that mothers indeed do have a more natural, wealthier reserve of socially and economically advantageous and sustainable resources to leverage in weightier, more statistically reliable Daubert terms. Has the US Health and Human Services Department and its “state” Eugenicist, misogynistic counterparts heard the news? Equal parenting as a matter of law naturally determines mother’s share, or, community stake in he/r own child, and child’s rights are naturally and lawfully reciprocal as endowed by our divine Creator ALMIGHTY GOD, his living Gift and direct testimony. Would anyone else care to “weigh-in” on the matter like mothers had to do for ten months of being with child without paternal support?
Fair Use and Legal Disclaimer (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):
- CENSORSHIP WILL BE PROSECUTED AS IT IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE IN THE THIS REPUBLIC USA, THE LAWS TO WHICH YOU WILL BE HELD ONE WAY OR ANOTHER!
- (1) This post is made in GOOD FAITH and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children from one another.
- (2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.
- (3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.
- (4) If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand,