Prosecutor Cites Faulty Exams In Up To 170 Children’s Cases


Associated Press

Prosecutor Cites Faulty Exams in up to 170 Children’s Cases

 CHILDREN’S ASSESSMENT CENTER (“C.A.C.”)

ferrer-swingset-small

 POSTED: 9:11 AM CDT April 20, 2004

HOUSTONA prosecutor says faulty physical exams performed by a former nurse may have resulted in wrongful conviction of some defendants in child sex abuse cases .

A review of examinations performed by the Children’s Assessment Center nurse found potential problems in as many as 170 cases in which charges were filed, Harris County District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal said Monday.   Rosenthal could not say how many of the cases are still pending and could now be in jeopardy.  “But I’m more concerned that she committed an error and that someone was convicted wrongfully,” he told The Houston Chronicle in Tuesday’s editions.  Founded in 1991 by the county, the assessment center provides a coordinated approach to evaluating and treating children believed to have been molestedSuspected abuse victims are given a physical examination, counseling and other services. The results of the examinations help the district attorney’s office decide which cases to prosecute and what can be used as evidence at trialRosenthal said potential problems surfaced after the nurse left the CAC and the district attorney’s office asked an independent doctor to verify her work in one case before it went to trial.  The office then initiated a peer review by area doctors of all of the nurse’s cases. The reviews, he said, included medical records as well as either photographs or videotapes.

 

False Child Abuse Allegations
Junk Science

FAIR USE AND LEGAL DISCLAIMER (PROMINENTLY DISPLAYED):

(1)  This post is made in good faith and for deterrent purposes against child abusers, alleged child abusers, and those who would maternally alienate fit, loving mothers and children, their physical and intellectual property,  from one another.

(2) Content in this post is protected by Julian’s Real Mummy’s First Amendment herein claimed rights as a natural-born American, “sovereign,” “elect” citizen pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights made applicable to the states via ratification and application of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal, US Constitution and incorporated Bill of Rights, under the freedom of expression, freedom of association, freedom to peaceably assemble, and freedom to speech.

(3) All content in this post is also protected pursuant to the Federal statute 17 U.S.C., section 107 (“Fair Use”) as this content is solely intended for general knowledge, academic research, and/or entertainment purposes.

(4)  If anyone should desire, require, or demand a retraction or modification in part or in full, you must contact the  author of this blog for fair notice to correct, pursuant to reasonable and lawfully obtained evidence supported by all legal and factual bases for your desire, demand, and/or requirement for  a full or partial retraction in a timely manner so that Author of this blog may respond expediently and lawfully.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s