THE ROUSE FAMILY STORY
DIRTY SOUTH DAKOTA
Release the 4 INNOCENT Yankton Sioux Desmond Rouse, Garfield Feather, Russel Hubbeling and Jesse Rouse immediately and reverse their false convictions!
The State of South Dakota abducts innocent children for money and makes millions and runs its court and prison system on convicting Native Americans… and they do this for money too!! Quote of a relative: This is “not just a petition asking the government to look at the ‘shit’ they pull to incarcerate our people… It’s exposing the Indians that are really the sell outs in Indian County…” With all the corruption involved in this case, by the court and other law officials, combined with the lack of evidence against Desmond and Jesse Rouse, Garfield Feather and Russell Hubbeling, there is NO LEGAL REASON these 4 men should have been imprisoned in the first place, much STILL be there! This whole sordid mess is yet another display of the racism and hatred that exists toward the Native American people. It’s thoroughly and totally DISGUSTING and each of you who have the authority to reverse their sentence needs to do so NOW! How absurd, still in prison when they shouldn’t have been sent there at all~ If you dislike or object to my using the word “corruption” in reference to those officials involved in this lunacy, do something about it!!!! Recognize the truth and reverse their sentences IMMEDIATELY! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!
Racial or ethnic discrimination was throughout the case. There was no evidence. What was purported to be evidence by the prosecution was not reliable evidence. Manipulated testimony, purchased testimony, imaginative evidence, evidence from people having a conflict of interest ( a social worker who was also a foster parent of the alleged victims) , children who said NOTHING HAPPENED were not believed by the court and were threatened not to be able to see their mothers again if they did not testify the way the prosecutors instructed them to testify. Everything I say here is in certified transcripts. The first appellate panel (2-1) vacated the decision and remanded the case for a new trial. BUT the new trial never happened. The dissenter then wrote a new decision denying the new trial. Absolutely outrageous. A blight on our judicial system.