Abusive Restraining Orders Defy First Amendment, More from CCFC and Cole Stuart

Sidebar--Ahhh, I love these guys with California Coalition for Families and Children more and more with each paragraph and lawful filing…like poetry to my soul, much like that which divinely inspires the burning passion and wrath of the same kindness, love, mercy, and faith–“weightier matters” (Matthew 23:13-23:23, The Holy Bible, all versions) wielded against my innocent five year old son, my only child, my life, more precious to me than my own heart, yet, “inextricably intertwined” (citing alleged and erroneously applied “Rooker Feldman” “doctrine” application).  Keep fighting for all the right reasons, Cole Stuart and the Real Mummies and Daddies of the Real America and the Real Kingdom.


Click on the link above or cut and paste into your browser.

Real Mommies and Daddies of the Real America, I present to you that the death knell of the guaranteed, well-established “unalienable,” fundamental, and constitutional and natural, and Sovereign law rights to the “care, custody, and control” of one’s children and to be a parent, ” and to direct the moral and religious upbringing of one’s children,” interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court–the “supreme law of land”–to include the affection, nurturing, bonding, and meaningful participation in all areas of a child’s life, has tolled.

To some mothers, restraining orders are a necessity and even then do not “protect” to the degree necessary when real abusive men are on the receiving end of “restraining orders.”  Sometimes, they even have the effect of further endangering mother and/or child(ren).

However, to other mothers, children, and fathers–to Families, the bedrock of our society, including many non-voluntary single parents– restraining “orders,”due to the nature and procedure through which they are, as a matter of law but lacking in fact, adopted without sufficient evidence, with perjury, with hearsay,  with misrepresentations, containing de-contextualized and edited, one-sided ex-parte “evidence” or conversation(s) in one-party recording states, and where due process is artfully and deliberately thwarted for profit by the courts and all other community partners and key stakeholders charged with “protecting” such unfortunate victims, and sometimes even without required petitions to procure such orders having been read or questioned by magistrates, masters, court referees, and associate judges, they are more often than not the deliberate weapon of choice for their abusers, oppressors, disturbed individuals–torturers.

Such instruments have, more often than not, murdered the fundamental, well-established, guaranteed liberty, rights, and/or freedom to be a parent to one’s child, to participate meaningfully in the “care, control, and custody” of his/her child, and to “direct the moral and religious upbringing of one’s child” ( Troxel vs Granville 530 US 57 (2000); Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745(1982); See, e.g., Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534 (1925); See also Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629, 639 (1968); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923);Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 165 (1944)).




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s