Declaration of joni-faith: of family saloo


Page 1 of Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom.pdf 002Page 2 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 3 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 4 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 5 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 6 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 7 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 8 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 9 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 10 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith SaloomPage 10 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 11 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 12 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 13 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 14 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 15 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 16 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 17 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 18 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 19 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom Page 20 of 20 Declaration of Joni Faith Saloom

The file stamp at the top of Page 1 (June 26, 2012) indicates not that the person filing the document received a  meaningful hearing or was allowed to present evidence in a constitutional court, but rather that the clerks simply put it into the file in Cause No. 2007-05391, 310th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.  This does not denote that judges necessarily read this information.  In fact, it is a popular opinion based on statistically significant firsthand observations of parties  in Harris County (Houston,TX) that judges routinely sign orders for their favorite attorney who contributed the most to their campaign before they even let a forced pro se (unrepresented) party speak at all without threat of imprisonment or arrest by bailiffs, let alone present evidence in their favor or read any pleadings  on file pertaining to the case before them for meaning and substance.

Please also note that the bate stamps at the bottom were added by someone in the office of former judge and current attorney, Ronnie Harrison (Harrison Law Offices in Houston,TX) who is best friends with Donna Everson (CPS/court-appointed guardian ad litem and attorney ad litem for child in this cause).  There was not properly noticed trial or jury trial in this case before final orders were rendered as was promised to me, the author, by Judge Lisa Millard on court record upon my own motion for jury trial that was specifically insisted upon in Respondent’s Original Answer(call for specifics and dates).  This document was not admitted  or even given an opportunity to be presented as evidence in this case at any meaningful time without threats of  what would have been false arrest by bailiff for what was threatened as “contempt of court” by Associate Judge Conrad Moren and Judge Lisa Millard.

Disclaimer:

This post is made in good faith.  It is Author of this blog’s original work product based on firsthand, actual, “legal” and “lawful” knowledge (as opposed to hearsay or perjury that is so ubiquitous in the unfortunate “states” of fraudulent family courts by unlawful statutes and codes and doctrines, which are not lawful where they are unconstitutional).  This Declaration(certified/verified under penalty of perjury–original certification available upon request) is not intended for profit or commercial use, but is rather posted to help others who may be facing similar situations and help them avoid certain pitfalls.  Furthermore, this information is expressly and strictly forbidden from being used for any purposes of exploitation, mockery, slander, malice, rumor-mongering, and child exploitation.  Yet, children will continue to be sold, federalized, and exploited commercially and sexually if stories like this are not exposed, or at least, that is Author’s educated and experienced, initiated opinion to which she is entitled under the fundamental and well-established as a matter of fact and law First Amendment rights to freedom of speech, expression, to freely associate, and to direct the moral and religious upbringing of her child where she has not been found to be unfit in any way in any court of competent and proper “jurisdiction,” or to have committed a crime that would warrant these horrendous deprivations and retaliation by a rogue government and possibly bribed judges and social workers and police officers on knowledge and belief.

That being said, this post is in no way intended as “legal” advice, and should certainly not be construed as such as Author of this post is not a legal practitioner or, even more desirable, a board-certified specialist in family or otherwise constitutional or any other law discipline.  Author, being a natural woman and claimant of property that was a Gift from God, a now 7 1/2 year-old little natural man, was forced to defend herself in a collateral attack from pernicious and ill-willed parties with financial incentives to collude to deprive parties of constitutional, civil, “inalienable, ” (“life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”), “unalienable,” parental, natural, Divine and common law and property rights (Declaration of Independence) with reasonably foreseeable knowledge of harmful consequences to Author and to Author’s “property” of her own body, her womb, created by God.  “Take heart and have courage” (The Holy Bible, repeated throughout, all  real versions).  Veritatem Dilexi–Through Truth, Knowledge!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s